HomeCinemaBanter

HomeCinemaBanter (http://www.homecinemabanter.com/index.php)
-   UK digital tv (http://www.homecinemabanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   How did this happen? (http://www.homecinemabanter.com/showthread.php?t=72320)

R. Kennedy McEwen October 4th 12 01:11 AM

How did this happen?
 
During tonight's "Exposure" about the "Other Side of Jimmy Savile" Sky
ran an advert where a girl of 'questionable age' told Bruce Willis that
"Sky Broadband was unlimited, AS AM I" before walking off arm in arm
with him.

Was this a subliminal message that Willis is a paedo?
That Murdoch is?

(OMG hopefully that isn't Murdoch senior - that is just too gross to
contemplate!).

Or both?

Who [email protected] up in placing such an ad in the middle of that programme?
--
Kennedy


Ian October 4th 12 02:12 AM

How did this happen?
 
In message , R. Kennedy McEwen
writes
During tonight's "Exposure" about the "Other Side of Jimmy Savile" Sky
ran an advert where a girl of 'questionable age' told Bruce Willis that
"Sky Broadband was unlimited, AS AM I" before walking off arm in arm
with him.

Was this a subliminal message that Willis is a paedo?
That Murdoch is?

(OMG hopefully that isn't Murdoch senior - that is just too gross to
contemplate!).

Or both?

Who [email protected] up in placing such an ad in the middle of that programme?


You think a woman in her 20s is of "questionable" age?
--
Ian

Brian Gaff October 4th 12 10:31 AM

How did this happen?
 
That ad has been all over the place. I must admit that it was a bit odd
wherever it appears. Unlimited in what way? does this mean she is going to
expand uncontrollably?

Brian

--
From the Sofa of Brian Gaff Reply address is active
"R. Kennedy McEwen" wrote in message
...
During tonight's "Exposure" about the "Other Side of Jimmy Savile" Sky ran
an advert where a girl of 'questionable age' told Bruce Willis that "Sky
Broadband was unlimited, AS AM I" before walking off arm in arm with him.

Was this a subliminal message that Willis is a paedo?
That Murdoch is?

(OMG hopefully that isn't Murdoch senior - that is just too gross to
contemplate!).

Or both?

Who [email protected] up in placing such an ad in the middle of that programme?
--
Kennedy




Brian Gaff October 4th 12 10:34 AM

How did this happen?
 
Did you ever see pictures of the 13 year old Helen Shapiro ( spellink
warning), when she was actually supposed to be 18?

I remember the event clearly but it only came out years later on and
seemingly was never given much of a thought.
Brian

--
From the Sofa of Brian Gaff Reply address is active
"Ian" wrote in message
...
In message , R. Kennedy McEwen
writes
During tonight's "Exposure" about the "Other Side of Jimmy Savile" Sky ran
an advert where a girl of 'questionable age' told Bruce Willis that "Sky
Broadband was unlimited, AS AM I" before walking off arm in arm with him.

Was this a subliminal message that Willis is a paedo?
That Murdoch is?

(OMG hopefully that isn't Murdoch senior - that is just too gross to
contemplate!).

Or both?

Who [email protected] up in placing such an ad in the middle of that programme?


You think a woman in her 20s is of "questionable" age?
--
Ian




Ian October 4th 12 12:00 PM

How did this happen?
 
In message , Brian Gaff
writes
Did you ever see pictures of the 13 year old Helen Shapiro ( spellink
warning), when she was actually supposed to be 18?

I remember the event clearly but it only came out years later on and
seemingly was never given much of a thought.
Brian

I was one of the many young boys who had a crush on Helen Shapiro.

I was 13, and she was 14.

It was typical, and still is, to have a crush on someone in the pop
media who is around the same age as oneself.

There was never any pretence that she was any older than that.

I don't know where you got that idea.

Hayley Mills was another example at that time.
--
Ian

Bill Wright[_2_] October 4th 12 03:36 PM

How did this happen?
 
Ian wrote:
In message , Brian Gaff
writes
Did you ever see pictures of the 13 year old Helen Shapiro ( spellink
warning), when she was actually supposed to be 18?

I remember the event clearly but it only came out years later on and
seemingly was never given much of a thought.
Brian

I was one of the many young boys who had a crush on Helen Shapiro.

I was 13, and she was 14.


Yes I clearly remember when I was 13, taking a copy of the Daily Mirror
to the toilet because it had a picture of her in it.

Bill

Norman Wells[_7_] October 4th 12 04:17 PM

How did this happen?
 
Bill Wright wrote:
Ian wrote:
In message , Brian Gaff
writes
Did you ever see pictures of the 13 year old Helen Shapiro (
spellink warning), when she was actually supposed to be 18?

I remember the event clearly but it only came out years later on
and seemingly was never given much of a thought.
Brian

I was one of the many young boys who had a crush on Helen Shapiro.

I was 13, and she was 14.


Yes I clearly remember when I was 13, taking a copy of the Daily
Mirror to the toilet because it had a picture of her in it.


Did it make it more absorbent then?


Yellow[_2_] October 4th 12 06:43 PM

How did this happen?
 
In article ,
says...

During tonight's "Exposure" about the "Other Side of Jimmy Savile" Sky
ran an advert where a girl of 'questionable age' told Bruce Willis that
"Sky Broadband was unlimited, AS AM I" before walking off arm in arm
with him.

Was this a subliminal message that Willis is a paedo?
That Murdoch is?

(OMG hopefully that isn't Murdoch senior - that is just too gross to
contemplate!).

Or both?

Who [email protected] up in placing such an ad in the middle of that programme?


You think that an actress in her 20's, playing someone with a job, could
be confused with a pre-pubescent child?

Don't be an idiot.

R. Kennedy McEwen October 5th 12 01:22 AM

How did this happen?
 
In article , Yellow
writes
In article ,
says...

During tonight's "Exposure" about the "Other Side of Jimmy Savile" Sky
ran an advert where a girl of 'questionable age' told Bruce Willis that
"Sky Broadband was unlimited, AS AM I" before walking off arm in arm
with him.

Was this a subliminal message that Willis is a paedo?
That Murdoch is?

(OMG hopefully that isn't Murdoch senior - that is just too gross to
contemplate!).

Or both?

Who [email protected] up in placing such an ad in the middle of that programme?


You think that an actress in her 20's, playing someone with a job, could
be confused with a pre-pubescent child?

Don't be an idiot.


I don't think any of those making allegations are claiming they were
pre-pubescent, although that doesn't preclude further allegation to that
effect, just under-age. Perhaps you should learn the difference between
biological and legislation definitions.

Nevertheless, as others have pointed out, making someone appear to be in
their 20's when they are not is trivial, just as making someone in their
20's or even 30's *appear* pre-pubescent is a major, mainly British led,
industry! Her age certainly looked "questionable" to me, but perhaps I
am a little more conservative in that context than you.

I still maintain that, in that context, that ad should never have been
run. It was reminiscent of NBC running that add for oven cleaners
during the first US airing of "Holocaust" back in the 70's.
--
Kennedy


Yellow[_2_] October 5th 12 10:51 AM

How did this happen?
 
"R. Kennedy McEwen" wrote in message
...
In article , Yellow
writes
In article ,
says...

During tonight's "Exposure" about the "Other Side of Jimmy Savile" Sky
ran an advert where a girl of 'questionable age' told Bruce Willis that
"Sky Broadband was unlimited, AS AM I" before walking off arm in arm
with him.

Was this a subliminal message that Willis is a paedo?
That Murdoch is?

(OMG hopefully that isn't Murdoch senior - that is just too gross to
contemplate!).

Or both?

Who [email protected] up in placing such an ad in the middle of that programme?


You think that an actress in her 20's, playing someone with a job, could
be confused with a pre-pubescent child?

Don't be an idiot.


I don't think any of those making allegations are claiming they were
pre-pubescent, although that doesn't preclude further allegation to that
effect, just under-age. Perhaps you should learn the difference between
biological and legislation definitions.


Perhaps you should learn what the word "paedophilia" means.



Nevertheless, as others have pointed out, making someone appear to be in
their 20's when they are not is trivial, just as making someone in their
20's or even 30's *appear* pre-pubescent is a major, mainly British led,
industry! Her age certainly looked "questionable" to me, but perhaps I am
a little more conservative in that context than you.


The actress is clearly an adult and the skit shows her working at a job. How
many 14 or15 year olds do you know who work in an office for Sky?



I still maintain that, in that context, that ad should never have been
run. It was reminiscent of NBC running that add for oven cleaners during
the first US airing of "Holocaust" back in the 70's.


Well, everyone is entitled to their opinion but I think in this case you
jare just missing a sense of humour.



ian field October 5th 12 11:40 PM

How did this happen?
 


"Norman Wells" wrote in message
...
Bill Wright wrote:
Ian wrote:
In message , Brian Gaff
writes
Did you ever see pictures of the 13 year old Helen Shapiro (
spellink warning), when she was actually supposed to be 18?

I remember the event clearly but it only came out years later on
and seemingly was never given much of a thought.
Brian

I was one of the many young boys who had a crush on Helen Shapiro.

I was 13, and she was 14.


Yes I clearly remember when I was 13, taking a copy of the Daily
Mirror to the toilet because it had a picture of her in it.


Did it make it more absorbent then?


Its not a tory tabloid.


ian field October 5th 12 11:42 PM

How did this happen?
 


"R. Kennedy McEwen" wrote in message
...
During tonight's "Exposure" about the "Other Side of Jimmy Savile"


Gary Glitter was leader of the gang - apparently.


Ian October 6th 12 02:51 AM

How did this happen?
 
In message , Ian Field
writes


"Norman Wells" wrote in message
...
Bill Wright wrote:
Ian wrote:
In message , Brian Gaff
writes
Did you ever see pictures of the 13 year old Helen Shapiro (
spellink warning), when she was actually supposed to be 18?

I remember the event clearly but it only came out years later on
and seemingly was never given much of a thought.
Brian

I was one of the many young boys who had a crush on Helen Shapiro.

I was 13, and she was 14.


Yes I clearly remember when I was 13, taking a copy of the Daily
Mirror to the toilet because it had a picture of her in it.


Did it make it more absorbent then?


Its not a tory tabloid.


No, it's a lavatory tabloid.
--
Ian

ian field October 6th 12 04:38 PM

How did this happen?
 


"Ian" wrote in message
...
In message , Ian Field
writes


"Norman Wells" wrote in message
...
Bill Wright wrote:
Ian wrote:
In message , Brian Gaff
writes
Did you ever see pictures of the 13 year old Helen Shapiro (
spellink warning), when she was actually supposed to be 18?

I remember the event clearly but it only came out years later on
and seemingly was never given much of a thought.
Brian

I was one of the many young boys who had a crush on Helen Shapiro.

I was 13, and she was 14.


Yes I clearly remember when I was 13, taking a copy of the Daily
Mirror to the toilet because it had a picture of her in it.

Did it make it more absorbent then?


Its not a tory tabloid.


No, it's a lavatory tabloid.
--
Ian


Its a simple matter of availability.

The only reason I wouldn't use a tory propaganda rag as bog paper, is that I
wouldn't have bought one in the first place.


Dave Farrance October 6th 12 06:45 PM

How did this happen?
 
Martin wrote:

Never use the Guardian, the ink rubs off.


Biodegradable "agri-based" inks doncha know. Every time you buy a paper
with petroleum-based ink, a baby otter drops dead.

ian field October 6th 12 07:16 PM

How did this happen?
 


"Dave Farrance" wrote in message
...
Martin wrote:

Never use the Guardian, the ink rubs off.


Biodegradable "agri-based" inks doncha know. Every time you buy a paper
with petroleum-based ink, a baby otter drops dead.


And the weather gets otter an' otter.


Bill Wright[_2_] October 7th 12 03:08 AM

How did this happen?
 
Martin wrote:

Never use the Guardian, the ink rubs off.


43 years ago a girl and I wanted to have sexual intercourse, but she was
menstruating and didn't want to get the bed dirty. In those days the
Guardian was reasonably unbiased and we usually bought it. I put that
day's paper on the bed. The girl sweated a lot during the act of
intercourse, and afterwards I noticed that she had a mirror image of the
headlines across her arse.

Bill

Clive[_3_] October 7th 12 11:33 AM

How did this happen?
 
In message , Ian
writes
In message , Brian Gaff
writes
Did you ever see pictures of the 13 year old Helen Shapiro ( spellink
warning), when she was actually supposed to be 18?
I remember the event clearly but it only came out years later on and
seemingly was never given much of a thought.
Brian

I was one of the many young boys who had a crush on Helen Shapiro.
I was 13, and she was 14.
It was typical, and still is, to have a crush on someone in the pop
media who is around the same age as oneself.
There was never any pretence that she was any older than that.
I don't know where you got that idea.
Hayley Mills was another example at that time.

You and I have a lot in common.
--
Clive

tony sayer October 7th 12 01:15 PM

How did this happen?
 
In article , Bill Wright
scribeth thus
Martin wrote:

Never use the Guardian, the ink rubs off.


43 years ago a girl and I wanted to have sexual intercourse, but she was
menstruating and didn't want to get the bed dirty. In those days the
Guardian was reasonably unbiased and we usually bought it. I put that
day's paper on the bed. The girl sweated a lot during the act of
intercourse, and afterwards I noticed that she had a mirror image of the
headlines across her arse.

Bill


I think... thats more information than we really need;!..

Seeing that most on here are married;!...

--
Tony Sayer


Peter Duncanson October 7th 12 02:03 PM

How did this happen?
 
On Sun, 07 Oct 2012 02:08:24 +0100, Bill Wright
wrote:

Martin wrote:

Never use the Guardian, the ink rubs off.


43 years ago a girl and I wanted to have sexual intercourse, but she was
menstruating and didn't want to get the bed dirty. In those days the
Guardian was reasonably unbiased and we usually bought it. I put that
day's paper on the bed. The girl sweated a lot during the act of
intercourse, and afterwards I noticed that she had a mirror image of the
headlines across her arse.

Today some girls would pay good money to get things tattooed on their
arses, athough headlines from the Guardian might be unusual.

--
Peter Duncanson
(in uk.tech.digital-tv)

[email protected] October 7th 12 02:46 PM

How did this happen?
 
On Sun, 07 Oct 2012 02:08:24 +0100, Bill Wright
wrote:

Martin wrote:

Never use the Guardian, the ink rubs off.


43 years ago a girl and I wanted to have sexual intercourse, but she was
menstruating and didn't want to get the bed dirty. In those days the
Guardian was reasonably unbiased and we usually bought it. I put that
day's paper on the bed. The girl sweated a lot during the act of
intercourse, and afterwards I noticed that she had a mirror image of the
headlines across her arse.

So that's what they mean by red top papers.

Norman Wells[_7_] October 7th 12 03:01 PM

How did this happen?
 
Bill Wright wrote:
Martin wrote:

Never use the Guardian, the ink rubs off.


43 years ago a girl and I wanted to have sexual intercourse, but she
was menstruating and didn't want to get the bed dirty. In those days
the Guardian was reasonably unbiased and we usually bought it. I put
that day's paper on the bed. The girl sweated a lot during the act of
intercourse, and afterwards I noticed that she had a mirror image of
the headlines across her arse.


If it was clear enough you could tell it was a mirror image, she
couldn't have moved much. Are you sure she wasn't asleep?


ian field October 7th 12 05:08 PM

How did this happen?
 


"Bill Wright" wrote in message
...
Martin wrote:

Never use the Guardian, the ink rubs off.


43 years ago a girl and I wanted to have sexual intercourse, but she was
menstruating and didn't want to get the bed dirty. In those days the
Guardian was reasonably unbiased and we usually bought it. I put that
day's paper on the bed. The girl sweated a lot during the act of
intercourse, and afterwards I noticed that she had a mirror image of the
headlines across her arse.

Bill


JEEEZ - TMI dude!


ian field October 7th 12 05:09 PM

How did this happen?
 


"Martin" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 07 Oct 2012 13:03:37 +0100, Peter Duncanson
wrote:

On Sun, 07 Oct 2012 02:08:24 +0100, Bill Wright
wrote:

Martin wrote:

Never use the Guardian, the ink rubs off.

43 years ago a girl and I wanted to have sexual intercourse, but she was
menstruating and didn't want to get the bed dirty. In those days the
Guardian was reasonably unbiased and we usually bought it. I put that
day's paper on the bed. The girl sweated a lot during the act of
intercourse, and afterwards I noticed that she had a mirror image of the
headlines across her arse.

Today some girls would pay good money to get things tattooed on their
arses, athough headlines from the Guardian might be unusual.


but would they pay Bill to do it?



I was wondering how much he had to pay them.


ian field October 7th 12 05:10 PM

How did this happen?
 


"Norman Wells" wrote in message
...
Bill Wright wrote:
Martin wrote:

Never use the Guardian, the ink rubs off.


43 years ago a girl and I wanted to have sexual intercourse, but she
was menstruating and didn't want to get the bed dirty. In those days
the Guardian was reasonably unbiased and we usually bought it. I put
that day's paper on the bed. The girl sweated a lot during the act of
intercourse, and afterwards I noticed that she had a mirror image of
the headlines across her arse.


If it was clear enough you could tell it was a mirror image, she couldn't
have moved much. Are you sure she wasn't asleep?



.................or dead!


Bill Wright[_2_] October 7th 12 05:59 PM

How did this happen?
 
Norman Wells wrote:
Bill Wright wrote:
Martin wrote:

Never use the Guardian, the ink rubs off.


43 years ago a girl and I wanted to have sexual intercourse, but she
was menstruating and didn't want to get the bed dirty. In those days
the Guardian was reasonably unbiased and we usually bought it. I put
that day's paper on the bed. The girl sweated a lot during the act of
intercourse, and afterwards I noticed that she had a mirror image of
the headlines across her arse.


If it was clear enough you could tell it was a mirror image, she
couldn't have moved much. Are you sure she wasn't asleep?

First, doesn't time fly? It wasn't 43 years ago; it was more like 46.

No, she wouldn't be asleep. She was always the instigator of sex, and I
found it difficult to keep pace with her. She wanted it literally
morning noon and night, and then again during the night. Sometimes I
used to feign sleep, but she would rouse me (and at that age, even
though you're sore and you've got an exam in the morning you can't help
being roused). She wasn't a particularly attractive girl in the face,
but she had a very nice figure and she seemed to know innately how to
make sex good. We were both virgins until we met, but within 24 hours it
was like wildfire.

I think that the top sheet of paper must have adhered to her skin at the
start of the process, and because the Guardian didn't use staples this
sheet was free to move with her, leaving the lower sheets remaining
stationery. I'm now having a bet with myself concerning dim pedants.

Alas the girl and I found that we didn't always get on socially. She had
a lot of social class hang ups and they got in the way. Eventually I
decided the thing wasn't viable (she bought me some cuff links for God's
sake) and I'd noticed that an artist we knew was keen on her. I swapped
her for one of his Jimi Hendrix posters. I still have the poster, and
the girl and I still write to each other. We both have daughters with
the same name, and partners who are invalids.

After the first girl and I split up I soon formed a friendship with the
girl in the next room, who'd we'd got to know because of the constant
banging of our bedhead on her wall. We went to see Rosencrantz and
Guildenstern are Dead together. It was all the rage at the time. Happy
days!

Bill

Grimly Curmudgeon[_2_] October 8th 12 08:02 PM

How did this happen?
 
On Sun, 07 Oct 2012 10:52:32 +0200, Martin wrote:

I noticed that she had a mirror image of the
headlines across her arse.


"8th Army push bottles up Germans"?


"VIVIAN FUCHS OFF TO THE ANTARCTIC"

MartinR October 9th 12 02:28 PM

How did this happen?
 
On Saturday, October 6, 2012 3:41:28 PM UTC+1, Martin wrote:
On Sat, 6 Oct 2012 15:38:17 +0100, "Ian Field"

wrote:







"Ian" wrote in message


...


In message , Ian Field


writes






"Norman Wells" wrote in message


...


Bill Wright wrote:


Ian wrote:


In message , Brian Gaff


writes


Did you ever see pictures of the 13 year old Helen Shapiro (


spellink warning), when she was actually supposed to be 18?




I remember the event clearly but it only came out years later on


and seemingly was never given much of a thought.


Brian




I was one of the many young boys who had a crush on Helen Shapiro.




I was 13, and she was 14.






Yes I clearly remember when I was 13, taking a copy of the Daily


Mirror to the toilet because it had a picture of her in it.




Did it make it more absorbent then?




Its not a tory tabloid.




No, it's a lavatory tabloid.


--


Ian






Its a simple matter of availability.




The only reason I wouldn't use a tory propaganda rag as bog paper, is that I


wouldn't have bought one in the first place.




Never use the Guardian, the ink rubs off.


How can you tell? Do you look? Or maybe you use a webcam and point it at your arse and look on the monitor, as I did once to check on my haemorrhoids.

MR


--



Martin



ian field October 9th 12 06:59 PM

How did this happen?
 


"Martin" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 9 Oct 2012 05:28:00 -0700 (PDT), MartinR
wrote:

Never use the Guardian, the ink rubs off.


How can you tell? Do you look? Or maybe you use a webcam and point it at
your arse and look on the monitor, as I did once to check on my
haemorrhoids.


The ink comes off on anything it touches.


Pretty big rubber stamp.


Bill Wright[_2_] October 9th 12 07:09 PM

How did this happen?
 
MartinR wrote:

How can you tell? Do you look? Or maybe you use a webcam and point it at your

arse and look on the monitor, as I did once to check on my haemorrhoids.

I took some stills of my arse to show the doctor how bad my skin
condition could be. We ended up discussing cameras.

Bill

Paul Ratcliffe October 9th 12 10:26 PM

How did this happen?
 
On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 18:09:28 +0100, Bill Wright wrote:

How can you tell? Do you look? Or maybe you use a webcam and point it at your

arse and look on the monitor, as I did once to check on my haemorrhoids.

I took some stills of my arse to show the doctor how bad my skin
condition could be. We ended up discussing cameras.


It's a good job you don't need to get pictures developed any more isn't it?

ian field October 9th 12 11:21 PM

How did this happen?
 


"Paul Ratcliffe" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 18:09:28 +0100, Bill Wright wrote:

How can you tell? Do you look? Or maybe you use a webcam and point it
at your

arse and look on the monitor, as I did once to check on my haemorrhoids.

I took some stills of my arse to show the doctor how bad my skin
condition could be. We ended up discussing cameras.


It's a good job you don't need to get pictures developed any more isn't
it?


Its OK as long as you don't get Boots to develop photos of your 6' spliff.


Bill Wright[_2_] October 10th 12 04:08 AM

How did this happen?
 
Paul Ratcliffe wrote:
On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 18:09:28 +0100, Bill Wright wrote:

How can you tell? Do you look? Or maybe you use a webcam and point it at your

arse and look on the monitor, as I did once to check on my haemorrhoids.

I took some stills of my arse to show the doctor how bad my skin
condition could be. We ended up discussing cameras.


It's a good job you don't need to get pictures developed any more isn't it?

Well, I wouldn't have been ashamed, and I don't mind people having a
laugh at my expense. In an odd way I was rather proud of that picture.
It was evidence of suffering.

Bill

Paul Ratcliffe October 10th 12 09:58 AM

How did this happen?
 
On Tue, 9 Oct 2012 22:21:57 +0100, Ian Field
wrote:

It's a good job you don't need to get pictures developed any more isn't
it?


Its OK as long as you don't get Boots to develop photos of your 6' spliff.


6 feet???

One of the people at work had a roll of film developed 20 odd years ago
and got back somebody else's pictures. They were mostly of things 'down
there'.

ian field October 10th 12 05:25 PM

How did this happen?
 


"Paul Ratcliffe" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 9 Oct 2012 22:21:57 +0100, Ian Field

wrote:

It's a good job you don't need to get pictures developed any more isn't
it?


Its OK as long as you don't get Boots to develop photos of your 6'
spliff.


6 feet???


About 1 foot long isn't difficult with a decent rolling mat, then all you
have to do is assemble like the stages of a rocket.

It made the newspapers because Boots photo lab informed the police and the
address was subsequently raided.


ian field October 10th 12 05:27 PM

How did this happen?
 


"Bill Wright" wrote in message
...
Paul Ratcliffe wrote:
On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 18:09:28 +0100, Bill Wright wrote:

How can you tell? Do you look? Or maybe you use a webcam and point it
at your
arse and look on the monitor, as I did once to check on my haemorrhoids.

I took some stills of my arse to show the doctor how bad my skin
condition could be. We ended up discussing cameras.


It's a good job you don't need to get pictures developed any more isn't
it?

Well, I wouldn't have been ashamed, and I don't mind people having a laugh
at my expense. In an odd way I was rather proud of that picture. It was
evidence of suffering.



You could have had a "guess how many dingleberries" stall at the village
fair.


Bill Wright[_2_] October 10th 12 09:53 PM

How did this happen?
 
Ian Field wrote:

You could have had a "guess how many dingleberries" stall at the village
fair.

No that wouldn't work, because I washed the area thoroughly before
taking the picture.

You've given me an idea though for our next church fete. I'll get all
the members of the parochial church council to let me photograph
close-ups of their anuses, then display them all with numbers and give
people cards to write down which arse belongs to who. I think a quid a
go would be about right.

I'll ring the vicar now.

Bill

ian field October 10th 12 10:18 PM

How did this happen?
 


"Bill Wright" wrote in message
...
Ian Field wrote:

You could have had a "guess how many dingleberries" stall at the village
fair.

No that wouldn't work, because I washed the area thoroughly before taking
the picture.

You've given me an idea though for our next church fete. I'll get all the
members of the parochial church council to let me photograph close-ups of
their anuses, then display them all with numbers and give people cards to
write down which arse belongs to who. I think a quid a go would be about
right.

I'll ring the vicar now.


Ask for a shot of the parson's nose.


Grimly Curmudgeon[_2_] October 13th 12 02:26 PM

How did this happen?
 
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 16:25:29 +0100, "Ian Field"
wrote:

Its OK as long as you don't get Boots to develop photos of your 6'
spliff.


6 feet???


About 1 foot long isn't difficult with a decent rolling mat, then all you
have to do is assemble like the stages of a rocket.

It made the newspapers because Boots photo lab informed the police and the
address was subsequently raided.


With the rise of the digicam, I suspect large sighs of relief were
heard from the dopers and fiddlers.
Whatever, Boots went way down in my opinion for grassing up someone
for rolling a joint, ffs.

ian field October 13th 12 02:31 PM

How did this happen?
 


"Grimly Curmudgeon" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 16:25:29 +0100, "Ian Field"
wrote:

Its OK as long as you don't get Boots to develop photos of your 6'
spliff.

6 feet???


About 1 foot long isn't difficult with a decent rolling mat, then all you
have to do is assemble like the stages of a rocket.

It made the newspapers because Boots photo lab informed the police and the
address was subsequently raided.


With the rise of the digicam, I suspect large sighs of relief were
heard from the dopers and fiddlers.
Whatever, Boots went way down in my opinion for grassing up someone
for rolling a joint, ffs.


"someone" is in the singular - its company policy which they enacted on
every opportunity.



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:33 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com