If I upgrade to Sky+ will Sky give me a card for my existing box?

"nog" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 09:02:57 +0100, Tumbleweed wrote:

So what do you know about Pout that means that their business practice
is in
some way dodgy?
AFAIK they run their business well, havent seen any complaints from
anyone
here anyway.

Entirely unsupported assumptions about the sort of people involved in such
businesses - they would be well down my list of people to trust.

Just out of interest, which sort of people would be higher up? When
answering, bear in mind what we know about the behaviours of people within
major public companies, religions, those who sell financial products to the
public and other businesses, etc :-)

--
Tumbleweed

email replies not necessary but to contact use;
tumbleweednews at hotmail dot com

On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 10:51:33 +0100, Tumbleweed wrote:

"nog" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 09:02:57 +0100, Tumbleweed wrote:

So what do you know about Pout that means that their business practice
is in
some way dodgy?
AFAIK they run their business well, havent seen any complaints from
anyone
here anyway.

Entirely unsupported assumptions about the sort of people involved in such
businesses - they would be well down my list of people to trust.

Just out of interest, which sort of people would be higher up? When
answering, bear in mind what we know about the behaviours of people within
major public companies, religions, those who sell financial products to the
public and other businesses, etc :-)

Yeah, ... I did say _unsupported_ assumptions. ;-)

"nog" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 10:51:33 +0100, Tumbleweed wrote:

"nog" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 09:02:57 +0100, Tumbleweed wrote:

So what do you know about Pout that means that their business practice
is in
some way dodgy?
AFAIK they run their business well, havent seen any complaints from
anyone
here anyway.

Entirely unsupported assumptions about the sort of people involved in
such
businesses - they would be well down my list of people to trust.

Just out of interest, which sort of people would be higher up? When
answering, bear in mind what we know about the behaviours of people
within
major public companies, religions, those who sell financial products to
the
public and other businesses, etc :-)

Yeah, ... I did say _unsupported_ assumptions. ;-)

Thats fair enough, but on the basis of recent behaviour from such groups as
I mentioned, I just wondered which ones would be higher up your list :-)


--
Tumbleweed

email replies not necessary but to contact use;
tumbleweednews at hotmail dot com

On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 20:51:18 +0100, Tumbleweed wrote:

"nog" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 10:51:33 +0100, Tumbleweed wrote:

"nog" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 09:02:57 +0100, Tumbleweed wrote:

So what do you know about Pout that means that their business practice
is in
some way dodgy?
AFAIK they run their business well, havent seen any complaints from
anyone
here anyway.

Entirely unsupported assumptions about the sort of people involved in
such
businesses - they would be well down my list of people to trust.

Just out of interest, which sort of people would be higher up? When
answering, bear in mind what we know about the behaviours of people
within
major public companies, religions, those who sell financial products to
the
public and other businesses, etc :-)

Yeah, ... I did say _unsupported_ assumptions. ;-)

Thats fair enough, but on the basis of recent behaviour from such groups as
I mentioned, I just wondered which ones would be higher up your list :-)

The list is morphing into an array. :-)

"nog" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 20:51:18 +0100, Tumbleweed wrote:

"nog" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 10:51:33 +0100, Tumbleweed wrote:

"nog" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 09:02:57 +0100, Tumbleweed wrote:

So what do you know about Pout that means that their business
practice
is in
some way dodgy?
AFAIK they run their business well, havent seen any complaints from
anyone
here anyway.

Entirely unsupported assumptions about the sort of people involved in
such
businesses - they would be well down my list of people to trust.

Just out of interest, which sort of people would be higher up? When
answering, bear in mind what we know about the behaviours of people
within
major public companies, religions, those who sell financial products
to
the
public and other businesses, etc :-)

Yeah, ... I did say _unsupported_ assumptions. ;-)

Thats fair enough, but on the basis of recent behaviour from such groups
as
I mentioned, I just wondered which ones would be higher up your list :-)

The list is morphing into an array. :-)

LOL :-)

--
Tumbleweed

email replies not necessary but to contact use;
tumbleweednews at hotmail dot com