|
Commissioning new Blackhill transmitter
I drove past the now twin masts at Blackhill (Central Scotland). I
know the new mast is for DSO but I wondered if they will wait until June to start using the new aerials or if they can make the transfer early. I see that some of the new digital channels are the same as the present analogue channels (which may provide the answer). Does each channel have its own aerial (antenna) or do they all go through the same aerial? If the former, does the size of the aerial have to be matched exactly to the intended frequency? Do you need a digital aerial to transmit digital as we all know by now that you need a digital aerial to receive digital TV? :-) |
Commissioning new Blackhill transmitter
"Scott" wrote in message
... I drove past the now twin masts at Blackhill (Central Scotland). I know the new mast is for DSO but I wondered if they will wait until June to start using the new aerials or if they can make the transfer early. I see that some of the new digital channels are the same as the present analogue channels (which may provide the answer). Does each channel have its own aerial (antenna) or do they all go through the same aerial? If the former, does the size of the aerial have to be matched exactly to the intended frequency? Do you need a digital aerial to transmit digital as we all know by now that you need a digital aerial to receive digital TV? :-) The transmitters are all combined at ground level and fed by several cables to an aerial array which is designed to give power gain - on a main site like Balck Hill either +10dB or +13dB. The aerials are the same for both analogue and digital. -- Woody harrogate three at ntlworld dot com |
Commissioning new Blackhill transmitter
On Sun, 2 Jan 2011 14:41:08 -0000, "Woody"
wrote: "Scott" wrote in message .. . I drove past the now twin masts at Blackhill (Central Scotland). I know the new mast is for DSO but I wondered if they will wait until June to start using the new aerials or if they can make the transfer early. I see that some of the new digital channels are the same as the present analogue channels (which may provide the answer). Does each channel have its own aerial (antenna) or do they all go through the same aerial? If the former, does the size of the aerial have to be matched exactly to the intended frequency? Do you need a digital aerial to transmit digital as we all know by now that you need a digital aerial to receive digital TV? :-) The transmitters are all combined at ground level and fed by several cables to an aerial array which is designed to give power gain - on a main site like Balck Hill either +10dB or +13dB. The aerials are the same for both analogue and digital. Sorry this is off-topic now but can anyone suggest a reason why my post has disappeared and Woody's reply has created a new thread in my newsreader (Agent)? A number of my postings have disappeared from view but people are replying so they must see them. PS Back on topic, why did Black Hill need a new transmitter when most of the others have just been upgraded? Not complaining obviously about the special treatement, just wondering. |
Commissioning new Blackhill transmitter
Scott wrote:
can anyone suggest a reason why my post has disappeared and Woody's reply has created a new thread in my newsreader (Agent)? Your post, Woody's reply and your reply to him are all visible here, properly threaded. |
Commissioning new Blackhill transmitter
On Sunday, January 2nd, 2011 at 14:57:27h +0000, Scott wrote:
Sorry this is off-topic now but can anyone suggest a reason why my post has disappeared and Woody's reply has created a new thread in my newsreader (Agent)? You are posting to EternalSeptember and presumably reading from that news server. Since your post is present on that server because other people can see it, the explanation is that something has messed up in the indexing and or caching of articles by your newsreader Forte Agent. I use Pan and occasionally month old or more articles appear as unread because it has had a hiccough with its internal "database". |
Commissioning new Blackhill transmitter
On Sun, 2 Jan 2011 15:27:57 +0000 (UTC), J G Miller
wrote: On Sunday, January 2nd, 2011 at 14:57:27h +0000, Scott wrote: Sorry this is off-topic now but can anyone suggest a reason why my post has disappeared and Woody's reply has created a new thread in my newsreader (Agent)? You are posting to EternalSeptember and presumably reading from that news server. Since your post is present on that server because other people can see it, the explanation is that something has messed up in the indexing and or caching of articles by your newsreader Forte Agent. I use Pan and occasionally month old or more articles appear as unread because it has had a hiccough with its internal "database". Thanks to you and Andy for helping to isolate the problem. What I think I will try is to delete a few thousand posts and see if that helps. |
Commissioning new Blackhill transmitter
On Sun, 2 Jan 2011 14:41:08 -0000, "Woody"
wrote: The transmitters are all combined at ground level and fed by several cables to an aerial array Cable or waveguide? -- Cheers Peter |
Commissioning new Blackhill transmitter
Scott wrote:
I drove past the now twin masts at Blackhill (Central Scotland). I know the new mast is for DSO but I wondered if they will wait until June to start using the new aerials or if they can make the transfer early. I see that some of the new digital channels are the same as the present analogue channels (which may provide the answer). They are likely to run some high power tests on the post DSO allocations from the new mast and aerials overnight. Keep a look out between now and DSO for the analogue services that are 'giving up' their allocations being scheduled to be off the air overnight. That's what happened at Wenvoe and Winter Hill (though those sites just had new aerials, not permanent replacement masts), and the muxes were 'empty' during the tests. -- Mark Please replace invalid and invalid with gmx and net to reply. www.paras.org.uk |
Commissioning new Blackhill transmitter
Brian Gaff wrote:
Trolling again.. The obvious answer is that normally one only is used, but of course to get the polar responses required multiple aerials will be visible and phased to get the desired effect.. Mybe! Brian Brian, a total change of subject. I'm writing something that touches on the way blind people use television, and in particular the way analogue switch-off is affecting them. I just wonder if you could offer any insights, so to speak. I can't imagine what it must be like to be blind, so I feel that I might be missing something obvious. Can you help? Bill |
Commissioning new Blackhill transmitter
On Sun, 02 Jan 2011 15:41:41 +0000, Scott wrote:
On Sun, 2 Jan 2011 15:27:57 +0000 (UTC), J G Miller wrote: On Sunday, January 2nd, 2011 at 14:57:27h +0000, Scott wrote: Sorry this is off-topic now but can anyone suggest a reason why my post has disappeared and Woody's reply has created a new thread in my newsreader (Agent)? You are posting to EternalSeptember and presumably reading from that news server. Since your post is present on that server because other people can see it, the explanation is that something has messed up in the indexing and or caching of articles by your newsreader Forte Agent. I use Pan and occasionally month old or more articles appear as unread because it has had a hiccough with its internal "database". Thanks to you and Andy for helping to isolate the problem. What I think I will try is to delete a few thousand posts and see if that helps. And then compact the database, if that's an option. Might be best to copy the database(s) first, if that's not offered as a choice before compaction. -- Peter. The gods will stay away whilst religions hold sway |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:40 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com