|
Scottish TV at the expense of the English and Welsh
Mark Carver wrote:
You really can't have such an important democratic decision such as independence, influenced by a public fear they won't get to see EastEnders and SCD ever again. It's absolutely right the BBC remain tight lipped IMHO. The SNP make quite heavy weather of this in their various propaganda, stressing that Eastenders etc will still be available. But to be snarky*, it could be said that the Scottish people have every right to consider all consequences of independence, and if the loss of Eastenders is their primary concern, above taxation, education, defence, and health, then fair enough. Bill *snarky. A southern word I learnt from Mark, and there is in yesterday's Times! |
Scottish TV at the expense of the English and Welsh
|
Scottish TV at the expense of the English and Welsh
Benefit?
Surely that's a just a matter of opinion? On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 16:44:56 +0000, Michael Chare [email protected] wrote: I Scotland becomes a separate country how will we stop them from benefiting from free satellite TV paid for by the English and Welsh? -- ================================================== ======= Please always reply to ng as the email in this post's header does not exist. Or use a contact address at: http://www.macfh.co.uk/JavaJive/JavaJive.html http://www.macfh.co.uk/Macfarlane/Macfarlane.html |
Scottish TV at the expense of the English and Welsh
At least she's better looking and sounding than the previous rambling
front woman Janet Street-Porter - now there's a truly ghastly woman, both to look at and to listen to. On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 11:41:59 +0000, wrote: On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 16:44:56 +0000, Michael Chare [email protected] wrote: My personal hope is that they could take Julia "I've got to appear on your telly every time you turn it on" bloody Bradbury, stick her on a walk in the highlands where she gets lost and because the Scots won't be able to afford an airforce is never found or seen again. -- ================================================== ======= Please always reply to ng as the email in this post's header does not exist. Or use a contact address at: http://www.macfh.co.uk/JavaJive/JavaJive.html http://www.macfh.co.uk/Macfarlane/Macfarlane.html |
Scottish TV at the expense of the English and Welsh
In article ,
Mark Carver wrote: Yes they do, but if the matter of which TV programmes it will still be possible to view post separation distorts the choice is that a good thing ? Who are you, or the BBC, to decide which information will distort our views? Or which views are distorted? -- Richard |
Scottish TV at the expense of the English and Welsh
On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 21:16:34 +0000, Mark Carver
wrote: wrote: On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 18:47:22 +0000, Mark Carver You really can't have such an important democratic decision such as independence, influenced by a public fear they won't get to see EastEnders and SCD ever again. It's absolutely right the BBC remain tight lipped IMHO. Are you speaking tongue in cheek? Surely the voters have every right to know ALL the implications of their choice. Yes they do, but if the matter of which TV programmes it will still be possible to view post separation distorts the choice is that a good thing ? It's democracy in play I agree, but clouded with the emotion of trivial matters, The very fact EE and SCD were mentioned by name in the SNP's document could be interpreted as emotional manipulation. However, it is a frequently used political tool. Those programmes are trivial matters to you, and to me. But who are we to judge what is important to the voters of Scotland? If we know better than them what is really important we might as well call off the election and make the decision for them. |
Scottish TV at the expense of the English and Welsh
Richard Tobin wrote:
Who are you, or the BBC, to decide which information will distort our views? The BBC do it a lot, by simply not including certain items in the news. The fact that news programmes do not actually have all that many words in them makes it easy for broadcasters to manipulate what people see. I could point to dozens of items the BBC news hasn't covered, items which in my opinion they have left out because of their bias, but of course the fact is only a tiny fraction of all news items makes it to the screen. The 24/7 news channels are lazy. They could cover far more items but they just cover half an hour's worth and play it over and over again. Bill |
Scottish TV at the expense of the English and Welsh
|
Scottish TV at the expense of the English and Welsh
Mark Carver writes:
The worry (for them) is a significant number of people in Scotland will use the question of whether BBC programmes will still be available or not, to influence their voting choice. If the population want to watch these programmes then surely it will be up to one of the (new) Scottish TV channels to negotiate the rights with the BBC (and other channels) to show them. |
Scottish TV at the expense of the English and Welsh
Peter Duncanson writes:
Surely any relationship the BBC would have with an independent Scotland would be a matter for Parliament. The BBC Charter would have to be amended to fit the new situation. The BBC bigwigs might be able to make suggestions but they wouldn't have the power to make decisions. I disagree. The relationship between the BBC and an independent Scotland should not be decided by parliament, but as a commercial/contractual relationship between the BBC and Scottish broadcasters. If a Scottish broadcaster wishes transmit BBC programming to viewers/listeners in Scotland then they should negotiate the rights to do so. The BBC sells its programming to other foreign stations, so an independent Scotland should be treated in the same way. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:17 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com