HomeCinemaBanter

HomeCinemaBanter (http://www.homecinemabanter.com/index.php)
-   UK digital tv (http://www.homecinemabanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   new tv is 50hz ok (http://www.homecinemabanter.com/showthread.php?t=69216)

Roderick Stewart[_2_] April 22nd 11 10:05 AM

new tv is 50hz ok
 
In article , Max Demian wrote:
Ironically, CGI programmers have put a lot of effort and CPU into
making the "right" motion blur in each frame, whilst the film makers
seem to be losing it.


Since when? My experience of making videocaps from feature films would
suggest that the shutter speed remains a constant proportion of the 24 fps
regardless of lighting conditions


A lot of "films" these days are not actually made on film at all, but
electronically from television cameras. One of the effects available with
modern cameras is an extreme shortening of the exposure time, giving a sort
of jerky effect that some directors seem to like. Effects in electronic
cameras (unlike film cameras with physically moving parts) can be done so
easily that many directors do them just because they can.

Rod.
--
Virtual Access V6.3 free usenet/email software from
http://sourceforge.net/projects/virtual-access/


rog April 22nd 11 11:44 PM

new tv is 50hz ok
 
On 22 Apr, 09:05, Roderick Stewart
wrote:
In article , Max Demian wrote:
Ironically, CGI programmers have put a lot of effort and CPU into
making the "right" motion blur in each frame, whilst the film makers
seem to be losing it.


Since when? My experience of making videocaps from feature films would
suggest that the shutter speed remains a constant proportion of the 24 fps
regardless of lighting conditions


A lot of "films" these days are not actually made on film at all, but
electronically from television cameras. One of the effects available with
modern cameras is an extreme shortening of the exposure time, giving a sort
of jerky effect that some directors seem to like. Effects in electronic
cameras (unlike film cameras with physically moving parts) can be done so
easily that many directors do them just because they can.

Rod.
--
Virtual Access V6.3 free usenet/email software fromhttp://sourceforge.net/projects/virtual-access/


Hi
I think I'm going with a samsung UE32D5520, any comments or experience
of this gratefully appreciated.
Rog

Woody[_3_] April 23rd 11 10:23 AM

new tv is 50hz ok
 
"rog" wrote in message
...
On 22 Apr, 09:05, Roderick Stewart
wrote:
In article , Max Demian
wrote:
Ironically, CGI programmers have put a lot of effort and
CPU into
making the "right" motion blur in each frame, whilst the
film makers
seem to be losing it.


Since when? My experience of making videocaps from feature
films would
suggest that the shutter speed remains a constant proportion
of the 24 fps
regardless of lighting conditions


A lot of "films" these days are not actually made on film at
all, but
electronically from television cameras. One of the effects
available with
modern cameras is an extreme shortening of the exposure time,
giving a sort
of jerky effect that some directors seem to like. Effects in
electronic
cameras (unlike film cameras with physically moving parts) can
be done so
easily that many directors do them just because they can.

Rod.
--
Virtual Access V6.3 free usenet/email software
fromhttp://sourceforge.net/projects/virtual-access/


Hi
I think I'm going with a samsung UE32D5520, any comments or
experience
of this gratefully appreciated.
Rog




If that is a LED set think about buying a set of computer
speakers to go with it. LED sets are very think and so
correspondingly are the speakers therein.


--
Woody

harrogate three at ntlworld dot com



tony sayer April 23rd 11 01:21 PM

new tv is 50hz ok
 
In article
s.com, rog scribeth thus
On 22 Apr, 09:05, Roderick Stewart
wrote:
In article , Max Demian wrote:
Ironically, CGI programmers have put a lot of effort and CPU into
making the "right" motion blur in each frame, whilst the film makers
seem to be losing it.


Since when? My experience of making videocaps from feature films would
suggest that the shutter speed remains a constant proportion of the 24 fps
regardless of lighting conditions


A lot of "films" these days are not actually made on film at all, but
electronically from television cameras. One of the effects available with
modern cameras is an extreme shortening of the exposure time, giving a sort
of jerky effect that some directors seem to like. Effects in electronic
cameras (unlike film cameras with physically moving parts) can be done so
easily that many directors do them just because they can.

Rod.
--
Virtual Access V6.3 free usenet/email software fromhttp://sourceforge.net/proj

ects/virtual-access/

Hi
I think I'm going with a samsung UE32D5520, any comments or experience
of this gratefully appreciated.
Rog


Well said my piece earlier but seriously suggest you check out the newer
Sony's!....
--
Tony Sayer



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com