|
New TV - Samsung or Panasonic?
Jim wrote:
What bugs me most about the Panasonic is its User Interface. The Samsung Program Guide keeps the tuned channel visible and audible in a quarter-screen, while the Panasonic one stops tuning while in the Guide - you can't continue to watch/listen while browsing. Personally, as I always watch via the PVR, even when viewing live, the details of the TV EPG become pretty academic. Chris -- Chris J Dixon Nottingham UK Plant amazing Acers. |
New TV - Samsung or Panasonic?
Chris J Dixon wrote:
Personally, as I always watch via the PVR, even when viewing live, the details of the TV EPG become pretty academic. Chris As a person committed to saving the planet I implore you not to do that. It wastes electricity. Bill |
New TV - Samsung or Panasonic?
Bill Wright wrote:
Chris J Dixon wrote: Personally, as I always watch via the PVR, even when viewing live, the details of the TV EPG become pretty academic. As a person committed to saving the planet I implore you not to do that. It wastes electricity. But for the minimal extra cost, I can pause or replay at will, can check recordings are progressing OK, don't have to wait for the PVR to get its ducks in a row when I need it, and only have to work with one menu system. The fact of the matter is that I view so little live, that it really isn't worth considering. Chris -- Chris J Dixon Nottingham UK Plant amazing Acers. |
New TV - Samsung or Panasonic?
In article ,
Bill Wright wrote: As a person committed to saving the planet I implore you not to do that. It wastes electricity. Remember not to feed the troll! -- Richard |
New TV - Samsung or Panasonic?
Chris J Dixon wrote:
Personally, as I always watch via the PVR, even when viewing live, the details of the TV EPG become pretty academic. As a person committed to saving the planet I implore you not to do that. It wastes electricity. But for the minimal extra cost, I can pause or replay at will, can check recordings are progressing OK, don't have to wait for the PVR to get its ducks in a row when I need it, and only have to work with one menu system. The fact of the matter is that I view so little live, that it really isn't worth considering. Well I hope you're happy when the sea rises fifty feet and floods your house and the temperature rises so much that you can fry eggs on your bird table and there's a plague of frogs. Bill |
New TV - Samsung or Panasonic?
Bill Wright wrote:
Chris J Dixon wrote: Personally, as I always watch via the PVR, even when viewing live, the details of the TV EPG become pretty academic. As a person committed to saving the planet I implore you not to do that. It wastes electricity. But for the minimal extra cost, I can pause or replay at will, can check recordings are progressing OK, don't have to wait for the PVR to get its ducks in a row when I need it, and only have to work with one menu system. The fact of the matter is that I view so little live, that it really isn't worth considering. Well I hope you're happy when the sea rises fifty feet and floods your house and the temperature rises so much that you can fry eggs on your bird table and there's a plague of frogs. Bill With the Chinese building a new coal fired power station every 5 days, a few people in the UK spinning extra hard drives to watch TV ain't gona make much difference Steve Terry -- Get a free GiffGaff PAYG Sim and £5 bonus after activation at: http://giffgaff.com/orders/affiliate/gfourwwk |
New TV - Samsung or Panasonic?
Richard Tobin wrote:
In article , Bill Wright wrote: As a person committed to saving the planet I implore you not to do that. It wastes electricity. Remember not to feed the troll! -- Richard Spoilsport! Bill |
New TV - Samsung or Panasonic?
On 25/04/2013 12:38, Paul D Smith wrote:
So, it's picture quality, support etc that I'm interested in here - thoughts? Nothing about sound quality which says it all, really. No wonder the set makers get away with not bothering. ++++++++++++++ The optical out is for my 7.1 surround system. My 42in Panny Viera (around 5 years old) doesn't seem to output Dolby from its optical out. Only 2 ch stereo. Can't figure out why. It's a pain because it would be the lazy man's way of feeding 5.1 etc from the Sky boxes and DVD player to the surround sound system. -- Chris |
New TV - Samsung or Panasonic?
"Martin" wrote in message
... On Fri, 26 Apr 2013 14:40:27 +0100, "Steve Terry" wrote: Bill Wright wrote: Well I hope you're happy when the sea rises fifty feet and floods your house and the temperature rises so much that you can fry eggs on your bird table and there's a plague of frogs. With the Chinese building a new coal fired power station every 5 days, a few people in the UK spinning extra hard drives to watch TV ain't gona make much difference Especially with Iran and N Korea spinning centrifuges to make WMDs. That's all right, as long as the "weapons of mass destruction" are like the ones the Boston marathon bomber is charged with setting off. -- Max Demian |
New TV - Samsung or Panasonic?
Max Demian wrote:
"Martin" wrote: Especially with Iran and N Korea spinning centrifuges to make WMDs. That's all right, as long as the "weapons of mass destruction" are like the ones the Boston marathon bomber is charged with setting off. It did strike me that calling the Boston bombs WMDs devalued the term. Apparently when dealing with civilians, the FBI class anything with more than 1/4 ounce of explosive as a WMD, it's only when dealing with the military that the normal CBRN type devices are called WMDs. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:02 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com