![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dave wrote:
Any UK digibox you buy now will not support HD. Is the current thinking that only those people who subscribe to Sky's HDTV offering will be able to take part in the BBC HDTV trial? I have no desire to be a Sky subscriber (too expnseive compared to BBC offering) but would like to be a member of the BBC HDTV trial. Is this scenario likely? Not at all. The BBC (and ITV) have declared their intention never again to use Sky encryption and given Sky's nature this is totally understandable. This presumably means that either the BBC HD service will be FTA and, as such, receivable on any Sky or non-Sky HD receiver (these do already exist on the Continent) or that they will use some other form of encryption of a less proprietary nature. The details aren't released yet so it's "wait and see". I suspect that the "trial" will be open to anyone with a suitable FTA HD receiver. -- Digibox problem? : A reboot solves 90% of these. The Sky Digital FAQ: http://tinyurl.com/8vef5 UK TV overseas: http://tinyurl.com/6p73 BBC reception questions? ; http://www.astra2d.com/ Fed up with on-screen logos? : http://logofreetv.org/ ---- Only the truth as I see it. No monies return'd. ;-) |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dave" wrote in message ups.com... Jomtien wrote: Dave wrote: I'm thinking of getting a digibox from FreeSatFromSky so I can sign up for the trial as soon as it is launched. Any UK digibox you buy now will not support HD. Is it likely that the only way to get on the BBC HDTV trial will be to be a Sky HDTV subscriber. I have no desire to subsribe to Sky. The BBC channel offering (for £11/month) is far better value than Sky's more expensive offerings IMHO. I wonder if it will be possible to go on the HDTV trial without being a Sky subcriber? I guess I need to wait until the BBC release more details on the HDTV trial. I have not seen any implementation details on Digital Spy. Dave hang on, is that £11 a month on top of the Tv licence fee? That is a tax on watching the BBC channels, what a choice that is! NOT! |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Nigel Barker wrote: On 9 Dec 2005 05:42:45 -0800, "Dave" wrote: Is it likely that the only way to get on the BBC HDTV trial will be to be a Sky HDTV subscriber. I have no desire to subsribe to Sky. The BBC channel offering (for £11/month) is far better value than Sky's more expensive offerings IMHO. I wonder if it will be possible to go on the HDTV trial without being a Sky subcriber? This is the first that I have heard any suggestion that BBC HDTV service would be only available by subscription. Do you have a pointer to somewhere that the BBC state they will charge 11 pounds per month? -- Nigel Barker Live from the sunny Cote d'Azur Hi guys, Sorry to cause confusion. I do not mean the BBC plan to charge a subscription. All I was saying that 9in my view) the yearly licence fee (which I guess works out around £11 per month (i.e. approx £130/year)) delivers a much better range of programmes than any Sky subscription. (starting around £16/month I think). Cheers, David |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 9 Dec 2005 05:42:45 -0800, "Dave" wrote:
Is it likely that the only way to get on the BBC HDTV trial will be to be a Sky HDTV subscriber. I have no desire to subsribe to Sky. The BBC channel offering (for £11/month) is far better value than Sky's more expensive offerings IMHO. I wonder if it will be possible to go on the HDTV trial without being a Sky subcriber? This is the first that I have heard any suggestion that BBC HDTV service would be only available by subscription. Do you have a pointer to somewhere that the BBC state they will charge 11 pounds per month? -- Nigel Barker Live from the sunny Cote d'Azur |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 13 Dec 2005 07:11:13 -0800, "Dave" wrote:
Nigel Barker wrote: On 9 Dec 2005 05:42:45 -0800, "Dave" wrote: Is it likely that the only way to get on the BBC HDTV trial will be to be a Sky HDTV subscriber. I have no desire to subsribe to Sky. The BBC channel offering (for £11/month) is far better value than Sky's more expensive offerings IMHO. I wonder if it will be possible to go on the HDTV trial without being a Sky subcriber? This is the first that I have heard any suggestion that BBC HDTV service would be only available by subscription. Do you have a pointer to somewhere that the BBC state they will charge 11 pounds per month? -- Nigel Barker Live from the sunny Cote d'Azur Hi guys, Sorry to cause confusion. I do not mean the BBC plan to charge a subscription. All I was saying that 9in my view) the yearly licence fee (which I guess works out around £11 per month (i.e. approx £130/year)) delivers a much better range of programmes than any Sky subscription. (starting around £16/month I think). Cheers, David That's a relief! BTW To watch Sky you need to pay the 11 pounds per month in any case so the real minimum cost of having Sky is actually 11+15=26 pounds per month:-) -- Nigel Barker Live from the sunny Cote d'Azur |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
olympus wrote:
Any UK digibox you buy now will not support HD. Is it likely that the only way to get on the BBC HDTV trial will be to be a Sky HDTV subscriber. I refer you to my previous message in which I explained why this will probably not be the case. -- Digibox problem? : A reboot solves 90% of these. The Sky Digital FAQ: http://tinyurl.com/8vef5 UK TV overseas: http://tinyurl.com/6p73 BBC reception questions? ; http://www.astra2d.com/ Fed up with on-screen logos? : http://logofreetv.org/ ---- Only the truth as I see it. No monies return'd. ;-) |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dave" wrote in message ups.com... Nigel Barker wrote: On 9 Dec 2005 05:42:45 -0800, "Dave" wrote: Is it likely that the only way to get on the BBC HDTV trial will be to be a Sky HDTV subscriber. I have no desire to subsribe to Sky. The BBC channel offering (for £11/month) is far better value than Sky's more expensive offerings IMHO. I wonder if it will be possible to go on the HDTV trial without being a Sky subcriber? This is the first that I have heard any suggestion that BBC HDTV service would be only available by subscription. Do you have a pointer to somewhere that the BBC state they will charge 11 pounds per month? -- Nigel Barker Live from the sunny Cote d'Azur Hi guys, Sorry to cause confusion. I do not mean the BBC plan to charge a subscription. All I was saying that 9in my view) the yearly licence fee (which I guess works out around £11 per month (i.e. approx £130/year)) delivers a much better range of programmes than any Sky subscription. (starting around £16/month I think). Cheers, David The yearly TV tax pays for crappy BBC 1, BBC2 and the mostly unwatched Digital channels, That's what? six channels? for £130 a year? (plus the witterings on BBC radio.) Sky gives you hundreds of channels, a much better £ to channel ratio and a huge range of programming, not the PC rubbish of the BBC, which you have no choice but to pay for. Let the people who want to watch BBC pay for the BBC, why should I pay a tax so that Chavs can get their daily dose of Eastenders and other ****e like that? Let it sink or swim in the real world, then maybe they won't waste money on things like giving members of an orchestra £3,000 each because they have moved their workplace a couple of miles!, or waste £24 Million on those stupid between programmes adverts for themselves. I must strongly disagree with you that the BBC produces anything watchable. |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
they are saying that whilst they will transmit in HDV, the only place you
will, be able to watch it in HDV is on specially set up screens in London. "Jomtien" wrote in message ... olympus wrote: Any UK digibox you buy now will not support HD. Is it likely that the only way to get on the BBC HDTV trial will be to be a Sky HDTV subscriber. I refer you to my previous message in which I explained why this will probably not be the case. -- Digibox problem? : A reboot solves 90% of these. The Sky Digital FAQ: http://tinyurl.com/8vef5 UK TV overseas: http://tinyurl.com/6p73 BBC reception questions? ; http://www.astra2d.com/ Fed up with on-screen logos? : http://logofreetv.org/ ---- Only the truth as I see it. No monies return'd. ;-) |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
"olympus" wrote in message ... The yearly TV tax pays for crappy BBC 1, BBC2 and the mostly unwatched Digital channels, That's what? six channels? for £130 a year? (plus the witterings on BBC radio.) Sky gives you hundreds of channels, a much better £ to channel ratio and a huge range of programming, not the PC rubbish of the BBC, which you have no choice but to pay for. Let the people who want to watch BBC pay for the BBC, why should I pay a tax so that Chavs can get their daily dose of Eastenders and other ****e like that? Let it sink or swim in the real world, then maybe they won't waste money on things like giving members of an orchestra £3,000 each because they have moved their workplace a couple of miles!, or waste £24 Million on those stupid between programmes adverts for themselves. I must strongly disagree with you that the BBC produces anything watchable. I am not defending the BBC licence fee being levied on the basis of having a TV rather than what you watch, however I cant agree that with your view that the Sky subscription somehow gives you access to higher quality programming. 1. the Sky sub doesn't give you the BBC, ITV, C4 or 5. 2. of what remains of the "hundreds of channels", 90% are far worse dross than the BBC - e.g. the endless game and shopping channels and below-chav level "entertainment" - surely you must appreciate that. 3. Of the channels that have output more comparable to BBC, then Sky 1/2/3 can hardly be considered to be putting out programming that appeals to audiences above the level of the BBC. Though Sky does have some good US sourced material 4. channels like E4 have a lot of low brow programming - and the good stuff they have is repeated on C4 anyway. 5. The UK* channels are largely filled with BBC programming anyway. 6. The BBC matches the content of the discovery/Nat geo/history/etc type channels (which also contain a lot of BBC sourced programming anyway) £ to channel ratio is a totally irrelevant comparison to make with regard to programming quality which you speak about. Loz |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
"olympus" wrote in message ... they are saying that whilst they will transmit in HDV, the only place you will, be able to watch it in HDV is on specially set up screens in London. where did they say that? They *did* say there would be a trial only in London, and they would provide the special set top boxes to participants Loz |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Sky's HDTV | {{{{{Welcome}}}}} | UK digital tv | 105 | March 15th 05 07:40 PM |
| Sky's HDTV | {{{{{Welcome}}}}} | UK sky | 116 | March 15th 05 10:06 AM |
| Perfume on the PIG | Bob Miller | High definition TV | 31 | June 20th 04 03:49 PM |
| HDTV in Japan, the Europe and other parts of the world. | JDeats | High definition TV | 123 | May 28th 04 04:07 AM |
| Completing the HDTV Picture | Ben Thomas | High definition TV | 0 | July 22nd 03 10:55 PM |