Sky One continues to deface middle of programmes

Mike Henry wrote:

Sky One reached yet another new low yesterday with their vandalism of
another prime-time first-run episode of Malcolm in the Middle:

And yet people still pay for this so-called service. They must be
bonkers.

I will not pay a penny to watch channels with ads or any sort of
banners, DOGS, pop-ups, voice-overs, etc. etc.

If I ever pay for TV it will be to see the programmes and nothing
else.

--
Digibox problem? : A reboot solves 90% of these.
The Sky Digital FAQ: http://tinyurl.com/8vef5
UK TV overseas: http://tinyurl.com/6p73
BBC reception questions? ; http://www.astra2d.com/
Fed up with on-screen logos? : http://logofreetv.org/
----
Only the truth as I see it.
No monies return'd. ;-)

Jomtien wrote:
Mike Henry wrote:


Sky One reached yet another new low yesterday with their vandalism of
another prime-time first-run episode of Malcolm in the Middle:


And yet people still pay for this so-called service. They must be
bonkers.

I will not pay a penny to watch channels with ads or any sort of
banners, DOGS, pop-ups, voice-overs, etc. etc.

If I ever pay for TV it will be to see the programmes and nothing
else.


It's only a matter of time before the 'main terrestrial' channels copy
this idea. That'll be the point to give up with TV as an entertainment
source IMHO.

--
Mark
Please replace invalid and invalid with gmx and net to reply.

In ,
Mark Carver rambled on about something in a
strange manner:
Jomtien wrote:
Mike Henry wrote:


Sky One reached yet another new low yesterday with their vandalism of
another prime-time first-run episode of Malcolm in the Middle:


And yet people still pay for this so-called service. They must be
bonkers.

I will not pay a penny to watch channels with ads or any sort of
banners, DOGS, pop-ups, voice-overs, etc. etc.

If I ever pay for TV it will be to see the programmes and nothing
else.


It's only a matter of time before the 'main terrestrial' channels copy
this idea. That'll be the point to give up with TV as an entertainment
source IMHO.

Seriously, if you are ****ed off with it. CANCEL your subs!!! It's the only
way Sky will learn. If enough of you cancel and tell them why, they will
finally get the message.

Don't just sit here moaning and do the "British thing" and take it. Do
something about it!

"^^artnada^^" wrote in message
. uk...
In ,
Mark Carver rambled on about something in a
strange manner:
Jomtien wrote:
Mike Henry wrote:


Sky One reached yet another new low yesterday with their vandalism of
another prime-time first-run episode of Malcolm in the Middle:


And yet people still pay for this so-called service. They must be
bonkers.

I will not pay a penny to watch channels with ads or any sort of
banners, DOGS, pop-ups, voice-overs, etc. etc.

If I ever pay for TV it will be to see the programmes and nothing
else.


It's only a matter of time before the 'main terrestrial' channels copy
this idea. That'll be the point to give up with TV as an entertainment
source IMHO.

Seriously, if you are ****ed off with it. CANCEL your subs!!! It's the
only way Sky will learn. If enough of you cancel and tell them why, they
will finally get the message.

Don't just sit here moaning and do the "British thing" and take it. Do
something about it!

I cancelled Sky 6 months ago and don't miss it one bit. It would probably
only take about 500 cancellations in a single day for alarm bells to ring at
Sky

In oups.com,
Mark Carver rambled on about something in a strange
manner:
^^artnada^^ wrote:
In ,
Mark Carver rambled on about something in a

It's only a matter of time before the 'main terrestrial' channels copy
this idea. That'll be the point to give up with TV as an entertainment
source IMHO.

Seriously, if you are ****ed off with it. CANCEL your subs!!! It's the
only
way Sky will learn. If enough of you cancel and tell them why, they will
finally get the message.

Don't just sit here moaning and do the "British thing" and take it. Do
something about it!

I did cancel, in November 2001,

Good on ya! 1 down, 8mill to go

Mark Carver wrote:
Jomtien wrote:
Mike Henry wrote:


Sky One reached yet another new low yesterday with their vandalism of
another prime-time first-run episode of Malcolm in the Middle:


And yet people still pay for this so-called service. They must be
bonkers.

I will not pay a penny to watch channels with ads or any sort of
banners, DOGS, pop-ups, voice-overs, etc. etc.

If I ever pay for TV it will be to see the programmes and nothing
else.


It's only a matter of time before the 'main terrestrial' channels copy
this idea. That'll be the point to give up with TV as an entertainment
source IMHO.


Same here. One of the reasons that I stopped paying Mr Murdoch a monthly
fee was because of the way $ky One was butchered, and that was a couple
of years ago.

Sigh.


Clem

Same here. One of the reasons that I stopped paying Mr Murdoch a monthly
fee was because of the way $ky One was butchered, and that was a couple of
years ago.

Sigh.


Clem



I cancelled in 2000 because of Sky's on-screen crap. So, Sky have lost at
least £2,000.00 in revenue from us.

I will not subscribe to any defaced TV service.

On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 21:11:56 -0000, "Heracles Pollux"
wrote:

I will not subscribe to any defaced TV service.

Could you say that a few hundred more times, I think there are some
people at the back who haven't got the message yet.