HomeCinemaBanter

HomeCinemaBanter (http://www.homecinemabanter.com/index.php)
-   UK digital tv (http://www.homecinemabanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   My first experience of freeview ;-) (http://www.homecinemabanter.com/showthread.php?t=67270)

Peter Duncanson August 19th 10 01:02 PM

My first experience of freeview ;-)
 
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 10:56:52 +0100, Mark
wrote:

On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 08:39:15 -0700 (PDT), "
wrote:

On Aug 18, 2:41*pm, J G Miller wrote:
On Wednesday, August 18th, 2010 at 08:56:40h +0100, Kennedy McEwen wrote:

Haven't seen that series on any of the perpetual repeat channels though.
;-)

Has it ever been repeated since the 1970s?

Or is it considered unsuitable for modern sensitive audiences because of
its racial stereotypes?


It isn't the audience that's sensitive. It's the lefty/liberals who
run broadcasting, who would like to brainwash us all.


Better wear your tinfoil hat then.

This morning the BBC News I watched only covered what the Tories were
doing and only interviewed a Tory MP. This must be evidence of right
wing bias within the BBC ;-)


;-)

But were the coverage and questions put from a lefty point of view?


--
Peter Duncanson
(in uk.tech.digital-tv)

Mark[_13_] August 19th 10 01:37 PM

My first experience of freeview ;-)
 
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 13:16:48 +0200, Martin wrote:

On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 10:56:52 +0100, Mark
wrote:

On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 08:39:15 -0700 (PDT), "
wrote:

On Aug 18, 2:41*pm, J G Miller wrote:
On Wednesday, August 18th, 2010 at 08:56:40h +0100, Kennedy McEwen wrote:

Haven't seen that series on any of the perpetual repeat channels though.
;-)

Has it ever been repeated since the 1970s?

Or is it considered unsuitable for modern sensitive audiences because of
its racial stereotypes?

It isn't the audience that's sensitive. It's the lefty/liberals who
run broadcasting, who would like to brainwash us all.


Better wear your tinfoil hat then.

This morning the BBC News I watched only covered what the Tories were
doing and only interviewed a Tory MP. This must be evidence of right
wing bias within the BBC ;-)


The episodes of HIGNFY leading up to the last election were hardly impartial.


Agreed. They were very nice to Labour and Tories and insulting to the
Lib Dems.
--
(\__/) M.
(='.'=) Due to the amount of spam posted via googlegroups and
(")_(") their inaction to the problem. I am blocking some articles
posted from there. If you wish your postings to be seen by
everyone you will need use a different method of posting.


Jim Lesurf[_2_] August 19th 10 01:39 PM

My first experience of freeview ;-)
 
In article , Dave Plowman (News)
wrote:
In article , Mark
wrote:
It isn't the audience that's sensitive. It's the lefty/liberals who
run broadcasting, who would like to brainwash us all.


Better wear your tinfoil hat then.


This morning the BBC News I watched only covered what the Tories were
doing and only interviewed a Tory MP. This must be evidence of right
wing bias within the BBC ;-)


The idea is to get an equal number of complaints from both sides. Sadly,
the right wingers tend to be more vocal. Since they just love having
something to get all upset and self righteous about.


As exampled in last week's 'Any Questions' where
the-woman-who-used-to-work-for-the-CBI got very annoyed and loudly talked
over someone who'd dared to point out that mere evidence clashed with her
theories.

Maybe someone should raise a discussion about all this on a *political*
newsgroup. :-)

mode='stir'
If people want to talk about 'politics' on a topic closer to science and
technology, maybe they should focus on what Dawkin's prog on More4 last
night investigated. I've not yet watched it all, but in what I saw I was
despressed by yet another apparent example of a 'science' sic? teacher
who seemed to have no real understanding of science. It would be funny if
the consequences weren't so worrying. And it is being paid for with our
taxes.... /mode

Slainte,

Jim

--
Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me.
Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm
Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html
Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html


[email protected] August 19th 10 03:32 PM

My first experience of freeview ;-)
 
On Aug 19, 7:58*am, "Hawkins"
wrote:
" wrote in message

...
On Aug 18, 2:41 pm, J G Miller wrote:

On Wednesday, August 18th, 2010 at 08:56:40h +0100, Kennedy McEwen wrote:


Haven't seen that series on any of the perpetual repeat channels though.
;-)


Has it ever been repeated since the 1970s?


Or is it considered unsuitable for modern sensitive audiences because of
its racial stereotypes?


It isn't the audience that's sensitive. It's the lefty/liberals who
run broadcasting, who would like to brainwash us all.

Bill

Hello Bill,
Have you seen any of Pat Condell's Utube videos ? He has a great way of
putting ideas across with force and a wry sense of humour.
Pardon this intrusion but I really think he is on the right track.http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=.../0/pZmxMlSTETo

Richard H.


That's very good! Very amusing. How come we all agree with him but
nothing is every put right?

Bill

[email protected] August 19th 10 03:34 PM

My first experience of freeview ;-)
 
On Aug 19, 10:56*am, Mark
wrote:
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 08:39:15 -0700 (PDT), "


This morning the BBC News I watched only covered what the Tories were
doing and only interviewed a Tory MP. *This must be evidence of right
wing bias within the BBC ;-)


Ah, they do that sometimes. It's a sort of double bluff. Mind you I
don't think BBC News is all that biased. It's the values and
assumptions in light entertainment programmes that annoy me. Bring
back Bernard Manning I say!

Bill


[email protected] August 19th 10 03:37 PM

My first experience of freeview ;-)
 
On Aug 19, 11:22*am, "Dave Plowman (News)"
wrote:
In article ,
* *Mark wrote:


The idea is to get an equal number of complaints from both sides.
Sadly, the right wingers tend to be more vocal. Since they just love
having something to get all upset and self righteous about.


No, it's the lefties who get self-righteous. The looks of self-
righteous disapproval I get when I talk in a loud voice about
Pakistanis,Gypsies and dole scroungers in a student pub prove that.

Bill

[email protected] August 19th 10 03:40 PM

My first experience of freeview ;-)
 
On Aug 19, 10:41*am, Jim Lesurf wrote:
In article , tim....
Main annoyance is that we had a loss of signal for about 10 seconds on 7th
Aug. Right in the middle of the slow movement of Mahler's 5th on BBC2.
Arrggh. *:- *Must try and find out what happened. Annoying that the BBC1/2
Proms don't get repeated as do the ones on BBC4. So no second chance to
hear the work without the break. Murphy only strikes when it matters!


Couldn't you just keep singing, like they do on 'I'm sorry I haven't a
clue'?

Bill

Jim Lesurf[_2_] August 19th 10 04:18 PM

My first experience of freeview ;-)
 
In article
,
wrote:
On Aug 19, 10:41 am, Jim Lesurf wrote:
In article , tim.... Main annoyance
is that we had a loss of signal for about 10 seconds on 7th Aug. Right
in the middle of the slow movement of Mahler's 5th on BBC2. Arrggh.
:- Must try and find out what happened. Annoying that the BBC1/2
Proms don't get repeated as do the ones on BBC4. So no second chance
to hear the work without the break. Murphy only strikes when it
matters!


Couldn't you just keep singing, like they do on 'I'm sorry I haven't a
clue'?


Wrong movement. You're thinking of the later one.

Slainte,

Jim

--
Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me.
Electronics
http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scot...o/electron.htm
Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html
Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html


Dave Plowman (News) August 19th 10 05:59 PM

My first experience of freeview ;-)
 
In article
,
wrote:
On Aug 19, 11:22 am, "Dave Plowman (News)"
wrote:
In article ,
Mark wrote:


The idea is to get an equal number of complaints from both sides.
Sadly, the right wingers tend to be more vocal. Since they just love
having something to get all upset and self righteous about.


No, it's the lefties who get self-righteous. The looks of self-
righteous disapproval I get when I talk in a loud voice about
Pakistanis,Gypsies and dole scroungers in a student pub prove that.


You actually think only left wingers object to racist comments? And that
left wingers approve of dole scroungers - if they are indeed that?

One thing I do find strange is how so many right wingers think the state
should pay for the care of *their* old folks - regardless of how rich they
are.

--
*Gravity is a myth, the earth sucks *

Dave Plowman
London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

[email protected] August 19th 10 09:25 PM

My first experience of freeview ;-)
 
On Aug 19, 4:59*pm, "Dave Plowman (News)"
wrote:
In article
No, it's the lefties who get self-righteous. The looks of self-
righteous disapproval I get when I talk in a loud voice about
Pakistanis,Gypsies and dole scroungers in a student pub prove that.


You actually think only left wingers object to racist comments?

Well obviously not because I object very strongly to racist comments
but I'm not a leftie. What on earth makes you think I would be making
racist comments anyway? If I mentioned Pakistanis I would probably be
talking about illegal immigrants, and if I mentioned gypsies I would
probably be talking about the recent incident in which Scarborough
Council has spent £55,000 providing them with an exclusive holiday
camp, whilst they won't even provide car parks without height barriers
so motor home owners (who bring a lot of serious money into the towns)
can park. What's racist about that? A racist would probably say
something like "Pakistanis and Gypsies are the scum of the earth and
they should all be gassed." I think you've forgotten what racism
actually is.

And that left wingers approve of dole scroungers - if they are indeed that?

Left wingers are very soft on all forms of welfare state abuse.
There's no doubt about that.


One thing I do find strange is how so many right wingers think the state
should pay for the care of *their* old folks - regardless of how rich they
are.

Person One works hard all their life and saves up for their old age.
Result: the state takes their house and savings to pay for their care.
Person Two does very little work all their life, and boozes and smokes
what money they have. Result: the state provides their care.

Bill


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com