![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
hello,
i am interesting in purchasing a HD tv for the primary purpose of wathing movies. currently movies on DVD (netflix, etc), but eventually HD discs as well. dont really care about broadcast tv. 300 channels of crap. ![]() anyway, im testing out some models (right now i have a 42" Samsung DLP). however the common thing i see in them is -- they cant make "black". they can make "darker", but its never the true black im used to from CRTs. this is likely because when a crt's proton gun isnt sending protons to the glass tube, it remains off (true black). but in these new sets, which are bulb-lit, they can evidently only attempt to mask the light from certain pixel areas. this is imperfect and produces a luminscent blue-black. i see this on computer LCDs as well, but their contrast ratios are much less than the 3,000-8,000:1 ratios home theater LCD & plasma. anyway... can anyone help set my expectation -- can anything produce actual or near-CRT blacks? or will i be disappointed w/ each technology & brand, because none of them are as dark as a CRT? also, im still looking at marketing material, but any idea what a typical DLP contrast ratio is? thanks! matt |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
oh, and replace "proton" w/ "photon" or whatever it is that makes these
things work... ![]() matt |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yes nothing is as black as a CRT. Also, contrast ratios that are reported
are based on different methods so you cannot use them to compare one manufacturers to another. Got to see in person and lighting levels in stores are too bright. Plasmas should be darker then LCDs. I am not sure about DLPs. wrote in message ups.com... hello, i am interesting in purchasing a HD tv for the primary purpose of wathing movies. currently movies on DVD (netflix, etc), but eventually HD discs as well. dont really care about broadcast tv. 300 channels of crap. ![]() anyway, im testing out some models (right now i have a 42" Samsung DLP). however the common thing i see in them is -- they cant make "black". they can make "darker", but its never the true black im used to from CRTs. this is likely because when a crt's proton gun isnt sending protons to the glass tube, it remains off (true black). but in these new sets, which are bulb-lit, they can evidently only attempt to mask the light from certain pixel areas. this is imperfect and produces a luminscent blue-black. i see this on computer LCDs as well, but their contrast ratios are much less than the 3,000-8,000:1 ratios home theater LCD & plasma. anyway... can anyone help set my expectation -- can anything produce actual or near-CRT blacks? or will i be disappointed w/ each technology & brand, because none of them are as dark as a CRT? also, im still looking at marketing material, but any idea what a typical DLP contrast ratio is? thanks! matt |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
In 2008, SED is coming out from Toshiba.
SED technology works much like a traditional CRT except instead of one large electron gun firing at all the screen phosphors that light up to create the image you see, SED has thousands of tiny electron guns known as "emitters" for each phosphor sub-pixel. This may bode well for video purists who feel that CRTs offer the best picture quality, bar none. One prototype has even attained a contrast ratio of 100,000:1. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
RobH wrote:
In 2008, SED is coming out from Toshiba. SED technology works much like a traditional CRT except instead of one large electron gun firing at all the screen phosphors that light up to create the image you see, SED has thousands of tiny electron guns known as "emitters" for each phosphor sub-pixel. This may bode well for video purists who feel that CRTs offer the best picture quality, bar none. One prototype has even attained a contrast ratio of 100,000:1. Please remember that a 50:1 contrast ratio is all you need, if it is linear. Take a look at some of Mitsubishi's best CRT projectors. That's all they provided for a CR in a darkened room. The image quality was/is spectacular. Matthew -- You can bet that a week after Daguerre took the first photograph, vendors were selling feelthy pictures on the streets of Paris. Thomas A. Horsley on alt.tv.tech.hdtv |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
wow, that sounds awesome. thats what im into -- true blacks due to lack
of phospor lumination. looks awesome. too bad its not out yet.... fyi, ive also heard of "diamond dust" display technology, which would also be actual lumination. thanks, matt RobH wrote: In 2008, SED is coming out from Toshiba. SED technology works much like a traditional CRT except instead of one large electron gun firing at all the screen phosphors that light up to create the image you see, SED has thousands of tiny electron guns known as "emitters" for each phosphor sub-pixel. This may bode well for video purists who feel that CRTs offer the best picture quality, bar none. One prototype has even attained a contrast ratio of 100,000:1. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
"RobH" wrote in message ... In 2008, SED is coming out from Toshiba. SED technology works much like a traditional CRT except instead of one large electron gun firing at all the screen phosphors that light up to create the image you see, SED has thousands of tiny electron guns known as "emitters" for each phosphor sub-pixel. This may bode well for video purists who feel that CRTs offer the best picture quality, bar none. One prototype has even attained a contrast ratio of 100,000:1. And it is all hype. the ratios quoted are gray to gray, not balc to black, which means for watching movies the contrast ratio is useless. There are many issues for SED to be addressed before it will be ready to compete with current technologies. Putting any hope or faith in SED would be foolish for at least 2 years after market wide production begins. Bobby |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Rick wrote:
Yes nothing is as black as a CRT. Also, contrast ratios that are reported are based on different methods so you cannot use them to compare one manufacturers to another. Got to see in person and lighting levels in stores are too bright. Plasmas should be darker then LCDs. I am not sure about DLPs. When we got the DLP Christmas '03 I was very disappointed in the black level performance. After going to work the next Monday and bemoaning the blacks, I was all set to be unhappy - but in fact, I like it. When Jay Leno came on with his almost black suit, I was unhappy - until I noticed the shadows his arm was casting on his torso. I didn't THINK I was crushing the blacks on the old set but... The ambient light level will have a big impact on the perceived black level. The black looks much better with some background lights on and the same is true of a CRT. The apparent gamma changes with ambient as well. Worst case viewing is a totally dark room. SED will be neat if / when it shows up but I'm happy at present. And you're right about contrast ratio numbers. If you can't duplicate a measurement, it means essentially nothing. GG |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
NoNoBadDog! wrote:
"RobH" wrote in message ... In 2008, SED is coming out from Toshiba. SED technology works much like a traditional CRT except instead of one large electron gun firing at all the screen phosphors that light up to create the image you see, SED has thousands of tiny electron guns known as "emitters" for each phosphor sub-pixel. This may bode well for video purists who feel that CRTs offer the best picture quality, bar none. One prototype has even attained a contrast ratio of 100,000:1. And it is all hype. the ratios quoted are gray to gray, not balc to black, which means for watching movies the contrast ratio is useless. There are many issues for SED to be addressed before it will be ready to compete with current technologies. Putting any hope or faith in SED would be foolish for at least 2 years after market wide production begins. Bobby Could you elaborate on your "gray to gray, not balc to black" remark? Don't understand your reference. Bob Miller |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
G-squared wrote: When we got the DLP Christmas '03 I was very disappointed in the black level performance. After going to work the next Monday and bemoaning the blacks, I was all set to be unhappy - but in fact, I like it. When not following you. why were you disappointed on first viewing, but then..not? The ambient light level will have a big impact on the perceived black good to know. i was in a dark room, as is customary when we watch movies. i suppose i could try it w/ a light on. is this why philips sells that rear "ambi-light" flat panel? level. The black looks much better with some background lights on and the same is true of a CRT. ....not sure about this. w/ my CRT i always watched movies in a darkened room, and they were true black -- not electrons hitting the glass. never noticed anything disappointing. matt |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Plasma Screen Life | afiggatt | High definition TV | 4 | November 11th 05 11:49 PM |
| Plasma panel collapse coming soon? | Randy Sweeney | High definition TV | 64 | January 3rd 05 11:05 PM |
| FS: PLasma tv 50' asking $3,500 Make Offer | Reverendjcap | UK digital tv | 6 | January 10th 04 12:39 AM |
| 42-in LCD vs plasma for PC use? | Dg1261 | High definition TV | 4 | December 19th 03 04:54 AM |
| Comparing RPTV and Plasma display brightness | Vidguy7 | High definition TV | 2 | July 13th 03 06:31 AM |