![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Mark Carver" wrote in message ...
Tristán White wrote: [snip] You *read* that magazine ? I simply pick it up off the door mat, take it outside, and drop it straight into my recycling wheelie bin. Yeah. Have you had Sky long enough to remember many years ago when the Sky magazine was actually a subscription option? You could save a pound or two every month by electing not to receive the magazine. Ah, the good old days. - Julian |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 17:00:58 -0000, "Nige"
wrote: Get a life & stop reading the Daily Mail. Read the Independent every day mate. Wouldn't wipe my arse on the Mail. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
I won't reply to each and every one of the smug crass answers to my
post. I'll just send this one as a summary. First of all, it'll probably be my last to this group. What an unfriendly bunch you all are. I write my first post and all I get back is a load of crap about how I should get out more (lol you *really* don't know me... I get out far too much!) that I should stop reading the Mail (I wouldn't wipe my arse on that sensationalists bull**** rag, I read the Independent) etc etc. Nice people you are! I didn't want to be too maudlin' but I have a mate out there who is holidaying in Phuket over Xmas and New Year and I haven't heard from him, his mobile isn't working or anything. So when I saw that report, I was pretty taken aback, but accepted of course that how could Sky know... but when I went on to their website, I was much more annoyed at there being no apology. And I thought, well this is only someone I know from raves, clubbing etc, not a close friend or relative, so how would someone who may have lost someone really really close going to feel. See, perhaps before you take turns in making crass remarks about the first post of a new member to your newsgroup, you could perhaps not be so bloody rash/rude/predictable. Over and out. I don't think I'll post here again. Well done, enjoy your little clique. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Tristán White wrote:
Over and out. I don't think I'll post here again. Well done, enjoy your little clique. Post, don't post, no one gives a stuff - same as any newsgroup. And describing an unmoderated newsgroup as a clique is about as sensible as your first post. Regards Mark |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Tristán White" wrote in message ... I won't reply to each and every one of the smug crass answers to my post. I'll just send this one as a summary. I notice that you failed to address any of the non crass answers though. Such as the fact that the Tsunami was caused by an eathquake, not the weather, so your whole rant against Sky was misplaced anyway.... bye Loz |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Tristán White" wrote in message ... I won't reply to each and every one of the smug crass answers to my post. translation =because i dont ahve good replies to them I'll just send this one as a summary. translation = i'll complain about something else instead. First of all, it'll probably be my last to this group. Probably? Jeez, there's determination for you! What an unfriendly bunch you all are. transation= you *******s disagreed with me I write my first post and all I get back is a load of crap about how I should get out more (lol you *really* don't know me... I get out far too much!) that I should stop reading the Mail (I wouldn't wipe my arse on that sensationalists bull**** rag, I read the Independent) etc etc. Nice people you are! I didn't want to be too maudlin' but I have a mate out there who is holidaying in Phuket over Xmas and New Year and I haven't heard from him, his mobile isn't working or anything. and the relevance to that of global warming induced tidal waves is........**** all. So when I saw that report, I was pretty taken aback, but accepted of course that how could Sky know... but when I went on to their website, I was much more annoyed at there being no apology. They should apologise for saying that global warming wouldnt create a massive tidal wave that swamped New York? hmmmmm, very strange. -- Tumbleweed email replies not necessary but to contact use; tumbleweednews at hotmail dot com |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
In it he goes on to say that tidal waves killing thousands of people just couldn't happen, He doesn't say that at all. Your affectation of outrage is silly. |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
loz wrote:
"Tristán White" wrote in message ... I won't reply to each and every one of the smug crass answers to my post. I'll just send this one as a summary. I notice that you failed to address any of the non crass answers though. Such as the fact that the Tsunami was caused by an eathquake, not the weather, so your whole rant against Sky was misplaced anyway.... Since when have cold, hard facts ever stopped someone from having a right old whinge? -- somnambulist |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|