|
TOT moorland fires and turbines
J G Miller wrote:
If the moon moves just ten percent farther, it will cause unbelievable disaster for our planet I don't believe it. Bill |
TOT moorland fires and turbines
In article , Bill Wright wrote:
J G Miller wrote: If the moon moves just ten percent farther, it will cause unbelievable disaster for our planet I don't believe it. Bill Well, if it's unbelievable and you don't believe it, he must be telling the truth... Rod. -- Virtual Access V6.3 free usenet/email software from http://sourceforge.net/projects/virtual-access/ |
TOT moorland fires and turbines
Bill Wright wrote:
J G Miller wrote: If the moon moves just ten percent farther, it will cause unbelievable disaster for our planet I don't believe it. I dunno about "unbelievable disaster", but it would be a major climate change at the minimum. I'd heard about it on some science programme on the TV. Checking Wikipedia's axial tilt article, I see that somebody's written: The relatively small range for the Earth is due to the stabilizing influence of the Moon, but it will not remain so. According to W.R. Ward, the orbit of the Moon (which is continuously increasing due to tidal effects) will have gone from the current 60 to approximately 66.5 Earth radii in about 1.5 billion years. Once this occurs, a resonance from planetary effects will follow, causing swings of the obliquity between 22° and 38°. Further, in approximately 2 billion years, when the Moon reaches a distance of 68 Earth radii, another resonance will cause even greater oscillations, between 27° and 60°. This would have extreme effects on climate. |
TOT moorland fires and turbines
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 00:25:38 +0100, Dave Farrance wrote:
Bill Wright wrote: [snip] Checking Wikipedia's axial tilt article, I see that somebody's written: The relatively small range for the Earth is due to the stabilizing influence of the Moon, but it will not remain so. According to W.R. Ward, the orbit of the Moon (which is continuously increasing due to tidal effects) will have gone from the current 60 to approximately 66.5 Earth radii in about 1.5 billion years. Once this occurs, a resonance from planetary effects will follow, causing swings of the obliquity between 22° and 38°. Further, in approximately 2 billion years, when the Moon reaches a distance of 68 Earth radii, another resonance will cause even greater oscillations, between 27° and 60°. This would have extreme effects on climate. Just to cheer us all up, Wikipedia's article on the sun remarks that its radiation increases by about 10% per billion years and that this is likely to cause the oceans to boil and extinguish all life before any of these lunar effects happen. -- Steve Hayes, South Wales, UK -- remove colours from address |
TOT moorland fires and turbines
On Wednesday, June 22nd, 2011 at 09:29:29h +0000, Steve Hayes wrote:
Just to cheer us all up, Wikipedia's article on the sun remarks that its radiation increases by about 10% per billion years and that this is likely to cause the oceans to boil and extinguish all life before any of these lunar effects happen. Do you think NASA will have had its budget increase by then to further manned space exploration? ;) |
TOT moorland fires and turbines
On 22/06/2011 00:25, Dave Farrance wrote:
Bill wrote: J G Miller wrote: If the moon moves just ten percent farther, it will cause unbelievable disaster for our planet I don't believe it. I dunno about "unbelievable disaster", but it would be a major climate change at the minimum. I'd heard about it on some science programme on the TV. Checking Wikipedia's axial tilt article, I see that somebody's written: The relatively small range for the Earth is due to the stabilizing influence of the Moon, but it will not remain so. According to W.R. Ward, the orbit of the Moon (which is continuously increasing due to tidal effects) will have gone from the current 60 to approximately 66.5 Earth radii in about 1.5 billion years. Once this occurs, a resonance from planetary effects will follow, causing swings of the obliquity between 22° and 38°. Further, in approximately 2 billion years, when the Moon reaches a distance of 68 Earth radii, another resonance will cause even greater oscillations, between 27° and 60°. This would have extreme effects on climate. Ah yes, the same oscillation that are clearly seen in Mars (no significant moons) Jupiter (no significant moons - well not by _it's_ standard) Saturn... I leave out Venus and Mercury as their spin is so slow. And no one would have noticed Uranus. Andy |
TOT moorland fires and turbines
Andy Champ wrote:
On 22/06/2011 00:25, Dave Farrance wrote: The relatively small range for the Earth is due to the stabilizing influence of the Moon, but it will not remain so. According to W.R. Ward, the orbit of the Moon (which is continuously increasing due to tidal effects) will have gone from the current 60 to approximately 66.5 Earth radii in about 1.5 billion years. Once this occurs, a resonance from planetary effects will follow, causing swings of the obliquity between 22° and 38°. Further, in approximately 2 billion years, when the Moon reaches a distance of 68 Earth radii, another resonance will cause even greater oscillations, between 27° and 60°. This would have extreme effects on climate. Ah yes, the same oscillation that are clearly seen in Mars (no significant moons) Jupiter (no significant moons - well not by _it's_ standard) Saturn... I leave out Venus and Mercury as their spin is so slow. And no one would have noticed Uranus. Well, slight changes in axial tilt are detectable, but obviously not the whole oscillations since I believe that the maths shows that the oscillations take place over tens (or hundreds?) of thousands of years. |
TOT moorland fires and turbines
On 22/06/2011 22:12, Dave Farrance wrote:
Well, slight changes in axial tilt are detectable, but obviously not the whole oscillations since I believe that the maths shows that the oscillations take place over tens (or hundreds?) of thousands of years. So the fact that they are all within 30 degrees of the ecliptic is just chance? Even Venus, which spins backwards? Andy |
TOT moorland fires and turbines
Andy Champ wrote:
On 22/06/2011 22:12, Dave Farrance wrote: Well, slight changes in axial tilt are detectable, but obviously not the whole oscillations since I believe that the maths shows that the oscillations take place over tens (or hundreds?) of thousands of years. So the fact that they are all within 30 degrees of the ecliptic is just chance? Even Venus, which spins backwards? I understand that if the gravitational influence on a planet is overwhelmingly just one body, then its axial tilt is reasonably stable. In the case of the Earth, if the Moon recedes too far, then there will be significant influences from the Moon, the Sun, and Jupiter, which will apparently result in much larger axial tilt oscillations. I'd guess that Uranus has been knocked on its side by the relatively large influence of Jupiter and Saturn at its position. Venus might well have inverted at some point to get its backwards spin. To the nearest degree, the axial tilts a Mercury 0 Venus 177 Earth 23 Mars 25 Jupiter 3 Saturn 26 Uranus 97 Neptune 28 |
TOT moorland fires and turbines
We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
drugs began to take hold. I remember Peter Duncanson saying something like: What force will cause the Earth to tip on its access? A big boy will do it and run away. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:16 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com