|
|
HDTVs and audio
At long last I've decided to take the plunge and buy an HDTV 'Freeview'
set. Almost certainly an LED Panasonic of modest size. I'd welcome some answers to a few pretty basic questions, mainly wrt the audio side of operations. 1) Is it standard for such sets to accept audio in via HDMI and then copy that out via an SPDIF coax/optical outlet for connection to a decent external DAC? If the answer to (1) is 'yes': 2) Is it normal to then be able to mute the TV's own speakers so you just can use a hifi and the external DAC for the audio? 3) Does that normally then bypass any 'volume control' of the TV set? Or is this user-choosable, or what? 4) Does HDMI ensure audio-video synch? Either from the TV's digital output, or by telling the HDMI source and allowing a digital spdif output from that to be delayed to match? Or? It would be convenient from my POV is the TV acted simply as a 'pass though' for the audio from external sources - e.g. DVD player. So ensured lip-synch by otherwise allowed the audio samples to be 'as from the source' without any sounds from the TVs speakers. But is the norm? Or is there a problem here? Also: Are middle-of-the range panasonics likely to have 3 HDMI sockets? Allow no 'overscan' so a 1:1 scaling of HD sources? I'll ask about such things in the shop. But some comments here to clarify what I should be able to expect would be helpful. Cheers, Jim -- Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me. Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html |
HDTVs and audio
Jim Lesurf wrote:
At long last I've decided to take the plunge and buy an HDTV 'Freeview' set. Almost certainly an LED Panasonic of modest size. I'd welcome some answers to a few pretty basic questions, mainly wrt the audio side of operations. I have a Sony, so my answers are specifically applicable for that, however FWIW, I would expect Panny to be the same. 1) Is it standard for such sets to accept audio in via HDMI and then copy that out via an SPDIF coax/optical outlet for connection to a decent external DAC? Yes If the answer to (1) is 'yes': 2) Is it normal to then be able to mute the TV's own speakers so you just can use a hifi and the external DAC for the audio? Yes 3) Does that normally then bypass any 'volume control' of the TV set? Or is this user-choosable, or what? By-passes the TV's volume control 4) Does HDMI ensure audio-video synch? Either from the TV's digital output, or by telling the HDMI source and allowing a digital spdif output from that to be delayed to match? Or? I've had no lip sync issues, either using the TV's own tuner, or external HDMI sources It would be convenient from my POV is the TV acted simply as a 'pass though' for the audio from external sources - e.g. DVD player. So ensured lip-synch by otherwise allowed the audio samples to be 'as from the source' without any sounds from the TVs speakers. But is the norm? Or is there a problem here? That's how I do it. Use a AV Amp, fed by optical link from the TV's 'Audio Out', and only feed the external boxes into the TV via HDMI. The TV is the 'master' source selection device, Volume control is using the Amp, I don't use any of the amp's HDMI facilities. Also: Are middle-of-the range panasonics likely to have 3 HDMI sockets? IMHO Yes Allow no 'overscan' so a 1:1 scaling of HD sources? Sony's yes, LGs no, I don't know about Pannys or Samsungs. Irritatingly on the Sony you have to set 1:1 mapping (they call it 'Full Pixel') separately for every input, and also when the set is in progressive *and* interlace mode. Remember the HD Mux employs dynamic GOP by GOP p/i switching, so with the Sony you can end up with the overscan cutting in and out every second or so. You need to set full pixel mode separately when it's forced into each mode. It's a PITA, but once set, that's it ! I'll ask about such things in the shop. But some comments here to clarify what I should be able to expect would be helpful. One must IMHO is the ability to remap and delete EPG LCNs, so you can put the HD versions of channels on the 'SD' LCNs, instead of having them up at 101+ which is the default condition for Freeview. -- Mark Please replace invalid and invalid with gmx and net to reply. |
HDTVs and audio
Mine is LG
"Jim Lesurf" wrote in message ... At long last I've decided to take the plunge and buy an HDTV 'Freeview' set. Almost certainly an LED Panasonic of modest size. I'd welcome some answers to a few pretty basic questions, mainly wrt the audio side of operations. 1) Is it standard for such sets to accept audio in via HDMI and then copy that out via an SPDIF coax/optical outlet for connection to a decent external DAC? If the answer to (1) is 'yes': Yes - and received digital audio 2) Is it normal to then be able to mute the TV's own speakers so you just can use a hifi and the external DAC for the audio? Yes. 3) Does that normally then bypass any 'volume control' of the TV set? Or is this user-choosable, or what? If you are using digital then the signal is sent 'as is'. Not sure what happens on analog, but I would expect line output (600mV). On my earlier Philips set this was selectable. 4) Does HDMI ensure audio-video synch? Either from the TV's digital output, or by telling the HDMI source and allowing a digital spdif output from that to be delayed to match? Or? Never had any trouble with this. Kindly the BBC outputs a couple of minutes a day of test card with speaker and synch tests to allow you to check everything is correct. Any delay will be set specific. It would be convenient from my POV is the TV acted simply as a 'pass though' for the audio from external sources - e.g. DVD player. So ensured lip-synch by otherwise allowed the audio samples to be 'as from the source' without any sounds from the TVs speakers. But is the norm? Or is there a problem here? I do it the other way around - HDMI sources got to the AV amp first. Freesat and Freeview are received in the set, so if I want full surround I use the optical SPDIF link to go the other way. Some more recent HDMI have a reverse audio channel (so avoiding the need for the SPDIF link). Also: Are middle-of-the range panasonics likely to have 3 HDMI sockets? Probably - look it up at Richer Sounds. Allow no 'overscan' so a 1:1 scaling of HD sources? No idea. Full HD should come out unaltered. For DVD, analog (e.g. VCR) and SD sources it will have to be upscaled somewhere, although I think it is best to let the set do it. I'll ask about such things in the shop. But some comments here to clarify what I should be able to expect would be helpful. Buy the boxes from Richer Sounds, buy the cables from CPC. Cheap cables are just fine for digital. Cheers, Jim |
HDTVs and audio
R. Mark Clayton wrote:
Allow no 'overscan' so a 1:1 scaling of HD sources? No idea. Full HD should come out unaltered. It doesn't on any HD sets, they are all set to 3ish % overscan, which means that rescaling is going on, even on native 1920 x 1080 broadcasts. My folks have an LG, I can't find the 1:1 pixel mode setting. Take a look at this screen shot taken from BBC News HD, note the gap under the ticker, see if you have the same ? https://www.dropbox.com/s/5h6i6aymfb...2016.18.43.jpg -- Mark Please replace invalid and invalid with gmx and net to reply. |
HDTVs and audio
In article ,
Mark Carver wrote: R. Mark Clayton wrote: It doesn't on any HD sets, they are all set to 3ish % overscan, which means that rescaling is going on, even on native 1920 x 1080 broadcasts. My Sony Bravia is set to a slight overscan by default, but there is a setting for the HDMI inputs to be 'pixel perfect', i.e. no overscan and an exact pixel for pixel match to the source. Occasionally you get fine lines at the edges of the picture as a result. |
HDTVs and audio
In article , R. Mark Clayton
wrote: Mine is LG "Jim Lesurf" wrote in message ... 4) Does HDMI ensure audio-video synch? Either from the TV's digital output, or by telling the HDMI source and allowing a digital spdif output from that to be delayed to match? Or? Never had any trouble with this. Kindly the BBC outputs a couple of minutes a day of test card with speaker and synch tests to allow you to check everything is correct. Any delay will be set specific. When is the HD testcard broadcast and on what 'station'? I recall getting a copy from the HDTV a long time ago, but I thought it just popped up occasionally so you had to guess when it would show. I'll ask about such things in the shop. But some comments here to clarify what I should be able to expect would be helpful. Buy the boxes from Richer Sounds, I'll probably buy the TV from a local shop if they have what I want. Otherwise I may look to John Lewis to get one. Either way, I'll need them to also cart away my old CRT set (analogue). I can't even lift that, let alone put it out for collection! buy the cables from CPC. Cheap cables are just fine for digital. Erm. yes, I think I'd guessed that. :-) Jim -- Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me. Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html |
HDTVs and audio
IMLE (sample of 2 Sonys) yes, yes, yes, no
-- Robin reply to address is (meant to be) valid |
HDTVs and audio
On 01/01/2014 17:14, Roger Wilmut wrote:
In article , Mark Carver wrote: R. Mark Clayton wrote: It doesn't on any HD sets, they are all set to 3ish % overscan, which means that rescaling is going on, even on native 1920 x 1080 broadcasts. My Sony Bravia is set to a slight overscan by default, but there is a setting for the HDMI inputs to be 'pixel perfect', i.e. no overscan and an exact pixel for pixel match to the source. Occasionally you get fine lines at the edges of the picture as a result. with an older sky box i found that on certain sd channels (the non full pal resolution ones), the box was inserting bright blue pillarboxes on the extreme left and right of the image. a later replacement sky box wisely made them black instead so back came my zero overscan setting. -- Gareth. That fly.... Is your magic wand. |
HDTVs and audio
Jim Lesurf wrote:
At long last I've decided to take the plunge and buy an HDTV 'Freeview' set. Steady on Jim! Almost certainly an LED Panasonic of modest size. Experience of what customers have said, plus my own experience, tells me that you should get a slightly bigger screen than you think you want, if you aren't used to HD. I'd welcome some answers to a few pretty basic questions, mainly wrt the audio side of operations. FWIW I simply take the audio from the 'headphone' jack on the (Sony) TV. The telly is set for the internal speaker to be muted. This works perfectly for analogue and digital reception, reception via scart and HDMI. Full control of volume and no sync problems. If I compare Swiss Classic direct or via the telly there's no difference that I can tell. Are middle-of-the range panasonics likely to have 3 HDMI sockets? Each model either will or won't. It isn't a probability thing. Google it. Why Panasonic, particularly? I'll ask about such things in the shop. A complete and utter waste of time breath and temper. You'd better taking a ride over the bridge to Edinburgh and asking the chimps in the zoo. While you're there have a look at what's on the floor in the elephant house. That'll give you an idea of what the answer would be like if you asked the boys in the TV shop about overscan. But some comments here to clarify what I should be able to expect would be helpful. The only question worth asking in the shop is "Can you match the internet price?" Bill |
HDTVs and audio
Mark Carver wrote:
It doesn't on any HD sets, they are all set to 3ish % overscan, which means that rescaling is going on, even on native 1920 x 1080 broadcasts. True, but as with Roger, my Sony will let me set it to exact pixel mapping. -- SteveT |
HDTVs and audio
Steve Thackery wrote:
Mark Carver wrote: It doesn't on any HD sets, they are all set to 3ish % overscan, which means that rescaling is going on, even on native 1920 x 1080 broadcasts. True, but as with Roger, my Sony will let me set it to exact pixel mapping. I know it will, and so does mine, what is it you didn't understand about my original responce to Jim ? ;-) -- Mark Please replace invalid and invalid with gmx and net to reply. |
HDTVs and audio
Mark Carver wrote:
Steve Thackery wrote: Mark Carver wrote: It doesn't on any HD sets, they are all set to 3ish % overscan, which means that rescaling is going on, even on native 1920 x 1080 broadcasts. True, but as with Roger, my Sony will let me set it to exact pixel mapping. I know it will, and so does mine, what is it you didn't understand about my original responce to Jim ? ;-) Don't call him a ponce! Bill |
HDTVs and audio
In article ,
Jim Lesurf wrote: 1) Is it standard for such sets to accept audio in via HDMI and then copy that out via an SPDIF coax/optical outlet for connection to a decent external DAC? An alternative, depending on your audio equipment, is to send the output by HDMI too, using the audio return channel. This has the advantage (from my point of view) that you can use the TV's volume control - volume up and down are sent through the HDMI connection. Are middle-of-the range panasonics likely to have 3 HDMI sockets? My 2010 model has three on the back and one on the side, useful for temporary connections. -- Richard |
HDTVs and audio
On Wed, 01 Jan 2014 17:14:59 +0000, Roger Wilmut
wrote: In article , Mark Carver wrote: R. Mark Clayton wrote: It doesn't on any HD sets, they are all set to 3ish % overscan, which means that rescaling is going on, even on native 1920 x 1080 broadcasts. My Sony Bravia is set to a slight overscan by default, but there is a setting for the HDMI inputs to be 'pixel perfect', i.e. no overscan and an exact pixel for pixel match to the source. Occasionally you get fine lines at the edges of the picture as a result. Back in the days of analogue TV tuner expansion cards (when 30GB HDDs had just become affordable) and the typical PC didn't have quite enough 'grunt' to effectively do the mpg compression on-the-fly to avoid burning up HDD space at the rate of a 100MB per minute), I used to do most of my viewing using the PC and wondered why on earth anyone would put up with the outrageous overscan typical of most domestic TV sets of the day (circa 2000). Later, sometime in 2005, when I installed my first DVB-T adapter, I still had the same opinion (but the bit rates employed by BBC1 and BBC2 were still quite respectable back then). It's only in recent years with the bit rates now only at around 50 to 75% of what they used to be that I can see a need to offer an 'overscan' option. With mpeg compression, the edges of the transmitted picture will exhibit compression artifacts at a noticably higher level than elsewhere. With the less aggressive compression used in the early days, this wasn't too much of a distraction but since then, they've become more pronounced and now I can see some merit in emulating 'overscan'. With a "Pixel Perfect" display, rescaling to achieve this 'overscan' is just an unnecessary act of stupidity. A superior method when the transmitted pictures exactly match the display resolution is to blank out the offending edges. This will shrink the display area slightly but, provided the bezel is of the correct colour (pitch black, of course!), the result will be more acceptable than adding scaling artifacts to a picture already compromised in quality due to the lossy compression employed by the broadcast system. In the case of a "Full HD FreeView" set with a 1080 line dispalay panel this would only really benefit Full HD broadcasts. When such a set is used to receive SD broadcasts which have to be upscaled anyway, they can be upscaled to create an actual overscan to eliminate the edge compression artifacts when the viewer chooses the overscan option since whatever upscaling artifacts are there are unlikely to be noticably worse for this display mode. It's quite possible that I'm describing exactly the process in use for the HD overscan option, I'm not familiar with HD TV technology since I've no burning desire, as yet, to "upgrade" anytime soon. -- Regards, J B Good |
HDTVs and audio
Richard Tobin wrote:
Jim Lesurf wrote: 1) Is it standard for such sets to accept audio in via HDMI and then copy that out via an SPDIF coax/optical outlet for connection to a decent external DAC? An alternative, depending on your audio equipment, is to send the output by HDMI too, using the audio return channel. Then you're at the mercy of whatever DAC in in the amp, it also requires HDMI 1.4 support in TV and amp, not likely to be an issue for new kit. This has the advantage (from my point of view) that you can use the TV's volume control - volume up and down are sent through the HDMI connection. You don't need to use ARC to get that, my amp does support ARC but TV is older and only has HDMI 1.3, so I use SP/DIF from TV to amp, and the CEC channel lets the TV's remote control the amp's volume (once the TV's internal speakers have been deselected) in addition turning on/off the TV makes the amp follow suit. |
HDTVs and audio
On Wed, 01 Jan 2014 14:58:02 +0000 (GMT), Jim Lesurf wrote:
At long last I've decided to take the plunge and buy an HDTV 'Freeview' set. Almost certainly an LED Panasonic of modest size. I'd welcome some answers to a few pretty basic questions, mainly wrt the audio side of operations. Right, I have a new(ish) Panasonic, bought in September from Richer Sounds - I'd recommend RS or JL as the prices are good (especially taking into account no (added) delivery charge and the 5-year warranty). Mine is probably mid-range and is this one: http://www.richersounds.com/product/...ana-txl50et60b or - oh, looks as if JL's not doing the same model now http://www.johnlewis.com/electricals...048/c800005013 1) Is it standard for such sets to accept audio in via HDMI and then copy that out via an SPDIF coax/optical outlet for connection to a decent external DAC? Yes, I have HDMI from the AVR then SPDIF to the AVR on one socket and the Humax Freesat PVR on another. I don't have HDMI Service enabled in the AVR as that takes the standby power from 1W to ~19W! If the answer to (1) is 'yes': 2) Is it normal to then be able to mute the TV's own speakers so you just can use a hifi and the external DAC for the audio? Simple - turn the TV's volume to 0. 3) Does that normally then bypass any 'volume control' of the TV set? Or is this user-choosable, or what? Not on mine and also the headphone socket doesn't cut the speakers. Instead of running the AVR at 45W all the while - not needed for most programmes - I've a pair of active PC speakers. The volume control on the PVR will control these but not the on on the TV, so not very good. 4) Does HDMI ensure audio-video synch? Either from the TV's digital output, or by telling the HDMI source and allowing a digital spdif output from that to be delayed to match? Or? It seems to be OK. I had to adjust the sync. once, for a recording on the PVR, but it is OK for both DTTV and DSTV. It would be convenient from my POV is the TV acted simply as a 'pass though' for the audio from external sources - e.g. DVD player. So ensured lip-synch by otherwise allowed the audio samples to be 'as from the source' without any sounds from the TVs speakers. But is the norm? Or is there a problem here? It could be possible but I don't yet know. On my model, the BD player (LG) won't show on the TV through either the AVR or its own direct connection. Also: Are middle-of-the range panasonics likely to have 3 HDMI sockets? Mine has. RS has reasonable details, or try: http://www.panasonic.com/uk/consumer...sions/led.html Allow no 'overscan' so a 1:1 scaling of HD sources? Yes. I'll ask about such things in the shop. But some comments here to clarify what I should be able to expect would be helpful. Cheers, Jim Panny shops probably no good; RS - pot luck but can be good; same with JL really. -- Peter. The gods will stay away whilst religions hold sway |
HDTVs and audio
On 01/01/2014 17:18, Jim Lesurf wrote:
Never had any trouble with this. Kindly the BBC outputs a couple of minutes a day of test card with speaker and synch tests to allow you to check everything is correct. Any delay will be set specific. When is the HD testcard broadcast and on what 'station'? It used to be carried on BBC HD, but that's now been converted to BBC 2 HD, and sadly no longer has any downtime to carry the test signals. There is 03:00hrs to 06:00hrs that could be used, but that space is used for back to back BBC 2 promos -- Mark Please replace invalid and invalid with gmx and net to reply. |
HDTVs and audio
Johny B Good wrote:
With mpeg compression, the edges of the transmitted picture will exhibit compression artifacts at a noticably higher level than elsewhere. Are you sure? The edges? That's not my experience as a viewer (although I don't know anything much about the MPEG compression algorithm). As a viewer, the compression artefacts become most obvious on large areas of similar colour which move, such as mist. I certainly haven't spotted anything odd about the edges. Could you provide a reference for me to read up more about it? -- SteveT |
HDTVs and audio
Jim Lesurf wrote:
Using the TVs 'volume control' something I'd tend to avoid if possible as I have no idea how well it can scale the values. My TV just seems to send "+" and "-" commands to the amp rather than absolute values, my amp is set for a 0-100 scale with 0.5 unit steps which is finer than the TV's inbuilt volume control (0 to 63 I think) the amp has the option of using a dB scale but my brain doesn't naturally use logs. |
HDTVs and audio
Steve Thackery wrote:
Johny B Good wrote: With mpeg compression, the edges of the transmitted picture will exhibit compression artifacts at a noticably higher level than elsewhere. Are you sure? The edges? That's not my experience as a viewer (although I don't know anything much about the MPEG compression algorithm). As a viewer, the compression artefacts become most obvious on large areas of similar colour which move, such as mist. I certainly haven't spotted anything odd about the edges. Could you provide a reference for me to read up more about it? I always thought the crappy edges were scaler artifacts rather than mpeg/bitrate related - but then I could be wrong. |
HDTVs and audio
On Wed, 01 Jan 2014 14:58:02 +0000 (GMT), Jim Lesurf
wrote: 3) Does that normally then bypass any 'volume control' of the TV set? Or is this user-choosable, or what? My TV and Audio system - both Samsung - have integrated control through the remote (Samsung's implementation of HDMI-CEC). When the Home Theatre is on, the TV remote audio buttons control it's volume and TV speakers are off. CEC isn't guaranteed to work if devices are from different brands. On my set-up, the HT has to be switched on manually (or via TV remote) - it's not automatic with TV start-up. It would be convenient from my POV is the TV acted simply as a 'pass though' for the audio from external sources - e.g. DVD player. So ensured lip-synch by otherwise allowed the audio samples to be 'as from the source' without any sounds from the TVs speakers. But is the norm? Or is there a problem here? What you need to check is whether the TV will pass through multi-channel audio. My model down-mixes to stereo, but this was changed in later ones. I believe there was some licensing issue involved. , You will get more detailed answers from AV web forums. There will likely find threads dedicated to a candidate model. |
HDTVs and audio
In article , Andy
Burns wrote: Jim Lesurf wrote: Using the TVs 'volume control' something I'd tend to avoid if possible as I have no idea how well it can scale the values. My TV just seems to send "+" and "-" commands to the amp rather than absolute values, my amp is set for a 0-100 scale with 0.5 unit steps which is finer than the TV's inbuilt volume control (0 to 63 I think) the amp has the option of using a dB scale but my brain doesn't naturally use logs. FWIW human response to how loud sounds are tends to be more like a 'log' variation. So values in dB seem fairly natural to me. Indeed, I regret that many modern hifi amps lack precise steps in a quasi-log sequence on their mechanical volume controls. My concern about scaling, though, isn't the law of the adjustement. But questions like how well the *sample values* are scaled. e.g. the need to dither or noise shape to avoid adding distortion unless it is 24bit (or more). Jim -- Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me. Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html |
HDTVs and audio
In article ,
Jim Lesurf wrote: At long last I've decided to take the plunge and buy an HDTV 'Freeview' set. Almost certainly an LED Panasonic of modest size. I'd welcome some answers to a few pretty basic questions, mainly wrt the audio side of operations. 1) Is it standard for such sets to accept audio in via HDMI and then copy that out via an SPDIF coax/optical outlet for connection to a decent external DAC? More common is optical out. If the answer to (1) is 'yes': 2) Is it normal to then be able to mute the TV's own speakers so you just can use a hifi and the external DAC for the audio? Yes. There is often a menu setting that allows you to turn off the internal speakers. 3) Does that normally then bypass any 'volume control' of the TV set? Or is this user-choosable, or what? Again yes - or could be either. The mute control may still work, though. Which can be handy. 4) Does HDMI ensure audio-video synch? Either from the TV's digital output, or by telling the HDMI source and allowing a digital spdif output from that to be delayed to match? Or? Seems OK here. It would be convenient from my POV is the TV acted simply as a 'pass though' for the audio from external sources - e.g. DVD player. So ensured lip-synch by otherwise allowed the audio samples to be 'as from the source' without any sounds from the TVs speakers. But is the norm? Or is there a problem here? Any audio delay is normally applied to the output from the TV, so if you route your DVD etc through it all should be fine. The snags arise if you feed the audio direct to an external amp. Also: Are middle-of-the range panasonics likely to have 3 HDMI sockets? Should have, but check. Some bargains may be old models with fewer inputs than the current norm. Mine has three and an additional HDMI for computer - I'm not quite sure what is different with this one, yet. I'm wondering if it allows two way 'traffic'. Allow no 'overscan' so a 1:1 scaling of HD sources? Most give a bewildering variety of choices. Hopefully with the correct one in there somewhere. I'll ask about such things in the shop. But some comments here to clarify what I should be able to expect would be helpful. If you look on the Curries website, you'll find basic information about number of inputs etc. And whether it has an HD FreeView tuner - not all smaller sets do, although may claim to be full HD. In my experience you can generally forget asking a shop assistant about such things. Unless you have a decent independant retailer - but be prepared to pay rather more for the same set than you might otherwise. Perhaps if you find the model that seems to suit you online and give its number, someone with it could give more specific answers. -- *(on a baby-size shirt) "Party -- my crib -- two a.m Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
HDTVs and audio
On 02/01/2014 13:01, Andy Furniss wrote:
I always thought the crappy edges were scaler artifacts rather than mpeg/bitrate related - but then I could be wrong. They mostly appear to be blanking errors, which by rights shouldn't be there on a completely end to end digital system. One problem however are digital effects units, where the background (next event) image is sometimes one pixel (each side) wider and one pixel higher (top and bottom) than the foreground image. -- Mark Please replace invalid and invalid with gmx and net to reply. |
HDTVs and audio
Mark Carver wrote:
On 02/01/2014 13:01, Andy Furniss wrote: I always thought the crappy edges were scaler artifacts rather than mpeg/bitrate related - but then I could be wrong. They mostly appear to be blanking errors, which by rights shouldn't be there on a completely end to end digital system. One problem however are digital effects units, where the background (next event) image is sometimes one pixel (each side) wider and one pixel higher (top and bottom) than the foreground image. Ahh, something different then. I was thinking scaler artifacts relying on vague memories or reading something, probably by Clive Poynton, which said multi tap scaler artifacts were expected on edges. I don't actually watch much TV, and TBH they aren't that noticable anyway - slightly more annoying is why do the BBC scale down to 704 and put it in 720 - why not just to broadcast 704 and loose the black bars? |
HDTVs and audio
In article , Jim
wrote: On Wed, 01 Jan 2014 14:58:02 +0000 (GMT), Jim Lesurf wrote: What you need to check is whether the TV will pass through multi-channel audio. My model down-mixes to stereo, but this was changed in later ones. I believe there was some licensing issue involved. , You will get more detailed answers from AV web forums. There will likely find threads dedicated to a candidate model. I'm only really interested in stereo for audio. The room isn't big enough for two more Quad ESLs anyway! 8-] So now I always set sources to output stereo LPCM, not bitreams. Jim -- Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me. Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html |
HDTVs and audio
On 01/01/2014 14:58, Jim Lesurf wrote:
At long last I've decided to take the plunge and buy an HDTV 'Freeview' set. Almost certainly an LED Panasonic of modest size. I'd welcome some answers to a few pretty basic questions, mainly wrt the audio side of operations. 1) Is it standard for such sets to accept audio in via HDMI and then copy that out via an SPDIF coax/optical outlet for connection to a decent external DAC? My Samsung TV does this If the answer to (1) is 'yes': 2) Is it normal to then be able to mute the TV's own speakers so you just can use a hifi and the external DAC for the audio? If I mute the TV sound then there is an icon on the screen. Turning down the volume works fine 3) Does that normally then bypass any 'volume control' of the TV set? Or is this user-choosable, or what? In my case the SPDIF output volume is determined by the HDMI input volume. 4) Does HDMI ensure audio-video synch? Either from the TV's digital output, or by telling the HDMI source and allowing a digital spdif output from that to be delayed to match? Or? No, my TV allows the sync to be adjusted. Unfortunately the TV is quite good at forgetting what the setting should be. So I change the delay, and then put it back to where it was and the sound is then in sync It would be convenient from my POV is the TV acted simply as a 'pass though' for the audio from external sources - e.g. DVD player. So ensured lip-synch by otherwise allowed the audio samples to be 'as from the source' without any sounds from the TVs speakers. But is the norm? Or is there a problem here? My TV converts the analogue signal from a scart socket to digital and outputs it via the SPDIF port (likely it also did the same for analogue TV - but those days are gone) -- Michael Chare |
HDTVs and audio
Jim Lesurf wrote:
Andy Burns wrote: My TV just seems to send "+" and "-" commands to the amp rather than absolute values [...] the amp has the option of using a dB scale but my brain doesn't naturally use logs. FWIW human response to how loud sounds are tends to be more like a 'log' variation. So values in dB seem fairly natural to me. Oh, I'm aware that hearing works in a log fashion, but that doesn't mean I can glance at a display on the other side of the room reading -33.5dB and instinctively know whether that means blaring or quiet :-) |
HDTVs and audio
In article , Andy
Burns wrote: Jim Lesurf wrote: Andy Burns wrote: My TV just seems to send "+" and "-" commands to the amp rather than absolute values [...] the amp has the option of using a dB scale but my brain doesn't naturally use logs. FWIW human response to how loud sounds are tends to be more like a 'log' variation. So values in dB seem fairly natural to me. Oh, I'm aware that hearing works in a log fashion, but that doesn't mean I can glance at a display on the other side of the room reading -33.5dB and instinctively know whether that means blaring or quiet :-) Hardly surprising given that the mean level for pop/rock music may well be 20- 30dB higher than a lot of classical music! So it'll obvious depend on what you're feeding into the system. :-) FWIW Although the sources have gain controls I use the analogue volume control on the preamps. (modified quad 34s) Typically I usually have this set about 20dB higher for classical music from R3 or my own files than rock/pop CDs. Jim -- Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me. Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html |
HDTVs and audio
In article , Michael
Chare [email protected] wrote: On 01/01/2014 14:58, Jim Lesurf wrote: 2) Is it normal to then be able to mute the TV's own speakers so you just can use a hifi and the external DAC for the audio? If I mute the TV sound then there is an icon on the screen. Turning down the volume works fine Do that with our existing CRT set. Perhaps a sign of the poor regard TV builders have for audio is that you can still hear *hiss* from the TV speakers if you have your head near to them with no audio playing. Ludicrous for modern power amps after a volume control to do that. Jim -- Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me. Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html |
HDTVs and audio
On Thu, 02 Jan 2014 11:11:43 +0000, Andy Burns wrote:
Jim Lesurf wrote: Using the TVs 'volume control' something I'd tend to avoid if possible as I have no idea how well it can scale the values. My TV just seems to send "+" and "-" commands to the amp rather than absolute values, my amp is set for a 0-100 scale with 0.5 unit steps which is finer than the TV's inbuilt volume control (0 to 63 I think) the amp has the option of using a dB scale but my brain doesn't naturally use logs. Be glad that you're not using the volume control on the Humax Freesat PVR - 5% steps! -- Peter. The gods will stay away whilst religions hold sway |
HDTVs and audio
Jim Lesurf wrote:
FWIW I simply take the audio from the 'headphone' jack on the (Sony) TV. The telly is set for the internal speaker to be muted. This works perfectly for analogue and digital reception, reception via scart and HDMI. Full control of volume and no sync problems. If I compare Swiss Classic direct or via the telly there's no difference that I can tell. The only TV I've ever had with almost decent analogue audio output was a B&O one decades ago. Alas monophonic 4:3. The analogue output from other sets seems always to give hum problems, background noise, distorted peaks, etc. So I regard the analogue sound circuits in TVs as best avoided. It could be that your opinion is based on the use of old CRT sets. I have absolutely no issues with the analogue audio from my new Sony. And I am very critical. Does "the internet" always come and take away my old CRT so I don't even have to try and lift it? I expect John Lewis probably do, but I'm less sure about the tax dodgers. I suppose if you don't have any helpful friends or neighbours you should weigh up any extra cost incurred by using the local firm versus the cost of disposing of the old set. Won't the council take it? If it still works won't you be putting it in a bedroom, or using Freecycle? Bill |
HDTVs and audio
In article , Bill Wright
wrote: Jim Lesurf wrote: FWIW I simply take the audio from the 'headphone' jack on the (Sony) TV. The telly is set for the internal speaker to be muted. This works perfectly for analogue and digital reception, reception via scart and HDMI. Full control of volume and no sync problems. If I compare Swiss Classic direct or via the telly there's no difference that I can tell. The only TV I've ever had with almost decent analogue audio output was a B&O one decades ago. Alas monophonic 4:3. The analogue output from other sets seems always to give hum problems, background noise, distorted peaks, etc. So I regard the analogue sound circuits in TVs as best avoided. It could be that your opinion is based on the use of old CRT sets. About 10 years old. As I said, the previous set (B&O) was better in general audio terms and would drive a fair external speaker. No noise from the speakers when the volume was wound down, etc. But it was monophonic analogue 4:3 of the pre-scart generation. So we replaced it when digital came along... Does "the internet" always come and take away my old CRT so I don't even have to try and lift it? I expect John Lewis probably do, but I'm less sure about the tax dodgers. I suppose if you don't have any helpful friends or neighbours you should weigh up any extra cost incurred by using the local firm versus the cost of disposing of the old set. Plus, of course, the wish to see some of the profit 'stay local' with ordinary shops rather tha be taken afar by big companies who may also do things like dodge tax. Surprised if you don't understand that someone might prefer to support local small businesses and employment if they can do the job OK. Particularly to help ensure they will be there when we buy other more day-to-day items However in the end I'll decide on the basis of what they offer and if it suits. If they don't have something we like, I'll look elsewhere. Probably JL being the next port of call as there aren't any other local shops for TVs. Won't the council take it? If it still works won't you be putting it in a bedroom, or using Freecycle? The council would take it from the kerbside for 25 quid. But I can't even lift it, let alone carry it that far. Nor could I plus better-half. Totally out of the question to carry it up the stairs even if we wanted a TV that size up there! In fact, I'd fear for the floor upstairs as its a loft conversion. Jim -- Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me. Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html |
HDTVs and audio
On Thu, 02 Jan 2014 04:45:49 -0600, "Steve Thackery"
wrote: Johny B Good wrote: With mpeg compression, the edges of the transmitted picture will exhibit compression artifacts at a noticably higher level than elsewhere. Are you sure? The edges? That's not my experience as a viewer (although I don't know anything much about the MPEG compression algorithm). As a viewer, the compression artefacts become most obvious on large areas of similar colour which move, such as mist. I certainly haven't spotted anything odd about the edges. That's possibly due to your attention being drawn away from the edges by the compression artifacts you've so accurately observed (tempted as I am, I'll not raise any 'conspiracy theories' about 'distraction techniques' being used by the mpeg codecs). Could you provide a reference for me to read up more about it? I'm afraid I can't. You'll just have to scrutinise the edges of mpeg material more closely than usual. You should see the effect soon enough (most apparent with largish areas of mid luminence colour tones that are cropped by the frame edge). The effect seems most pronounced on the side edges but is still, to a less obvious degree, present at the top and bottom edges of the frame. You won't, as a matter of course, be able to observe the effect if the display is 'overscanning' the transmitted frame beyond the edges of the display area. Your best chance of seeing picture content right out to the edges of the trasmitted picture is to use a computer to playback the movie file. Once you've tried this exercise in observation, you'll be able to better relate to the use of 'overscanning' in a modern day TV sets when you come to google for references to this effect. -- Regards, J B Good |
HDTVs and audio
I'll probably buy the TV from a local shop if they have what I want.
Otherwise I may look to John Lewis to get one. Either way, I'll need them to also cart away my old CRT set (analogue). I can't even lift that, let alone put it out for collection! John Lewis will take away your old set for £9 if you buy a large screen TV (37" or over). -- Robin reply to address is (meant to be) valid |
HDTVs and audio
Johny B Good wrote:
Once you've tried this exercise in observation, you'll be able to better relate to the use of 'overscanning' in a modern day TV sets when you come to google for references to this effect. Well, I don't use overscanning. All of my viewing is in HD where possible, and I have the TV set to pixel-to-pixel mapping at all times. To be honest I don't notice any of the typical compression artefacts in HD, but I do get annoyed at how "soft" they've made the pictures (presumably to reduce the bandwidth requirements). They aren't *really* 1920 x 1080, because the fine details smooth out at a far larger scale than the individual pixels. They're just transmitted as such. -- SteveT |
HDTVs and audio
"Andy Burns" wrote in message o.uk... Richard Tobin wrote: Jim Lesurf wrote: 1) Is it standard for such sets to accept audio in via HDMI and then copy that out via an SPDIF coax/optical outlet for connection to a decent external DAC? An alternative, depending on your audio equipment, is to send the output by HDMI too, using the audio return channel. Then you're at the mercy of whatever DAC in in the amp, true, but if you can spot it, you must have pretty good ears. it also requires HDMI 1.4 support in TV and amp, not likely to be an issue for new kit. true, then use optical or coax. This has the advantage (from my point of view) that you can use the TV's volume control - volume up and down are sent through the HDMI connection. Are you sure? You don't need to use ARC to get that, my amp does support ARC but TV is older and only has HDMI 1.3, so I use SP/DIF from TV to amp, and the CEC channel lets the TV's remote control the amp's volume (once the TV's internal speakers have been deselected) in addition turning on/off the TV makes the amp follow suit. |
HDTVs and audio
On Thu, 02 Jan 2014 16:22:35 -0600, "Steve Thackery"
wrote: Johny B Good wrote: Once you've tried this exercise in observation, you'll be able to better relate to the use of 'overscanning' in a modern day TV sets when you come to google for references to this effect. Well, I don't use overscanning. All of my viewing is in HD where possible, and I have the TV set to pixel-to-pixel mapping at all times. To be honest I don't notice any of the typical compression artefacts in HD, but I do get annoyed at how "soft" they've made the pictures (presumably to reduce the bandwidth requirements). They aren't *really* 1920 x 1080, because the fine details smooth out at a far larger scale than the individual pixels. They're just transmitted as such. To be fair, it's not a particularly noticable effect until you get bored by the picture content and let your gaze wander off to the edges. Once you've spotted this 'edge effect' (usually on very slow pans with bland mid tone backgrounds), you're more likely to spot it almost every time the picture content becomes less than attention grabbing. Even at its most obvious, the effect isn't a serious distraction in dire need of removal by 'overscanning'. It's just that this seems to be the only "good" reason for having an 'overscan' option at all. -- Regards, J B Good |
HDTVs and audio
In article ,
R. Mark Clayton wrote: This has the advantage (from my point of view) that you can use the TV's volume control - volume up and down are sent through the HDMI connection. Are you sure? Yes. That's how I do it on my Panasonic TV with Onkyo receiver. I only use the receiver remote when I'm playing CDs - everything else goes through the TV. -- Richard |
HDTVs and audio
R. Mark Clayton wrote:
"Andy Burns" wrote: Then you're at the mercy of whatever DAC in in the amp, true, but if you can spot it, you must have pretty good ears. I wouldn't claim my ears are up to it, but Jim obviously does :-P Richard Tobin wrote: This has the advantage (from my point of view) that you can use the TV's volume control - volume up and down are sent through the HDMI connection. Are you sure? Yes. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:46 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com