HD sound quality
 

Has the sound on HD been changed? I noticed at the weekend that the
sound quality seems richer with stronger bass. Has some technical
change been made?

HD sound quality
 

Scott wrote:
Has the sound on HD been changed? I noticed at the weekend that the
sound quality seems richer with stronger bass. Has some technical
change been made?

You don't say which channel or which system, Freeview or Freesat?
--
Adrian

HD sound quality
 

On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 21:27:00 +0100, Scott
wrote:

Has the sound on HD been changed? I noticed at the weekend that the
sound quality seems richer with stronger bass. Has some technical
change been made?

Russ Andrews has rewired Television Centre at licence payers' expense
in preparation for some other broadcaster to take it over.

HD sound quality
 

On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 00:09:13 GMT, Paul Ratcliffe wrote:

On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 21:27:00 +0100, Scott
wrote:

Has the sound on HD been changed? I noticed at the weekend that the
sound quality seems richer with stronger bass. Has some technical
change been made?

Russ Andrews has rewired Television Centre at licence payers' expense
in preparation for some other broadcaster to take it over.

So the sky's the limit!
--
Peter.
The gods will stay away
whilst religions hold sway

HD sound quality
 

Paul Ratcliffe wrote:
On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 21:27:00 +0100, Scott
wrote:

Has the sound on HD been changed? I noticed at the weekend that the
sound quality seems richer with stronger bass. Has some technical
change been made?

Russ Andrews has rewired Television Centre at licence payers' expense
in preparation for some other broadcaster to take it over.

Surely if that was the case, no one would have noticed any difference
*until* they'd been told of the vast sums spent? ;-)

Tim

HD sound quality
 

On Tuesday, July 10th, 2012, at 08:16:13h +0100, Peter C exclaimed:

So the sky's the limit!

And you mean that most sincerely.

http://t2.gstatic.COM/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcS2GOrd9xTe836j71lvpXVh4X0Cebfjl 8WVlmTftWHeeyBXJBSgQw

HD sound quality
 

On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:06:59 +0000 (UTC), J G Miller wrote:

On Tuesday, July 10th, 2012, at 08:16:13h +0100, Peter C exclaimed:

So the sky's the limit!

And you mean that most sincerely.

http://t2.gstatic.COM/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcS2GOrd9xTe836j71lvpXVh4X0Cebfjl 8WVlmTftWHeeyBXJBSgQw

coo, that takes me back a bit - well, a lot TBH!
--
Peter.
The gods will stay away
whilst religions hold sway

HD sound quality
 

In article ,
Paul Ratcliffe wrote:
Russ Andrews has rewired Television Centre at licence payers' expense
in preparation for some other broadcaster to take it over.

Just heard of someone who had some Quad electrostatics modified by Russ
Andrews. (why, I dunno) They needed repair (admittedly some way down the
line) and the repair company says they're scrap. Just about everything
Araldited together.

--
*Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it *

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

HD sound quality
 

Op dinsdag, 10 juli, 2012, om 15:28:12u +0200,
vroegt Martin van Nederlands:

Was £100 the top prize in those distant days? :-)

From what I understand of the history of that period,
the first quiz shows on the ITV network did have large
top prizes but following the scandal of NBC's "Twenty One"
with contestant Charles Van Doren given the answers to
the questions to memorize before the show, the ITA
stepped in and laid down regulations limiting the
prize money to something like maybe GBP 1 000 per show
and possibly GBP 2 500 in total for repeat appearances
of contestants.

The ITA always felt that one of its primary goals was
to prevent the ITV network being operated in any way like
or perceived to be like US television.

For a personal account by Charles Van Doren of the Quiz Show Scandal see

http://www.newyorker.COM/reporting/2008/07/28/080728fa_fact_vandoren?currentPage=all

The root cause lay in the sponsor of the program, according to Wikipedia

QUOTE

The initial broadcast of Twenty One was played honestly, with no
manipulation of the game by the producers. Unfortunately, that
broadcast was, in the words of producer Dan Enright, "a dismal failure";
the first two contestants succeeded only in making a mockery of the format
by how little they really knew.

Show sponsor Geritol, upon seeing this opening-night performance,
reportedly became furious with the results, and threatened to pull
their sponsorship of the show if it happened again.

The end result: Twenty One was not merely "fixed", it was almost
totally choreographed. Contestants were cast almost as if they were
actors, and in fact were active and (usually) willing partners in
the deception. They were given instruction as to how to dress, what
to say to the host, when to say it, what questions to answer, what
questions to miss, even when to mop their brows in their isolation booths
(which had air conditioning that could be cut off at will, to make
them sweat more).

UNQUOTE

HD sound quality
 

In article , Dave Plowman (News)
scribeth thus
In article ,
Paul Ratcliffe wrote:
Russ Andrews has rewired Television Centre at licence payers' expense
in preparation for some other broadcaster to take it over.

Just heard of someone who had some Quad electrostatics modified by Russ
Andrews. (why, I dunno) They needed repair (admittedly some way down the
line) and the repair company says they're scrap. Just about everything
Araldited together.


Ought to be had up in court on a charge of desecration:(....
--
Tony Sayer