|
Did I not explain it very well?
It's that sort of blind ignorance coupled with supreme confidence in one's knowledge, so typical of the arts educated elite in this country that leads to these people pontificating about windfarms and other environmental issues. Bill Yes now that is really scary. That Merkel in Germany now wants to do away with all the reactors they have and go renewables.. Just absolutely stupid rather than wait and see what went wrong and then make informed -engineering- decisions on the matter.. -- Tony Sayer |
Did I not explain it very well?
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 20:22:25 +0000, tony sayer
wrote: It's that sort of blind ignorance coupled with supreme confidence in one's knowledge, so typical of the arts educated elite in this country that leads to these people pontificating about windfarms and other environmental issues. Bill Yes now that is really scary. That Merkel in Germany now wants to do away with all the reactors they have and go renewables.. Just absolutely stupid rather than wait and see what went wrong and then make informed -engineering- decisions on the matter.. I agree totally. There is natural concentration on the six reactors that are in trouble at the Fukushika No 1 (Daiichi) plant. However, there is a second plant 11.5 kilometres to the south, Fukushima No 2 (Daini) Nuclear Power Plant, which has four reactors. These have not been in the news because the problems there have been much less and manageable. http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/RS...i_1403112.html So it would be valuable to know what the differences are that resulted in serious damage to one plant and much less serious to the other. This website has news reports by people in the industry: http://www.world-nuclear.org/fukushi...arthquake.html -- Peter Duncanson (in uk.tech.digital-tv) |
Did I not explain it very well?
On Friday, March 25th, 2011 at 20:22:25h +0000, Tony Sayer wrote:
That Merkel in Germany now wants to do away with all the reactors they have and go renewables.. That may be the impression which Kanzler Merkel is giving at the present time, but wait until after the state elections, and nothing much will change, and it will be back to business as normal. But there is certainly nothing wrong in trying to improve on the percentage of power generated from renewables rather than other sources. |
Did I not explain it very well?
"Scott" wrote in message ... On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 16:28:03 +0000, Bill Wright wrote: Last week I advised a customer as follows: Your terrestrial reception is very poor. I can replace the aerial with a better one, but I can't give you a 100% guarantee that reception will always be perfect. I suggest you go for Freesat. We discussed this at length. The next day, I installed Freesat for him. Today he rung to complain that although reception on the Freesat box was perfect the picture when he didn't use the Freesat box was still breaking up, "despite it coming from the satellite." The TV set does not have Freesat built in. This customer is CEO of a quango with a multi-million pound budget. My great aunt used to believe that if you left an electrical socket with nothing plugged in the electricity would escape through the holes and increase the electricity bill. As I remember it, most coffin dodgers feared that a light socket switched on with no bulb in it would leak electricity and poison them like gas. I knew a Hungarian car mechanic who refused to have a microwave oven because he thought it was radioactive! I even showed him a copy of the EM spectrum chart and pointed out where microwaves were at the medium-high end of radio waves in comparison to IR from his regular oven and radiation way over yonder beyond UV. |
Did I not explain it very well?
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , Scott wrote: My great aunt used to believe that if you left an electrical socket with nothing plugged in the electricity would escape through the holes and increase the electricity bill. Think lots still do by all these dummy plugs you see around... AFAIK those were originally intended to stop kiddies sticking things in the holes. |
Did I not explain it very well?
"Max Demian" wrote in message ... "Jumbo Jack" wrote in message ... "Bill Wright" wrote in message ... Last week I advised a customer as follows: Your terrestrial reception is very poor. I can replace the aerial with a better one, but I can't give you a 100% guarantee that reception will always be perfect. I suggest you go for Freesat. We discussed this at length. The next day, I installed Freesat for him. Today he rung to complain that although reception on the Freesat box was perfect the picture when he didn't use the Freesat box was still breaking up, "despite it coming from the satellite." The TV set does not have Freesat built in. This customer is CEO of a quango with a multi-million pound budget. and could you do his job.....I very much doubt it. So its what you know and what you don't need to know. The CEO had been given the knowledge. He just didn't process it very well, which is necessary for most jobs I would have thought. Its nothing unusual for suits to be thick as two short planks - its not what you know, its who you know. |
Did I not explain it very well?
"Jumbo Jack" wrote in message ... "Bill Wright" wrote in message ... Bill Wright wrote: Max Demian wrote: This customer is CEO of a quango with a multi-million pound budget. and could you do his job.....I very much doubt it. So its what you know and what you don't need to know. The CEO had been given the knowledge. He just didn't process it very well, which is necessary for most jobs I would have thought. That's exactly it. Bill I also know of a person in a 'top job' who cannot find her way about at all, either by use of a map or a satnav. Nor can she organise her private life, and her judgement of people must be pretty bad from the Another example was the educated lady who declared that a new office had far too many electric points on the dado trunking. "You don't need all those you know! Haven't you seen those things that are a sort of strip of electric sockets? You just plug it into one socket on the wall and then you can plug about six things into it all at once. I got one from the Radio Times and it's brilliant!" It's that sort of blind ignorance coupled with supreme confidence in one's knowledge, so typical of the arts educated elite in this country that leads to these people pontificating about windfarms and other environmental issues. Bill but she's earning more than thee..... The perfect place to clamp down on benefits. |
Did I not explain it very well?
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 21:16:51 +0000, Peter Duncanson
wrote: Fukushika ? That spelling must be a radiation induced typo. Fukushima. -- Peter Duncanson (in uk.tech.digital-tv) |
Did I not explain it very well?
In article ,
Ian Field wrote: Think lots still do by all these dummy plugs you see around... AFAIK those were originally intended to stop kiddies sticking things in the holes. Many of them have the disadvantage that an enterprising child can unplug them and then put them back upside down using just the earth pin, thus unshielding the live and neutal. -- Richard |
Did I not explain it very well?
In article ,
tony sayer wrote: Just absolutely stupid rather than wait and see what went wrong and then make informed -engineering- decisions on the matter.. However, many of the problems were probably not engineering ones. -- Richard |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:07 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com