|
Does this look like an IRS Aerial/Satellite
On Monday, August 9th, 2010 at 13:52:43h -0700, William Wright explained:
That's what's wrong with this country. Exactly -- the attitude today is not even "it does not have to be perfect" but "do as little as you can get away with doing". Meanwhile the Chinese economy continues to grow and grow (10% over the three months up to June 2010) ... |
Does this look like an IRS Aerial/Satellite
On Monday, August 9th, 2010 at 22:05:18h +0100, Andy Burns wrote:
I'd imagine that if the fruits of your labour is all that keeps hundreds of people from hurtling to their death it concentrates the mind a little more than than ensuring little old ladies can watch Corrie! Pratt and Whitney? |
Does this look like an IRS Aerial/Satellite
On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 21:26:10 +0000 (UTC), J G Miller
wrote: Pratt and Whitney? No, General Electric. -- Alan White Mozilla Firefox and Forte Agent. Twenty-eight miles NW of Glasgow, overlooking Lochs Long and Goil in Argyll, Scotland. Webcam and weather:- http://windycroft.co.uk/weather |
Does this look like an IRS Aerial/Satellite
On Monday, August 9th, 2010 at 13:51:02h -0700, William Wright explained:
When you lift an aerial (by pushing the mast up through the brackets) to roof screening effects don't stop 'just like that'. Funny innit? Rather than being a screening effect, could it actually be due to destructive interference from signal bouncing off the roof? |
Does this look like an IRS Aerial/Satellite
In article ,
J G Miller wrote: On Monday, August 9th, 2010 at 13:51:02h -0700, William Wright explained: When you lift an aerial (by pushing the mast up through the brackets) to roof screening effects don't stop 'just like that'. Funny innit? Rather than being a screening effect, could it actually be due to destructive interference from signal bouncing off the roof? that can happen, too. But remember that many roofs have a substantial metal content (red concrete tiles are coated with iron oxide) which lifts the local earth plane to roof top level. -- From KT24 Using a RISC OS computer running v5.16 |
Does this look like an IRS Aerial/Satellite
On Aug 9, 10:05*pm, Andy Burns wrote:
wrote: On Aug 9, 6:26 pm, "Nick Le Lievre" I don`t care if its not the most perfect job that could ever be done. That's what's wrong with this country. There was a programme on a month or so back about Rolls Royce making turbofan engines, one thing that came across was how *everyone* interviewed was very proud of the job they do (or did) and was concerned to do it right. I'd imagine that if the fruits of your labour is all that keeps hundreds of people from hurtling to their death it concentrates the mind a little more than than ensuring little old ladies can watch Corrie! No that's wrong. If you are given a job to do you owe it to yourself to do it to the best of your ability. Even if you are a student doing a menial job during the holidays you should do it properly. If this was drilled into kids at school things would be a lot better. Bill |
Does this look like an IRS Aerial/Satellite
On Aug 9, 10:29*pm, J G Miller wrote:
On Monday, August 9th, 2010 at 13:51:02h -0700, William Wright explained: When you lift an aerial (by pushing the mast up through the brackets) to roof screening effects don't stop 'just like that'. Funny innit? Rather than being a screening effect, could it actually be due to destructive interference from signal bouncing off the roof? That's another way of conceptualising fresnel effects. There are refractive as well as reflective effects involved. The simplest thing is, don't have something near the signal path. Bill |
Does this look like an IRS Aerial/Satellite
On Aug 9, 10:33*pm, charles wrote:
In article , * *J G Miller wrote: On Monday, August 9th, 2010 at 13:51:02h -0700, William Wright explained: When you lift an aerial (by pushing the mast up through the brackets) to roof screening effects don't stop 'just like that'. Funny innit? Rather than being a screening effect, could it actually be due to destructive interference from signal bouncing off the roof? that can happen, too. *But remember that many roofs have a substantial metal content (red concrete tiles are coated with iron oxide) which lifts the local earth plane to roof top level. -- From KT24 Using a RISC OS computer running v5.16 Yes, if the roof is near the aerial. Yagis don't like a ground plane within a couple of wavelengths. This used to be an issue in the days of VP 45MHz transmissions. You could get low gain problems when you were doing an aerial on a backyard pole (for a prefab or caravan). Another thing is that any internal wiring can be almost where the aerial is looking, potentially bad when the roof is made of flimsy stuff like shingles. Slightly off the subject, you can get massive problems when the aerial is just above a flat roof and looking over it, when the tx is significantly high up. You get nulls and peaks as you move the aerial up and down the mast. It's because of shallow angle reflections from the roof. I had one of these once where standing water on the roof caused almost complete loss of all channels. Bill |
Does this look like an IRS Aerial/Satellite
" wrote in message
... No that's wrong. If you are given a job to do you owe it to yourself to do it to the best of your ability. Even if you are a student doing a menial job during the holidays you should do it properly. If this was drilled into kids at school things would be a lot better. I should imagine a lot depends on whether you like the job or not, I suppose you love your job that`s why you put in the extra effort that others can`t be bothered to. |
Does this look like an IRS Aerial/Satellite
"J G Miller" wrote in message
... On Monday, August 9th, 2010 at 13:52:43h -0700, William Wright explained: That's what's wrong with this country. Exactly -- the attitude today is not even "it does not have to be perfect" but "do as little as you can get away with doing". The attitude of the installers maybe but I`m ok with it as long as it works properly, if for some reason because of their cack handed installation the system does not function as it should then I will be the first to complain. I don`t care if the FM aerial is ****e or even if the freeview reception is crap, all I`m really interested in is the satellite reception of Sky. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:55 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com