|
BBC Three Kaput
On 07/03/2014 13:58, Martin wrote:
On Thu, 06 Mar 2014 19:11:23 +0000, Peter Duncanson wrote: snip The Guardian also reports that BBC is likely to announce BBC3's original programming will now air on BBC1 from 11pm but will be cut from one hour to 30 minutes. Eastenders repeats currently shown on BBC 3 have to go somewhere too. Actually, make BBC 3's replacement BBC 1+2.5, and no one will notice. As pointed out in another group last night, if BBC 1+1 isn't going to come on until 7pm (possibly 8pm to avoid the tricky issue of having 18 regional variations to delay) and BBC 1 simulcasts BBC News from 1am until 6am, then quite honestly what's the bloody point ? BBC News overnight is full of stuff effectively repeated from the previous hour anyway ! There's a hole in my bucket........ -- Mark Please replace invalid and invalid with gmx and net to reply. |
BBC Three Kaput
In article ,
Martin writes: On Thu, 06 Mar 2014 18:56:27 +0000, Mark Carver wrote: Brian Gaff wrote: Maybe some of those not on freeview but free on the sat could be put on the freeview channels Seems that space is destined to be taken by BBC 1+1 Get rid of BBC 4 to make room for BBC2+1 next? I hope not, but they announced some time ago that the channel would no longer be commissioning any original drama. -- John Hall "He crams with cans of poisoned meat The subjects of the King, And when they die by thousands G.K.Chesterton: Why, he laughs like anything." from "Song Against Grocers" |
BBC Three Kaput
On Fri, 07 Mar 2014 15:59:50 +0000, Mark Carver
wrote: Actually, make BBC 3's replacement BBC 1+2.5, and no one will notice. As pointed out in another group last night, if BBC 1+1 isn't going to come on until 7pm (possibly 8pm to avoid the tricky issue of having 18 regional variations to delay) and BBC 1 simulcasts BBC News from 1am until 6am, then quite honestly what's the bloody point ? BBC News overnight is full of stuff effectively repeated from the previous hour anyway ! Should I repost this again tomorrow? :-) Anyway, if there's any trickiness in the regional dept., why wouldn't it also apply at 22:25? How do +1 channels work technically anyway? Do they just repeat the triggers on another port of a server (what happens to live stuff and voiceovers and breakdowns and other such anomolies?) or do they just record everything as transmitted and buffer it for an hour before playing out again? |
BBC Three Kaput
Paul Ratcliffe wrote:
On Fri, 07 Mar 2014 15:59:50 +0000, Mark Carver wrote: Actually, make BBC 3's replacement BBC 1+2.5, and no one will notice. As pointed out in another group last night, if BBC 1+1 isn't going to come on until 7pm (possibly 8pm to avoid the tricky issue of having 18 regional variations to delay) and BBC 1 simulcasts BBC News from 1am until 6am, then quite honestly what's the bloody point ? BBC News overnight is full of stuff effectively repeated from the previous hour anyway ! Should I repost this again tomorrow? :-) Anyway, if there's any trickiness in the regional dept., why wouldn't it also apply at 22:25? Well it would, but I suppose that would only requite 7.5 mins of 'move along now, nothing to see here' captions ? How do +1 channels work technically anyway? Do they just repeat the triggers on another port of a server (what happens to live stuff and voiceovers and breakdowns and other such anomolies?) or do they just record everything as transmitted and buffer it for an hour before playing out again? Part of Ofcom's conditions for licensing +1 channels, is they must be *exactly* the same as the main channel, but just an hour later. Except of course some content has to be blanked out for rights issues. I think most broadcasters just stuff their main output through a server on delay, and use triggers from the main service automation to blank out things at the right moments. I'm sure the Beeb will devise their own very special and unique method of implementation :-) -- Mark Please replace invalid and invalid with gmx and net to reply. |
BBC Three Kaput
On Fri, 07 Mar 2014 14:27:54 +0000, Mark
wrote: Who wants yet another +1 channel? (hint: not me) I don't either. They serve no purpose since DVR was developed. Steve Yes they do if your DVR can only record one thing at a time. Yes that's true but I have never needed to record more than one program. Can't most (modern) PVRs record more than one programme at once? Even if they can't, two of them can record two things at once, three of them can record three things at once, four of them can record four things at once, and so on. You just equip yourself with whatever you need, depending on how much of your life you want to spend/waste watching television. A setup that seems to cover every eventuality is a two tuner PVR plus the old single tuner PVR I never bothered to get rid of. The old one very rarely gets used, and then usually only because it also includes a DVD recorder. Rod. |
BBC Three Kaput
On Fri, 07 Mar 2014 16:15:13 +0100, Martin wrote:
Who wants yet another +1 channel? (hint: not me) I don't either. They serve no purpose since DVR was developed. They solve the problem of recording clashes and just missing a programme when in serendipity mode. So does iPlayer. Rod. |
BBC Three Kaput
"Mark" wrote in message ... On Thu, 6 Mar 2014 23:11:11 -0000, "Max Demian" wrote: "Peter Duncanson" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 6 Mar 2014 18:00:09 +0100, "tim....." wrote: "David" wrote in message ... When this BBC3 closes does that mean the children's programs closed too on the daytime that shares with it? ----------------------------------------------------- seems not (that's one of the reasons why the savings don't make sense) It seems that the BBC3 bandwidth will be used for a BBC1+1 service. That will presumably be during the evening rather than daytime. Here is a bit more information from the horse's mouth (or nearby orifice): ================================================= = Why is the BBC closing a TV channel? BBC News, UK, 6 March 2014 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-26469085 The BBC has announced sweeping changes to youth channel BBC Three, which will disappear from the EPG in autumn 2015. The channel will continue in a truncated form on the iPlayer, while some of its more popular programmes could transfer to BBC One and Two. Overall, its programme budget will be cut from the current £85 million to £25 million. The closure will make way for an extension of CBBC's broadcasting hours, and a BBC One + 1 channel. [...] ================================================= = Who wants yet another +1 channel? (hint: not me) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Me, especially in the 8-10pm slots I frequently get double and triple clashes in this time slot and have to resolve them by shifting one of them - something that I currently can't do if the clash is between 3 BBC channels tim |
BBC Three Kaput
"Martin" wrote in message ... On Fri, 07 Mar 2014 12:53:49 +0000, Dave W wrote: On Fri, 07 Mar 2014 11:04:45 +0000, Stephen Wolstenholme wrote: On Fri, 07 Mar 2014 09:18:16 +0000, Mark wrote: Who wants yet another +1 channel? (hint: not me) I don't either. They serve no purpose since DVR was developed. Steve Yes they do if your DVR can only record one thing at a time. Even when you can record two things at a time sometimes ------------------------------------------------- Yep, even then I sometimes can't record all that I want; Here's a clash from Wednesday nights 9pm end Jan/beginning Feb: Outnumbered (BBC1), Horizon (BBC2), MM(ITV). I can't resolve this by shifting MM as it starts at 8pm, so shifting it an hour still leaves me with a 9pm clash (though I can fix it by ****ing about splitting it into two - but WTF! [1]). I need to be able to shift one of the BBC channels to fix it properly tim [1]I did actually try this once and then the PVR decided that it wasn't going to record the second half -- Martin in Zuid Holland |
BBC Three Kaput
"Martin" wrote in message ... On Thu, 6 Mar 2014 18:03:46 +0100, "tim....." wrote: "Brian Gaff" wrote in message ... BBC 1 plus 1? Anyway, one can now see one of the reasons they wanted to cancel Sky at night. They are running out of our dosh. Perhaps its time to get a new model. Surely the BBCs job as a public service broadcaster is to cater for things the commercial folk cannot as they cannot sell adverts in it. Then if any of the stuff gets popular, they should have a commercial wing that can carry on making sid shows and put them out with adverts to help with funding the rest of the BBC. That way surely eveyone wins. However that pre supposes that commercials actually work. My guess is that now so many people are getting their content via other means which enables editing of the adverts, that commercial funding is going to be a decreasing revenue. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- You obviously didn't see the report that I linked a week or so back despite the trumpeted success of streamed media, 98.5% of TV is still watched as "live" broadcasts. Amongst the 1000 households sampled. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ I don't know how big the sample that they use is. But I'm sure that they can sanity check the iPlayer figure by looking at their server stats tim |
BBC Three Kaput
"tim....." wrote in message ... "Martin" wrote in message ... On Thu, 6 Mar 2014 18:03:46 +0100, "tim....." wrote: "Brian Gaff" wrote in message ... BBC 1 plus 1? Anyway, one can now see one of the reasons they wanted to cancel Sky at night. They are running out of our dosh. Perhaps its time to get a new model. Surely the BBCs job as a public service broadcaster is to cater for things the commercial folk cannot as they cannot sell adverts in it. Then if any of the stuff gets popular, they should have a commercial wing that can carry on making sid shows and put them out with adverts to help with funding the rest of the BBC. That way surely eveyone wins. However that pre supposes that commercials actually work. My guess is that now so many people are getting their content via other means which enables editing of the adverts, that commercial funding is going to be a decreasing revenue. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- You obviously didn't see the report that I linked a week or so back despite the trumpeted success of streamed media, 98.5% of TV is still watched as "live" broadcasts. Amongst the 1000 households sampled. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ I don't know how big the sample that they use is. But I'm sure that they can sanity check the iPlayer figure by looking at their server stats It is a well known fact that 83 per cent of statistical samples are inaccurate. -- JohnT |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:48 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com