|
Curry's LG offer
On 22/03/2011 14:45, Dr Hfuhruhurr wrote:
LED will probably be my next option as costs are definitely coming down and they're the next best thing to Plasma IMO. Plus I think that being so thin is just simply amazing. :) you could almost use picture hooks to hang them :) Trouble is they've made them so b****y thin they can't get a decent speaker in the box. So you have a flat telly with an external decoder, and a set of speakers instead of a fatter tele. Andy |
Curry's LG offer
On 22 Mar,
"The dog from that film you saw" wrote my 40" sony led backlit lcd weighs less than the 26" sharp lcd it replaced by about 3kg. I've just replaced my 8 YO 19" computer LCD monitor by a 23" widescreen HD LED one, so I could use the former upstairs for a different project. Apart from the improvement in clarity, I was amazed at teh difference in weight and thickness between the two. Apart from the upper right corner the new one runs virtually at ambient temperature too. I may need to use the central heating to replace the heat the old one produced. -- BD Change lycos to yahoo to reply |
Curry's LG offer
In article , Andy Champ
wrote: Trouble is they've made them so b****y thin they can't get a decent speaker in the box. So you have a flat telly with an external decoder, and a set of speakers instead of a fatter tele. But if you care about sound you'd have a set of decent speakers anyway, so nothing lost there. Rod. -- Virtual Access V6.3 free usenet/email software from http://sourceforge.net/projects/virtual-access/ |
Curry's LG offer
On 23/03/2011 06:04, Roderick Stewart wrote:
In , Andy Champ wrote: Trouble is they've made them so b****y thin they can't get a decent speaker in the box. So you have a flat telly with an external decoder, and a set of speakers instead of a fatter tele. But if you care about sound you'd have a set of decent speakers anyway, so nothing lost there. Rod. Our old CRT came with a pair of 6-inch or so speakers in the set, another pair for the rear, and a woofer in the cabinet it came with. Adequate for TV if not hifi. Andy |
Curry's LG offer
In article , Andy
Champ wrote: Adequate for TV if not hifi. What? Sound is sound, and like anything else it can be good quality or bad. Why should the presence of pictures make us drop our standards? Rod. -- Virtual Access V6.3 free usenet/email software from http://sourceforge.net/projects/virtual-access/ |
Curry's LG offer
On 24/03/2011 06:00, Roderick Stewart wrote:
In et.uk, Andy Champ wrote: Adequate for TV if not hifi. What? Sound is sound, and like anything else it can be good quality or bad. Why should the presence of pictures make us drop our standards? My wife is watching something right now which is a speech-only station. Telephone quality would be adequate (if annoying). What it does is fine. OK, so there's nothing below 200Hz. It doesn't matter on that type of programme. On a concert, OTOH, every dB matters. Andy |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:04 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com