|
BBC to reduce DSat red button service to match Freeview
They really are taking the **** with their "Platform Neutral" stance
now... "During the course of this review, BBC management has stated its plans to reduce the service’s use of capacity on the digital satellite and cable platforms after the 2012 Olympics, to bring it closer to its current usage on the digital terrestrial platform. This should result in distribution cost savings to the BBC. We agree with this proposed course of action, and we would expect BBC Red Button to reduce its distribution costs by providing a more consistent level of service across different digital TV platforms. Implementation date: 2012." from http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/assets...tton_final.pdf I wonder if there will be any distribution cost savings at all? Are they really going to give up a transponder? Or maybe they'll let out the space. Like they do all the other null packets they send. (!) Here's an alternative idea for them: how about maximising the use and value of these streams by finally letting Freesat viewers access them all(!), giving them an EPG entry, and letting people PVR them! Oh, and using the downtime for something useful. Cheers, David. |
BBC to reduce DSat red button service to match Freeview
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 05:31:33 -0800 (PST),
" wrote: Here's an alternative idea for them: how about maximising the use and value of these streams by finally letting Freesat viewers access them all(!), giving them an EPG entry, and letting people PVR them! Oh, and using the downtime for something useful. That won't sell any Freeview boxes, now will it? Scaling back the service after 2012 is probably just something they were planning to do anyway. "Interactive Television" was more of a fad than a long-term venture. -- |
BBC to reduce DSat red button service to match Freeview
On Friday, November 12th, 2010 at 14:58:25h +0000, Zero Tolerance wrote:
"Interactive Television" was more of a fad than a long-term venture. It was something to generate more hype to get people interested in getting equipped for DSO. Once DSO is achieved, ie after the Olympics 2012, lo and behold, it is time for the BBC to scale it back and reduce it to almost nothing. There is also the possibility that once everybody is "Freeview" enabled, more and more of what is now Freeview content will become Payview. |
BBC to reduce DSat red button service to match Freeview
wrote in message ... snip : Here's an alternative idea for them: how about maximising : the use and value of these streams by finally letting Freesat : viewers access them all(!), giving them an EPG entry, and : letting people PVR them! Oh, and using the downtime for : something useful. They can't do that, simply, as each channel would then constitute an extra channel which would then require formal approval. -- Regards, Jerry. |
BBC to reduce DSat red button service to match Freeview
wrote in message ... http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/assets...tton_final.pdf I'm getting Page Not Found. Regards David |
BBC to reduce DSat red button service to match Freeview
On Nov 12, 4:49*pm, "Jerry" wrote:
wrote in message ... snip : Here's an alternative idea for them: how about maximising : the use and value of these streams by finally letting Freesat : viewers access them all(!), giving them an EPG entry, and : letting people PVR them! Oh, and using the downtime for : something useful. They can't do that, simply, as each channel would then constitute an extra channel which would then require formal approval. Yes, that is the politics behind it. I was talking about common sense! ;-) Cheers, David |
BBC to reduce DSat red button service to match Freeview
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 15:19:46 +0000 (UTC), J G Miller
wrote: It was something to generate more hype to get people interested in getting equipped for DSO. It was something the BBC saw Sky doing and they couldn't wait to do it themselves. I think even Sky have given up on it now. There is also the possibility that once everybody is "Freeview" enabled, more and more of what is now Freeview content will become Payview. No realistic possibility that I can see, though. -- |
BBC to reduce DSat red button service to match Freeview
On Friday, November 12th, 2010 at 17:45:41h +0000, Zero Tolerance wrote:
No realistic possibility that I can see, though. So the fact that OfCon changed the licencing conditions of the "Freeview" multiplexes B, C, and D to remove the "free to air" only restriction, ie allow subscription content did not create a realistic possibility? http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.UK/consultations/paytv/ |
BBC to reduce DSat red button service to match Freeview
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:10:41 -0000, "David"
wrote: wrote in message ... http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/assets...tton_final.pdf I'm getting Page Not Found. Strange. Perhaps the url is being truncated. Try this: http://tinyurl.com/35ll9rn -- Peter Duncanson (in uk.tech.digital-tv) |
BBC to reduce DSat red button service to match Freeview
I've never understood the red button, as as far as I can see, its just
another stream of data ie another channel, and its only used as and when. Why not do as they always did and say, ch xx for whatever. Red button is njust a bit of bull**** really. They want to use less paid for bandwidth, end of story. Brian -- Brian Gaff - Note:- In order to reduce spam, any email without 'Brian Gaff' in the display name may be lost. Blind user, so no pictures please! wrote in message ... They really are taking the **** with their "Platform Neutral" stance now... "During the course of this review, BBC management has stated its plans to reduce the service’s use of capacity on the digital satellite and cable platforms after the 2012 Olympics, to bring it closer to its current usage on the digital terrestrial platform. This should result in distribution cost savings to the BBC. We agree with this proposed course of action, and we would expect BBC Red Button to reduce its distribution costs by providing a more consistent level of service across different digital TV platforms. Implementation date: 2012." from http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/assets...tton_final.pdf I wonder if there will be any distribution cost savings at all? Are they really going to give up a transponder? Or maybe they'll let out the space. Like they do all the other null packets they send. (!) Here's an alternative idea for them: how about maximising the use and value of these streams by finally letting Freesat viewers access them all(!), giving them an EPG entry, and letting people PVR them! Oh, and using the downtime for something useful. Cheers, David. |
BBC to reduce DSat red button service to match Freeview
"Peter Duncanson" wrote in message ... On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:10:41 -0000, "David" wrote: wrote in message ... http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/assets...tton_final.pdf I'm getting Page Not Found. Strange. Perhaps the url is being truncated. Try this: http://tinyurl.com/35ll9rn Got it Thanks David |
BBC to reduce DSat red button service to match Freeview
"J G Miller" wrote in message ... : On Friday, November 12th, 2010 at 17:45:41h +0000, Zero Tolerance wrote: : : No realistic possibility that I can see, though. : : So the fact that OfCon changed the licencing conditions of the "Freeview" : multiplexes B, C, and D to remove the "free to air" only restriction, ie : allow subscription content did not create a realistic possibility? : At the behest of ITV most likely... That said, many think that if ITV (who are the only/most likely broadcaster on FV) start hiding channels behind a paywall it will be the start of the end of ITV, far to many already well established pay TV channels to choose from already whilst other FTA channels could easily fill the (non soap) vacuum that would be left by ITV, I can't think of any other channel or broadcaster who is not already behind a paywall on FV going that route - those that might could/would already be behind one already - thinking of Virgin and Discovery (aka Quest) or those hiding behind the BT Vision paywall etc. -- Regards, Jerry. |
BBC to reduce DSat red button service to match Freeview
It seems to me that the BBC lost a lot of the bandwidth it used for its
interactive services on Freeview in order to make room for the HD channels post-DSO. Two of the HD channels are the BBC's own but the other two are ITV 1 HD and Channel 4 HD, so how about ITV and Ch4 hand back the bandwidth wasted by their +1 channels? -- JM |
BBC to reduce DSat red button service to match Freeview
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:54:34 +0000 (UTC), J G Miller
wrote: So the fact that OfCon changed the licencing conditions of the "Freeview" multiplexes B, C, and D to remove the "free to air" only restriction, ie allow subscription content did not create a realistic possibility? http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.UK/consultations/paytv/ Mux B is completely within the control of the BBC. The removal of the FTA restriction there is merely a shim to allow Arqiva to short-sell capacity which they do not yet own by using ex-BBC space in pre-DSO areas. Across the rest of the muxes, there's not enough room to do anything of any particular value from a pay-tv perspective because there are too many vested interests squatting on the capacity. -- |
BBC to reduce DSat red button service to match Freeview
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 12:58:25 +0000, Zero Tolerance wrote:
Mux B is completely within the control of the BBC. Post DSO, Multiplex B does not exist and is shared between BBC, Channel 3 licencees, and C4, and maybe five, for HD services. So the fact that BBC lost considerable capacity on what was Multiplex B shows that it is most definitely not within the control of the BBC. Across the rest of the muxes, there's not enough room to do anything of any particular value from a pay-tv perspective because there are too many vested interests squatting on the capacity. Yes, at the present time with DVB-t/MPEG-2. But when Arquiva can persuade the relevant parties that it is time to DVB-t2/MPEG-4 (which will be fully endorsed by OfCon or its successor) then $ky Picnic, for example, could very well be back on the table. |
BBC to reduce DSat red button service to match Freeview
"J G Miller" wrote in message ... snip: : Yes, at the present time with DVB-t/MPEG-2. But when Arquiva can persuade : the relevant parties that it is time to DVB-t2/MPEG-4 (which will be fully : endorsed by OfCon or its successor) then $ky Picnic, for example, could : very well be back on the table. I can just smell the revolting public if the above does happen... Perhaps the next BBC licence fee settlement will see the BBC funding replacement STB, PVRs and TVs! -- Regards, Jerry. |
BBC to reduce DSat red button service to match Freeview
On Saturday, November 13th, 2010 at 15:31:49h +0000, Jerry wrote:
I can just smell the revolting public if the above does happen... Smell? ;) Have you not already *seen* the revolting public in action at Millbank House this week? |
BBC to reduce DSat red button service to match Freeview
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 14:56:00 +0000 (UTC), J G Miller
wrote: On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 12:58:25 +0000, Zero Tolerance wrote: Mux B is completely within the control of the BBC. Post DSO, Multiplex B does not exist and is shared between BBC, Channel 3 licencees, and C4, and maybe five, for HD services. So the fact that BBC lost considerable capacity on what was Multiplex B shows that it is most definitely not within the control of the BBC. Very nice. However as I thought was clear, I was referring to Multiplex B as it exists now, and not in its nonexistent form post-DSO. Yes, at the present time with DVB-t/MPEG-2. But when Arquiva can persuade the relevant parties that it is time to DVB-t2/MPEG-4 (which will be fully endorsed by OfCon or its successor) then $ky Picnic, for example, could very well be back on the table. Still not likely, IMHO. Ofcom made sure that Picnic was kicked into the long grass years ago. We won't be seeing that again. All the rest of any new capacity would be sucked up by the usual suspects - ITV, BBC, C4, Five, to maintain their status quo of terrestrial viewing share. -- |
BBC to reduce DSat red button service to match Freeview
On Sunday, November 14th, 2010 at 18:21:02h +0000, Zero Tolerance suggested:
Still not likely, IMHO. Maybe not likely, but it does have a greater possibility with DVB-t2/MPEG-4 multiplexes. Ofcom made sure that Picnic was kicked into the long grass years ago. For a good technical reason. OfCon promotes, as it should, DVB-t2 because it is a more efficient use of spectrum. B$kyB was proposing DVB-t/MPEG-4 for Picnic. Having mixed MPEG-2 and MPEG-4 on a DVB-t multiplex was a variable that OfCon did not wish to countenance, especially as some integrated televisions and digital converter boxes may have been unable to cope with mixed encoding on a multiplex. With the proposed abolition of OfCon, and a very B$kyB friendly Secretary of State at DCMS who is under obligation to repay Uncle Rupert for his support during the recent election and to maintain goodwill for the duration of the current administration and into the next election, policies which are not in the financial interest of B$kyB will not be pursued. |
BBC to reduce DSat red button service to match Freeview
"J G Miller" wrote in message ... On Saturday, November 13th, 2010 at 15:31:49h +0000, Jerry wrote: I can just smell the revolting public if the above does happen... Smell? ;) Have you not already *seen* the revolting public in action at Millbank House this week? That was not at all representative of the country and achieved nothing other than harden The Coalitions resolve. |
BBC to reduce DSat red button service to match Freeview
"Jerry" wrote in message ... "J G Miller" wrote in message ... snip: : Yes, at the present time with DVB-t/MPEG-2. But when Arquiva can persuade : the relevant parties that it is time to DVB-t2/MPEG-4 (which will be fully : endorsed by OfCon or its successor) then $ky Picnic, for example, could : very well be back on the table. I can just smell the revolting public if the above does happen... Perhaps the next BBC licence fee settlement will see the BBC funding replacement STB, PVRs and TVs! -- Regards, Jerry. Of course The BBC could instill a regime of absolute enforcement and S.O.R.N. for TV sets! |
BBC to reduce DSat red button service to match Freeview
"J G Miller" wrote in message ... snip : : With the proposed abolition of OfCon, and a very B$kyB friendly Secretary : of State at DCMS who is under obligation to repay Uncle Rupert for his : support during the recent election and to maintain goodwill for the duration : of the current administration and into the next election, policies which : are not in the financial interest of B$kyB will not be pursued. Err, that would be why the DfT has ordered a review of Uncle Rupert's wish to take outright control of BSkyB, if you were correct I doubt that such a move by Uncle Vince would have been approved higher up in the coalition. -- Regards, Jerry. |
BBC to reduce DSat red button service to match Freeview
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 22:19:39 +0000, Jerry Mapson asked:
Err, that would be why the DfT has ordered a review of Uncle Rupert's wish to take outright control of BSkyB Can we therefore conclude that the Daily Mirror is just plain lying then when it reported at http://www.mirror.co.UK/news/top-stories/2010/11/05/business-secretary-vince-cable-blocks-rupert-murdoch-s-bid-to-buy-sky-115875-22693408/ "Business Secretary Vince Cable *enraged Tory allies* yesterday by blocking Rupert Murdoch's £12billion bid to take over Sky ..." or The Grauniad was lying when it reported at http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/organgrinder/2010/nov/04/vince-cable-news-corp-bskyb "Cameron's Tories owed something to the pre-election backing of the Sun and the other News Corp titles." According to that same article, it was the opposition from two Tory party supporting newspapers, the Daily Mail and the the Daily Telegraph which provided the political support for Cable to refer the decision to the DfT. Cameron, Osborne, and Hunt clearly would not want to alienate the owners of two of their traditional supporting newspapers by refusing the referral, which could have led to a collapse of the coalition. As to what the DfT decides of course, is another matter entirely and one would expect a ruling to be decided in the appropriate gentlemen's clubs over after dinner alcoholic beverages. |
BBC to reduce DSat red button service to match Freeview
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 18:33:25 +0000 (UTC), J G Miller
wrote: For a good technical reason. OfCon promotes, as it should, DVB-t2 because it is a more efficient use of spectrum. B$kyB was proposing DVB-t/MPEG-4 for Picnic. Nice try, but DVB-T2 hadn't even been prototyped at the time that Picnic was proposed. Thus, with DVB-T being the only game in town, and MPEG-4 being substantially more efficient way to use the spectrum than MPEG-2, Ofcom of course promoted, as it should, a LESS efficient use of spectrum. Having mixed MPEG-2 and MPEG-4 on a DVB-t multiplex was a variable that OfCon did not wish to countenance, especially as some integrated televisions and digital converter boxes may have been unable to cope with mixed encoding on a multiplex. However, broadcasting material which 'some' Freeview equipment is unable to cope with doesn't seem to be a problem when those broadcasts are undertaken by anyone except Sky. Any Freeview equipment which genuinely are "unable to cope" with a transmission in a format they did not understand would already be completely unusable in many parts of the UK. With the proposed abolition of OfCon, and a very B$kyB friendly Secretary of State at DCMS who is under obligation to repay Uncle Rupert for his support during the recent election and to maintain goodwill for the duration of the current administration and into the next election, policies which are not in the financial interest of B$kyB will not be pursued. Cobblers. I don't recall seeing anyone wave through the News Corp takeover... -- |
BBC to reduce DSat red button service to match Freeview
On Monday, November 15th, 2010 at 16:03:32h +0000, Kill Joy asked:
I bought a Freesat box to get the additional "Press Red" channels that Freeview doesn't have. Does this mean I wasted my money? No, because you will still be able to watch CBS Action, CBS Drama, CBS Reality, Men&Movies, Movies4Men, Movies4Men2, Horror Channel, NHK World, CNBC etc, etc |
BBC to reduce DSat red button service to match Freeview
"J G Miller" wrote in message ... : On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 22:19:39 +0000, Jerry Mapson asked: : : Err, that would be why the DfT has ordered a review of Uncle Rupert's : wish to take outright control of BSkyB : : Can we therefore conclude that the Daily Mirror is just plain lying then : when it reported at : : http://www.mirror.co.UK/news/top-stories/2010/11/05/business-secretary-vince-cable-blocks-rupert-murdoch-s-bid-to-buy-sky-115875-22693408/ : : "Business Secretary Vince Cable *enraged Tory allies* yesterday by : blocking Rupert Murdoch's £12billion bid to take over Sky ...." : : or The Grauniad was lying when it reported at : : http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/organgrinder/2010/nov/04/vince-cable-news-corp-bskyb : : "Cameron's Tories owed something to the pre-election backing of the : Sun and the other News Corp titles." Sorry to say, I wouldn't believe a word those news papers print, one wants the collapse of the coalition whilst the other still has to make the case against both the Tories and Murdoch, anything than sows division... : : According to that same article, it was the opposition from two Tory party : supporting newspapers, the Daily Mail and the the Daily Telegraph which : provided the political support for Cable to refer the decision to the DfT. : : Cameron, Osborne, and Hunt clearly would not want to alienate the owners : of two of their traditional supporting newspapers by refusing the referral, : which could have led to a collapse of the coalition. The fact that, if true, it's more important what the *none* Murdoch press say would suggest that perhaps Murdoch's influence on UK politics might be on the wane. : : As to what the DfT decides of course, is another matter entirely and one : would expect a ruling to be decided in the appropriate gentlemen's clubs : over after dinner alcoholic beverages. Hmm, if only, then we might get a decision based on what is best for the UK rather than what is best for a political party! -- Regards, Jerry. |
BBC to reduce DSat red button service to match Freeview
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 20:59:47 +0000, Jerry wrote:
Sorry to say, I wouldn't believe a word those news papers print Fair enough, you do consider them to be lying then. |
BBC to reduce DSat red button service to match Freeview
"J G Miller" wrote in message ... : On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 20:59:47 +0000, Jerry wrote: : : Sorry to say, I wouldn't believe a word those news papers : : Fair enough, you do consider them to be lying then. No, that would be to east to contest, economical with the truth, no lies but facts twisted for the reasons you snipped (for brevity). -- Regards, Jerry. |
BBC to reduce DSat red button service to match Freeview
wrote:
They really are taking the **** with their "Platform Neutral" stance now... "During the course of this review, BBC management has stated its plans to reduce the service’s use of capacity on the digital satellite and cable platforms after the 2012 Olympics, to bring it closer to its current usage on the digital terrestrial platform. This should result in distribution cost savings to the BBC. We agree with this proposed course of action, and we would expect BBC Red Button to reduce its distribution costs by providing a more consistent level of service across different digital TV platforms. Implementation date: 2012." from http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/assets...tton_final.pdf I wonder if there will be any distribution cost savings at all? Are they really going to give up a transponder? Or maybe they'll let out the space. Like they do all the other null packets they send. (!) The transponder for those channels is leased by Sky. I presume the BBC is paying BSkyB. Maybe this statement is just a negotiating position. |
BBC to reduce DSat red button service to match Freeview
"Jim" wrote in message o.uk... The transponder for those channels is leased by Sky. I presume the BBC is paying BSkyB. Maybe this statement is just a negotiating position. I don't think so. Certainly when I was involved in this the BBC were leasing their transponder space directly from SES and Eurosat. I think the BBC still have to pay Sky to have the services included on that Platform but I assume that renting the transponder space is by far the biggest cost. Also as I think transponder space is at a premium I don't think that suggesting to give one up would be a wise negotiation strategy. Glyn |
BBC to reduce DSat red button service to match Freeview
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 10:09:29 +0000, Glyn Morgan wrote:
Certainly when I was involved in this the BBC were leasing their transponder space directly from SES and Eurosat. Yes since all B$kyB offer other stations is a place on their EPG and the option of being encypted, and both come at a price, with encryption as you might expect, being a very large sum of money. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:48 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com