|
Half choice Freeview transmitters
|
Half choice Freeview transmitters
In article ,
lid says... Paul Cummins wrote: We were about to embark at Dover, when (Yellow) came up to me and whispered: Quite a few of the relay transmitter (including my mother's which is how come I took an interest) were never converted to show C5 so the 4 channels was it. Even if the relay was not converted, more than 70% of the population was in reach of a C5 analogue transmitter, Indeed, and once DSO is complete 90% of the population will be served by transmitters carrying all six Freeview muxes. That's 81 sites. The remaining 1070 relay sites that only carry three muxes, serve between them less than 10% of the remaining UK population. And after all, 10% of the population is only 6 million people. |
Half choice Freeview transmitters
Yellow wrote:
The remaining 1070 relay sites that only carry three muxes, serve between them less than 10% of the remaining UK population. And after all, 10% of the population is only 6 million people. I wonder how many of those 6 million gave up waiting for DSO, and got themselves satellite ? -- Mark Please replace invalid and invalid with gmx and net to reply. www.paras.org.uk |
Half choice Freeview transmitters
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 15:47:35 +0100, Yellow wrote:
In article , says... We were about to embark at Dover, when (Yellow) came up to me and whispered: Quite a few of the relay transmitter (including my mother's which is how come I took an interest) were never converted to show C5 so the 4 channels was it. Even if the relay was not converted, more than 70% of the population was in reach of a C5 analogue transmitter, just many of them had neither the time or inclination (or money) to put up a second aerial for the out of band (90% of the time) and different direction of the weaker C5 transmitter. Bit of a Homer Simpson "doh" moment here because the reason for these transmitters were put up in the first place was because the people served could not receive a satisfactory service from other transmitters, regardless of the aerial used. To bring the thread back on topic, AIUI because digital signals are more robust than analogue, some people who could not get acceptable service from the main transmitter before can now. Maybe some of these relays are no longer required? I live in an area with a relay transmitter (which must have been built because of reception problems) but now enjoy perfect reception from the main transmitter. |
Half choice Freeview transmitters
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 16:01:08 +0100, Mark Carver
wrote: Yellow wrote: The remaining 1070 relay sites that only carry three muxes, serve between them less than 10% of the remaining UK population. And after all, 10% of the population is only 6 million people. I wonder how many of those 6 million gave up waiting for DSO, and got themselves satellite ? And how many can get digital from the main transmitter on account of digital being less prone to multipath interference? |
Half choice Freeview transmitters
On 6/17/2012 11:01 AM, Mark Carver wrote:
Yellow wrote: The remaining 1070 relay sites that only carry three muxes, serve between them less than 10% of the remaining UK population. And after all, 10% of the population is only 6 million people. I wonder how many of those 6 million gave up waiting for DSO, and got themselves satellite ? That's what I, and a number of my neighbours, did. |
Half choice Freeview transmitters
On Sunday, June 17th, 2012, at 15:36:04h +0100, Yellow wrote:
That does not help people who have aerial based Digital TV equipment, not satellite. So what help do you want? What you say is like saying that it does not help people with antenna based systems that they cannot receive BBC Radio London but it is available on satellite. The simple fact of the matter is that the commercial service broadcasters decided not to make their services available from all transmitter sites just like many other TV and radio services. So if you really want to watch Film 4 and cannot get a signal from a main transmitter site, then you can avail yourself of satellite, cable if in a serviced area, maybe IPTV, as well as Internet film4od.film4.COM Alternatively mount a national campaign to get Channel 4 corporation (owned by the government) to drop Channel 4 +1 from multiplex PSB-2 and replace it with Film 4. Have you brought this matter to the attention of your elected representative at the Westminter Parliament, or a member of either house who is also a member at your gentleman's club (usually the best way of getting results)? |
Half choice Freeview transmitters
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 15:34:07 +0100, Mark Carver wrote:
Anyway, if you are a milkman, be careful:- Do you still have a poet under the stairs? Or were they removed during privatization? |
Half choice Freeview transmitters
On Sunday, June 17th, 2012, at 10:39:00h +0100, Paul Cummins explained:
I've just been appointed to my new job by the American MD. Congratulations. Do you always compare tangerines with tomatoes? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:23 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com