![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Edgar J. Hoover"
For an extra $5 you can sign up for a premium usenet service and get it yourself. I dont trust usenet services. I can give you a ftp account on my domain, where you can upload the packages. |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 2006-07-06 10:54:38 -0700, "Max Gerking" said:
"Edgar J. Hoover" For an extra $5 you can sign up for a premium usenet service and get it yourself. I dont trust usenet services. I can give you a ftp account on my domain, where you can upload the packages. And you think FTP is any safer...good luck. |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Max Gerking wrote:
"Edgar J. Hoover" For an extra $5 you can sign up for a premium usenet service and get it yourself. I dont trust usenet services. I can give you a ftp account on my domain, where you can upload the packages. Give me access to your ftp site and I will upload a short version. -- Bill Anderson I am the Mighty Favog |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi Bill,
Thank you very much for taking the effort! I'm downloading it now. I really appreciate it, can't wait to view it on my PLasma. Steven Bink http://bink.nu Amsterdam The Netherlands wrote in message ups.com... Bonk wrote: Discovery 'Go' For July 4 Launch Mission managers have cleared Discovery for launch at 2:38 p.m. EDT on July 4. A day of additional analysis showed that the loss of a small piece of foam from the external tank didn't pose a safety concern for launch. I hope someone manages to record it in HD form HDNET. TS files would be great. Please respond here on the newsgroup to let me know whether the clip I posted is satisfactory. (I think I used "HDTV Post" or something like that as the sender name.) This is the first time I've ever tried to post a binary. I've downloaded plenty, but last night when I began puzzling through my newsreader software I realized I'd never uploaded any. It took me some time to figure it out, and I'm not sure I got it right. Had to reboot this morning and (I hope) continue about where the upload left off. I have my fingers crossed that the entire effort isn't a waste of time and newsgroup space. The clip is over two gigabytes. It starts about two and a half minutes before launch and continues to the end of the HDNET broadcast. Toward the end when they're repeating video of the launch, there are some great shots from several Hi-Def camera angles -- shots that weren't used during the actual launch. I've seen most of the Shuttle launches -- several in person -- but this was the first time I recall such a clear view of the solids falling away. Very nice. -- Bill Anderson I am the Mighty Favog |
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hello again,
whats the different between these files: 804,1 K Shuttle Launch 4 July 2006 contd. - File 01 of 19 - yEnc "shuttle_launch_ and these files: 804,1 K Shuttle Launch 4 July 2006 - File 01 of 37 - yEnc "shuttle_launch_ I've only 5GB traffic volume. |
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
Max Gerking wrote:
Hello again, whats the different between these files: 804,1 K Shuttle Launch 4 July 2006 contd. - File 01 of 19 - yEnc "shuttle_launch_ and these files: 804,1 K Shuttle Launch 4 July 2006 - File 01 of 37 - yEnc "shuttle_launch_ I've only 5GB traffic volume. There are 37 files. In the middle of the upload I had to reboot. So there are two sequences of files that begin with 01. The filenames for the second sequence include an abbreviation for "continued." Look at the last part of the filenames and you'll see that the filenames are different from those in the first sequence. -- Bill Anderson I am the Mighty Favog |
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bonk wrote: Hi Bill, Thank you very much for taking the effort! I'm downloading it now. I really appreciate it, can't wait to view it on my PLasma. You are very welcome. Actually, I've enjoyed learning how (or attempting to learn how) to post large binaries. The process even prompted me to subscribe to Giganews so I could have a fast connection to newsgroups. Just $13 a month for two gigabytes of downloads per month. The problem is that at these new fast speeds, I probably downloaded a fourth of that last night. I may need to sign up for unlimited. We'll see. -- Bill Anderson I am the Mighty Favog |
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
Del Mibbler wrote: With my 1.8 GHz/ATI 9800 system, VLC played the clip jerkily. Media Player Classic with HDTVPump played it smoothly but with speedups every few seconds. No way to tell if there would have been lipsync issues. Windows Media Player was pretty good, with a number of freezes at the start. As expected, my MyHD card played it very well, but FF/RW didn't work at all. If you're not familiar with the card, it has its own MPEG2 decoding and output, so it doesn't require a fast processor and the video card's capabilities don't matter. Del, you would probably be amused if you knew how many times I have read and re-read your very helpful response. I am learning a lot and I find all this fascinating. It has been my goal for some time to record Hi-Def video successfully, but it's been only during the past few months that I have learned how to connect my cable box to the computer and capture a transfer stream. Now I am struggling with the fact that different HDTV channels seem to provide different types of video. Some of what I capture -- HBO for example -- plays great. Other stuff -- ABC Network for example -- seems to be more problematic. You have helped me with this in another thread, I believe. Thanks. VLC does not play the launch clip jerkily (or at least not very jerkily) on my Pentium 3.2 GHz / ATI 9600 XT system, but when the camera moves quickly, or when the smoke billows from the launch pad, I do see tearing of the video. This is not as apparent when playing the clip in the ATI File Player, or Windows Media Player, but still it's there if you look closely. So from your note I have inferred that an even faster processor will be required to play Hi-Def successfully from my computer. I use the ATI 9600XT because it has dual outputs, and I can send video from my computer to my 42 inch plasma screen display, which has computer monitor input. I had to trim out the launch sequence from the original capture, which ran for a couple of hours and was over 13 gigabytes. I believe that in the process I converted the transfer stream clip to mpeg2. Speaking for myself and, I suspect, most others who frequent a.b.hdtv, I'd rather have had the original transport stream, cut into 100 MB segments as you did the RAR files. No need to RAR them; they're already compressed about as much as they're going to be. If you look at other posts there, nearly all are .ts files. HDTVtoMPEG2 can handle that repackaging very well; just make sure the output format is transport stream. This makes perfect sense. I used WinRar on the clip because I knew of no other way to break the file apart into segments. My primary problem was deciding how large to make each segment. I appreciate you letting me know that 100 MB segments are about right. I guessed correctly. Hooray. One advantage of posting .ts files directly is that one can download any one or a group of them to view as samples. No need to take the whole thing just to see if you want it. Though that's not really an issue with a short clip like this. Indeed. I downloaded one .ts segment from alt.binaries.hdtv last night just as a test, and now I understand the value of what you're telling me. The MyHD software is quite good about playing consecutively-numbered files smoothly if they're named correctly. Though not documented, the most common naming convention on a.b.hdtv usually works well: filename.nnnn.ts I assume HDTV2MPEG2 will automatically apply the consecutive numbers as you've described? I will check this some time over the weekend. where nnnn is a 4-digit number. I'm not aware of a software-only player that does that, but I haven't really looked. Most will play a list of files, but with black or a glitch between them. Those who want one big file can reassemble the pieces with HDTVtoMPEG2, MPEG2Repair (which can also fix other errors) or even the venerable COPY /B command. Note that if your clip had exceeded 4 GB, those still using FAT32 file systems (Win 98, ME, etc.) would not have been able to unRAR it, though they could have used 100 MB .ts files. Finally, thank you for uploading this. I don't have HDNet, so this is the only way I could see the launch in HD. And thank you for the very helpful suggestions in both threads. -- Bill Anderson I am the Mighty Favog |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Sky reveals HDTV launch lineup | Robert McCall | UK sky | 269 | September 3rd 05 07:09 PM |
| Sky's HDTV | {{{{{Welcome}}}}} | UK sky | 116 | March 15th 05 10:06 AM |
| Sky HDTV service - more recent announcements | Andy | UK home cinema | 21 | March 6th 05 11:02 PM |
| HDTV - after one year, I'm unimpressed | magnulus | High definition TV | 102 | December 27th 04 02:36 AM |
| CAPTURE OTA HDTV FROM SAMSUNG STB USING 1394, THEN DIVX ENCODE | Jim Waschura | High definition TV | 0 | November 15th 03 06:10 AM |