|
No waterproofing on the f conn and no cable clips?
On Feb 11, 10:55*pm, "IanT" wrote:
"martin willmott" wrote in message ... On 11 Feb, 03:52, " wrote: http://www.buckbyaerials.co.uk/rogue9.htm Bill Martin, are you aware that there are two people called Bill in this group? My own comment has been confined to 'no waterproofing of the 'f' connector and no cable clips?' I didn't criticise you for it, I merely pointed it out, although of course you know it's very poor work. I find it surprising that you put pics of bad work on your website. Firstly there are 4 bolts although the one does appear to be missing I'm not sure what you're saying. If one is missing from a set of four there are three. I've looked very closely and it looks like three bolts and an empty hole to me. and yes you are right I forgot to tape the f connector, but then it is solid cable, not air spaced. It doesn't matter. The house is surrounded by high trees, there was no option but to put it on the chimney, Fair enough. I often put dishes on chimneys, if I'm happy that the chimney will stand it. In this case I'd be far more worried about the tall mast, which is on a very small chimney for the load it will impose, with the brackets much too close. The rule of thumb is 1ft between the brackets for every seven feet of height. The dish in your picture should have been installed one or two courses of bricks lower. This would have reduced the visual impact and possibly helped it stand up to the wind. It would also have made it more secure because there would have been more weight on the bricks to which it was attached. so you never forget to tape a plug, I don't think I do actually, which is quite surprising really. you never under any circumstances bolt a dish to a chimney, See above. well I wish I was as f**king perfect as you! How about getting a life instead of nit picking at others, I don't nit pick on my website, I merely point out gross unforgivable errors. Mentioning that you have left the f connector unprotected and that you've left the cable insecure is not nit picking. These are serious faults. I guarantee all my work, I honour every single guarantee, promptly, Having a good honest attitude does not make you a competent installer. Your heart is in the right place but I honestly think you could improve your installation skills. recalls are rare but I bet even you mr perfect get one or two? Of course, how could it be otherwise? We all suffer faulty amplifiers etc, and make mistakes, and have confused people as customers. Up yours! Thank you. As you might know I'm always ready for a cheap thrill. Unfortunately some people spend a lot of time slagging others off in this group. *Bill often goes on about going out to correct aerial installations and how a lot of people are cowboys. *What he has NEVER done is name any company he claims have corrected work for. *Not once has he said anything about work installed by other companies because they would sue him. *I don't believe how perfect Bill is either, he sounds like he wants everyone to think he is. *We are all still waiting for the many names of companies that have installed unsuitable equipment that Bill has charged to "correct". *I think it will be funny to see someone we all know about on ROGUE TRADERS! *Let's see how perfect those claiming to be really are. One day Bill, you will upset the wrong people. You remind me of someone. Who could it be? http://www.buckbyaerials.co.uk/rogue3.htm How is this aerial attached to the chimney? Bill Bill |
No waterproofing on the f conn and no cable clips?
"martin willmott" wrote in message
... On 11 Feb, 03:52, " wrote: http://www.buckbyaerials.co.uk/rogue9.htm Bill Firstly there are 4 bolts although the one does appear to be missing and yes you are right I forgot to tape the f connector, but then it is solid cable, not air spaced. The house is surrounded by high trees, there was no option but to put it on the chimney, so you never forget to tape a plug, you never under any circumstances bolt a dish to a chimney, well I wish I was as f**king perfect as you! How about getting a life instead of nit picking at others, I guarantee all my work, I honour every single guarantee, promptly, recalls are rare but I bet even you mr perfect get one or two? Up yours! I'd wouldn't use you now. I'd be scared to shout and swear at me if I pointed out something I didn't approve of. A good aerial installation can easily last 30 years. Do you provide 30 years guarantee? Why do you use file names beginning "rouge" for web pages with pictures of your own work? -- Brian Gregory. (In the UK) To email me remove the letter vee. |
No waterproofing on the f conn and no cable clips?
"IanT" wrote in message
... "martin willmott" wrote in message ... On 11 Feb, 03:52, " wrote: http://www.buckbyaerials.co.uk/rogue9.htm Bill Firstly there are 4 bolts although the one does appear to be missing and yes you are right I forgot to tape the f connector, but then it is solid cable, not air spaced. The house is surrounded by high trees, there was no option but to put it on the chimney, so you never forget to tape a plug, you never under any circumstances bolt a dish to a chimney, well I wish I was as f**king perfect as you! How about getting a life instead of nit picking at others, I guarantee all my work, I honour every single guarantee, promptly, recalls are rare but I bet even you mr perfect get one or two? Up yours! Unfortunately some people spend a lot of time slagging others off in this group. Bill often goes on about going out to correct aerial installations and how a lot of people are cowboys. What he has NEVER done is name any company he claims have corrected work for. Not The absurd laws in this country as they are at the moment mean he is wise not to name and shame. once has he said anything about work installed by other companies because they would sue him. I don't believe how perfect Bill is either, he sounds like he wants everyone to think he is. We are all still waiting for the many names of companies that have installed unsuitable equipment that Bill has charged to "correct". I think it will be funny to see someone we all know about on ROGUE TRADERS! Let's see how perfect those claiming to be really are. One day Bill, you will upset the wrong people. -- Brian Gregory. (In the UK) To email me remove the letter vee. |
No waterproofing on the f conn and no cable clips?
Bill
How ironic compared with his comments he http://www.buckbyaerials.co.uk/rogue7.htm A strange site. Some good advice and a couple of nice looking jobs, but also some nonsense, botchery and a bit scathing about log periodic aerials. Well log periodic do have their uses but they're not good for weak signal areas. Whilst I would agree that they don't have the gain of a Yagi, they are useful around here even in weak signal areas as channel allocation runs from C21 to C63. I have ended up with a better balance of levels by using a LP and low noise amplifier, rather than a wideband Yagi with very low gain at C21. |
No waterproofing on the f conn and no cable clips?
"martin willmott" wrote in message
... On 11 Feb, 03:52, " wrote: http://www.buckbyaerials.co.uk/rogue9.htm Bill Firstly there are 4 bolts although the one does appear to be missing and yes you are right I forgot to tape the f connector, but then it is solid cable, not air spaced. The house is surrounded by high trees, there was no option but to put it on the chimney, so you never forget to tape a plug, you never under any circumstances bolt a dish to a chimney, well I wish I was as f**king perfect as you! How about getting a life instead of nit picking at others, I guarantee all my work, I honour every single guarantee, promptly, recalls are rare but I bet even you mr perfect get one or two? Up yours! Stones and glass houses comes to mind. Your site has other examples of unsatisfactory work such as long thin masts on chimneys, and insufficient lashings. If you did indeed substitute a dish because the long mast and preamp was not good enough then why did you leave the leave the dodgy mast in situ? Peter Crosland |
No waterproofing on the f conn and no cable clips?
In article , wrote:
On 12 Feb, "Doctor D" wrote: Whilst I would agree that they don't have the gain of a Yagi, they are useful around here even in weak signal areas as channel allocation runs from C21 to C63. I have ended up with a better balance of levels by using a LP and low noise amplifier, rather than a wideband Yagi with very low gain at C21. I've recently replaced my loft aerial, a supposedly high gain contract yagi with an external log (and new feeder), as after DSO a group A is not enough. There is more signal from the log, allowing me to dispense with the distribution amp and substitute a 4 way splitter, retaining a decoding margin of over 18dB with the current low power MUXs. Field strength is good, I'm about 12 miles LOS from a 500kw main station. Slight ghosting was a problem with the analogue. I haven't looked too closely since I changed the aerial but it's no worse. Remember that roofing material can attenuate signals to a very significant extent. In upper band V it can easily be a 20dB loss. Red concrete roof tile, widely used in the 60s, 70s and 80s, go their colour from iron oxide (aka rust). many modern roof tiles have metal reinforcing layer inside. And if teh roff inslation has metal foil involved ....... -- From KT24 Using a RISC OS computer running v5.16 |
No waterproofing on the f conn and no cable clips?
"Doctor D" wrote in message
... Bill How ironic compared with his comments he http://www.buckbyaerials.co.uk/rogue7.htm A strange site. Some good advice and a couple of nice looking jobs, but also some nonsense, botchery and a bit scathing about log periodic aerials. Well log periodic do have their uses but they're not good for weak signal areas. Whilst I would agree that they don't have the gain of a Yagi, they are useful around here even in weak signal areas as channel allocation runs from C21 to C63. I have ended up with a better balance of levels by using a LP and low noise amplifier, rather than a wideband Yagi with very low gain at C21. You are right, I hadn't thought of that. Also I'm amazed that one transmitter is using such widely spaces channels. -- Brian Gregory. (In the UK) To email me remove the letter vee. |
No waterproofing on the f conn and no cable clips?
How ironic compared with his comments he http://www.buckbyaerials.co.uk/rogue7.htm A strange site. Some good advice and a couple of nice looking jobs, but also some nonsense, botchery and a bit scathing about log periodic aerials. Well log periodic do have their uses but they're not good for weak signal areas. Whilst I would agree that they don't have the gain of a Yagi, they are useful around here even in weak signal areas as channel allocation runs from C21 to C63. I have ended up with a better balance of levels by using a LP and low noise amplifier, rather than a wideband Yagi with very low gain at C21. You are right, I hadn't thought of that. Also I'm amazed that one transmitter is using such widely spaces channels. We've got two using a ridiculous spread. Lark Stoke 21-60 and Ridge Hill 22-63. |
No waterproofing on the f conn and no cable clips?
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:15:59 -0800 (PST), martin willmott
wrote: A "fallen analogue aerial". http://www.buckbyaerials.co.uk/rogue1.htm Well done. It takes a real pro to distinguish analogue and digital yagis from ground level. |
No waterproofing on the f conn and no cable clips?
On Feb 12, 11:21*am, "Doctor D" wrote:
How ironic compared with his comments he http://www.buckbyaerials.co.uk/rogue7.htm A strange site. Some good advice and a couple of nice looking jobs, but also some nonsense, botchery and a bit scathing about log periodic aerials. Well log periodic do have their uses but they're not good for weak signal areas. Whilst I would agree that they don't have the gain of a Yagi, they are useful around here even in weak signal areas as channel allocation runs from C21 to C63. I have ended up with a better balance of levels by using a LP and low noise amplifier, rather than a wideband Yagi with very low gain at C21.. You are right, I hadn't thought of that. Also I'm amazed that one transmitter is using such widely spaces channels. We've got two using a ridiculous spread. Lark Stoke 21-60 and Ridge Hill 22-63.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Can anyone beat Crosspool: 21 to 67? Bill |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:40 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com