Humax update announcement tomorrow...... HD recording problemfix??
 

On Thu, 09 Jan 2014 13:41:39 +0000
Mark Carver wrote:

On 09/01/2014 11:32, Davey wrote:
On Thu, 09 Jan 2014 11:09:04 +0000
Mark Carver wrote:

On 09/01/2014 10:50, Davey wrote:

Tacolneston. It still doesn't have Ch. 106 this morning, I
rescanned an hour ago.

According to the DUK checker. not date has been set yet, it just
says '2014' ?

Yes, see my other message. That's not how I interpreted it the other
day, though. Oh well.

Don't forget that Mux 7 will be on UHF Ch 31 from Taccy, well outside
the legacy aerial group C/D (UHF 48-68) so if you don't have a
Wideband you may still not be able to receive, or receive terribly
well.




My aerial is a wideband, but with no channel yet, it doesn''t do me much
good!

--
Davey.

Humax update announcement tomorrow...... HD recording problem fix??
 

"Ian" wrote in message
...
In message , Dickie mint
writes
On 08/01/2014 08:11, Paul D Smith wrote:
I annoyingly deleted them as I though it was just one-of-those-things
but now wish I hadn't as the fine people on the hummy forums has figured
out a work around to view the recordings.
+++++++
Please provide a link or info - I've got my "zero" recordings still.

Paul DS
It's buried somewhere in this thread :
http://hummy.tv/forum/threads/failed...-channel.4309/
But I think you need to have the customised software installed.
It involves copying off the .ts file and/or removing the .nts file

Richard

I've found that on a few occasions I've been able to play a recording that
the Hummy reports as failed.

dunno about HD, but the SD boxes just shows failed if they started late, not
because they failed completely (they wont be in the list at all)

tim


--
Ian

Humax update announcement tomorrow...... HD recording problemfix??
 

On Thu, 9 Jan 2014 18:35:53 +0100
"tim......" wrote:


"Ian" wrote in message
...
In message , Dickie mint
writes
On 08/01/2014 08:11, Paul D Smith wrote:
I annoyingly deleted them as I though it was just
one-of-those-things but now wish I hadn't as the fine people on
the hummy forums has figured out a work around to view the
recordings. +++++++
Please provide a link or info - I've got my "zero" recordings
still.

Paul DS
It's buried somewhere in this thread :
http://hummy.tv/forum/threads/failed...-channel.4309/
But I think you need to have the customised software installed.
It involves copying off the .ts file and/or removing the .nts file

Richard

I've found that on a few occasions I've been able to play a
recording that the Hummy reports as failed.

dunno about HD, but the SD boxes just shows failed if they started
late, not because they failed completely (they wont be in the list at
all)

tim


--
Ian


As an experiment, the other day, I recorded The Taste at the same time
in SD and HD, and again in SD on the +1 channel, wishing to see what
would happen. The '+1' recording put up a comment about the recording
being incomplete due to 'a conflict with another recording of greater
importance', and although it missed a short part of the intro, it
recorded the rest. The two together were both 63 minutes long, the '+1+
recording was 60 minutes. This is a recent Humax.

--
Davey.

Humax update announcement tomorrow...... HD recording problemfix??
 

On 09/01/2014 19:12, Davey wrote:
As an experiment, the other day, I recorded The Taste at the same time
in SD and HD, and again in SD on the +1 channel, wishing to see what
would happen. The '+1' recording put up a comment about the recording
being incomplete due to 'a conflict with another recording of greater
importance', and although it missed a short part of the intro, it
recorded the rest. The two together were both 63 minutes long, the '+1+
recording was 60 minutes. This is a recent Humax.



And the +1 channel had a higher number?

Richard

Humax update announcement tomorrow...... HD recording problemfix??
 

On Thu, 09 Jan 2014 20:29:22 +0000
Dickie mint wrote:

On 09/01/2014 19:12, Davey wrote:
As an experiment, the other day, I recorded The Taste at the same
time in SD and HD, and again in SD on the +1 channel, wishing to
see what would happen. The '+1' recording put up a comment about
the recording being incomplete due to 'a conflict with another
recording of greater importance', and although it missed a short
part of the intro, it recorded the rest. The two together were both
63 minutes long, the '+1+ recording was 60 minutes. This is a
recent Humax.



And the +1 channel had a higher number?

Richard

Well, yes.
--
Davey.