|
BBC are extraordinary!
I watched the 18:00 News yesterday on BBC 1. The national bit was OK,
then they handed over to the regions. So what happened? The pictures came from London, but the sound from Bristol! This lasted for 8 of the 10 minute allocation until someone noticed. I'm on the Mendip tx if that makes any difference. Hugh -- Hugh Newbury www.evershot-weather.org |
BBC are extraordinary!
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 08:06:34 +0000, Hugh Newbury
wrote: I watched the 18:00 News yesterday on BBC 1. Actually the 19:00 news. The national bit was OK, then they handed over to the regions. So what happened? The pictures came from London, but the sound from Bristol! This lasted for 8 of the 10 minute allocation until someone noticed. Why did you choose to exaggerate the figures by a factor of 2? The actual times were 3:50 out of 5:00. I can assure you someone noticed fairly quickly, but obviously deciding what the problem was and how best to effect the solution was not immediately obvious, although perhaps it should have been. I'm on the Mendip tx if that makes any difference. Yes it does. |
BBC are extraordinary!
On 10/02/13 10:27, Paul Ratcliffe wrote:
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 08:06:34 +0000, Hugh Newbury wrote: I watched the 18:00 News yesterday on BBC 1. Actually the 19:00 news. The national bit was OK, then they handed over to the regions. So what happened? The pictures came from London, but the sound from Bristol! This lasted for 8 of the 10 minute allocation until someone noticed. Why did you choose to exaggerate the figures by a factor of 2? The actual times were 3:50 out of 5:00. I can assure you someone noticed fairly quickly, but obviously deciding what the problem was and how best to effect the solution was not immediately obvious, although perhaps it should have been. I'm on the Mendip tx if that makes any difference. Yes it does. You're right. I was checking the time in the Radio Times, but looked at today's page instead of yesterday's. Hugh -- Hugh Newbury www.evershot-weather.org |
BBC are extraordinary!
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 11:57:44 +0000
Hugh Newbury wrote: On 10/02/13 10:27, Paul Ratcliffe wrote: On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 08:06:34 +0000, Hugh Newbury wrote: I watched the 18:00 News yesterday on BBC 1. Actually the 19:00 news. The national bit was OK, then they handed over to the regions. So what happened? The pictures came from London, but the sound from Bristol! This lasted for 8 of the 10 minute allocation until someone noticed. Why did you choose to exaggerate the figures by a factor of 2? The actual times were 3:50 out of 5:00. I can assure you someone noticed fairly quickly, but obviously deciding what the problem was and how best to effect the solution was not immediately obvious, although perhaps it should have been. I'm on the Mendip tx if that makes any difference. Yes it does. You're right. I was checking the time in the Radio Times, but looked at today's page instead of yesterday's. Hugh And the Radio Times can be wrong. It says that The One Show starts at 7:00 pm, but it often starts 2 minutes before that. -- Davey. |
BBC are extraordinary!
Davey wrote:
And the Radio Times can be wrong. It says that The One Show starts at 7:00 pm, but it often starts 2 minutes before that. Actually, I don't think The One Show *ever* starts as late as 19:00:00 ? ! -- Mark Please replace invalid and invalid with gmx and net to reply. www.paras.org.uk |
BBC are extraordinary!
"Mark Carver" wrote in message ... Davey wrote: And the Radio Times can be wrong. It says that The One Show starts at 7:00 pm, but it often starts 2 minutes before that. Actually, I don't think The One Show *ever* starts as late as 19:00:00 ? ! -- Mark Please replace invalid and invalid with gmx and net to reply. www.paras.org.uk It is designed so you can watch 2 minutes of rubbish and the switch over for some intelligent TV from Channel 4 News. |
BBC are extraordinary!
On 10/02/2013 08:06, Hugh Newbury wrote:
I watched the 18:00 News yesterday on BBC 1. The national bit was OK, then they handed over to the regions. So what happened? The pictures came from London, but the sound from Bristol! This lasted for 8 of the 10 minute allocation until someone noticed. I'm on the Mendip tx if that makes any difference. Hugh Last week (Wednesday I think it was) the local regional news broadcasts at 06:25 and 06:55 for the BBC London region were replaced with the local South East news, covering Kent and Sussex instead. There was clearly an issue, because during the 06:55 broadcast the presenter 'welcomed' viewers from London. No idea what the issue was, no on-air apology either. Clem |
BBC are extraordinary!
Clem Dye wrote:
Last week (Wednesday I think it was) the local regional news broadcasts at 06:25 and 06:55 for the BBC London region were replaced with the local South East news, covering Kent and Sussex instead. There was clearly an issue, because during the 06:55 broadcast the presenter 'welcomed' viewers from London. No idea what the issue was, no on-air apology either. That's normally because the London news presenter has overslept/had their car fail to start/had the reminder ap on their smartphone crash.... etc -- Mark Please replace invalid and invalid with gmx and net to reply. www.paras.org.uk |
BBC are extraordinary!
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 12:19:56 +0000, Davey wrote:
And the Radio Times can be wrong. It says that The One Show starts at 7:00 pm, but it often starts 2 minutes before that. It's so they can fit in approx. 2 minutes of news at 19:58. Programmes that notionally start at 19:30 also tend to start at 19:28 for the same reason, obviously. |
BBC are extraordinary!
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 13:19:38 +0000, Clem Dye
wrote: Last week (Wednesday I think it was) the local regional news broadcasts at 06:25 and 06:55 for the BBC London region were replaced with the local South East news, covering Kent and Sussex instead. There was clearly an issue, because during the 06:55 broadcast the presenter 'welcomed' viewers from London. No idea what the issue was, no on-air apology either. Apparently the presenter didn't turn up for whatever reason. |
BBC are extraordinary!
On 10/02/2013 08:06, Hugh Newbury wrote:
I watched the 18:00 News yesterday on BBC 1. The national bit was OK, then they handed over to the regions. So what happened? The pictures came from London, but the sound from Bristol! This lasted for 8 of the 10 minute allocation until someone noticed. I'm on the Mendip tx if that makes any difference. Hugh It happened on satellite too. |
BBC are extraordinary!
Chris wrote:
On 10/02/2013 08:06, Hugh Newbury wrote: I watched the 18:00 News yesterday on BBC 1. The national bit was OK, then they handed over to the regions. So what happened? The pictures came from London, but the sound from Bristol! This lasted for 8 of the 10 minute allocation until someone noticed. I'm on the Mendip tx if that makes any difference. Hugh It happened on satellite too. Of course, the Beeb have very strict 'Platform Neutrality' rules :-) -- Mark Please replace invalid and invalid with gmx and net to reply. www.paras.org.uk |
BBC are extraordinary!
I guess they can't afford the batteries for their hearing aids these days.
Brian -- Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email. graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them Email: __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ __________ "Hugh Newbury" wrote in message ... I watched the 18:00 News yesterday on BBC 1. The national bit was OK, then they handed over to the regions. So what happened? The pictures came from London, but the sound from Bristol! This lasted for 8 of the 10 minute allocation until someone noticed. I'm on the Mendip tx if that makes any difference. Hugh -- Hugh Newbury www.evershot-weather.org |
BBC are extraordinary!
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 14:32:49 +0000, Chris wrote:
I watched the 18:00 News yesterday on BBC 1. The national bit was OK, then they handed over to the regions. So what happened? The pictures came from London, but the sound from Bristol! This lasted for 8 of the 10 minute allocation until someone noticed. I'm on the Mendip tx if that makes any difference. It happened on satellite too. Well it would, as it was a studio output switching fault. |
BBC are extraordinary!
Paul Ratcliffe wrote:
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 13:19:38 +0000, Clem Dye wrote: Last week (Wednesday I think it was) the local regional news broadcasts at 06:25 and 06:55 for the BBC London region were replaced with the local South East news, covering Kent and Sussex instead. There was clearly an issue, because during the 06:55 broadcast the presenter 'welcomed' viewers from London. No idea what the issue was, no on-air apology either. Apparently the presenter didn't turn up for whatever reason. Why couldn't someone else step in? They would only have had to read a script wouldn't they? Manuel out of Fawlty Towers could do it. Mr Bean could do it. Bill |
BBC are extraordinary!
Bill Wright wrote:
Paul Ratcliffe wrote: Apparently the presenter didn't turn up for whatever reason. Why couldn't someone else step in? teethsucking Wrong union you see, can't have that. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:13 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com