|
DVR recommendation please
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 19:54:20 -0000, "Brian Gaff"
wrote: You are right, i just could not get a dvd recorder to do what I wanted but a pvr seems pretty simple, although in my eye situation it would have to speak now. I'd go for a bog standard dvd from Tesco or somesuch, and a decent pvr. Nobody has answered the actual question yet, ie what models etc. anyone? Some have suggested the Humax 9150 secondhand. I am happy with my 9300 PVR. As far a DVD players its hard to recommend any particular model. I suggest the OP looks at the Which? reviews. A summary is available to non-members online. -- (\__/) M. (='.'=) Due to the amount of spam posted via googlegroups and (")_(") their inaction to the problem. I am blocking some articles posted from there. If you wish your postings to be seen by everyone you will need use a different method of posting. |
DVR recommendation please
On Jan 28, 9:20*am, Mark
wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 19:54:20 -0000, "Brian Gaff" wrote: You are right, i just could not get a dvd recorder to do what I wanted but a pvr seems pretty simple, although in my eye situation it would have to speak now. I'd go for a bog standard dvd from Tesco or somesuch, and a decent pvr. Nobody has answered the actual question yet, ie what *models etc. anyone? Some have suggested the Humax 9150 secondhand. *I am happy with my 9300 PVR. *As far a DVD players its hard to recommend any particular model. I suggest the OP looks at the Which? reviews. *A summary is available to non-members online. -- (\__/) *M. (='.'=) Due to the amount of spam posted via googlegroups and (")_(") their inaction to the problem. I am blocking some articles posted from there. *If you wish your postings to be seen by everyone you will need use a different method of posting. If you don't fancy 'refurb' with 12 months on site warranty for 80- odd quid the 9150T is around 130 quid new from Argos, Comet etc. Match with any HDMI capable DVD player from Tesco or whatever, 20 quid or so. Job done. Personally I have no interest in HD, the programmes are still 99.9% crap no matter how many pixels they add. The very very few programmes where HD makes a difference to my enjoyment I'd rather wait for a Blu-Ray version and watch it in proper HD. |
DVR recommendation please
In message ,
Mark wrote I suggest the OP looks at the Which? reviews. But only if you want one that has more bells and useless whistles. Which? seem to think the more advertising hype on the side of the box the better the unit. -- Alan news2009 {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk |
DVR recommendation please
"Mark" wrote in message ... On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 19:54:20 -0000, "Brian Gaff" wrote: You are right, i just could not get a dvd recorder to do what I wanted but a pvr seems pretty simple, although in my eye situation it would have to speak now. I'd go for a bog standard dvd from Tesco or somesuch, and a decent pvr. Nobody has answered the actual question yet, ie what models etc. anyone? Some have suggested the Humax 9150 secondhand. I am happy with my 9300 PVR. As far a DVD players its hard to recommend any particular model. I suggest the OP looks at the Which? reviews. A summary is available to non-members online. I was one of the original subscribers to "Which" in the early 1960s. They then lost their way entirely. I remember a 4 page review they did of strawberry jam! A year or so back, the Consumers Association offered my a 3 month free trial plus a set of test reports entitled "The Pick of Which". I took the free trial and one of the test reports was about products with which I have expertise. The reports were spectacularly inaccurate which made me wonder how much reliance I can have on reports about products of which I know little or nothing. So, if "Which" says it is good or bad, then in my eyes it ain't necessarily so. -- JohnT |
DVR recommendation please
In article ,
JohnT wrote: I remember a 4 page review they did of strawberry jam! Nowt wrong with that. It varies tremendously in price - and a high price doesn't necessarily guarantee quality. Of course you could simply buy all the brands on sale and check them yourself. But then that applies to any consumer goods. -- *Don't squat with your spurs on * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
DVR recommendation please
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 23:10:21 -0000, "JohnT"
wrote: "Mark" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 19:54:20 -0000, "Brian Gaff" wrote: You are right, i just could not get a dvd recorder to do what I wanted but a pvr seems pretty simple, although in my eye situation it would have to speak now. I'd go for a bog standard dvd from Tesco or somesuch, and a decent pvr. Nobody has answered the actual question yet, ie what models etc. anyone? Some have suggested the Humax 9150 secondhand. I am happy with my 9300 PVR. As far a DVD players its hard to recommend any particular model. I suggest the OP looks at the Which? reviews. A summary is available to non-members online. I was one of the original subscribers to "Which" in the early 1960s. They then lost their way entirely. I remember a 4 page review they did of strawberry jam! A year or so back, the Consumers Association offered my a 3 month free trial plus a set of test reports entitled "The Pick of Which". I took the free trial and one of the test reports was about products with which I have expertise. The reports were spectacularly inaccurate which made me wonder how much reliance I can have on reports about products of which I know little or nothing. So, if "Which" says it is good or bad, then in my eyes it ain't necessarily so. I agree that Which? ain't as good as they used to be. However, AFAIK, they are the /only/ independent organisation that tests consumer products. I would no longer rely entirely on a Which report but they do provide useful information to help choose a suitable product. -- (\__/) M. (='.'=) Due to the amount of spam posted via googlegroups and (")_(") their inaction to the problem. I am blocking some articles posted from there. If you wish your postings to be seen by everyone you will need use a different method of posting. |
DVR recommendation please
In article ,
Mark wrote: I agree that Which? ain't as good as they used to be. However, AFAIK, they are the /only/ independent organisation that tests consumer products. I would no longer rely entirely on a Which report but they do provide useful information to help choose a suitable product. It's surprising how many just glance at the 'best buy' headline and condemn the rest without reading it. Could be their favourite is a 'good but pricey'. And of course few will have tested all the products on the market so just feel slighted if what they've bought doesn't win - even although it works well enough for them. Some years ago Jaguar got very shirty when a Which member's report said that sample showed Jags not to be the most reliable in class. But if they'd read the whole article, the same members were very pleased with their Jag and would recommend it to a friend. I got a bit fed up with data being given (or sold) to the press before I'd received my copy of the mag. So one reason for cancelling my subscription. It's much easier these days to find comparative reviews for free on the net. And they're now allowing data to be used in adverts which puts me off even more. Sort of the same as Sky - paying a subscription and still having ads. -- *Never kick a cow pat on a hot day * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
DVR recommendation please
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 14:53:21 +0000 (GMT), "Dave Plowman (News)"
wrote: In article , Mark wrote: I agree that Which? ain't as good as they used to be. However, AFAIK, they are the /only/ independent organisation that tests consumer products. I would no longer rely entirely on a Which report but they do provide useful information to help choose a suitable product. It's surprising how many just glance at the 'best buy' headline and condemn the rest without reading it. Could be their favourite is a 'good but pricey'. And of course few will have tested all the products on the market so just feel slighted if what they've bought doesn't win - even although it works well enough for them. You do have the read between the lines. Sometimes it's not easy to work out why product A has been given a "best buy" status when product B, with the same "score", has not. Some years ago Jaguar got very shirty when a Which member's report said that sample showed Jags not to be the most reliable in class. But if they'd read the whole article, the same members were very pleased with their Jag and would recommend it to a friend. I got a bit fed up with data being given (or sold) to the press before I'd received my copy of the mag. So one reason for cancelling my subscription. It's much easier these days to find comparative reviews for free on the net. And they're now allowing data to be used in adverts which puts me off even more. I'd rather they did not allow this. -- (\__/) M. (='.'=) Due to the amount of spam posted via googlegroups and (")_(") their inaction to the problem. I am blocking some articles posted from there. If you wish your postings to be seen by everyone you will need use a different method of posting. |
DVR recommendation please
In message , Mark
wrote You do have the read between the lines. Sometimes it's not easy to work out why product A has been given a "best buy" status when product B, with the same "score", has not. As others have said you only have to read one of their product reviews on a subject you know something about to see the flaws in their testing and selection method. Many years ago I read Which? review where they rated one box of electronics highly and slated another. The only real difference in the product was the badge/branding. -- Alan news2009 {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:49 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com