![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is there an option to transfer what you've recorded on your sky+ to your PC
for editing etc, and how? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Pat Mustard" wrote in message ... Is there an option to transfer what you've recorded on your sky+ to your PC for editing etc, and how? Only by recapturing on the PC the analog output from the Sky+ box. Loz |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"loz" wrote in message
... "Pat Mustard" wrote in message ... Is there an option to transfer what you've recorded on your sky+ to your PC for editing etc, and how? Only by recapturing on the PC the analog output from the Sky+ box. Loz What happens when you put the Sky Plus HD into a PC...Can it be read? What filesystem does it use? Can Linux read it? |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
I am told that you can see the files no problem but they are encrypted on
the disk and need the card to decrypt. Michael "Dean Jarratt" wrote in message .. . "loz" wrote in message ... "Pat Mustard" wrote in message ... Is there an option to transfer what you've recorded on your sky+ to your PC for editing etc, and how? Only by recapturing on the PC the analog output from the Sky+ box. Loz What happens when you put the Sky Plus HD into a PC...Can it be read? What filesystem does it use? Can Linux read it? |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Michael Hudson" wrote in message
... I am told that you can see the files no problem but they are encrypted on the disk and need the card to decrypt. Michael In which case, I'm assuming they can be cracked by someone willing to write a utility to decrypt them...trust me there are always patterns that I skilful individual can work out. "Dean Jarratt" wrote in message .. . "loz" wrote in message ... "Pat Mustard" wrote in message ... Is there an option to transfer what you've recorded on your sky+ to your PC for editing etc, and how? Only by recapturing on the PC the analog output from the Sky+ box. Loz What happens when you put the Sky Plus HD into a PC...Can it be read? What filesystem does it use? Can Linux read it? |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 18/11/03 10:24 am, in article
, "Dean Jarratt" wrote: "Michael Hudson" wrote in message ... I am told that you can see the files no problem but they are encrypted on the disk and need the card to decrypt. Michael In which case, I'm assuming they can be cracked by someone willing to write a utility to decrypt them...trust me there are always patterns that I skilful individual can work out. Yep - but to do see they would need to have Sky's Videoguard encryption system - as encrypted channels on Sky are recorded in their encrypted form on the hard drive, and not de-crypted until playback. I suspect that many people are working on hacking Sky - but not just to replay Sky+ recordings.. It would be interesting to see what happens on Sky+ recordings of BBC or similarly un-encrypted channels. Steve "Dean Jarratt" wrote in message .. . "loz" wrote in message ... "Pat Mustard" wrote in message ... Is there an option to transfer what you've recorded on your sky+ to your PC for editing etc, and how? Only by recapturing on the PC the analog output from the Sky+ box. Loz What happens when you put the Sky Plus HD into a PC...Can it be read? What filesystem does it use? Can Linux read it? |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dean Jarratt" wrote in message .. . "Michael Hudson" wrote in message ... I am told that you can see the files no problem but they are encrypted on the disk and need the card to decrypt. Michael In which case, I'm assuming they can be cracked by someone willing to write a utility to decrypt them...trust me there are always patterns that I skilful individual can work out. Sure, but they havent been cracked yet, and Sky just changed its encryption so its back to square one. What you omitted at the end of your statement was 'given enough time'. If the time is long enough then to all practical purposes it cant be cracked. -- Tumbleweed Remove theobvious before replying (but no email reply necessary to newsgroups) |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Tumbleweed" wrote in message
. .. "Dean Jarratt" wrote in message .. . "Michael Hudson" wrote in message ... I am told that you can see the files no problem but they are encrypted on the disk and need the card to decrypt. Michael In which case, I'm assuming they can be cracked by someone willing to write a utility to decrypt them...trust me there are always patterns that I skilful individual can work out. Sure, but they havent been cracked yet, and Sky just changed its encryption so its back to square one. What you omitted at the end of your statement was 'given enough time'. If the time is long enough then to all practical purposes it cant be cracked. Herein lies the question...If someone recorded a Box Office movie, and then transferred that to a seperate PC HD. They could then re-install the SKY+ HD into the digibox and not watch it (hence not paying for it). They would still have the copied encrypted file on their PC. The encryption could not change, thus it gives a hacker all the time they need to decrypt the file and play it. Using this method a person could copy as many movies as possible until Sky changed the encryption method. Once they did change the encryption method, it would be possible to repeat the process again, and again give a hacker as much time as needed to hack the new encryption. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dean Jarratt" wrote in message
.. . "Tumbleweed" wrote in message . .. "Dean Jarratt" wrote in message .. . "Michael Hudson" wrote in message ... I am told that you can see the files no problem but they are encrypted on the disk and need the card to decrypt. Michael In which case, I'm assuming they can be cracked by someone willing to write a utility to decrypt them...trust me there are always patterns that I skilful individual can work out. Sure, but they havent been cracked yet, and Sky just changed its encryption so its back to square one. What you omitted at the end of your statement was 'given enough time'. If the time is long enough then to all practical purposes it cant be cracked. Herein lies the question...If someone recorded a Box Office movie, and then transferred that to a seperate PC HD. They could then re-install the SKY+ HD into the digibox and not watch it (hence not paying for it). They would still have the copied encrypted file on their PC. The encryption could not change, thus it gives a hacker all the time they need to decrypt the file and play it. "All the time"? You are assuming that the encryption could be cracked in someones lifetime. There are still russian coded messages from WWII that havent been cracked! You also appear to be wildly over estimating the point of doing this. Unless the cracker can break the encryption within a year or so the movie will be shown on a free channel anyway, plus it could always be downloaded off the net or be bought as a pirate dvd for free way before its released on Box Office (even before its at the cinema!). Why would this hypothetical hacker waste their time doing this when they could get the movies for free or minimal cost anyway? Using this method a person could copy as many movies as possible until Sky changed the encryption method. Once they did change the encryption method, it would be possible to repeat the process again, and again give a hacker as much time as needed to hack the new encryption. No, they wouldnt have as much time as they needed since if they cant crack it within the time the encryption is chnaged, it wouldnt be worth it (By definition all thsoe movies would be available for free by then). And since the movie can be downloaded even before its shown at the cinema its hard to see the value. The value of cracking it would be to get free access to SKy, not just the movies. But again, that needs to be done within the timespan of sky changing the algorithm, and bearing in mind the likely benefits compared to the time you could spend doing other stuff. -- Tumbleweed Remove theobvious before replying (but no email reply necessary to newsgroups) |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Tumbleweed" wrote in message . .. Herein lies the question...If someone recorded a Box Office movie, and then transferred that to a seperate PC HD. They could then re-install the SKY+ HD into the digibox and not watch it (hence not paying for it). They would still have the copied encrypted file on their PC. The encryption could not change, thus it gives a hacker all the time they need to decrypt the file and play it. "All the time"? You are assuming that the encryption could be cracked in someones lifetime. There are still russian coded messages from WWII that havent been cracked! You also appear to be wildly over estimating the point of doing this. Unless the cracker can break the encryption within a year or so the movie will be shown on a free channel anyway, plus it could always be downloaded off the net or be bought as a pirate dvd for free way before its released on Box Office (even before its at the cinema!). Why would this hypothetical hacker waste their time doing this when they could get the movies for free or minimal cost anyway? Using this method a person could copy as many movies as possible until Sky changed the encryption method. Once they did change the encryption method, it would be possible to repeat the process again, and again give a hacker as much time as needed to hack the new encryption. No, they wouldnt have as much time as they needed since if they cant crack it within the time the encryption is chnaged, it wouldnt be worth it (By definition all thsoe movies would be available for free by then). And since the movie can be downloaded even before its shown at the cinema its hard to see the value. The value of cracking it would be to get free access to SKy, not just the movies. But again, that needs to be done within the timespan of sky changing the algorithm, and bearing in mind the likely benefits compared to the time you could spend doing other stuff. Yes OK, if it takes a hacker too long to crack the encryption it would not be worth it...it probably isn't worth it anyway because you can rent a DVD for less than Box Office charges...but 'theoretically' it is possible to defeat Sky in this way... I believe that by giving access to read/write data, a utility could be written and installed on the SKY+ HD which decrypts incoming signals, hence taking away the need for a sky subscription and card. |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|