|
Swiss aerials
|
Swiss aerials
"Bill Wright" wrote in message
... https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/...%20aerials.jpg Bill That first picture puzzles me. Surely that must be a repeater so could it be that the top shrouded antenna is for receive and the other two are transmitting as they are in slightly different directions? Also if this is 2000m up why are they not fully heated rather than just a protected dipole? -- Woody harrogate three at ntlworld dot com |
Swiss aerials
On 11/11/2013 05:36, Bill Wright wrote:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/...%20aerials.jpg Bill What's the thing at the top of the Wengeren Berenese Oberland picture (top left)? Is it some sort of covered UHF aerial? Looking at the damage to some of the directors on the 21(?) element UHF aerials on the adjacent picture (Murten Canton Fribourg), maybe it's necessary! -- Jeff |
Swiss aerials
On 11/11/2013 05:36, Bill Wright wrote:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/...%20aerials.jpg Bill I was expecting to see a spiral aerial - like a Swiss roll! -- Cheers, Roger ____________ Please reply to Newsgroup. Whilst email address is valid, it is seldom checked. |
Swiss aerials
On Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:46:07 -0000, "Woody"
wrote: "Bill Wright" wrote in message ... https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/...%20aerials.jpg Bill That first picture puzzles me. Surely that must be a repeater so could it be that the top shrouded antenna is for receive and the other two are transmitting as they are in slightly different directions? Also if this is 2000m up why are they not fully heated rather than just a protected dipole? I thought that was a Toblerone at the top :) |
Swiss aerials
On Mon, 11 Nov 2013 10:48:43 +0000
Roger Mills wrote: On 11/11/2013 05:36, Bill Wright wrote: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/...%20aerials.jpg Bill I was expecting to see a spiral aerial - like a Swiss roll! I was expecting a plane, as in Swissair. -- Davey. |
Swiss aerials
Roger Mills wrote:
On 11/11/2013 05:36, Bill Wright wrote: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/...%20aerials.jpg Bill I was expecting to see a spiral aerial - like a Swiss roll! Yes, but the Swiss rotators work by clockwork. They have to climb on their snowy roofs with a key every now and then. Bill |
Swiss aerials
On 11.11.2013 10:19, Martin wrote:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/...%20aerials.jpg They'll do anything to get Freesat so that they can watch Downton Abbey. :-) Freesat reception is no problem at all in most of Switzerland. In western parts of the country, the UK beam of Astra 2F at 28.2°E can be picked up with 60-100 cm dish size. Most of the cable networks distribute BBC and ITV domestic services as part of their digital multiplexes. Since Switzerland is not a EU member, they are free to do so. Within the EU, cable operators have to obtain approval from foreign TV stations if they want to distribute their services - and of course neither BBC nor ITV will grant such approvals due to copyright issues. Since most parts of Switzerland are not located very far from a border, TV reception of foreign station has been very common in the analogue era. The German VHF transmitter Feldberg on ch 8 was running at 100 kW ERP from a mountain top in the Black Forest and covered many parts of northern Switzerland. The first picture is an example for that. In the digital era, the spill-over of TV signals into Switzerland has decreased, and most households receive TV via cable or via satellite, the latter usually with two LNBs to pick up both the Swiss signals on Hotbird 13°E and the free German signals on Astra 19.2°E. Cable operators still use terrestrial DVB-T signals from France and Italy (South Tyrol) as a source for the popular HD services from France and Austria (!). So they do not need smartcards to decode satellite signals from these countries which they probably cannot legally obtain. Cheers - Uli |
Swiss aerials
In message , Bill Wright
writes Roger Mills wrote: On 11/11/2013 05:36, Bill Wright wrote: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/...%20aerials.jpg Bill I was expecting to see a spiral aerial - like a Swiss roll! Yes, but the Swiss rotators work by clockwork. They have to climb on their snowy roofs with a key every now and then. That idea is totally cuckoo.................. Bill -- Bill |
Swiss aerials
On 12.11.2013 12:02, Martin wrote:
On Mon, 11 Nov 2013 23:32:22 +0100, Ulrich Onken wrote: Most of the cable networks distribute BBC and ITV domestic services as part of their digital multiplexes. Since Switzerland is not a EU member, they are free to do so. Within the EU, cable operators have to obtain approval from foreign TV stations if they want to distribute their services - and of course neither BBC nor ITV will grant such approvals due to copyright issues. Copyright is not EU dependant. No, it is not. But the way in which the retransmission of foreign TV services via cable is regulated, differs. Within the EU, it is regulated in articles 8-12 of directive 93/83/EEC which has been implemented in the national media laws of the member states: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/...3L0083:EN:HTML According to article 8.1, cable retransmission is only permitted if the copyright holder (the TV station) agrees. There is no such explicite provision in Swiss law. As a result, a cable operator in Germany had to stop retransmission of Austrian (ORF) TV programs around 2007, after the ORF had objected. The ORF has been in Swiss cable networks for decades, and decades ago, the ORF has been unsuccessful to challenge this at a Swiss court. Similar with BBC TV. The same cable operator did not get permission to retransmit the BBC in Germany a number of years ago. Swiss cable operators do not have to ask for permission if the service is free-to-the-air and is picked up within the country. (I guess they might pay a fee to the BBC, similar to Dutch cable operators). Cheers, Uli |
Swiss aerials
On 13.11.2013 16:44, Martin wrote:
On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 19:08:59 +0100, Ulrich Onken wrote: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/...3L0083:EN:HTML According to article 8.1, cable retransmission is only permitted if the copyright holder (the TV station) agrees. There is no such explicite provision in Swiss law. Switzerland is signed up to the Berne copyright convention. Yes, it has. And of course the convention has been implemented in Swiss law (Urheberrechtsgesetz, URG). However, neither the convention nor the URG explicitely describe what is permitted and what is not when retransmitting foreign TV broadcasts via cable. In 2007, the BBC tried with a lawsuit against a Swiss cable operator (GGA Maur) to stop retransmission of CBBC One, BBC Four and Ceebies in parts of the canton Zurich. The BBC lost its case, both in the first instance and at the appeal court. The court argued that the satellite signal is free-to-the-air and can be received easily by everybody, thus it is free for fair further use. It was undisputed that the cable operator would have to pay fees for the retransmission. Details of the appeal court decision (unfortunately in German): http://www.servat.unibe.ch/dfr/bge/c3133568.html In Switzerland, the BBC can ask for fees in compensation for cable retransmission, but it cannot stop the retransmission by legal means. In EU countries the legislation is more favourable for copyright holders and broadcasters. With exception of the historic situations in Ireland, the Netherlands and Belgium, the BBC does not grant any retransmission rights for its domestic services to foreign cable operators. There are at least three German websites transmitting live BBC, ITV Sky Sport Eurosport etc that I know of. I don't believe any of them pay a thing to the companies providing the programmes Do BBC, ITV and Sky know of these websites? They have got their lawyers, see the case with GGA Maur. Cheers, Uli |
Swiss aerials
On 14.11.2013 10:05, Martin wrote:
On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 20:52:28 +0100, Ulrich Onken wrote: In 2007, the BBC tried with a lawsuit against a Swiss cable operator (GGA Maur) to stop retransmission of CBBC One, BBC Four and Ceebies in parts of the canton Zurich. The BBC lost its case, both in the first instance and at the appeal court. The court argued that the satellite signal is free-to-the-air and can be received easily by everybody, thus it is free for fair further use. It was undisputed that the cable operator would have to pay fees for the retransmission. Have they? They have to, see section 5.6 of the appeal court ruling at http://www.servat.unibe.ch/dfr/bge/c3133568.html. The cable operator has the right for retransmission if he pays the copyright fees according to a certain tariff ("GT 1"). Cheers, Uli |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:28 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com