|
Sound
On 14/07/2012 14:08, Brian Gaff wrote:
I notice that most tvs these days have really awful sound, toppy and brash. Its a tradition for tvs to be the poor relation of the home entertainment devices, and I suppose one is supposed to plug it into a surround system or whatever to make it worth while. Are there any reasonably priced tvs that do not sound like a bucket of bolts rattling in a plastic tuppaware box? Brian Apart from cost, is there any reason why external speaker sockets could not be made available on small TVs (19 - 24")? It seems to me that even a a couple of small speakers in a decent cabinet (maybe something like those in reasonable 5.1 systems) would sound far better than the inbuilt speaker(s). I know that most of these small TVs only have a power output in the low single watts range, but that should be sufficient for most purposes. -- Jeff |
Sound
"Brian Gaff" wrote in message
... Well, there was a lot of work done on containing the magnetic field and there were some nice sounding eliptical speakers also, some very long and thin. Rediffusion used to use these and they actually sounded quite nice. Things got a little worse when transistors were used though, but soon this was sorted out. Until recently I had a 25" CRT TV right next to a big hi-fi speaker. I found that if I made the TV show a clear white ground and I took the speaker away, there was slight but noticeable coloration the side the speaker had been, which disappeared when I put the speaker back. This was presumably the ability of the TV to adjust to different magnetic fields, but I have no idea how it works. I tried switching the set off and on again a few times with the speaker removed with no effect, so either it takes a lot of power cycles to do it or the mechanism wasn't working any more. Is it true that in the early days of colour TV you had to call an engineer in to degauss your set if you moved it to a different part of the room? -- Max Demian |
Sound
Max Demian wrote:
I tried switching the set off and on again a few times with the speaker removed with no effect, so either it takes a lot of power cycles to do it or the mechanism wasn't working any more. Don't de-gauss circuits only cut-in for the first few seconds when the TV is stone cold? |
Sound
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012 10:42:46 +0100, "Max Demian"
wrote: Is it true that in the early days of colour TV you had to call an engineer in to degauss your set if you moved it to a different part of the room? I was a TV engineer when colour TV started and I can't remember ever having to degauss a set when it had been moved. Sometimes a set needed degaussing after installation but that wasn't very common. Most sets were not shaken up too much in the delivery van and the coils usually stayed in place. Steve -- Neural Network Software. http://www.npsl1.com EasyNN-plus. Neural Networks plus. http://www.easynn.com SwingNN. Forecast with Neural Networks. http://www.swingnn.com JustNN. Just Neural Networks. http://www.justnn.com |
Sound
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012 10:28:25 +0100, Jeff Layman
wrote: On 14/07/2012 14:08, Brian Gaff wrote: I notice that most tvs these days have really awful sound, toppy and brash. Its a tradition for tvs to be the poor relation of the home entertainment devices, and I suppose one is supposed to plug it into a surround system or whatever to make it worth while. Are there any reasonably priced tvs that do not sound like a bucket of bolts rattling in a plastic tuppaware box? Brian Apart from cost, is there any reason why external speaker sockets could not be made available on small TVs (19 - 24")? It seems to me that even a a couple of small speakers in a decent cabinet (maybe something like those in reasonable 5.1 systems) would sound far better than the inbuilt speaker(s). I know that most of these small TVs only have a power output in the low single watts range, but that should be sufficient for most purposes. A problem using external speakers with small TVs is the apparent misdirection of the sound relative to the picture. The best place for speakers is just under the screen or a balanced pair, one on either side of the screen. I find using separate hifi or surround sound systems distracts from the picture. I like the sound to come from the same direction as the screen. Steve -- Neural Network Software. http://www.npsl1.com EasyNN-plus. Neural Networks plus. http://www.easynn.com SwingNN. Forecast with Neural Networks. http://www.swingnn.com JustNN. Just Neural Networks. http://www.justnn.com |
Sound
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012 11:12:32 +0100
Stephen Wolstenholme wrote: On Sun, 15 Jul 2012 10:28:25 +0100, Jeff Layman wrote: On 14/07/2012 14:08, Brian Gaff wrote: I notice that most tvs these days have really awful sound, toppy and brash. Its a tradition for tvs to be the poor relation of the home entertainment devices, and I suppose one is supposed to plug it into a surround system or whatever to make it worth while. Are there any reasonably priced tvs that do not sound like a bucket of bolts rattling in a plastic tuppaware box? Brian Apart from cost, is there any reason why external speaker sockets could not be made available on small TVs (19 - 24")? It seems to me that even a a couple of small speakers in a decent cabinet (maybe something like those in reasonable 5.1 systems) would sound far better than the inbuilt speaker(s). I know that most of these small TVs only have a power output in the low single watts range, but that should be sufficient for most purposes. A problem using external speakers with small TVs is the apparent misdirection of the sound relative to the picture. The best place for speakers is just under the screen or a balanced pair, one on either side of the screen. I find using separate hifi or surround sound systems distracts from the picture. I like the sound to come from the same direction as the screen. Steve In that respect, the Logitech PC speakers that I have are ideal, they sit at the sides of the TV, which itself sits on top of a VCR, so the speakers are to each side and level with the bottom of the screen. There is also a subwoofer, but I keep that turned down to a low level, the suspended wooden floor booms if prompted. -- Davey. |
Sound
In article , Stephen
Wolstenholme wrote: On Sun, 15 Jul 2012 10:28:25 +0100, Jeff Layman wrote: On 14/07/2012 14:08, Brian Gaff wrote: I notice that most tvs these days have really awful sound, toppy and brash. Its a tradition for tvs to be the poor relation of the home entertainment devices, and I suppose one is supposed to plug it into a surround system or whatever to make it worth while. Are there any reasonably priced tvs that do not sound like a bucket of bolts rattling in a plastic tuppaware box? Brian Apart from cost, is there any reason why external speaker sockets could not be made available on small TVs (19 - 24")? It seems to me that even a a couple of small speakers in a decent cabinet (maybe something like those in reasonable 5.1 systems) would sound far better than the inbuilt speaker(s). I know that most of these small TVs only have a power output in the low single watts range, but that should be sufficient for most purposes. A problem using external speakers with small TVs is the apparent misdirection of the sound relative to the picture. The best place for speakers is just under the screen or a balanced pair, one on either side of the screen. I find using separate hifi or surround sound systems distracts from the picture. I like the sound to come from the same direction as the screen. so put the speakers either side of thescreen -- From KT24 Using a RISC OS computer running v5.18 |
Sound
In article , Jeff Layman
wrote: Apart from cost, is there any reason why external speaker sockets could not be made available on small TVs (19 - 24")? It seems to me that even a a couple of small speakers in a decent cabinet (maybe something like those in reasonable 5.1 systems) would sound far better than the inbuilt speaker(s). From the POV of manufacturers and retailers I suspect there are two main reasons why they generally don't do that. 1) It is a tacit admission that their 'fashionable' flat panel TVs can't provide decent sound without a lot of help. (Which might make people start asking why they've been flogging them for so long already!) 2) That it may deter innocent purchasers who see it in the shop beside sets that don't "need more boxes", and are probably cheaper because the makers haven't bothered. So a mix of 'wife acceptance factor', cost, etc. I guess they may also be happy in the shop to then sell you 'add ons' like speakers, amp, etc. The basic idea, of course, is that consumer goods are made to be *sold*, not to be *used*. In theory a flat panel display could be combined with an ESL or DML. But they'd then have to sell something that "looks like the other panels, but costs a lot more". So even if the makers are confident they could develop one, it runs into rules 1 and 2... Slainte, Jim -- Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me. Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html |
Sound
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012 11:48:07 +0100, charles
wrote: In article , Stephen Wolstenholme wrote: On Sun, 15 Jul 2012 10:28:25 +0100, Jeff Layman wrote: On 14/07/2012 14:08, Brian Gaff wrote: I notice that most tvs these days have really awful sound, toppy and brash. Its a tradition for tvs to be the poor relation of the home entertainment devices, and I suppose one is supposed to plug it into a surround system or whatever to make it worth while. Are there any reasonably priced tvs that do not sound like a bucket of bolts rattling in a plastic tuppaware box? Brian Apart from cost, is there any reason why external speaker sockets could not be made available on small TVs (19 - 24")? It seems to me that even a a couple of small speakers in a decent cabinet (maybe something like those in reasonable 5.1 systems) would sound far better than the inbuilt speaker(s). I know that most of these small TVs only have a power output in the low single watts range, but that should be sufficient for most purposes. A problem using external speakers with small TVs is the apparent misdirection of the sound relative to the picture. The best place for speakers is just under the screen or a balanced pair, one on either side of the screen. I find using separate hifi or surround sound systems distracts from the picture. I like the sound to come from the same direction as the screen. so put the speakers either side of thescreen I did say that for external speakers. With using hifi or surround sound that not always possible. My main TV is not in the same direction as my hifi and my other TVs are in different rooms. Steve -- Neural Network Software. http://www.npsl1.com EasyNN-plus. Neural Networks plus. http://www.easynn.com SwingNN. Forecast with Neural Networks. http://www.swingnn.com JustNN. Just Neural Networks. http://www.justnn.com |
Sound
In article ,
Stephen Wolstenholme wrote: A problem using external speakers with small TVs is the apparent misdirection of the sound relative to the picture. The best place for speakers is just under the screen or a balanced pair, one on either side of the screen. I find using separate hifi or surround sound systems distracts from the picture. I like the sound to come from the same direction as the screen. As it will if the speakers are either side of the TV, and you sit in the sweet spot. Most speakers designed for mounting under the TV etc - ie 'dialogue speakers' don't actually sound very good. -- *It's o.k. to laugh during sexŒ.Œ.just don't point! Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:56 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com