![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi,
I was thinking about TV detector vans, didn't they use to work by picking up the signals from the scan coils in CRTs? (Tell me if I am wrong) Are they not finding it very difficult these days to 'detect' LCD / Plasma screens? What about a PC with a freeview card recording to the hard disk and then watching the MPEG later, that must be very difficult to detect. Just wondering... Nige |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Nigel Percy wrote:
Hi, I was thinking about TV detector vans, didn't they use to work by picking up the signals from the scan coils in CRTs? (Tell me if I am wrong) No, it's the local oscillator in the tuner section that is apparently received, so the display device (or even lack of one) is not a factor. Are they not finding it very difficult these days to 'detect' LCD / Plasma screens? What about a PC with a freeview card recording to the hard disk and then watching the MPEG later, that must be very difficult to detect. Just wondering... There's a thread currently raging in uk.media.misc.tv discussing just how feasible/possible the detection is these days. -- Mark Please replace invalid and invalid with gmx and net to reply. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Nigel Percy wrote:
Hi, I was thinking about TV detector vans, didn't they use to work by picking up the signals from the scan coils in CRTs? (Tell me if I am wrong) Are they not finding it very difficult these days to 'detect' LCD / Plasma screens? What about a PC with a freeview card recording to the hard disk and then watching the MPEG later, that must be very difficult to detect. Just wondering... Nige Don't they now just harrass folks who don't have a license? I think even more so if they have had one and stopped having one. Just take a look at this little blog http://blogs.warwick.ac.uk/davidmetc...censing_leave/ and another http://www.denyerec.co.uk/index.php?p=111 and there are probably many more, aswell as this interesting guardian item http://www.guardian.co.uk/guardian_j...566287,00.html -- Paul (Neurotic to the bone No doubt about it) ------------------------------------------------------ Stop and Look http://www.geocities.com/dreamst8me/ |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Mark Carver" wrote in message ... Nigel Percy wrote: Hi, I was thinking about TV detector vans, didn't they use to work by picking up the signals from the scan coils in CRTs? (Tell me if I am wrong) No, it's the local oscillator in the tuner section that is apparently received, so the display device (or even lack of one) is not a factor. Are they not finding it very difficult these days to 'detect' LCD / Plasma screens? What about a PC with a freeview card recording to the hard disk and then watching the MPEG later, that must be very difficult to detect. Just wondering... There's a thread currently raging in uk.media.misc.tv discussing just how feasible/possible the detection is these days. -- Well it is many years ago now but one evening there was one of the vans in the supermarket carpark, guess the men have to buy food sometime, and the back door was open. Guess what, nothing inside. So I guess they use vans clearly marked TV Detector and have a list of houses which have no recorded TV lience purchase and drive down that street, and enquire at that house. I have noted from time to time advance warning of the van being in an area in the local newspaper. I think these things scare people into buying a lience. -- Regards, David Please reply to News Group |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
I was thinking about TV detector vans, didn't they use to work by
picking up the signals from the scan coils in CRTs? (Tell me if I am wrong) Are they not finding it very difficult these days to 'detect' LCD / Plasma screens? What about a PC with a freeview card recording to the hard disk and then watching the MPEG later, that must be very difficult to detect. The vans are old hat now but they do exist. They also have handheld detectors. They detect RF signals form the local oscillator in the tuner. Peter Crosland |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
The message
from Mark Carver contains these words: Nigel Percy wrote: Hi, I was thinking about TV detector vans, didn't they use to work by picking up the signals from the scan coils in CRTs? (Tell me if I am wrong) No, it's the local oscillator in the tuner section that is apparently received, so the display device (or even lack of one) is not a factor. Are they not finding it very difficult these days to 'detect' LCD / Plasma screens? What about a PC with a freeview card recording to the hard disk and then watching the MPEG later, that must be very difficult to detect. Just wondering... There's a thread currently raging in uk.media.misc.tv discussing just how feasible/possible the detection is these days. Yes the LO radiation was quite strong enough for the TV detector vans to pinpoint the actual room the TV set was located in since the bulk of said radiation was emitted from the chassis (or PCB) rather than the antenna feeder. The TV detectors could also figure out which channel the set was tuned to since the LO was offset below the channel by the common IF of (ISTR, 35MHz, but feel free to correct me on this.) To successfully suppress such unwanted radiation requires screened boxes within screened boxes with all feeds (power, IF output etc)heavily filtered. Such filtering needs to be very carefully designed for it to be sufficiently effective to endow the reciever with stealth capability. It can be done but it's a very expensive exercise for commercial production. However, that's not to say such an exercise in modding a TV set is beyond the abilities of a talented (and motivated! :-) amateur, provided he's got access to suitable test gear to verify the efficacy of his efforts. Of course an alternative to 'stealthing' the LO is to suppress the TV detector van's recievers by swamping them with an edge of band signal (in this case around the 430MHz mark give or take whatever MHz it might require to avoid detection by existing services that might actually give a ****). Since the range between your swamping transmitter and the 'enemy' is unlikely to exceed 100 feet, I doubt you'd need more than 1 watt of Tx Power for the job, especially as you'd be using a directional antenna to focus your signal into the roadway to maximise benefit whilst minimising co-lateral damage to your own and to your neighbours' TV reception. The drawback to this is that the TV detector operatives might be savvy enough to recognise the effect and call on other services to pinpoint the source of the swamping signal. As a method, it could only look attractive when there's a house full of TV sets to hide. :-) On second thoughts, I'd opt for the 'Russian Dolls' screening boxes arrangement. Probably set up a suitable Multimedia PC within it's own custom built screened box in the basement (if you have one) and stream the content over fast or Gb ethernet to suitably located PC based viewing stations. You might think that a PC based TV reciever might have sufficient screening seeing that the tuner module is fitted within the confines of a metal case designed to meet the EEC directive on EMC, but I wouldn't place any reliance on the effectiveness of this without a searching and thorough test with suitable test gear. It's amazing how difficult it can be to confine unwanted radiation products within a screened box without benefit of suitable absorption materials or devices being placed inside said screening box. A plain screening box without absorption materials inside can become very ineffective if there's the slightest gap to allow the radiation to escape. Field strenghs will rapidly build up inside until equilibrium is reached with any one wave being reflected maybe a thousand times or more before it's attenuated to insignificance One thing in favour of the PCI tuning cards is that the screening tends to be much better than in a TV chassis simply to minimise interference from the shedloads of digital hash that exists within any modern PC. Since screening work both ways, that makes a PC based solution a more viable option than modding an existing TV reciever. Of course, anyone contemplating such measures needs to remember to stealth the antenna (and its feeder) as well! :-) HTH -- Regards, John. Please remove the "ohggcyht" before replying. The address has been munged to reject Spam-bots. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
David wrote: -- Well it is many years ago now but one evening there was one of the vans in the supermarket carpark, guess the men have to buy food sometime, and the back door was open. Guess what, nothing inside. But some detector equipment is small enough to be hand portable. pehaps they'd gone with it to check on something local. -- From KT24 - in "Leafy Surrey" Using a RISC OS computer running v5.11 |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ohh, not 'TV Detector Vans' again! Pay for the BBC from a hypothocated sum raised by general taxation and then let the 50 people without a TV claim a rebate. So simple! While we're at it, let's remove car tax and put it all on fuel. I can't see why my dad should pay a full road fund when he only does about 35 miles per year (that's his mileage, not his speed). Bill |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
The message
from "Bill Wright" contains these words: Ohh, not 'TV Detector Vans' again! Pay for the BBC from a hypothocated sum raised by general taxation and then let the 50 people without a TV claim a rebate. So simple! While we're at it, let's remove car tax and put it all on fuel. I can't see why my dad should pay a full road fund when he only does about 35 miles per year (that's his mileage, not his speed). Mind you, that could still be described as an average speed (35mpy :-) -- Regards, John. Please remove the "ohggcyht" before replying. The address has been munged to reject Spam-bots. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Nigel Percy" wrote in message ... Hi, I was thinking about TV detector vans, didn't they use to work by picking up the signals from the scan coils in CRTs? (Tell me if I am wrong) Are they not finding it very difficult these days to 'detect' LCD / Plasma screens? What about a PC with a freeview card recording to the hard disk and then watching the MPEG later, that must be very difficult to detect. Just wondering... I really don't think they need to bother as its a resonable assumption that every residence has at least one TV. An aerial or a sattellite dish is a big clue too!!!! |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|