TV roles urged for women wearing hijab

Muslim women wearing hijab, or headscarves, should be employed in
front-line roles in the media, said a report published yesterday by
Ruth Kelly, the minister for women.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main...1/nhijab21.xml

Really, I won't take television seriously until the day we see the
first chief constable in a hijab, then Judeo-British television will
parallel and link up nicely with Judeo-American television with it's
police chief characters who are almost always black.

I don't watch telly anyway and exactly for that reason - television is
used to supply opinions, not facts, and they are opinions which are
invariably offensive to me. Imagine the government saying "The country
needs more Ethno-nationalists in front line roles in the media, British
ones".


Who controls the British media:
http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/s...media_uk.shtml

Even though the Jews are only 0.5% of the population in Britain, they
have an almost total grip on the media here, systematically, constantly
and intensely feeding their propaganda and example to almost everyone
in Britain, which is nothing new. With this media, they are uniformly,
deliberately, systematically, constantly and intensely promoting both
the transformation and permanent destruction of Britain into a
multiracial, "multicultural" state, and also the interests of the
so-called "state of Israel", against the wishes and interests of
the native British people.

The television media that they control broadcast into almost every home
in Britain, all day, every day. BBC television under the Jew Alan
Yentob broadcasts into almost every home all day, every day. Likewise
ITV, which is controlled by Carlton Communications plc under the Jew
Michael Green and by Granada plc under the Jew Steve Morrison, each of
which broadcasts to regions of 26 million, half of the population, or
more, all day, every day. Daytime television across the ITV network,
which is broadcasted to the whole of Britain, every day, is mainly
provided by Granada's Anglia Television under the Jew Graham
Creelman, while the rest of the time it is controlled by the other
regions controlled by Carlton Communications plc and Granada plc.
Likewise ITN, which provides the news for the ITV network every day, is
controlled by the Jew Michael Green and its programmes are broadcast to
the whole of Britain, while Carlton and Granada jointly own the London
News Network. Channel 4 under the Jew Giovanni Treves accounts for 10%
of all television viewing in Britain. Further, BSkyB controlled by the
suspected Jew and obsessively Zionist Rupert Murdoch broadcasts to over
10 million subscribers and their families every day. The situation is
similar in radio, with all BBC radio stations controlled by the Jewess
Jenny Abramsky, alone accounting for 49% of all radio listening in
Britain, every day.

Further, in total, over 85 million copies of Jewish controlled
newspapers are sold in Britain every week, controlled by the Jewish
pornographer, Richard Desmond, the suspected Jew and obsessively
Zionist Rupert Murdoch, the jew Rupert Murdoch, the Jew Guy Zitter, the
openly Shabbat Goy and rabidly Zionist Conrad Black and "Mrs
Black", who is the Jewess Barbara Amiel.

They deliberately, constantly, systematically and intensely use this
media to promote the multiracial and "multicultural" transformation
of Britain against the wishes of the British people. That is
treachery, treason, of a terrific magnitude. Along with mass, coloured
immigration, they are also deliberately encouraging mass inter-racial
marriage, race-mixing, which will mean the extinction of our race.


Who controls the American media?:
http://www.natall.com/who-rules-america/

For example, a racially mixed couple will be respected, liked, and
socially sought after by other characters, as will a "take charge"
Black scholar or businessman, or a sensitive and talented homosexual,
or a poor but honest and hardworking illegal alien from Mexico. On the
other hand, a White racist-that is, any racially conscious White
person who looks askance at miscegenation or at the rapidly darkening
racial situation in America-is portrayed, at best, as a despicable
bigot who is reviled by the other characters, or, at worst, as a
dangerous psychopath who is fascinated by firearms and is a menace to
all law-abiding citizens. The White racist "gun nut," in fact, has
become a familiar stereotype on TV shows.

The average American, of whose daily life TV-watching takes such an
unhealthy portion, distinguishes between these fictional situations and
reality only with difficulty, if at all. He responds to the televised
actions, statements, and attitudes of TV actors much as he does to his
own peers in real life. For all too many Americans the real world has
been replaced by the false reality of the TV environment, and it is to
this false reality that his urge to conform responds. Thus, when a TV
scriptwriter expresses approval of some ideas and actions through the
TV characters for whom he is writing, and disapproval of others, he
exerts a powerful pressure on millions of viewers toward conformity
with his own views.

And as it is with TV entertainment, so it is also with the news,
whether televised or printed. The insidious thing about this form of
thought control is that even when we realize that entertainment or news
is biased, the media masters still are able to manipulate most of us.
This is because they not only slant what they present, but also they
establish tacit boundaries and ground rules for the permissible
spectrum of opinion. [...]



Ruth Kelly looks and sounds like a teenage boy btw:

http://img227.imageshack.us/img227/7...thkellybq4.jpg

On 21 Sep 2006 01:58:14 -0700, wrote:

Muslim women wearing hijab, or headscarves, should be employed in
front-line roles in the media, said a report published yesterday by
Ruth Kelly, the minister for women.


She should be the first to do this.

wrote in message
oups.com...
Muslim women wearing hijab, or headscarves, should be employed in
front-line roles in the media, said a report published yesterday by
Ruth Kelly, the minister for women.



Fine, and motorcyclists should be allowed to walk in to shops and petrol
stations with full face helmets on.

And hoodies should be allowed to go around like elves with their faces
hidden.

And if people want to walk in to banks with tights over their heads, they
should.


WRONG. This is the wrong country for this nonsense. In this country, we look
at facial expressions and use eye contact in order to understand and
communicate with each other.

Apart from "female circumcision", this is one of the most stupid ideas Islam
has ever come up with.

If Ruth Kelly wants to grant this concession to their barbaric, feudal,
arranged marriage culture, then she's even more stupid then she sounds.

Why don't all you Muslim women cover every part of your face/body all
the time. Nobody wants to see your ****ing ugly fat bodies anyway. And
Muslim men encouraging you to do this so no other males look at you -
who the **** would want to look anyway, you're all ****ing dogs. You
really **** me off, if you're living here then be prepared to integrate
a bit - if an English woman lives/works in one of your cesspit desert
states then she'd be expected to cover up - likewise don't expect to be
able to wear your filthy rag over your faces in every possible place,
at every possible oppprtunity, in this country.

And if you don't like it **** off back to whatever part of
pakighanistan you come from !!

Maria wrote in
:

On 21 Sep 2006 01:58:14 -0700, wrote:

Muslim women wearing hijab, or headscarves, should be employed in
front-line roles in the media, said a report published yesterday by
Ruth Kelly, the minister for women.


She should be the first to do this.

She'd look better in a burkha...

--
When the eagles are silent, the parrots begin to jabber.

http://www.cannibalthemusical.net/
http://www.txrollergirls.com/
http://www.prisonworks.org/

On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 11:00:53 +0000 (UTC), sxb
wrote:

Maria wrote in
:

On 21 Sep 2006 01:58:14 -0700, wrote:

Muslim women wearing hijab, or headscarves, should be employed in
front-line roles in the media, said a report published yesterday by
Ruth Kelly, the minister for women.


She should be the first to do this.

She'd look better in a burkha...

A horse-hair one.

In uk.media.tv.misc on Thu, 21 Sep 2006, wrote :

Who controls the British media:
http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/s...media_uk.shtml

Even though the Jews are only 0.5% of the population in Britain, they
have an almost total grip on the media here, systematically, constantly
and intensely feeding their propaganda and example to almost everyone
in Britain, which is nothing new.

Oh what a load of anti-Semitic BS.

There is no, and has *never* been, any Jewish world domination plot!
--
Paul 'Charts Fan' Hyett

Paul Hyett wrote:
Oh what a load of anti-Semitic BS.

There is no, and has *never* been, any Jewish world domination plot!
--
Paul 'Charts Fan' Hyett

Often when I point out this fact of Jewish media control to persons who
are Politically Correct, they will respond by saying that it makes no
difference who controls the media. Why does it bother me that Jews run
Hollywood, they ask in a sneering, condescending tone. I know that
people who respond in this way aren't being honest. They would
certainly think it made a difference if I controlled the media, for
example. And actually I'd be concerned if any group with an agenda of
its own had control of the media. I'd be concerned if all of the media
were in the hands of Southern Baptists, for example, or radical
vegetarians.

I am especially concerned about the Jewish control of the media,
however, for two reasons. First, the people who control the media also
control the political process in Britain: they control, in effect, the
policies of our government and the course taken by our society. That's
because the politicians, whether Conservatives or Labour, will not
stand up to the Jews. Instead they grovel at the Jews' feet. Every
politician knows that he must be portrayed favorably by the media if he
is to be elected, and every politician knows who controls the media.

Well I suppose if we have Government ministers who are members of Opus
Dei perhaps we should have newsreaders who whip themselves as well.

Also, what about transvestites? How come there are no transvestite
newsreaders? I know a transvestite that likes to wear Burkhas. He could
read the news and you would be killing two birds with one stone.

High time we had some nudist newsreaders as well or would that offend
Islam?

I tell you the sort of newsreader that will never be allowed the sort
that will always be a repressed minority someone with a strong Brummie
accent that's what.

Come on then Ruth, show us the colour of you're money, give us a
newsreader from Birmingham from somewhere like Erdington the home of
the down and dirty Brummie accent or someone from Walsall (need
subtitles though) even wearig a jillybat - I don't mind.

allan tracy wrote:
Well I suppose if we have Government ministers who are members of Opus
Dei perhaps we should have newsreaders who whip themselves as well.

Also, what about transvestites? How come there are no transvestite
newsreaders? I know a transvestite that likes to wear Burkhas. He could
read the news and you would be killing two birds with one stone.

High time we had some nudist newsreaders as well or would that offend
Islam?

I tell you the sort of newsreader that will never be allowed the sort
that will always be a repressed minority someone with a strong Brummie
accent that's what.

Come on then Ruth, show us the colour of you're money, give us a
newsreader from Birmingham from somewhere like Erdington the home of
the down and dirty Brummie accent or someone from Walsall (need
subtitles though) even wearig a jillybat - I don't mind.

Nothing wrong with Walsall !!

Adrain Chiles is from Hagley - but give me the Balck Country accent
anyday , I can uderstand it, in fact I've never had a problem with UK
accents . Soft Southerners can't understand anyone from north of
watford.