|
Lighting question
David Paste wrote:
On 11 Oct, 02:52, "j r powell" wrote: aren't you one of those massive racist ****s that were plentiful on here a few months back? No, you're wrong again. A complete lack of fact there. Well done, you've just highlighted your own ignorance and lack of metacognition. Here we go again: somebody apparently making back-to-back posts in a thread on his own. Those of us with killfiles are only aware of Jamie when people start quoting him. It was noticed something like two years ago by several people that he was showing the symptoms of a personality disorder, so there's no point trying to converse with him, because you'll not get anything sensible. And from what I see of the few quotes, now, he's become foul-mouthed like a burst sewer, so I'm happy to note that most of his process of deterioration has been hidden from me. Killfiles are good. |
Lighting question
"j r powell" wrote in message
... " wrote in message ... On Oct 11, 1:55 am, "Graham." wrote: Have you ever installed or replaced a bi-metal mains thermostat Yes and wondered why there is provision on it for neutral connection in addition to a live and switch-wire? Yes I'll leave you to ponder. Oh please do tell. Is it a miscellaneous provision of the Sod Act, designed to ensure that we have a chance to blow ourselves up? I presume Graham is referring to the little tiny heater element they sometimes put inside thermostats, which of course requires a neutral line to operate. It heats up in tandem with the radiators (or whatever heating technology is fitted). Afaik the idea behind this device is that if your thermostat is in a particularly cold part of the house, its ability to regulate the temperature might be compromised if relying upon nothing more than ambient temperature. That would just turn the thermostat into a simmerstat, as used to control the boiling rings on an electric cooker. Not really a thermostat then, as its response would be (more or less) independent of the ambient temperature. -- Max Demian |
Lighting question
On 11 Oct, 12:12, Mike Thomas wrote:
Here we go again: somebody apparently making back-to-back posts in a thread on his own. *Those of us with killfiles are only aware of Jamie when people start quoting him. *It was noticed something like two years ago by several people that he was showing the symptoms of a personality disorder, so there's no point trying to converse with him, because you'll not get anything sensible. *And from what I see of the few quotes, now, he's become foul-mouthed like a burst sewer, so I'm happy to note that most of his process of deterioration has been hidden from me. *Killfiles are good. Right, fair enough, I shall stop replying to him. I was not aware that killfiles stop ONLY the one person at a time (I don't use 'em, y'see) I was under the delusion they blocked those particular people & direct replies. |
Lighting question
On Oct 11, 11:14*am, David Paste wrote:
On 11 Oct, 02:52, "j r powell" wrote: So, denizens of u.t.d-d Did Jamie Powell really rape a dog last week? The rumour is out there, and Jamie has not denied it yet! Surely Jamie Powell didn't rape a dog last week and then churlishly throw a 10 pound note at it in a self-comforting act of contempt, walking away shouting "It was your fault anyway, Rex". Did Jamie Powell rape a dog? Well, this surely can't be good news. A dog can't talk, so it can't give consent. So that proves he raped it. Bill |
Lighting question
On 11 Oct, 13:50, "
wrote: A dog can't talk, so it can't give consent. So that proves he raped it. Bill Bill, I'd like to distance myself from my previously abominable persona. I have, in the last few hours found Jesusgod and am currently repenting for my sins. When I have fulfilled that particular requirement, I shall move on to the evangelical phase of my conversion, so I'll see you then. Amen. |
Lighting question
"Bill Wright" wrote in message
... I'm going to fit two lights in the same room. The problem is they don't have line and neutral marked. If I get one the wrong way round will they be in antiphase, and will this make the room get darker when I turn the light on? Too late for this year's Nobel's but if you can get your anti-light demo working quickly you''ll be in with a shout for next year. Paul DS |
Lighting question
In message , Max Demian
writes "j r powell" wrote in message ... " wrote in message ... On Oct 11, 1:55 am, "Graham." wrote: Have you ever installed or replaced a bi-metal mains thermostat Yes and wondered why there is provision on it for neutral connection in addition to a live and switch-wire? Yes I'll leave you to ponder. Oh please do tell. Is it a miscellaneous provision of the Sod Act, designed to ensure that we have a chance to blow ourselves up? I presume Graham is referring to the little tiny heater element they sometimes put inside thermostats, which of course requires a neutral line to operate. It heats up in tandem with the radiators (or whatever heating technology is fitted). Afaik the idea behind this device is that if your thermostat is in a particularly cold part of the house, its ability to regulate the temperature might be compromised if relying upon nothing more than ambient temperature. That would just turn the thermostat into a simmerstat, as used to control the boiling rings on an electric cooker. Not really a thermostat then, as its response would be (more or less) independent of the ambient temperature. I'm pretty sure that my central heating room thermostat has a resistor, effectively wired across the contacts. When the contacts are open, current flows through it (into "whatever it turns on and off"), so it acts as a local heater in side the thermostat case. In effect, it's a combination of a thermostat and a simmerstat, and this has the effect of reducing the 'backlash' or 'dead-zone' between the temperatures when the contacts open, and when they and close. I recall that, 35 years ago, the thermostat in my previous house was the same. I believe I did do some experiments with the resistor in circuit, and disconnected - and yes, it did influence things. Obviously, it's a compromise between reducing the backlash to the optimum minimum, and not having the temperature where the thermostat operates drifting up and down. -- Ian |
Lighting question
j r powell wrote:
No over-centre springs in glow-type starters........ Are you sure about that? I thought they may be dimpled to give them a snap action (in fact I'm almost certain, otherwise they'd draw out a long arc). The "ding" sound they make is perhaps another sign of an over-centre snap action. SteveT |
Lighting question
"Bill Wright" wrote in message ... I'm going to fit two lights in the same room. The problem is they don't have line and neutral marked. If I get one the wrong way round will they be in antiphase, and will this make the room get darker when I turn the light on? This is UK-DIY isn't it? I posted this message earlier but it didn't appear. Bill Are you trying to wire up a dimmer switch? More expensive ones have NO and NC terminals that allow you to have a dimmer and a switch control the same light. The dimmer part is always in series with the load, otherwise you will pop the fuse. |
Lighting question
"****" wrote in message ... On 11 Oct, 02:14, "Pikey Gob****e" wrote: Maybe Jamie was wrong then. Surely not! Well, the extreme unlikeliness of it is what made me remark on it. Mmm. You do have a good point. Well, there's no choice: we'll have to launch an investigation. Is this some form of amateur Blackface routine or what? You two are acting even dumber than usual. jamie. -- |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:14 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com