![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
The signal from Bilsdale of Mux D appears to be significantly weaker than
all of the other muxes on that transmitter. So much so that my mother's Setpal box hasn't yet even found that Mux, despite multiple re-scans. My Grundig GDT-2000 plugged into the same aerial finds it with no problems, yet is prone to interference. As the aerial concerned appears to be wideband, it seems that the strength of Mux seems to be at fault. As I get moaned at everytime I pop round as to the inability to receive Uk Brightideas (arrgghh!), I'd like to know if there are any plans afoot to increase the strength of this particular Mux. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
The signal from Bilsdale of Mux D appears to be significantly weaker than
all of the other muxes on that transmitter. I wonder why it is so restricted. I can't think of any main stations that use ch42 in that part of the world. Maybe there are a lot of relays. Bill http://www.wrightsaerials.tv/index.html |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
The signal from Bilsdale of Mux D appears to be significantly weaker than
all of the other muxes on that transmitter. I wonder why it is so restricted. I can't think of any main stations that use ch42 in that part of the world. Maybe there are a lot of relays. Bill http://www.wrightsaerials.tv/index.html |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bill wrote:
The signal from Bilsdale of Mux D appears to be significantly weaker than all of the other muxes on that transmitter. I wonder why it is so restricted. I can't think of any main stations that use ch42 in that part of the world. Maybe there are a lot of relays. Channel 4 analogue from Chatton (no s******ing at the back please), might be the reason. Also the Alston and Esh relays (both in Co Durham ?) use the allocation. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bill wrote:
The signal from Bilsdale of Mux D appears to be significantly weaker than all of the other muxes on that transmitter. I wonder why it is so restricted. I can't think of any main stations that use ch42 in that part of the world. Maybe there are a lot of relays. Channel 4 analogue from Chatton (no s******ing at the back please), might be the reason. Also the Alston and Esh relays (both in Co Durham ?) use the allocation. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Channel 4 analogue from Chatton (no s******ing at the back please),
might be the reason. Also the Alston and Esh relays (both in Co Durham ?) use the allocation. That'll be it then. Bill http://www.wrightsaerials.tv/index.html |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Channel 4 analogue from Chatton (no s******ing at the back please),
might be the reason. Also the Alston and Esh relays (both in Co Durham ?) use the allocation. That'll be it then. Bill http://www.wrightsaerials.tv/index.html |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| DLP and Power Failure | Bill Oertell | High definition TV | 10 | December 16th 04 01:38 PM |
| Broadcast Power Levels | Bob Miller | High definition TV | 2 | March 11th 04 06:46 AM |
| First Software Upgrade? | lightyear | Satellite dbs | 7 | February 13th 04 10:28 PM |
| Lying Liars and the Lies they are allowed to tell on AVSForum | Bob Miller | High definition TV | 5 | February 1st 04 02:00 AM |