![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
with 10 gigabit ethernet and half a terrabyte of disk per hour of
programming it might just work.... when I referred to NAS etc had in mind backing up from the Humax HD and then restoring it to the Humax to play rather than real time transfers. If the hard disk fils up before I have watched it then I don't see it that as a hardship. Of course if Humax went for Gigabit LAN then things would be different. What rates are the UK test HD broadcasts using? I have read the BBC were aiming at 16 to 20 20Mbps; the few snips of transport streams I've taken are consistent with that and so are the results others have (more reliably) reported. They have also indicated the ITV etc trials are if anything at lower bit rates. That is indeed h.264. And I assumed that is what the Humax would save (and be transferred across the network). So I'd not expected to be able to do a lot in real time (especially if the Humax is already recording 2 streams). -- Robin |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Robin wrote:
with 10 gigabit ethernet and half a terrabyte of disk per hour of programming it might just work.... when I referred to NAS etc had in mind backing up from the Humax HD and then restoring it to the Humax to play rather than real time transfers. If the hard disk fils up before I have watched it then I don't see it that as a hardship. Of course if Humax went for Gigabit LAN then things would be different. What rates are the UK test HD broadcasts using? I have read the BBC were aiming at 16 to 20 20Mbps & with a horizontal resolution of 1400 & something, from what I've just read, not 1920. Good grief - what are they doing the encodes with? An abacus? the few snips of transport streams I've taken are consistent with that and so are the results others have (more reliably) reported. They have also indicated the ITV etc trials are if anything at lower bit rates. That is indeed h.264. Saner bit rates, assuming the encoder isn't a pos. And I assumed that is what the Humax would save (and be transferred across the network). So I'd not expected to be able to do a lot in real time (especially if the Humax is already recording 2 streams). 20Mbps isn't a lot to ask of 100BaseT Ethernet, let alone gigabit, but aiui (not much iow) the bottleneck with PVRs is managing multiple near simultaneous reads/writes to the hard disk whilst avoiding unacceptable delays & subsequent data loss. 20Mbps per stream has got to be pushing it in that context. All guesswork on my part mind - I know nowt about the actual hardware implementations. -- Michael m r o z a t u k g a t e w a y d o t n e t |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Michael Rozdoba wrote:
20Mbps isn't a lot to ask of 100BaseT Ethernet, let alone gigabit, but aiui (not much iow) the bottleneck with PVRs is managing multiple near simultaneous reads/writes to the hard disk whilst avoiding unacceptable delays & subsequent data loss. 20Mbps per stream has got to be pushing it in that context. All guesswork on my part mind - I know nowt about the actual hardware implementations. I don't think it should be much of a problem. IIRC, the STi5514 chip used in several current models of Freeview PVRs is capable of handling three 20 Mbps transport streams simultaneously. And that was released in 2002... |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Pyriform wrote:
Michael Rozdoba wrote: 20Mbps isn't a lot to ask of 100BaseT Ethernet, let alone gigabit, but aiui (not much iow) the bottleneck with PVRs is managing multiple near simultaneous reads/writes to the hard disk whilst avoiding unacceptable delays & subsequent data loss. 20Mbps per stream has got to be pushing it in that context. All guesswork on my part mind - I know nowt about the actual hardware implementations. I don't think it should be much of a problem. IIRC, the STi5514 chip used in several current models of Freeview PVRs is capable of handling three 20 Mbps transport streams simultaneously. And that was released in 2002... http://www.st.com/stonline/press/new...2001/p934p.htm agrees with you, I think. And as you say, this was four years ago. -- Michael m r o z a t u k g a t e w a y d o t n e t |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
David Taylor wrote:
Well, uncompressed 1080i HD apparantly[1] requires around 1200Mbit/s, so with 10 gigabit ethernet and half a terrabyte of disk per hour of programming it might just work.... 1.485 Gb/s for industry standard HD-SDI (270 Mb/s for uncompressed 576i SD) -- Mark Please replace invalid and invalid with gmx and net to reply. |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Humax vx LG | Scott | UK digital tv | 7 | May 13th 06 09:43 PM |
| Humax unleashes $399 TiVo DVR with DVD-R/-R/W burner | John Smith | Tivo personal television | 1 | May 4th 05 11:27 AM |
| Scratches on my *NEW* Humax DRT800 | Jim | Tivo personal television | 7 | February 17th 05 06:47 PM |
| Widescreen swiching on Humax PVR | Toby Barrett | UK digital tv | 0 | August 2nd 04 10:53 AM |
| HUMAX - Channel 4 is different. | Marmaduke | UK digital tv | 4 | May 18th 04 12:17 AM |