|
HDMi lead Version 1.4 vs. 2.0
In article , David wrote:
Ok which work reliably for all situations that you found? An Amazon Basics cable: http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B003L1ZYYM -- Richard |
HDMi lead Version 1.4 vs. 2.0
In article ,
Jim Lesurf wrote: No. There isn't a difference between cables for different version numbers. So what do the different version number actually relate to? Things other than cables. http://www.audioholics.com/hdtv-form...-hdmi-versions -- Richard |
HDMi lead Version 1.4 vs. 2.0
On 20/01/2015 15:23, Richard Tobin wrote:
In article , David wrote: Ok which work reliably for all situations that you found? An Amazon Basics cable: http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B003L1ZYYM -- Richard This is what I received today from ordering yesterday. http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/151483249128 Look good quality and working ok. Regards David |
HDMi lead Version 1.4 vs. 2.0
In article , Richard Tobin
wrote: In article , Jim Lesurf wrote: No. There isn't a difference between cables for different version numbers. So what do the different version number actually relate to? Things other than cables. http://www.audioholics.com/hdtv-form...-hdmi-versions So essentially worthless/irrelevant as a way to tell one cable from another. Which leads back to my main question when faced with finding that cables do vary in what works with them. How to determine if one will do a task from the sales blurb, etc. Looks like "plug and prey" rules... Jim -- Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me. Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html |
HDMi lead Version 1.4 vs. 2.0
Jim Lesurf wrote:
Richard Tobin wrote: There isn't a difference between cables for different version numbers. So what do the different version number actually relate to? The protocol that's run over it, I've got some nice IPv6 compatible Ethernet leads if anyone's interested, they also support jumbo frames! |
HDMi lead Version 1.4 vs. 2.0
"Jim Lesurf" wrote in message ... In article , Richard Tobin wrote: In article , Jim Lesurf wrote: No. There isn't a difference between cables for different version numbers. So what do the different version number actually relate to? Things other than cables. http://www.audioholics.com/hdtv-form...-hdmi-versions So essentially worthless/irrelevant as a way to tell one cable from another. Which leads back to my main question when faced with finding that cables do vary in what works with them. How to determine if one will do a task from the sales blurb, etc. Looks like "plug and prey" rules... You could try http://www.russandrews.com/product.a...ZZBNCMNGRPOLLP -- JohnT |
HDMi lead Version 1.4 vs. 2.0
On 21/01/2015 12:40, JohnT wrote:
You could try http://www.russandrews.com/product.a...ZZBNCMNGRPOLLP ROFL Well I'm using 3 X 2 mtr which would be £1,113.60 Possibly more than the average price of a TV set. Regards David |
HDMi lead Version 1.4 vs. 2.0
In article ,
Jim Lesurf wrote: So what do the different version number actually relate to? Things other than cables. http://www.audioholics.com/hdtv-form...-hdmi-versions So essentially worthless/irrelevant as a way to tell one cable from another. That's a bit of a stranage way to put it. The HDMI cables that don't work are ones that don't conform to the standard, and you can hardly expect the standard to classify cables that don't conform to it. -- Richard |
HDMi lead Version 1.4 vs. 2.0
On 20/01/2015 20:00, Andy Burns wrote:
I've got some nice IPv6 compatible Ethernet leads if anyone's interested, they also support jumbo frames! Wouldn't they get stuck if the bend radius was too sharp ? -- Mark Please replace invalid and invalid with gmx and net to reply. |
HDMi lead Version 1.4 vs. 2.0
In article , Richard Tobin
wrote: In article , Jim Lesurf wrote: So what do the different version number actually relate to? Things other than cables. http://www.audioholics.com/hdtv-form...-hdmi-versions So essentially worthless/irrelevant as a way to tell one cable from another. That's a bit of a stranage way to put it. The HDMI cables that don't work are ones that don't conform to the standard, and you can hardly expect the standard to classify cables that don't conform to it. See the problem I outlined earlier. Two cables behaving differently. One 'cured' the problem between a TV and a recorder, the other 'cured' the problem between a monitor and a computer. Neither worked correctly in the other application. Jim -- Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me. Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:26 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com