|
OT[?]: Video player for hospital?
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 22:25:24 -0000, "Robin" wrote:
- battery life: I am sure the hospital won't allow PSUs plugged into their sockets so need several hours minimum between recharges; Because of a chronic health problem I am in hospital for days, weeks or sometimes months at a time. I always take a laptop and a phone. Both are plugged in recharging as required and nobody has ever objected. The possible interference with medical equipment has long been disproved apart from very rare occasions when very sensitive monitoring is being done. Steve -- EasyNN-plus. Neural Networks plus. http://www.easynn.com SwingNN. Forecast with Neural Networks. http://www.swingnn.com JustNN. Just Neural Networks. http://www.justnn.com |
OT[?]: Video player for hospital?
David Woolley wrote:
Bill Wright wrote: For a while bans were attempted in order to force patients to use Patientline (etc) but that was soon seen as indefensible. Most/all hospital equipment is RFI-proof. The days of bans on phones etc are pretty well gone. If you plug in look for an ordinary 13A socket, not one marked 'essential' as that is on a special circuit. In terms of plugging in, the issue is PAT testing. The NHS now outsources some work to private hospitals, and for at least one of those, they allow equipment to be plugged in, but it has to be subject to a free PAT test, first. My experience is that this regulation is universally disregarded. Bill |
OT[?]: Video player for hospital?
"the dog from that film you saw" wrote in message ... On 28/01/2013 07:45, Dr Zoidberg wrote: An iPad will do the job very nicely, but it sounds like you'd want the 64gb version if you plan on filling it with video which isn't cheap. It's a brilliant bit of kit IMO, but something like a Samsung Galaxy Tab has a Micro SD card slot so that will be a lot cheaper - half the price. the ipad would need all the mkv videos etc converting to something it likes wouldn't it? Nope, AVPlayerHD is one of a number of apps that will play pretty much any video file. I've not needed to convert anything on mine. You can upload files either through a HTTPS session or syncing them through iTunes. -- Alex |
OT[?]: Video player for hospital?
In message , Bill Wright
writes David Woolley wrote: Bill Wright wrote: For a while bans were attempted in order to force patients to use Patientline (etc) but that was soon seen as indefensible. Most/all hospital equipment is RFI-proof. The days of bans on phones etc are pretty well gone. If you plug in look for an ordinary 13A socket, not one marked 'essential' as that is on a special circuit. In terms of plugging in, the issue is PAT testing. The NHS now outsources some work to private hospitals, and for at least one of those, they allow equipment to be plugged in, but it has to be subject to a free PAT test, first. My experience is that this regulation is universally disregarded. How many times do 'normal' things (computers, phones, TV sets etc) actually fail a PAT test? -- Ian |
OT[?]: Video player for hospital?
In article ,
Ian Jackson wrote: In message , Bill Wright writes David Woolley wrote: Bill Wright wrote: For a while bans were attempted in order to force patients to use Patientline (etc) but that was soon seen as indefensible. Most/all hospital equipment is RFI-proof. The days of bans on phones etc are pretty well gone. If you plug in look for an ordinary 13A socket, not one marked 'essential' as that is on a special circuit. In terms of plugging in, the issue is PAT testing. The NHS now outsources some work to private hospitals, and for at least one of those, they allow equipment to be plugged in, but it has to be subject to a free PAT test, first. My experience is that this regulation is universally disregarded. How many times do 'normal' things (computers, phones, TV sets etc) actually fail a PAT test? usually only if the flex is damaged. Moulded on plugs have eliminated a lot of potential failures. -- From KT24 Using a RISC OS computer running v5.18 |
OT[?]: Video player for hospital?
In message , charles
writes In article , Ian Jackson wrote: In message , Bill Wright writes David Woolley wrote: Bill Wright wrote: For a while bans were attempted in order to force patients to use Patientline (etc) but that was soon seen as indefensible. Most/all hospital equipment is RFI-proof. The days of bans on phones etc are pretty well gone. If you plug in look for an ordinary 13A socket, not one marked 'essential' as that is on a special circuit. In terms of plugging in, the issue is PAT testing. The NHS now outsources some work to private hospitals, and for at least one of those, they allow equipment to be plugged in, but it has to be subject to a free PAT test, first. My experience is that this regulation is universally disregarded. How many times do 'normal' things (computers, phones, TV sets etc) actually fail a PAT test? usually only if the flex is damaged. Moulded on plugs have eliminated a lot of potential failures. And a quick visual inspection would virtually eliminate all of those? -- Ian |
OT[?]: Video player for hospital?
In article , Ian Jackson
wrote: In message , charles writes In article , Ian Jackson wrote: In message , Bill Wright writes David Woolley wrote: Bill Wright wrote: For a while bans were attempted in order to force patients to use Patientline (etc) but that was soon seen as indefensible. Most/all hospital equipment is RFI-proof. The days of bans on phones etc are pretty well gone. If you plug in look for an ordinary 13A socket, not one marked 'essential' as that is on a special circuit. In terms of plugging in, the issue is PAT testing. The NHS now outsources some work to private hospitals, and for at least one of those, they allow equipment to be plugged in, but it has to be subject to a free PAT test, first. My experience is that this regulation is universally disregarded. How many times do 'normal' things (computers, phones, TV sets etc) actually fail a PAT test? usually only if the flex is damaged. Moulded on plugs have eliminated a lot of potential failures. And a quick visual inspection would virtually eliminate all of those? certainly the ones where the outer sheath doesn't reach the cord grip. -- From KT24 Using a RISC OS computer running v5.18 |
OT[?]: Video player for hospital?
|
OT[?]: Video player for hospital?
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:35:20 UTC, charles
wrote: usually only if the flex is damaged. Moulded on plugs have eliminated a lot of potential failures. Many many years before PAT tests we routinely cut off molded plugs and fitited new MK ones - because all plugs had to be fitted by the company electrician......... -- Regards Dave Saville |
OT[?]: Video player for hospital?
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 17:23:13 +0000 (UTC), Dave Saville
wrote: Many many years before PAT tests we routinely cut off molded plugs and fitited new MK ones - because all plugs had to be fitted by the company electrician......... Now we do the exact opposite. If it hasn't got a moulded plug it's almost certainly going to get replaced with a lead that has. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:08 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com