![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Since I've been producing some DVD's recently I've had to focus on making
sure the field order was correct in order to avoid that aweful jerky video you get if it's wrong. Well I've noticed similer effects lately on DVB SKY broadcasts, and they may well have been there before without me noticing. Could it be really be the broadcaster can get field order wrong during production? Or could if be that DVD players produce smoother video when the field order is correct compared to STB's? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Since I've been producing some DVD's recently I've had to focus on making
sure the field order was correct in order to avoid that aweful jerky video you get if it's wrong. Well I've noticed similer effects lately on DVB SKY broadcasts, and they may well have been there before without me noticing. Could it be really be the broadcaster can get field order wrong during production? Or could if be that DVD players produce smoother video when the field order is correct compared to STB's? ISTR from my editing that it's usually lower field first (certainly when doing out with DV sources in Premiere). DVD and STB's should both be a standard MPEG2 stream, so can't see why their output should differ. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Mat Overton" wrote in message . uk... Since I've been producing some DVD's recently I've had to focus on making sure the field order was correct in order to avoid that aweful jerky video you get if it's wrong. Well I've noticed similer effects lately on DVB SKY broadcasts, and they may well have been there before without me noticing. Could it be really be the broadcaster can get field order wrong during production? Or could if be that DVD players produce smoother video when the field order is correct compared to STB's? ISTR from my editing that it's usually lower field first (certainly when doing out with DV sources in Premiere). DVD and STB's should both be a standard MPEG2 stream, so can't see why their output should differ. The fact it's only one progran would indicate the problem is not at the STB end, but a problem in production or broadcast. I have used video editors which have got the field order wrong. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mat Overton wrote:
: ISTR from my editing that it's usually lower field first (certainly when : doing out with DV sources in Premiere). DV field order is different from 'ordinary' 625-line video. ISTR that DV defines the active picture as starting on line 335 rather than line 23 as would be conventional. I think this is to make DV field order the same for PAL and NTSC: DV (525 or 625): lower field first 'Ordinary' 525: lower field first 'Ordinary' 625: upper field first Richard http://www.rtrussell.co.uk/ To reply by email change 'news' to my forename. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote in message ... Mat Overton wrote: : ISTR from my editing that it's usually lower field first (certainly when : doing out with DV sources in Premiere). DV field order is different from 'ordinary' 625-line video. ISTR that DV defines the active picture as starting on line 335 rather than line 23 as would be conventional. I think this is to make DV field order the same for PAL and NTSC: DV (525 or 625): lower field first 'Ordinary' 525: lower field first 'Ordinary' 625: upper field first Richard http://www.rtrussell.co.uk/ To reply by email change 'news' to my forename. I can't recall which editor I used which got it wrong, but perhaps it was designed for NTSC 525 line, and they forget to change the field order for PAL 625. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
wrote: Mat Overton wrote: : ISTR from my editing that it's usually lower field first (certainly when : doing out with DV sources in Premiere). DV field order is different from 'ordinary' 625-line video. ISTR that DV defines the active picture as starting on line 335 rather than line 23 as would be conventional. I think this is to make DV field order the same for PAL and NTSC: DV (525 or 625): lower field first 'Ordinary' 525: lower field first 'Ordinary' 625: upper field first Richard http://www.rtrussell.co.uk/ To reply by email change 'news' to my forename. Phil: Made a worse problem, I believe, because if a DOMESTIC Sony DV camera was used; the field pairing of the DV frame is RANDOM - and this shows also if tryingto slo-mo the sequence in an editor. (WHat Video Magazine reported on this many years ago) -- Phil Spiegelhalter: ==== Technical Training for Broadcasters ===== *RE CUE Mobile DV Multi-Camera Production and Non-Linear Editing* |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Cable surge protector problem with Comcast HDTV | Ray | High definition TV | 56 | February 29th 04 04:00 PM |
| Broadcast flag - a professional analysis | High definition TV | 1 | November 10th 03 02:10 PM | |
| Don't order Sky+ on the phone | Sonars UK | UK sky | 6 | November 1st 03 10:19 PM |
| Mail order electronic from US to Canada | John b | Home theater (general) | 0 | October 25th 03 10:48 PM |
| Fuzzy football field | Adam | Home theater (general) | 1 | September 16th 03 07:51 PM |