WHAT A GAME !

5-3 :-)

Depends on how much you hate Arsenal

Depends on how much you hate Arsenal

So it wasn`t womens volleyball then... shame... waste of 90 minutes air
time !

(you`d never know I wasn`t a football fan, would you !)

--
Please add "[newsgroup]" in the subject of any personal replies via email
--- My new email address has "ngspamtrap" & @btinternet.com in it ;-) ---

yes it was a waste of 90 mins, hard look Middlesborough you deserved to
win,

Surely, you must admit that it was an exciting game.
Anti-Arsenal supporters would have enjoyed the first half and most of the
second half.
Both Middlesborough and Arsenal played very well and put on a great
entertaining game of football.


Brendan

"Brendan DJ Murphy" wrote in message
...
yes it was a waste of 90 mins, hard look Middlesborough you deserved to
win,

Surely, you must admit that it was an exciting game.
Anti-Arsenal supporters would have enjoyed the first half and most of the
second half.
Both Middlesborough and Arsenal played very well and put on a great
entertaining game of football.


Brendan

yes it was exciting I have to admit but after another three or four games of
arsenal I wont be watching sky sports again, why cant the equal it all out.

Dave



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.742 / Virus Database: 495 - Release Date: 19/08/2004

There was a similar theory a few seasons back, when Salford United were
always on Sky.
Sky have to show each Premiership side, a minimum amount of times, per
season, think it is as low as 4 times.
Over and above that, they will show the bigger clubs, or should that read
successful clubs.
Man City, are of course, a Massive Club, but are rarely on Sky........

I would be happy to watch Arsenal.
They are a fast and entertaining side to watch.
As a City fan, and season ticket holder, who goes to games, I can say that,
without fear of being trite.
Whilst they get games like yesterday, Sky would be foolish not to show more
Arsenal games. It takes two sides to make an entertaining game mind, so,
doffed cap to The Boro!
neil

On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 13:42:57 +0000 (UTC), "Brendan DJ Murphy"
wrote:

Surely, you must admit that it was an exciting game.

Yup, and the enjoyment level might have been slightly higher if Sky's
director yesterday hadn't been so infatuated with his instant replay
machine and also fixated with the pointless closeups so beloved of
Andrew Franklin's team on Channel 4 Racing. I hope he/she learnt a
lesson from nearly missing the Reyes goal, but somehow I doubt it.

On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 18:01:23 +0100, "Brendan DJ Murphy"
wrote:

5-3 :-)

You should have stuck with it, it finished 40-26.

Charlie

--
Remove NO-SPOO-PLEASE from my email address to reply
Please send no unsolicited email or foodstuffs

yes it was exciting I have to admit but after another three or four games
of
arsenal I wont be watching sky sports again, why cant the equal it all
out.

Dave

Remember, there are more games live on Sky this season.
80(sky sports) +50(premplus) = 130

There are 380 Premiership games in total.
So one-in-three of all premiership games are shown live.


Of course it looks like Arsenal are getting all the games. But look more
closely, and you will see Norwich aren't doing bad either!

(we had this discussion at the end of last year..
http://tinyurl.com/4ehc9 )

ROLL ON THE YEAR WHEN THEY ARE ALL SHOWN LIVE VIA AN INTERACTIVE MENU!!!!!!
Technically, It can be done.

Brendan

Man City, are of course, a Massive Club, but are rarely on Sky........

I saw the Man City game in Old Trafford on Sky last year!
Remind me what the score was again....

Brendan