I hate DOGS

I hate DOGS.
Given that it appears so do many other people, why are DOGS generally getting
worse, not better?

Loz

"loz" wrote in message
...
I hate DOGS.
Given that it appears so do many other people, why are DOGS generally
getting
worse, not better?

Loz


I'll get my two dogs, Daisy and Alfie to give you a good nip :-o)
Mike.



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.617 / Virus Database: 396 - Release Date: 09-Mar-2004

On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:47:13 +0000 (UTC), "loz"
wrote:

I hate DOGS.
Given that it appears so do many other people, why are DOGS generally getting
worse, not better?

Because the TV companies don't care what you think.
Their customers are the advertisers (notice the lack of
DOGs during the ads). You are just there to sit quietly
and be advertised at like a good little consumer.

loz wrote:
I hate DOGS.
Given that it appears so do many other people, why are DOGS generally getting
worse, not better?

Loz


I know what DOGS are but why are they called DOGS?

Andy

#I hate DOGs.... worst of all the on-screen logos,
#I hate DOGs, they're my enemies.....

Altogether now!

"Jim Hatfield" [email protected] wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:47:13 +0000 (UTC), "loz"
wrote:

I hate DOGS.
Given that it appears so do many other people, why are DOGS generally getting
worse, not better?

Because the TV companies don't care what you think.
Their customers are the advertisers (notice the lack of
DOGs during the ads). You are just there to sit quietly
and be advertised at like a good little consumer.

But that's my point.
If DOGS alienate viewers, then it is hardly good for advertisers

Loz

On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 09:37:51 +0000, Andy P wrote:

loz wrote:
I hate DOGS.
Given that it appears so do many other people, why are DOGS generally getting
worse, not better?

Loz


I know what DOGS are but why are they called DOGS?

DOG is an acronym. Popularly thought to be Digital On-screen Graphics but
actually Digital Originated Graphics. The plural should be DOGs.

--
Nigel Barker
Live from the sunny Cote d'Azur

In message , loz
writes
But that's my point.
If DOGS alienate viewers, then it is hardly good for advertisers

Most viewers couldn't give a ****, something that the hysterical maniacs
here overlook in their silly little rantings.
--
James Masterton - www.masterton.co.uk

I know what DOGS are but why are they called DOGS?


Digital On-screen Garbage


Try supporting http://logofreetv.org/





--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

"James Masterton" wrote in message
...

Most viewers couldn't give a ****, something that the hysterical maniacs
here overlook in their silly little rantings.

They never bother me either - I tend to look at the programmes, not the
graphics. But, that said, I loathe Sky News's look, where there's so much
on-screen twaddle that it's reduced the actual image to about half-size.

Ian