|
new tv is 50hz ok
In article , Max Demian wrote:
Ironically, CGI programmers have put a lot of effort and CPU into making the "right" motion blur in each frame, whilst the film makers seem to be losing it. Since when? My experience of making videocaps from feature films would suggest that the shutter speed remains a constant proportion of the 24 fps regardless of lighting conditions A lot of "films" these days are not actually made on film at all, but electronically from television cameras. One of the effects available with modern cameras is an extreme shortening of the exposure time, giving a sort of jerky effect that some directors seem to like. Effects in electronic cameras (unlike film cameras with physically moving parts) can be done so easily that many directors do them just because they can. Rod. -- Virtual Access V6.3 free usenet/email software from http://sourceforge.net/projects/virtual-access/ |
new tv is 50hz ok
On 22 Apr, 09:05, Roderick Stewart
wrote: In article , Max Demian wrote: Ironically, CGI programmers have put a lot of effort and CPU into making the "right" motion blur in each frame, whilst the film makers seem to be losing it. Since when? My experience of making videocaps from feature films would suggest that the shutter speed remains a constant proportion of the 24 fps regardless of lighting conditions A lot of "films" these days are not actually made on film at all, but electronically from television cameras. One of the effects available with modern cameras is an extreme shortening of the exposure time, giving a sort of jerky effect that some directors seem to like. Effects in electronic cameras (unlike film cameras with physically moving parts) can be done so easily that many directors do them just because they can. Rod. -- Virtual Access V6.3 free usenet/email software fromhttp://sourceforge.net/projects/virtual-access/ Hi I think I'm going with a samsung UE32D5520, any comments or experience of this gratefully appreciated. Rog |
new tv is 50hz ok
"rog" wrote in message
... On 22 Apr, 09:05, Roderick Stewart wrote: In article , Max Demian wrote: Ironically, CGI programmers have put a lot of effort and CPU into making the "right" motion blur in each frame, whilst the film makers seem to be losing it. Since when? My experience of making videocaps from feature films would suggest that the shutter speed remains a constant proportion of the 24 fps regardless of lighting conditions A lot of "films" these days are not actually made on film at all, but electronically from television cameras. One of the effects available with modern cameras is an extreme shortening of the exposure time, giving a sort of jerky effect that some directors seem to like. Effects in electronic cameras (unlike film cameras with physically moving parts) can be done so easily that many directors do them just because they can. Rod. -- Virtual Access V6.3 free usenet/email software fromhttp://sourceforge.net/projects/virtual-access/ Hi I think I'm going with a samsung UE32D5520, any comments or experience of this gratefully appreciated. Rog If that is a LED set think about buying a set of computer speakers to go with it. LED sets are very think and so correspondingly are the speakers therein. -- Woody harrogate three at ntlworld dot com |
new tv is 50hz ok
In article
s.com, rog scribeth thus On 22 Apr, 09:05, Roderick Stewart wrote: In article , Max Demian wrote: Ironically, CGI programmers have put a lot of effort and CPU into making the "right" motion blur in each frame, whilst the film makers seem to be losing it. Since when? My experience of making videocaps from feature films would suggest that the shutter speed remains a constant proportion of the 24 fps regardless of lighting conditions A lot of "films" these days are not actually made on film at all, but electronically from television cameras. One of the effects available with modern cameras is an extreme shortening of the exposure time, giving a sort of jerky effect that some directors seem to like. Effects in electronic cameras (unlike film cameras with physically moving parts) can be done so easily that many directors do them just because they can. Rod. -- Virtual Access V6.3 free usenet/email software fromhttp://sourceforge.net/proj ects/virtual-access/ Hi I think I'm going with a samsung UE32D5520, any comments or experience of this gratefully appreciated. Rog Well said my piece earlier but seriously suggest you check out the newer Sony's!.... -- Tony Sayer |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:36 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com