HomeCinemaBanter

HomeCinemaBanter (http://www.homecinemabanter.com/index.php)
-   UK digital tv (http://www.homecinemabanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   get_iplayer 3.00 released (http://www.homecinemabanter.com/showthread.php?t=78160)

Brian Gaff May 2nd 17 10:14 AM

get_iplayer 3.00 released
 
WEll using the raw new iplayer I cannot find the tools and ways to watch any
more. The problem being that when you select yes I have a tv licence the
damn thing starts playing making the screenreader pointless and drowned out
I'll do another thread later on about using the newly botched up pages of
Iplayer that worked well previously.
Brian

--
----- -
This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
The Sofa of Brian Gaff...

Blind user, so no pictures please!
"NY" wrote in message
o.uk...
"Brian Gaff" wrote in message
...
Does this program work with a screenreader and also does it allow
selection of the AD stream on a program that has this. I'd have thought
this would be very trivial to add for them if its not there. When you can
confirm these then give me a download link for a windows built version.
Thanks.


I'm not sure what needs to be done to a web page to make it work well with
a screen reader. Hopefully the developers can say whether they have tested
it with a selection of screenreader programs.

There is a sub-menu on the web page (on localhost on your PC) which allows
you to select the version of the programme. And you can select that you
want a version that has AD. I'm not sure whether you can set a default
value so for all future programmes you always get the AD version.

One of the potential problems may be that the feedback as to when the
programme has finished downloading is visual: you get lots of info about
downloading the initial version as a TS file, downloading subtitles as a
text file, merging the two together to produce an MP4 file - interesting
as a progress report but the crucial thing is "all finished: now you can
watch / listen to what you've just downloaded".

I've just had a thought: I wonder if there is a way of only downloading
the soundtracks (programme audio and AD) without needing to download the
video part - that would speed up download considerably.




Jim Lesurf[_2_] May 2nd 17 10:28 AM

get_iplayer 3.00 released
 
Top posted for Brian:

gip is essentially command line. Others have built various other programs
around it. Given that it can be installed and run on Windows, it should be
possible to run it there in a terminal. (I don't use Windows so can only
take those points for granted here.)

On that basis I'd suspect that as Brian can type he can type in a simple
command. Either into the terminal, or to write a simple script file that
will run gip. All that is then needed in principle is for Brian to be able
to read the pid shown for each programme in the iplayer listings pages.
Then give gip that pid to fetch.

The difficult part would, I assume, be setting this all up in the first
place. But it should then be easy to use assuming the above.

It also occurs to me to wonder if someone who uses Windows could write a
suitable 'wrapper' program for those who have sight impairments and make
this easier.

I also wonder if gip can be made to just fetch the required *audio* streams
for TV programs as this would mean people who don't actually want the video
could save the bother, etc, of getting it and have smaller, more quickly
fetched, files to play.

Have these issues been covered in the past?

Jim

In article , NY
wrote:

Get iPlayer is good nd gets the job done, but it does have a slightly
geeky feel to its UI, as if they hastily bolted a Windows front end
onto a real-men-use-command-lines user interface ;-)


--
Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me.
Electronics https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/~www_pa...o/electron.htm
Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html
Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html


Adrian Caspersz May 2nd 17 12:09 PM

get_iplayer 3.00 released
 
On 02/05/17 08:38, Mike Tomlinson wrote:
En el artículo , Andy Burns
escribió:

forecast sounds gloomy ... "For whatever life it has left, get_iplayer
will rely more heavily on web scraping"


I don't understand this.

If get_iplayer is having to evolve to keep up with changes the BBC make
(and I'm not sure what those changes are), doesn't that render older
set-top boxes, TVs and other devices that have iPlayer baked into their
firmware obsolete?


The BBC iplayer site presented on end devices is a web site hosted from
somewhere. Manufacturer's proxy or straight to the BBC CDN, not sure.

The clients are lightweight and within a specification window that is
outside obsolescence (well, for the moment...)

--
Adrian C

Johnny B Good[_2_] May 2nd 17 07:02 PM

get_iplayer 3.00 released
 
On Mon, 01 May 2017 17:13:48 +0100, Jim Lesurf wrote:

In article , Johnny B Good
wrote:
On Mon, 01 May 2017 09:25:21 +0100, Pete Forman wrote:


get_iplayer 3.00 for Windows and other systems was released
yesterday.

The main feature is: Restored functionality broken by the BBC

Some features that were deprecated previously have now gone. Caching
has been revised, you will need to rebuild.

https://github.com/get-iplayer/get_i...iki/release300


Thank you for that timely news, Pete.


I'm running LM 17.1 KDE 64 and have been putting off an update to
ffmpeg that appeared in the update manager list several days back. The
new version number bears so little resemblance to 3.0 (7:3.3.0~trusty),
I was afraid to allow the update in case it broke my especially
installed ffmeg ver 3.0.


FWIW I keep different versions of ffmpeg in different places. GiP lets
you specify where to find the version it should use for a command you
give to it.


Well, GiP provides an awful lot of 'BackChat' (noise more like) whenever
it's downloading and processing each recording, including pointless
warnings about possible failure to ffmpeg a file correctly in spite of
the required version being accessable both before and after this recent
ffmpeg update which was joined by the latest GiP update (also from the
trusty PPA repository) in the Update Manager list a few hours after
posting my misgivings about the trusty PPA sourced version of ffmpeg.


I guess I can 'let it rip' now and see whether my fears were justified
since any remediation work it might cause will be 'lost in the noise'
of a major (to me) update task (as in the, "It's nothing on a big ship"
philosophical point of view).


I wanted to process my list of yesterday's PIDs before chancing complete
breakage of my GiP setup by allowing the ffmpeg update. The delay proved
useful since the trusty PPA repository I'd added meant the latest GiP
version, given the extra time, refreshed Linux Mint's update manager. I
was less leery of applying these associated updates so happily signed off
on the updating tasks.


FWIW2 I've experimented and found that with my old version of GiP simply
using

--fileprefix \"title_pid\"

added to the command string I build to feed to gip means I get files
that have a sensible title and include the pid.

N.B. I'm escaping the " chars above because I use a sprintf() to
assemble a command string which is then used to launch gip. (And as per
above I include an --ffmpeg option to point to the version gip should
use.)


It seems a little odd to me that having installed the latest and
greatest version of ffmpeg just prior to ditto for GiP, that there is
*still* the need for this. Has this *always* been the case with every
install of GiP? I mean, if this is SOP for every single installation of
GiP, then so be it. If it suppresses some of the needless 'backchat' from
a rather 'gobby' GiP, I'm only too happy to oblige (noblesse and all
that, don't y'know!).

Taking note of the benefit in filtering the sources to speed up
indexing, I've eliminated regional and local variants, adding back the
wanted exceptions as well as excluding unwanted channels (BBC News,
CBeebies and Parliament).

Refreshing the cache still overflowed the Konsole buffer and it took me
a while to figure out how to completely purge it before getting the index
list down to a manageable size. Since I couldn't find an obvious command
line incantation, I just unhid the user folders to access the GiP working
folder to remove the cache files to elsewhere to permit a fresh start
sans all the unwanted sources that had been cluttering up the cache.

Later perusal of the vast list of user options suggested I'd merely
missed the desired option to do what I'd been forced to do by manually
manipulating the files directly. The further perusal being in the pursuit
of preventing Gip using underscores in place of whitespace (amongst other
options of interest that I'm still trying to get my head around).

I'm not complaining since I'm only too aware of the need for this
(perceived) complexity that arises when a non-trivial program attempts to
offer the end user a solid helping of customisation to their almost
unique blend of requirements.

One of the settings in user preferences that I tried was to up the tv
quality to best. Unfortunately, this action (seemingly unneeded on
account it happens to be the default anyway) coincided with what appears
to be some more sabotage on the part of the eejits in charge of the
Beeb's iPlayer concession stand.

In attempting to refresh episodes from series 5 of "Shaun The Sheep"
which had previously *not* been processed into mp4 files by ffmpeg but
processed directly from their raw ts format by Handbrake into mkv files,
I hit a strange problem during the downloading.

As previously, they started off as the 1280 by 720 120MB file size until
hitting the 17.1MB mark, at which point the source was changed to the 960
by 540 96MB due to lost/corrupted packets in the HD source. Since this
problem afflicted *both* of today's episodes, I'm inclined to the theory
of it being sabotage, plain and simple rather than some curious accident.
Disabling the servers in turn (Akamei and Limelight) didn't change the
outcome, just the question of the starting filesize.

Personally speaking, I'm of the conviction that the untimely removal of
the metadata sources wasn't a matter of inconsiderate incompetence but an
active act of sabotage for a rapidly increasing number of GiP users that
the Beeb now see as a licensing and rights issue they can no longer
ignore on the basis of 'insignificance'.

Never mind that they are a Public Broadcasting Service whose viewership
includes a portion keen enough to provide a "Free Cloud Storage Backup
Facility" to protect against loss of priceless one off classics due to
parsimonious cockups such as those that afflicted "Doctor Who" and "Dad's
Army" resulting in episodes which are now lost forever (quite possibly,
such parsimony may be the reason why other more worthy classics such as
"The Goodies" and "Steptoe and Son" have never been repeated by the Beeb).

The risk of loss is no longer a case of wiping a programme recording on
very expensive videotape for re-use (a £70 videotape for just a single
programme back when £70 was real money rather than the pocket change of
today, capable of buying more than enough of the highest quality storage
for the Beeb's total weekly output).

The risk of 'lost episodes' these days is going to arise from "Finger
Trouble" or "Brain Farts" since the efficiency of file deletion is now
several orders of magnitude greater in both quantity and speed than good
old fashioned bulk erasure of videotapes. The Beeb ought to be showing
this willing band of volunteer backup storage providers less disdain and
a hell of a lot more respect for their efforts in providing a tertiary
level of backup protection, in my considered opinion.

--
Johnny B Good

[email protected] May 2nd 17 07:43 PM

get_iplayer 3.00 released
 
On Tuesday, 2 May 2017 08:38:26 UTC+1, Mike Tomlinson wrote:
En el artÃ*culo , Andy Burns
escribió:


I don't understand this.

If get_iplayer is having to evolve to keep up with changes the BBC make
(and I'm not sure what those changes are), doesn't that render older
set-top boxes, TVs and other devices that have iPlayer baked into their
firmware obsolete?


It certainly does. My main TV is a so-called "smart" TV, and it has now joined the Wii with a non-working iPlayer app.
GiP is now my only way of transferring iPlayer content to my TV.
Ian.


Robin[_9_] May 2nd 17 08:48 PM

get_iplayer 3.00 released
 
On 02/05/2017 18:02, Johnny B Good wrote:
snip

The Beeb ought to be showing
this willing band of volunteer backup storage providers less disdain and
a hell of a lot more respect for their efforts in providing a tertiary
level of backup protection, in my considered opinion.


I can only think:

a. you missed the point about the BBC not owning the intellectual
property in everything it broadcasts; or

b. you believe that all property is theft.


--
Robin
reply-to address is (intended to be) valid

Johnny B Good[_2_] May 3rd 17 02:25 AM

get_iplayer 3.00 released
 
On Tue, 02 May 2017 19:48:59 +0100, Robin wrote:

On 02/05/2017 18:02, Johnny B Good wrote:
snip

The Beeb ought to be showing this willing band of volunteer backup
storage providers less disdain and a hell of a lot more respect for
their efforts in providing a tertiary level of backup protection, in my
considered opinion.


I can only think:

a. you missed the point about the BBC not owning the intellectual
property in everything it broadcasts; or

b. you believe that all property is theft.


If that's all you can (erroneously) think, it seems to me that you
aren't using your brain to its full potential. FTAOD, both thoughts are
completely wrong BTW.

--
Johnny B Good

Roderick Stewart[_3_] May 3rd 17 10:21 AM

get_iplayer 3.00 released
 
On 2 May 2017 18:22:00 GMT, Huge wrote:

If get_iplayer is having to evolve to keep up with changes the BBC make
(and I'm not sure what those changes are), doesn't that render older
set-top boxes, TVs and other devices that have iPlayer baked into their
firmware obsolete?


It certainly does. My main TV is a so-called "smart" TV, and it has now joined the Wii with a non-working iPlayer app.
GiP is now my only way of transferring iPlayer content to my TV.


FWIW, my Samsung SMART TV is still fine.

Although deeply **** in a number of other ways.h


I have an Amazon box, and a stick, both of which are still working
fine with iPlayer and all the other stuff, and a great deal more
briskly than any "smart" TV or PVR I've ever used.

But then, Amazon regularly update their gadgets, which are quite cheap
to buy in the first place, no doubt knowing full well what would
happen to their customer base if they didn't. This is probably a
consequence of the supplier of the gadgets also being the supplier of
services that go with them, a condition that doesn't apply to TV sets.
It's probably inevitable.

Rod.

Andy Burns[_12_] May 3rd 17 12:59 PM

get_iplayer 3.00 released
 
Huge wrote:

I shall never buy another Samsung product as long as I live.


Do you expect to run out of manufacturers and newsagents to blacklist
before you kick the bucket :-)


Roderick Stewart[_3_] May 3rd 17 01:15 PM

get_iplayer 3.00 released
 
On 3 May 2017 09:59:45 GMT, Huge wrote:

If get_iplayer is having to evolve to keep up with changes the BBC make
(and I'm not sure what those changes are), doesn't that render older
set-top boxes, TVs and other devices that have iPlayer baked into their
firmware obsolete?

It certainly does. My main TV is a so-called "smart" TV, and it has now joined the Wii with a non-working iPlayer app.
GiP is now my only way of transferring iPlayer content to my TV.

FWIW, my Samsung SMART TV is still fine.

Although deeply **** in a number of other ways.h


I have an Amazon box, and a stick, both of which are still working
fine with iPlayer and all the other stuff, and a great deal more
briskly than any "smart" TV or PVR I've ever used.

But then, Amazon regularly update their gadgets, which are quite cheap
to buy in the first place, no doubt knowing full well what would
happen to their customer base if they didn't. This is probably a
consequence of the supplier of the gadgets also being the supplier of
services that go with them, a condition that doesn't apply to TV sets.
It's probably inevitable.


I freely admit that the Samsung SMART TV was a mistake. It's a festering
PoS. I shall never buy another Samsung product as long as I live.


I have several Samsung displays, including the TV, and they're all
excellent - at displaying pictures. I just don't expect the TV to do
anything other than display pictures. The clever stuff is best left to
other devices, for the reason I suggested above. I suspect the same
would apply regardless of what brand of TV I had.

Rod.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:01 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com