![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mark Carver wrote:
Nonsense also. At 64QAM the payload is 24Mb/s, there's 50 there ! I don't think your card is measuring things correctly, I suspect the video rates may absolute peak values set by the encoder for stat muxing, certainly not typical, and nowhere near what the normal rates are. The audio data is correct though, can't be varied dynamically. These must be values transmitted as fields witin the SI data, the BBC's figures, whilst extreme, look like the extreme upper limit for statmuxing and can not possibly have been reached by bit-rate measurement. The 4.35Mb/s given for BBC-1 in the original post strikes me as appearing correct given that, in England, BBC-1 is not statmuxed with other services. Intersting though the Welsh measurments would appear to indicate that BBC-1W as part of a statmuxed group. ISTR that S4C~ and S4C~2 are statmuxed into 6Mb/s (which would include audio) before being sent to Crawley Count for combination and up-linkng to the sat that distributes to the mux-A trnsport stream to the txs. ITV having an upper limit of 4Mb/s stikes true though, 10Mb/s is just a porky though! Rgds/Ted |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
In message ,
Ted Richardson wrote: The 4.35Mb/s given for BBC-1 in the original post strikes me as appearing correct given that, in England, BBC-1 is not statmuxed with other services. Intersting though the Welsh measurments would appear to indicate that BBC-1W as part of a statmuxed group. I have a BBC paper here from some years ago (sorry, lost the url but it should still be online somewhere?) which says that this is exactly the strategy used. BBC1 (and the other channels?) are sent at a "high" data rate (9Mbps) to the "nations" (Wales, Scotland, NI) and then the whole multiplex is created at that centre as a complete stat-muxed stream, rather than the English model where BBC1 is sent fixed rate as part of a "ready made" multiplex so that it is easy to strip it out and replace with local content when necessary, the other channels being stat-muxed. This also explains why BBC2 in England has no regional opt-outs, but BBC2W and BBC2S and so on exist. The reason given in the paper is cost - the equipment for producing a multiplex is expensive, and sending "high" bitrate channels around the country is expensive. In theory therefore there *should* be a perceived quality difference between channels on mux 1 as received from an English transmitter and as received from a Welsh (/Scotish etc.) transmitter, as the latter has the whole lot to play stat-muxing with while the former does not. Can't comment myself as I can't see a Welsh transmitter at the moment. Give me six months and I might be able to do so. Hwyl! M. -- Martin Angove: http://www.tridwr.demon.co.uk/ Two free issues: http://www.livtech.co.uk/ Living With Technology .... If there's one thing I can't stand, it's intolerance. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
In message ,
Ted Richardson wrote: The 4.35Mb/s given for BBC-1 in the original post strikes me as appearing correct given that, in England, BBC-1 is not statmuxed with other services. Intersting though the Welsh measurments would appear to indicate that BBC-1W as part of a statmuxed group. I have a BBC paper here from some years ago (sorry, lost the url but it should still be online somewhere?) which says that this is exactly the strategy used. BBC1 (and the other channels?) are sent at a "high" data rate (9Mbps) to the "nations" (Wales, Scotland, NI) and then the whole multiplex is created at that centre as a complete stat-muxed stream, rather than the English model where BBC1 is sent fixed rate as part of a "ready made" multiplex so that it is easy to strip it out and replace with local content when necessary, the other channels being stat-muxed. This also explains why BBC2 in England has no regional opt-outs, but BBC2W and BBC2S and so on exist. The reason given in the paper is cost - the equipment for producing a multiplex is expensive, and sending "high" bitrate channels around the country is expensive. In theory therefore there *should* be a perceived quality difference between channels on mux 1 as received from an English transmitter and as received from a Welsh (/Scotish etc.) transmitter, as the latter has the whole lot to play stat-muxing with while the former does not. Can't comment myself as I can't see a Welsh transmitter at the moment. Give me six months and I might be able to do so. Hwyl! M. -- Martin Angove: http://www.tridwr.demon.co.uk/ Two free issues: http://www.livtech.co.uk/ Living With Technology .... If there's one thing I can't stand, it's intolerance. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , Martin Angove
wrote: In theory therefore there *should* be a perceived quality difference between channels on mux 1 as received from an English transmitter and as received from a Welsh (/Scotish etc.) transmitter, as the latter has the whole lot to play stat-muxing with while the former does not. Can't comment myself as I can't see a Welsh transmitter at the moment. Give me six months and I might be able to do so. I can get a Scottish TX (Angus), but no English ones. so I can't compare either! :-/ Is there a way to get a Nokia 221T to tell you bitrates, etc? Slainte, Jim -- Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Audio Misc http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/AudioMisc/index.html Armstrong Audio http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/Audio/armstrong.html Barbirolli Soc. http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/JBSoc/JBSoc.html |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , Martin Angove
wrote: In theory therefore there *should* be a perceived quality difference between channels on mux 1 as received from an English transmitter and as received from a Welsh (/Scotish etc.) transmitter, as the latter has the whole lot to play stat-muxing with while the former does not. Can't comment myself as I can't see a Welsh transmitter at the moment. Give me six months and I might be able to do so. I can get a Scottish TX (Angus), but no English ones. so I can't compare either! :-/ Is there a way to get a Nokia 221T to tell you bitrates, etc? Slainte, Jim -- Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Audio Misc http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/AudioMisc/index.html Armstrong Audio http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/Audio/armstrong.html Barbirolli Soc. http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/JBSoc/JBSoc.html |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| r.v.s.tvro FAQ -- Contents | TVRO Hobbyists | Satellite tvro | 10 | May 4th 04 03:01 PM |
| r.v.s.tvro FAQ -- Contents | TVRO Hobbyists | Satellite tvro | 10 | April 18th 04 02:55 PM |
| r.v.s.tvro FAQ -- Contents | TVRO Hobbyists | Satellite tvro | 10 | April 3rd 04 01:37 PM |
| r.v.s.tvro FAQ -- Contents | TVRO Hobbyists | Satellite tvro | 10 | February 1st 04 09:44 AM |
| r.v.s.tvro FAQ -- Contents | TVRO Hobbyists | Satellite tvro | 20 | November 27th 03 12:49 PM |