|
Satellite v Freeview
"Jim Lesurf" wrote in message ... In article , JohnT wrote: "Jim Lesurf" wrote in message ... In article , Mark wrote: On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 11:47:47 +0000 (GMT), Jim Lesurf wrote: ...then paid less than that nice Mr Osbourne thought he'd been promised by his pals. I think that you are confusing Ozzie with George. That explains a lot. Cameron appointed the wrong one as Chancellor! :-) You will probably change your mind about this when the SNP appoint Lord Connery as Chancellor of an Independent HaggisLand. -- JohnT |
Satellite v Freeview
On 26/02/2013 13:50, Jim Lesurf wrote:
In article , Mark wrote: On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 11:47:47 +0000 (GMT), Jim Lesurf wrote: I don't really understand why they will be permitted to transmit significant levels of interference. Because they waved billions of quid in front of the government / OfCom. ...then paid less than that nice Mr Osbourne thought he'd been promised by his pals. Que song: "Its the saaaaame the whole world over..." :-) It may turn out to be a questionable investment. See: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-21579503 Scroll down to the Tuesday 1900 GMT blog. And South Korea has a 30% take-up of 4G contracts. -- Chris |
Satellite v Freeview
In article , JohnT
wrote: "Jim Lesurf" wrote in message ... I think that you are confusing Ozzie with George. That explains a lot. Cameron appointed the wrong one as Chancellor! :-) You will probably change your mind about this when the SNP appoint Lord Connery as Chancellor of an Independent HaggisLand. No, I'd still think Cameron was wrong. :-) Mind you, Connery seems to have much the same approach. Tax exile who keeps his cash hidden offshore and then preaches to the rest of us. Slainte, Jim -- Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me. Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html |
Satellite v Freeview
Stephen Wolstenholme wrote:
On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 16:22:44 +0000, bugbear wrote: Bill wrote: In message , lid writes From a consumer's perspective does satellite viewing have any advantages over Freeview other than a wider selection of stations? Is it less prone to interference/reception problems? You have stated the main advantage. After this it does depend somewhat on the location of the consumer, there are some areas where Freeview reception is not good and satellite would be better. Satellite is less likely to suffer from local interference, thermostats, trees, other radio transmitters, radio hams, CBers etc. and by the look of news reports 4G too. My neighbour asked me to cut a tree down, since in summer (when in leaf) he got poor reception on Sky. BugBear I hope you refused. Trees are more important than Sky. That would have looked better spelt "$ky" :-) BugBear |
Satellite v Freeview
In article , Chris Youlden
wrote: On 26/02/2013 13:50, Jim Lesurf wrote: In article , Mark wrote: On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 11:47:47 +0000 (GMT), Jim Lesurf wrote: "Its the saaaaame the whole world over..." :-) It may turn out to be a questionable investment. See: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-21579503 I get the //m. dot version because the dimwits who do the BBC site take for granted that using NetSurf on an ARM hardware box means I must be using a mobile. The result does look quaint on an HD monitor. :-) Readable, though. Yes, I've complained. ...And in the best tradition of BBC practice, been ignored. As have others who have complained. Scroll down to the Tuesday 1900 GMT blog. And South Korea has a 30% take-up of 4G contracts. How I would weep for the telcos if they have just bought a pig in a poke... However I assume part of the game-plan is to make DTTV harder for people to use, thus pushing people toward paying to get it via 4G instead! Ve Haff Ways of Making you adopt 4G! :-) Slainte, Jim -- Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me. Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html |
Satellite v Freeview
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 09:31:37 +0000 (GMT), Jim Lesurf
wrote: In article , JohnT wrote: "Jim Lesurf" wrote in message ... I think that you are confusing Ozzie with George. That explains a lot. Cameron appointed the wrong one as Chancellor! :-) You will probably change your mind about this when the SNP appoint Lord Connery as Chancellor of an Independent HaggisLand. No, I'd still think Cameron was wrong. :-) Mind you, Connery seems to have much the same approach. Tax exile who keeps his cash hidden offshore and then preaches to the rest of us. He's the sort of person I think of as an "absentee patriot". -- Peter Duncanson (in uk.tech.digital-tv) |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:02 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com