![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Rather than get involved in a similar thread which is beginning to meander,
does anyone have a comment about the alleged need for a high quality HDMI cable (between the Sky HD box and the telly). Whilst I appreciate that the bandwidth of the HD data stream probably requires a certain minimum standard, is there any justification for a 1.5m cable that costs 80 quid (which my local SONY dealer insists I need)? Chas |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Chas Gill wrote:
Rather than get involved in a similar thread which is beginning to meander, does anyone have a comment about the alleged need for a high quality HDMI cable (between the Sky HD box and the telly). Whilst I appreciate that the bandwidth of the HD data stream probably requires a certain minimum standard, is there any justification for a 1.5m cable that costs 80 quid (which my local SONY dealer insists I need)? HDMI being (non error corrected) digital, any loss/errors will be very obvious, very quickly as "sparklies" (random white dots/snow on the picture) at around 20ft and then total failure (picture blackout) at 30ft (depending on cable). Cables have much less of an effect on video quality on digital than they do with analog signals.There's no gradual degradation in picture quality over length like you get with analogue, just a large amount of bit errors that show up as sparklies. In short, for a length of 2m or under, a £4.50 HDMI cable will be just as good as an £80 one. If you're planning on long lengths for your projector like 10-15m, then a more expensive cable might be in order, but it either works or it doesn't... -- Mike |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Mike Redrobe" wrote in message k... Chas Gill wrote: Rather than get involved in a similar thread which is beginning to meander, does anyone have a comment about the alleged need for a high quality HDMI cable (between the Sky HD box and the telly). Whilst I appreciate that the bandwidth of the HD data stream probably requires a certain minimum standard, is there any justification for a 1.5m cable that costs 80 quid (which my local SONY dealer insists I need)? HDMI being (non error corrected) digital, any loss/errors will be very obvious, very quickly as "sparklies" (random white dots/snow on the picture) at around 20ft and then total failure (picture blackout) at 30ft (depending on cable). Cables have much less of an effect on video quality on digital than they do with analog signals.There's no gradual degradation in picture quality over length like you get with analogue, just a large amount of bit errors that show up as sparklies. In short, for a length of 2m or under, a £4.50 HDMI cable will be just as good as an £80 one. If you're planning on long lengths for your projector like 10-15m, then a more expensive cable might be in order, but it either works or it doesn't... -- Mike Thank you gentlemen - you have confirmed my cynical suspicions. Cheers Chas |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Chas Gill wrote:
Rather than get involved in a similar thread which is beginning to meander, does anyone have a comment about the alleged need for a high quality HDMI cable (between the Sky HD box and the telly). Whilst I appreciate that the bandwidth of the HD data stream probably requires a certain minimum standard, is there any justification for a 1.5m cable that costs 80 quid (which my local SONY dealer insists I need)? Chas I think you really know the answer. If a cheap lead works then there is no justification whatsover for spending more, particularly with a digital connection. -- Adrian |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:16:53 +0100, "Chas Gill"
wrote: Rather than get involved in a similar thread which is beginning to meander, does anyone have a comment about the alleged need for a high quality HDMI cable (between the Sky HD box and the telly). Whilst I appreciate that the bandwidth of the HD data stream probably requires a certain minimum standard, is there any justification for a 1.5m cable that costs 80 quid (which my local SONY dealer insists I need)? No, but try a cheap set of cables first - if they prove unsatisfactory, then purchase the expensive type from your Sony dealer. -- Cheers Peter Please remove the invalid to reply |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Peter wrote:
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:16:53 +0100, "Chas Gill" wrote: Rather than get involved in a similar thread which is beginning to meander, does anyone have a comment about the alleged need for a high quality HDMI cable (between the Sky HD box and the telly). Whilst I appreciate that the bandwidth of the HD data stream probably requires a certain minimum standard, is there any justification for a 1.5m cable that costs 80 quid (which my local SONY dealer insists I need)? No, but try a cheap set of cables first - if they prove unsatisfactory, then purchase the expensive type from your Sony dealer. If the cheap one is unsatisfactory, it is unfit for purpose and should be returned whence it came. It should then be substituted for one which meets the required specification and therefore works. There are no circumstances under which the purchase of the £80 Sony cable would be justified. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Chas Gill" wrote in message ... Rather than get involved in a similar thread which is beginning to meander, does anyone have a comment about the alleged need for a high quality HDMI cable (between the Sky HD box and the telly). Whilst I appreciate that the bandwidth of the HD data stream probably requires a certain minimum standard, is there any justification for a 1.5m cable that costs 80 quid (which my local SONY dealer insists I need)? Chas Your dealer gets them for about £4 each from SONY, ask him about the trade price list. They are told to sell at the RRP or risk having supplies withdrawn. I used to work for a company that dealt with Kenwood and Philips and could buy things for 30% of the RRP for my own use. In larger quantities the mark-up was great. Consumers are being ripped off in the UK. £80 is excessive, it's similar to when a boy racer wants an exhaust for a car - he will buy a £500 one instead of a £130 one because he is "TOLD" he needs it! All it comes down to is how thick and stupid the customer is and how much the company wants to make. If they know a customer has no knowledge or appears thick, they will tell them anything as they see them as a pound sign. You have to remember sales people lie to make a living most of the time. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Does anyone do a wall plate HDMI socket. ? |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Rob wrote:
Does anyone do a wall plate HDMI socket. ? All I can see after a quick search. http://www.tekcare.co.uk/Scripts/pro...dCategory=1381 http://tinyurl.com/h8kpd -- Adrian |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Rob" wrote in message ... Does anyone do a wall plate HDMI socket. ? Use an extension cable like these? http://www.datapro.net/products/1160.html Mount it on a blanking plate? |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Monster HDMI vs Component cables | lilrdgsr | High definition TV | 9 | April 4th 06 04:14 AM |
| A/V Surround Processors with DVI or HDMI switching | troyo | Home theater (general) | 0 | March 6th 06 07:33 PM |
| Using HDMI Switch to Connect Multiple HDMI sources. | jeff | High definition TV | 0 | February 1st 06 10:43 PM |