![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Just had an interesting chat with a lady at Sky, who said there was a
lot of internal debate (a mass debate) about whether there would be an additional charge for the HD channels, or if it would work like Sky+ and you get them 'free' if you get one or more of the top 'mixes', e.g. Sports World or Movies World. She was as desperate to get the actual pricing and availability as we all are! |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Ed" wrote in message ups.com... Just had an interesting chat with a lady at Sky, who said there was a lot of internal debate (a mass debate) about whether there would be an additional charge for the HD channels, or if it would work like Sky+ and you get them 'free' if you get one or more of the top 'mixes', e.g. Sports World or Movies World. She was as desperate to get the actual pricing and availability as we all are! She night think it is up for wank but I will eat my hat of they do not charge a substantial fee. The box will be £300+ too. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"steeler" wrote in message ... "Ed" wrote in message ups.com... Just had an interesting chat with a lady at Sky, who said there was a lot of internal debate (a mass debate) about whether there would be an additional charge for the HD channels, or if it would work like Sky+ and you get them 'free' if you get one or more of the top 'mixes', e.g. Sports World or Movies World. She was as desperate to get the actual pricing and availability as we all are! She night think it is up for wank but I will eat my hat of they do not charge a substantial fee. The box will be £300+ too. What type of hat have you got? At most it will be a tenner which is hardly substantial. Siggy |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Ed" wrote in message ups.com... Just had an interesting chat with a lady at Sky, who said there was a lot of internal debate (a mass debate) about whether there would be an additional charge for the HD channels, or if it would work like Sky+ and you get them 'free' if you get one or more of the top 'mixes', e.g. Sports World or Movies World. She was as desperate to get the actual pricing and availability as we all are! Ed has a point. BSKYB, as most people now know, is crap. Tired old movies, awful presentation, annoying software, which you could get more of the same on FREEVIEW for, erm, free. SKY HD will be like Sky Plus two years ago. The FREEVIEW-killer: the one reason to pay for Sky and not get yourself a Topfield TF5800 and don't pay again. SKY HD could be the only reason to want to pay for TV. It defies the law of common sense how Sky can month on month increase its subscriber base yet they do. You've go to hand it to Sky. These guys could sell ice to eskimos. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ed has a point. BSKYB, as most people now know, is crap. Tired old movies, awful presentation, annoying software, which you could get more of the same on FREEVIEW for, erm, free. SKY HD will be like Sky Plus two years ago. The FREEVIEW-killer: the one reason to pay for Sky and not get yourself a Topfield TF5800 and don't pay again. SKY HD could be the only reason to want to pay for TV. It defies the law of common sense how Sky can month on month increase its subscriber base yet they do. You've go to hand it to Sky. These guys could sell ice to eskimos. Just to add that if I were Sky, I would question whether I would want my suppliers making anything but Sky HD boxes from now on. For Sky to want to direct all new customers direct to the invincible Sky HD platform only and to commence migrating its high value customer base to Sky HD gives it major advantage over its rivals. The timing of this would be based on some algebraic formulae. Something like Demand over price resistance divided by churn multiplied by cost of upgrade less cost of rival platform impact over time. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Ed" wrote in message ups.com... Something like Demand over price resistance divided by churn multiplied by cost of upgrade less cost of rival platform impact over time. Plus the fact that Joe Chav seems completely happy to pay £1500 for a huge plasma or LCD screen which is HD ready, so presumably he's also got a couple of hundred quid that he's already put aside (mentally, not physically - credit card debt will finance it as usual) for his HD box. And just wait to the $ky marketing starts... Jesus Christ's second coming himself could be out-gunned by how Sky marketing will present this. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Ed" wrote in message ups.com... And just wait to the $ky marketing starts... Jesus Christ's second coming himself could be out-gunned by how Sky marketing will present this. Their current advert web site sky.com/hd is crap, and there are a few leaflets in various electrical stores. The calm before the storm? The ****-wit goldfish advert campaign (the irony) is still in full steam especially on day time TV. Adverts often portray the ****-wit public as enterprises perceive their customers. So a talking goldfish tells one to procure Sky and people do. Well I suppose you would have to be goldfish to need logos to remind you of the channel you selected and so you forget the quantity of repeats that fills the digital ecology. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Siggy" wrote in message ... "steeler" wrote in message ... "Ed" wrote in message ups.com... Just had an interesting chat with a lady at Sky, who said there was a lot of internal debate (a mass debate) about whether there would be an additional charge for the HD channels, or if it would work like Sky+ and you get them 'free' if you get one or more of the top 'mixes', e.g. Sports World or Movies World. She was as desperate to get the actual pricing and availability as we all are! She night think it is up for wank but I will eat my hat of they do not charge a substantial fee. The box will be £300+ too. What type of hat have you got? At most it will be a tenner which is hardly substantial. It is a trilby. The forfeit lies not only in the loss of a £100 hat but the mastication and digesting of said hat. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Heracles Pollux" wrote in message ... "Ed" wrote in message ups.com... And just wait to the $ky marketing starts... Jesus Christ's second coming himself could be out-gunned by how Sky marketing will present this. Their current advert web site sky.com/hd is crap, and there are a few leaflets in various electrical stores. The calm before the storm? The ****-wit goldfish advert campaign (the irony) is still in full steam especially on day time TV. Adverts often portray the ****-wit public as enterprises perceive their customers. So a talking goldfish tells one to procure Sky and people do. Well I suppose you would have to be goldfish to need logos to remind you of the channel you selected and so you forget the quantity of repeats that fills the digital ecology. They will need to show some marketing skill to sell what is on offer. HD sport (mostly watched down the pub), Artsworld (yeah, chavs love watching opera in HD), National Geographic (see Artsworld) and Sky One - where they have already admitted that half the programs will be upscaled versions rather than native HD. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
steeler wrote: "Heracles Pollux" wrote in message ... "Ed" wrote in message ups.com... And just wait to the $ky marketing starts... Jesus Christ's second coming himself could be out-gunned by how Sky marketing will present this. Their current advert web site sky.com/hd is crap, and there are a few leaflets in various electrical stores. The calm before the storm? The ****-wit goldfish advert campaign (the irony) is still in full steam especially on day time TV. Adverts often portray the ****-wit public as enterprises perceive their customers. So a talking goldfish tells one to procure Sky and people do. Well I suppose you would have to be goldfish to need logos to remind you of the channel you selected and so you forget the quantity of repeats that fills the digital ecology. They will need to show some marketing skill to sell what is on offer. HD sport (mostly watched down the pub), Artsworld (yeah, chavs love watching opera in HD), National Geographic (see Artsworld) and Sky One - where they have already admitted that half the programs will be upscaled versions rather than native HD. They will have to avoid the term HD about individual programmes but will put on more at higher quality than today (not difficult) and let people think those are HD. I'll save my money and make do with whatever programmes are broadcast on Freeview in the same quality as Planet Earth. -- John Cartmell [email protected] followed by finnybank.com 0845 006 8822 Qercus magazine FAX +44 (0)8700-519-527 www.finnybank.com Qercus - the best guide to RISC OS computing |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Sky HD extra Sub not set in stone | Ed | UK digital tv | 56 | April 1st 06 03:05 PM |
| General DVR Question | MarkR | Tivo personal television | 68 | July 8th 04 04:40 AM |
| Sky Digital FAQ - updated for FTA BBC 13/7/03 | Jomtien | UK sky | 0 | October 19th 03 07:56 AM |
| Sky Digital FAQ - updated for FTA BBC 13/7/03 | Jomtien | UK sky | 0 | October 12th 03 09:54 AM |
| sky extra digibox | Beck | UK digital tv | 0 | August 13th 03 04:21 PM |