|
Humax iPlayer-HD
Tried this last night and very nice it was too - but I noticed that the
small BBC logon was slightly off-screen so all I saw was "BC". Anyone else seen this with iPlayer? Seems odd since presumably the picture is the "perfect size" of a digital TV (or perhaps it's not!). BTW HDMI connection to the TV. Paul DS P.S. a very discreet logo - if only the off-air logos were like that :-(. |
Humax iPlayer-HD
On Oct 13, 5:00*pm, "Paul D Smith" wrote:
Tried this last night and very nice it was too - but I noticed that the small BBC logon was slightly off-screen so all I saw was "BC". *Anyone else seen this with iPlayer? *Seems odd since presumably the picture is the "perfect size" of a digital TV (or perhaps it's not!). BTW HDMI connection to the TV. Your TV must apply more overscan than the BBC expects. It's fully visible on Samsung TVs using their built-in iPlayer implementation. Cheers, David. |
Humax iPlayer-HD
|
Humax iPlayer-HD
"Yellow" wrote in message ... In article , says... Tried this last night and very nice it was too - but I noticed that the small BBC logon was slightly off-screen so all I saw was "BC". Anyone else seen this with iPlayer? Seems odd since presumably the picture is the "perfect size" of a digital TV (or perhaps it's not!). BTW HDMI connection to the TV. Same here. and here on sony bravia |
Humax iPlayer-HD
On Thursday, October 13th, 2011 at 19:35:18h +0100, Brian Gaff wrote:
Soo the BBC are using Samsung monitors then? Should that not be the production company making the shows for the BBC or Red Bee Media? If David Hunt is successful in applying the policies of the coalition government of national salvation, probably the only TV shows that the BBC will produce its-self in future will be national and regional news and political shows, because anything else prevents a private company from making a profit on producing such a show. |
Humax iPlayer-HD
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 19:51:28 +0000, J G Miller wrote:
If David Hunt is successful Jeremy Hunt that is ... |
Humax iPlayer-HD
On 13/10/2011 21:15, J G Miller wrote:
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 19:51:28 +0000, J G Miller wrote: If David Hunt is successful Jeremy Hunt that is ... David Hunt makes very attractive luminaires (or as I would call them - lights). Pete |
Humax iPlayer-HD
On Thursday, October 13th, 2011 at 23:36:26h +0100, Pete Shew wrote:
On 13/10/2011 21:15, J G Miller wrote: On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 19:51:28 +0000, J G Miller wrote: If David Hunt is successful Jeremy Hunt that is ... David Hunt makes very attractive luminaires (or as I would call them - lights). That would be a different one to the one I was misadvertently naming -- Baron Hunt, former Conservative and Unionist Party Westminster MP and former Secretary of State for Employment and for Wales, who has been named chairman of Press Complaints Commission under the "Jobs For the Boys" scheme being implemented by the current administration. |
Humax iPlayer-HD
Well at least it rhymes with something appropriately rude I suppose...
Brian -- Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email. graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them Email: __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ __________ "J G Miller" wrote in message ... On Thursday, October 13th, 2011 at 23:36:26h +0100, Pete Shew wrote: On 13/10/2011 21:15, J G Miller wrote: On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 19:51:28 +0000, J G Miller wrote: If David Hunt is successful Jeremy Hunt that is ... David Hunt makes very attractive luminaires (or as I would call them - lights). That would be a different one to the one I was misadvertently naming -- Baron Hunt, former Conservative and Unionist Party Westminster MP and former Secretary of State for Employment and for Wales, who has been named chairman of Press Complaints Commission under the "Jobs For the Boys" scheme being implemented by the current administration. |
Humax iPlayer-HD
wrote in message
... On Oct 13, 5:00 pm, "Paul D Smith" wrote: Tried this last night and very nice it was too - but I noticed that the small BBC logon was slightly off-screen so all I saw was "BC". Anyone else seen this with iPlayer? Seems odd since presumably the picture is the "perfect size" of a digital TV (or perhaps it's not!). BTW HDMI connection to the TV. Your TV must apply more overscan than the BBC expects. It's fully visible on Samsung TVs using their built-in iPlayer implementation. Why on earth would a digital TV apply overscan? I'll check tonight to see if it's something I can remove. Paul DS. |
Humax iPlayer-HD
Paul D Smith wrote:
Why on earth would a digital TV apply overscan? Because a surprising number of transmitted programs have weird black-and-white bits top and bottom. Personally I'd much rather live with them, and enjoy a 1:1 pixel mapping, than make the TV scale the picture so it's non-native to the screen. -- SteveT |
Humax iPlayer-HD
Paul D Smith wrote:
Why on earth would a digital TV apply overscan? I'll check tonight to see if it's something I can remove. Look for an "Exact Scan" or similar mode under the aspect ratio selection. As much as I like the idea of zero overscan and therefore no rcaling, I generally apply a 1 or 2% zoom to my HTPC as I find junk around the edges rather distracting. The junk takes a few forms, visible timecodes at the top, pixels without chroma at the sides, soft rather than crisp edges, or borders where a vision mixer doesn't fully overlay one source with another one, leaving one or two pixels of green or blue or unrelated video peeping out at the edges. The occasional boom mic in shot or lens vignetting is a bonus :-) |
Humax iPlayer-HD
"Andy Burns" wrote in message
o.uk... Paul D Smith wrote: Why on earth would a digital TV apply overscan? I'll check tonight to see if it's something I can remove. Look for an "Exact Scan" or similar mode under the aspect ratio selection. As much as I like the idea of zero overscan and therefore no rcaling, I generally apply a 1 or 2% zoom to my HTPC as I find junk around the edges rather distracting. The junk takes a few forms, visible timecodes at the top, pixels without chroma at the sides, soft rather than crisp edges, or borders where a vision mixer doesn't fully overlay one source with another one, leaving one or two pixels of green or blue or unrelated video peeping out at the edges. The occasional boom mic in shot or lens vignetting is a bonus :-) Thanks - I found the "overscan on/off" last night and was surprised to find, as Steve had hinted, that without overscan, the edges of the picture were a "slightly ripply, not using all the pixels". I wonder if, once analogue is switched off, whether we will slowly move forward to zero overscan, perhaps with a "trail period" for possible complaints like we had when (if memory serves) a few more lines were added to the old Ceefax system. So, I know where the setting is now - pity it's buried in the depths of the menu settings :-(. Paul DS, |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:42 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com