Masking "Dogs" on TV Screen.
 

"Mick." wrote in message
om...

"Light of Aria" wrote in message
...
I mask DOG **** by not watching channels with DOG ****.

That does not leave many channels to choose between though does it, most
on Freeview have them, some are not too bad but 5 has a really bright one.
Here is an online petition I found to get them removed.


http://www.petition.com/DOG/petition.html

Mick.





That's true. I live in a 4 channel world plus Film Four.

I'm just not part of the so called "competitive multi channel market".

It's not me filtering the channels so much as the channels filtering
themselves from me. Anything of any importance will be on DVDrip or
broadcast without DOG ****.

It is they who are sub-par and defective, not I!

Masking "Dogs" on TV Screen.
 

"Mark" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 03:10:43 -0800 (PST),
"
wrote:

On Jan 16, 7:24 pm, Scott wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 18:52:27 -0000, "Mick."
wrote:
Hi all,

I have been searching online to see if anyone has come up with an
effective way to

Mask the "Dogs" on our TV Screens.

I use a cardboard strip hung over the top of the set, which is better,
but I
would have hoped that by now someone might have made a diffuser of
sorts,
that might mask it if nothing else.

Anyone have any idea please?

I know this is complete heresy on this group, but I have started to
get used to them. I sometimes think something is missing if there is
no DOG.

Sounds like you spend more time watching trashy channels than main
ones. :-) I suppose us humans can be trained to accept anything as
normal.

FWIW I find them all quite irritating, except the BBC One HD one,
which I can often ignore - it being well out of the way, and very
feint.

I think BBC Four is the worst - it's obviously not the worst DOG in
and of itself, but it's in the 4x3 safe area of 16x9 programmes (i.e.
near the middle of the screen!) - and some of the programme are quite
dark and/or serious, which makes the DOG stand-out.

But BBC4 is not transmitted in 4x3 anywhere AFAIK?

It can be *received* in 4:3 if you have a non-widescreen TV.

Personnaly I think
there are worse DOGs on BBC3,

BBC3. Yuk. Lurid pink.

--
Max Demian

Masking "Dogs" on TV Screen.
 

On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 13:35:49 +0000, Java Jive
wrote:

They regularly have others ... Next programme advertising that drops
down from the Eurosport DOG, which is already far too big anyway, that
obscures the ball in the middle of a tennis rally.

It's obvious that the managers/bosses don't watch their own TV
channel.
--
(\__/) M.
(='.'=) Due to the amount of spam posted via googlegroups and
(")_(") their inaction to the problem. I am blocking some articles
posted from there. If you wish your postings to be seen by
everyone you will need use a different method of posting.

Masking "Dogs" on TV Screen.
 

On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 13:05:55 -0000, Roderick Stewart
wrote:

In article , Tim.... wrote:
I know this is complete heresy on this group, but I have started to
get used to them. I sometimes think something is missing if there is
no DOG.

They never bothered me in the first place.

I can't see what all the fuss is about :-(

They bothered me "in the first place", because "in the first place", i.e.
when broadcasting used to be about broadcasting, there weren't any.
Neither were the end credits speeded up, nor squashed into illegibility,
nor had anybody talking over them, programmes were neither preceeded with
jumpy resumes of the previous episodes nor followed by half the plot of
the next ones. In other words, nothing deliberately blemished or
interrupted a programme from the moment it started until it had ended,
because what the broadcasters existed for was, as their name suggests,
the broadcasts, and not the opportunity to buy a DVD. It's sad that
anyone can become so accustomed to this vandalism as to take it for
granted. It's a sign that we are gradually forgetting what broadcasting
is for.

I'm of the opinion that, if a programme is good enough to show, then
it should not be interrupted, defaced or squeezed. It's plain
vandalism, like graffiti.

--
(\__/) M.
(='.'=) Due to the amount of spam posted via googlegroups and
(")_(") their inaction to the problem. I am blocking some articles
posted from there. If you wish your postings to be seen by
everyone you will need use a different method of posting.

Masking "Dogs" on TV Screen.
 

On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 14:09:18 -0000, "Light of Aria"
wrote:


"Mick." wrote in message
news:[email protected] com...

"Light of Aria" wrote in message
...
I mask DOG **** by not watching channels with DOG ****.

That does not leave many channels to choose between though does it, most
on Freeview have them, some are not too bad but 5 has a really bright one.
Here is an online petition I found to get them removed.


http://www.petition.com/DOG/petition.html

That's true. I live in a 4 channel world plus Film Four.

Which four? Only BBC1,2 and Film4 are devoid of vandalism AFAIK
(Except children's programmes sometimes on BBC).

I'm just not part of the so called "competitive multi channel market".

It's not me filtering the channels so much as the channels filtering
themselves from me. Anything of any importance will be on DVDrip or
broadcast without DOG ****.

It is they who are sub-par and defective, not I!


--
(\__/) M.
(='.'=) Due to the amount of spam posted via googlegroups and
(")_(") their inaction to the problem. I am blocking some articles
posted from there. If you wish your postings to be seen by
everyone you will need use a different method of posting.

Masking "Dogs" on TV Screen.
 

On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 09:24:03 +0000, Jeff Layman wrote:

On 16/01/2011 20:30, tim.... wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 18:52:27 -0000,
wrote:

Hi all,

I have been searching online to see if anyone has come up with an
effective way to

Mask the "Dogs" on our TV Screens.



I use a cardboard strip hung over the top of the set, which is better, but
I
would have hoped that by now someone might have made a diffuser of sorts,
that might mask it if nothing else.



Anyone have any idea please?

Mick.

I know this is complete heresy on this group, but I have started to
get used to them. I sometimes think something is missing if there is
no DOG.

They never bothered me in the first place.

I can't see what all the fuss is about :-(

tim


Most of the time there is no problem. But wait till you see a DOG which
has moving graphics. That is a distracting nuisance.

CBBC is one (well, animated rather than moving) and can be distracting.
Fortunately I watch that channel very little, as only Sarah Jane is of
interest.
--
Peter.
The gods will stay away
whilst religions hold sway

Masking "Dogs" on TV Screen.
 

Mick. said the following on 16/01/2011 18:52:
Hi all,

I have been searching online to see if anyone has come up with an
effective way to

Mask the "Dogs" on our TV Screens.

I use a cardboard strip hung over the top of the set, which is better, but I
would have hoped that by now someone might have made a diffuser of sorts,
that might mask it if nothing else.

Anyone have any idea please?

Mick.

We're just lucky that they don't get as big as the old comedy series
which used to be on BET and that was one quarter of the screen.

I did send to Genius an ever so slightly sarcastic idea of having
DOGless channels and no announcements of what's coming up next so that
we wouldn't know what channel we were watching and then couldn't be
arsed to change channels as we usually do.

Richard.

Masking "Dogs" on TV Screen.
 

On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 14:37:11 -0000, "Max Demian"
wrote:

"Mark" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 03:10:43 -0800 (PST),
"
wrote:

On Jan 16, 7:24 pm, Scott wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 18:52:27 -0000, "Mick."
wrote:
Hi all,

I have been searching online to see if anyone has come up with an
effective way to

Mask the "Dogs" on our TV Screens.

I use a cardboard strip hung over the top of the set, which is better,
but I
would have hoped that by now someone might have made a diffuser of
sorts,
that might mask it if nothing else.

Anyone have any idea please?

I know this is complete heresy on this group, but I have started to
get used to them. I sometimes think something is missing if there is
no DOG.

Sounds like you spend more time watching trashy channels than main
ones. :-) I suppose us humans can be trained to accept anything as
normal.

FWIW I find them all quite irritating, except the BBC One HD one,
which I can often ignore - it being well out of the way, and very
feint.

I think BBC Four is the worst - it's obviously not the worst DOG in
and of itself, but it's in the 4x3 safe area of 16x9 programmes (i.e.
near the middle of the screen!) - and some of the programme are quite
dark and/or serious, which makes the DOG stand-out.

But BBC4 is not transmitted in 4x3 anywhere AFAIK?

It can be *received* in 4:3 if you have a non-widescreen TV.

I guess you can crop any widescreen picture to 4:3 but the "old"
channels are always transmitted in 4:3 on analogue.

Personnaly I think
there are worse DOGs on BBC3,

BBC3. Yuk. Lurid pink.
--
(\__/) M.
(='.'=) Due to the amount of spam posted via googlegroups and
(")_(") their inaction to the problem. I am blocking some articles
posted from there. If you wish your postings to be seen by
everyone you will need use a different method of posting.

Masking "Dogs" on TV Screen.
 

On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:09:45 +0000, Mark
wrote:

On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 14:37:11 -0000, "Max Demian"
wrote:

"Mark" wrote in message
. ..
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 03:10:43 -0800 (PST),
"
wrote:

On Jan 16, 7:24 pm, Scott wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 18:52:27 -0000, "Mick."
wrote:
Hi all,

I have been searching online to see if anyone has come up with an
effective way to

Mask the "Dogs" on our TV Screens.

I use a cardboard strip hung over the top of the set, which is better,
but I
would have hoped that by now someone might have made a diffuser of
sorts,
that might mask it if nothing else.

Anyone have any idea please?

I know this is complete heresy on this group, but I have started to
get used to them. I sometimes think something is missing if there is
no DOG.

Sounds like you spend more time watching trashy channels than main
ones. :-) I suppose us humans can be trained to accept anything as
normal.

FWIW I find them all quite irritating, except the BBC One HD one,
which I can often ignore - it being well out of the way, and very
feint.

I think BBC Four is the worst - it's obviously not the worst DOG in
and of itself, but it's in the 4x3 safe area of 16x9 programmes (i.e.
near the middle of the screen!) - and some of the programme are quite
dark and/or serious, which makes the DOG stand-out.

But BBC4 is not transmitted in 4x3 anywhere AFAIK?

It can be *received* in 4:3 if you have a non-widescreen TV.

I guess you can crop any widescreen picture to 4:3 but the "old"
channels are always transmitted in 4:3 on analogue.

I thought it was 14:9 for BBC.

Masking "Dogs" on TV Screen.
 

On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 03:10:43 -0800 (PST),
"
wrote:

On Jan 16, 7:24*pm, Scott wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 18:52:27 -0000, "Mick."
wrote:









Hi all,

* * *I have been searching online to see if anyone has come up with an
effective way to

Mask the "Dogs" on our TV Screens.

I use a cardboard strip hung over the top of the set, which is better, but I
would have hoped that by now someone might have made a diffuser of sorts,
that might mask it if nothing else.

Anyone have any idea please?

Mick.

I know this is complete heresy on this group, but I have started to
get used to them. *I sometimes think something is missing if there is
no DOG.

Sounds like you spend more time watching trashy channels than main
ones. :-) I suppose us humans can be trained to accept anything as
normal.

No. Mostly BBC One and BBC HD.

FWIW I find them all quite irritating, except the BBC One HD one,
which I can often ignore - it being well out of the way, and very
feint.

May explain my tolerance.

I think BBC Four is the worst - it's obviously not the worst DOG in
and of itself, but it's in the 4x3 safe area of 16x9 programmes (i.e.
near the middle of the screen!) - and some of the programme are quite
dark and/or serious, which makes the DOG stand-out.

Cheers,
David.