plasma

Try to take a look at logofree TV, watch out for screen burn THEY DONT TELL
YOU THAT IN THE SHOP

" Orange peel '\(\(\(" " \)\)\)'
wrote in message . uk

Try to take a look at logofree TV, watch out for screen burn THEY DONT TELL
YOU THAT IN THE SHOP


Indeed.

A nice warning in the manuals to welcome you following your expensive
new purchase.

http://logofreetv.org/?mode=article_...bbc_27032002_3



--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

In article lgate.org,
Heracles Pollux writes

http://logofreetv.org/?mode=article_...bbc_27032002_3

Continued use of "nether the less" raised a smile, but the real beauty
was in the letter dated 18th Feb 2002 to Mr Rampton from Martyn Culling,
which clearly states that "In any event, the BBC.. ..*is* liable for
any 'burn in' damages." Oops!

Now is that a transcription error? Or did the letter really say that?
--
Kennedy
Yes, Socrates himself is particularly missed;
A lovely little thinker, but a bugger when he's ****ed.
Python Philosophers (replace 'nospam' with 'kennedym' when replying)

On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 05:49:21 +0000, Kennedy McEwen
wrote:

In article lgate.org,
Heracles Pollux writes

http://logofreetv.org/?mode=article_...bbc_27032002_3

Continued use of "nether the less" raised a smile, but the real beauty
was in the letter dated 18th Feb 2002 to Mr Rampton from Martyn Culling,
which clearly states that "In any event, the BBC.. ..*is* liable for
any 'burn in' damages." Oops!

Now is that a transcription error? Or did the letter really say that?

So how long is it safe to leave a static image on a plasma before
'burn in' occurs?

Marky P.

In article ,
says...

So how long is it safe to leave a static image on a plasma before
'burn in' occurs?



I have seen Plasma screens, but I can not see what people see in them.
They are expensive, have problems with Burn in and the quality is not
that great anyway.
To be honest, apart from LED and that is not fantastic at the moment, I
think the old CRT is still the best quality and the best value.

On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 10:53:59 GMT, Marky P
wrote:

On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 05:49:21 +0000, Kennedy McEwen
wrote:

In article lgate.org,
Heracles Pollux writes

http://logofreetv.org/?mode=article_...bbc_27032002_3

Continued use of "nether the less" raised a smile, but the real beauty
was in the letter dated 18th Feb 2002 to Mr Rampton from Martyn Culling,
which clearly states that "In any event, the BBC.. ..*is* liable for
any 'burn in' damages." Oops!

Now is that a transcription error? Or did the letter really say that?

So how long is it safe to leave a static image on a plasma before
'burn in' occurs?

The disclaimers from Toshiba & Panasonic posted on that site refer to 'extended
periods of time'. Of course these are weasel words as they don't define how long
is an 'extended period of time'. Is it 1 hour? 2 hours? 4 hours? 12 hours?

--
Nigel Barker
Live from the sunny Cote d'Azur

ad wrote:

I think the old CRT is still the best quality and the best value.


There only saving grace is size without excessive bulk, but me, I've
got the room and couldn't give a stuff about interior decorating
aesthetics, so an RPTV, at half the price of plasmas and LCDs, is still
the best bet if you want a screen size beyond what a CRT will give you.

Regards

Mark

In article , Marky P
writes
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 05:49:21 +0000, Kennedy McEwen
wrote:

In article lgate.org,
Heracles Pollux writes

http://logofreetv.org/?mode=article_...bbc_27032002_3

Continued use of "nether the less" raised a smile, but the real beauty
was in the letter dated 18th Feb 2002 to Mr Rampton from Martyn Culling,
which clearly states that "In any event, the BBC.. ..*is* liable for
any 'burn in' damages." Oops!

Now is that a transcription error? Or did the letter really say that?

So how long is it safe to leave a static image on a plasma before
'burn in' occurs?

Depends on the contrast of the static image, but there are examples
where it has occurred in a little as 10 hours.
--
Kennedy
Yes, Socrates himself is particularly missed;
A lovely little thinker, but a bugger when he's ****ed.
Python Philosophers (replace 'nospam' with 'kennedym' when replying)

http://logofreetv.org/?mode=article_...bbc_27032002_3

Continued use of "nether the less" raised a smile, but the real beauty
was in the letter dated 18th Feb 2002 to Mr Rampton from Martyn Culling,
which clearly states that "In any event, the BBC.. ..*is* liable for
any 'burn in' damages." Oops!

Now is that a transcription error? Or did the letter really say that?




I assure you the letter supplied to us really said that.

The letter was straight cut-and-pasted in to our document and we don't
screw with quotes!

Although it would appear that the BBC have made a "Freudian Slip" and
admitted to liability, we know they want to riggle out of responsibility
and accountability for *anything* that they broadcast.

His typo was not a point worth jumping on!



http://logofreetv.org/



--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

"Mark A" wrote in message
...
I think the old CRT is still the best quality and the best value.
There only saving grace is size without excessive bulk, but me, I've
got the room and couldn't give a stuff about interior decorating
aesthetics, so an RPTV, at half the price of plasmas and LCDs, is still
the best bet if you want a screen size beyond what a CRT will give you.

the latest generation of DLP based RPTV give plasma a very good run for
their money.
And given you can pick up 46-50" HD models for just £1600-£1800 that is a
VERY good run.

Loz