A Home cinema forum. HomeCinemaBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HomeCinemaBanter forum » Home cinema newsgroups » UK digital tv
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Freeview Channel listings / bitrates



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old December 9th 03, 01:14 AM
Ted Richardson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mark Carver wrote:

Nonsense also. At 64QAM the payload is 24Mb/s, there's 50 there !
I don't think your card is measuring things correctly, I suspect the video
rates may absolute peak values set by the encoder for stat muxing, certainly
not typical, and nowhere near what the normal rates are. The audio data is
correct though, can't be varied dynamically.



These must be values transmitted as fields witin the SI data, the
BBC's figures, whilst extreme, look like the extreme upper limit for
statmuxing and can not possibly have been reached by bit-rate
measurement. The 4.35Mb/s given for BBC-1 in the original post
strikes me as appearing correct given that, in England, BBC-1 is not
statmuxed with other services. Intersting though the Welsh
measurments would appear to indicate that BBC-1W as part of a
statmuxed group. ISTR that S4C~ and S4C~2 are statmuxed into 6Mb/s
(which would include audio) before being sent to Crawley Count for
combination and up-linkng to the sat that distributes to the mux-A
trnsport stream to the txs.

ITV having an upper limit of 4Mb/s stikes true though, 10Mb/s is just
a porky though!

Rgds/Ted
  #12  
Old December 14th 03, 04:15 PM
Martin Angove
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In message ,
Ted Richardson wrote:

The 4.35Mb/s given for BBC-1 in the original post
strikes me as appearing correct given that, in England, BBC-1 is not
statmuxed with other services. Intersting though the Welsh measurments
would appear to indicate that BBC-1W as part of a statmuxed group.


I have a BBC paper here from some years ago (sorry, lost the url but
it should still be online somewhere?) which says that this is exactly
the strategy used. BBC1 (and the other channels?) are sent at a "high"
data rate (9Mbps) to the "nations" (Wales, Scotland, NI) and then the
whole multiplex is created at that centre as a complete stat-muxed
stream, rather than the English model where BBC1 is sent fixed rate as
part of a "ready made" multiplex so that it is easy to strip it out and
replace with local content when necessary, the other channels being
stat-muxed.

This also explains why BBC2 in England has no regional opt-outs, but
BBC2W and BBC2S and so on exist. The reason given in the paper is cost
- the equipment for producing a multiplex is expensive, and sending
"high" bitrate channels around the country is expensive.

In theory therefore there *should* be a perceived quality difference
between channels on mux 1 as received from an English transmitter and as
received from a Welsh (/Scotish etc.) transmitter, as the latter has the
whole lot to play stat-muxing with while the former does not. Can't
comment myself as I can't see a Welsh transmitter at the moment. Give me
six months and I might be able to do so.

Hwyl!

M.

--
Martin Angove: http://www.tridwr.demon.co.uk/
Two free issues: http://www.livtech.co.uk/ Living With Technology
.... If there's one thing I can't stand, it's intolerance.
  #13  
Old December 14th 03, 04:15 PM
Martin Angove
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In message ,
Ted Richardson wrote:

The 4.35Mb/s given for BBC-1 in the original post
strikes me as appearing correct given that, in England, BBC-1 is not
statmuxed with other services. Intersting though the Welsh measurments
would appear to indicate that BBC-1W as part of a statmuxed group.


I have a BBC paper here from some years ago (sorry, lost the url but
it should still be online somewhere?) which says that this is exactly
the strategy used. BBC1 (and the other channels?) are sent at a "high"
data rate (9Mbps) to the "nations" (Wales, Scotland, NI) and then the
whole multiplex is created at that centre as a complete stat-muxed
stream, rather than the English model where BBC1 is sent fixed rate as
part of a "ready made" multiplex so that it is easy to strip it out and
replace with local content when necessary, the other channels being
stat-muxed.

This also explains why BBC2 in England has no regional opt-outs, but
BBC2W and BBC2S and so on exist. The reason given in the paper is cost
- the equipment for producing a multiplex is expensive, and sending
"high" bitrate channels around the country is expensive.

In theory therefore there *should* be a perceived quality difference
between channels on mux 1 as received from an English transmitter and as
received from a Welsh (/Scotish etc.) transmitter, as the latter has the
whole lot to play stat-muxing with while the former does not. Can't
comment myself as I can't see a Welsh transmitter at the moment. Give me
six months and I might be able to do so.

Hwyl!

M.

--
Martin Angove: http://www.tridwr.demon.co.uk/
Two free issues: http://www.livtech.co.uk/ Living With Technology
.... If there's one thing I can't stand, it's intolerance.
  #14  
Old December 14th 03, 05:36 PM
Jim Lesurf
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Martin Angove
wrote:


In theory therefore there *should* be a perceived quality difference
between channels on mux 1 as received from an English transmitter and as
received from a Welsh (/Scotish etc.) transmitter, as the latter has the
whole lot to play stat-muxing with while the former does not. Can't
comment myself as I can't see a Welsh transmitter at the moment. Give me
six months and I might be able to do so.


I can get a Scottish TX (Angus), but no English ones. so I can't compare
either! :-/

Is there a way to get a Nokia 221T to tell you bitrates, etc?

Slainte,

Jim

--
Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm
Audio Misc http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/AudioMisc/index.html
Armstrong Audio http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/Audio/armstrong.html
Barbirolli Soc. http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/JBSoc/JBSoc.html
  #15  
Old December 14th 03, 05:36 PM
Jim Lesurf
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Martin Angove
wrote:


In theory therefore there *should* be a perceived quality difference
between channels on mux 1 as received from an English transmitter and as
received from a Welsh (/Scotish etc.) transmitter, as the latter has the
whole lot to play stat-muxing with while the former does not. Can't
comment myself as I can't see a Welsh transmitter at the moment. Give me
six months and I might be able to do so.


I can get a Scottish TX (Angus), but no English ones. so I can't compare
either! :-/

Is there a way to get a Nokia 221T to tell you bitrates, etc?

Slainte,

Jim

--
Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm
Audio Misc http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/AudioMisc/index.html
Armstrong Audio http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/Audio/armstrong.html
Barbirolli Soc. http://www.st-and.demon.co.uk/JBSoc/JBSoc.html
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
r.v.s.tvro FAQ -- Contents TVRO Hobbyists Satellite tvro 10 May 4th 04 03:01 PM
r.v.s.tvro FAQ -- Contents TVRO Hobbyists Satellite tvro 10 April 18th 04 02:55 PM
r.v.s.tvro FAQ -- Contents TVRO Hobbyists Satellite tvro 10 April 3rd 04 01:37 PM
r.v.s.tvro FAQ -- Contents TVRO Hobbyists Satellite tvro 10 February 1st 04 09:44 AM
r.v.s.tvro FAQ -- Contents TVRO Hobbyists Satellite tvro 20 November 27th 03 12:49 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2021 HomeCinemaBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.