Stealing Bill's pictures
 

Lots to see (and criticize) on this page http://www.abaerials.co.uk (click
on gallery) starting with the mains cable running diagonally in the plaster
from TV to socket outlet. They've also nicked one of Bill's pictures. It's
about the only picture that doesn't feature a Triax Unix 52. One size
obviously does fit all!

See if you can spot it:
http://www.wrightsaerials.tv/aerialp...dern/026.shtml

Cheers D

Stealing Bill's pictures
 

On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 20:49:05 -0000, "Doctor D"
wrote:


Lots to see (and criticize) on this page http://www.abaerials.co.uk (click
on gallery) starting with the mains cable running diagonally in the plaster
from TV to socket outlet. They've also nicked one of Bill's pictures. It's
about the only picture that doesn't feature a Triax Unix 52. One size
obviously does fit all!

See if you can spot it:
http://www.wrightsaerials.tv/aerialp...dern/026.shtml

This paragraph from the front page tells you all you need to know
about the company:


There is no need to replace your current television as there are
several options already available to receive the Freeview Digital TV
service. One of the more common methods is the installation of a new
Digital TV Aerial at your property, and the addition of a digital
receiver box to receive the signal.

Stealing Bill's pictures
 

Doctor D wrote:


Lots to see (and criticize) on this page http://www.abaerials.co.uk
(click on gallery) starting with the mains cable running diagonally
in the plaster from TV to socket outlet. They've also nicked one of
Bill's pictures. It's about the only picture that doesn't feature a
Triax Unix 52. One size obviously does fit all!

See if you can spot it:
http://www.wrightsaerials.tv/aerialp...dern/026.shtml

Cheers D

I wonder if they are Part-P registered. If so they should know about
safe zones.

--
Ashley
For Windsor Weather see www.snglinks.com/wx

Stealing Bill's pictures
 

"Doctor D" wrote in message
o.uk...

Lots to see (and criticize) on this page http://www.abaerials.co.uk (click
on gallery) starting with the mains cable running diagonally in the
plaster from TV to socket outlet. They've also nicked one of Bill's
pictures. It's about the only picture that doesn't feature a Triax Unix
52. One size obviously does fit all!

See if you can spot it: Cheers D

I don't see that company having a go at others and claiming to
correct lots of work and installations - but not being able to
name one single case or company involved. Not every company
is honest unfortunately and I get the impression some are run
by cowboys - especially when they keep claiming to correct work
undertaken by other companies.
I know who Trading Standards should be investigating. Remember
homes from hell? Guess which companies have been
recently filmed for a future TV programme.

Stealing Bill's pictures
 

We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
drugs began to take hold. I remember "IanT" saying
something like:

I don't see that company having a go at others and claiming to
correct lots of work and installations -

**** off, you tedious ****.

Stealing Bill's pictures
 

In message , IanT
writes
I don't see that company having a go at others and claiming to
correct lots of work and installations - but not being able to
name one single case or company involved.

Ian, are you sure it is a case of "not" being able to, or, being
sensible and not doing so in a public place? I could name a number of
companies work, both in my line of business and others that I have come
across that would be worthy of mention, but it is not worth the ensuing
slanging match. They will get their comeuppance by their own hand at
some point. Probably by loosing repeat business.


Not every company
is honest unfortunately and I get the impression some are run
by cowboys - especially when they keep claiming to correct work
undertaken by other companies.
I know who Trading Standards should be investigating. Remember
homes from hell? Guess which companies have been
recently filmed for a future TV programme.

Sorry, not very good at guessing, would you please say as you appear to
be in the know.



--
Bill

Stealing Bill's pictures
 

On Jan 18, 8:49*pm, "Doctor D" wrote:
Lots to see (and criticize) on this pagehttp://www.abaerials.co.uk(click
on gallery) starting with the mains cable running diagonally in the plaster
from TV to socket outlet. They've also nicked one of Bill's pictures. It's
about the only picture that doesn't feature a Triax Unix 52. One size
obviously does fit all!

See if you can spot it:http://www.wrightsaerials.tv/aerialp...dern/026.shtml

Cheers D

Many thanks for spotting that! Your eidetic memory must be
exceptional. The cheeky ****ing ****s! I shall be writing to them
tomorrow. Honestly! What a cheek! It wouldn't be so bad if the rest of
their site showed work and working methods of good standard.

Bill

Stealing Bill's pictures
 

Sounds like the speak of a marketing man.

Brian

--
Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email.
graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them
Email:
__________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ __________


wrote in message
...
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 20:49:05 -0000, "Doctor D"
wrote:


Lots to see (and criticize) on this page http://www.abaerials.co.uk (click
on gallery) starting with the mains cable running diagonally in the
plaster
from TV to socket outlet. They've also nicked one of Bill's pictures. It's
about the only picture that doesn't feature a Triax Unix 52. One size
obviously does fit all!

See if you can spot it:
http://www.wrightsaerials.tv/aerialp...dern/026.shtml

This paragraph from the front page tells you all you need to know
about the company:


There is no need to replace your current television as there are
several options already available to receive the Freeview Digital TV
service. One of the more common methods is the installation of a new
Digital TV Aerial at your property, and the addition of a digital
receiver box to receive the signal.

Stealing Bill's pictures
 

On 19/01/2010 06:56, Mike wrote:
Ann Elephant wrote:

Celebrity Erections will air in July 2010 and is a Nonsensical
Production.

BBC Press office. Not for release.

Wrong Bill.

Great Billing though :-)

--
Adrian C

Stealing Bill's pictures
 

On Jan 18, 8:49 pm, "Doctor D" wrote:
Lots to see (and criticize) on this pagehttp://www.abaerials.co.uk(click
on gallery) starting with the mains cable running diagonally in the plaster
from TV to socket outlet. They've also nicked one of Bill's pictures. It's
about the only picture that doesn't feature a Triax Unix 52. One size
obviously does fit all!

See if you can spot it:http://www.wrightsaerials.tv/aerialp...dern/026.shtml

Cheers D

Many thanks for spotting that! Your eidetic memory must be
exceptional. The cheeky ****ing ****s! I shall be writing to them
tomorrow. Honestly! What a cheek! It wouldn't be so bad if the rest of
their site showed work and working methods of good standard.


A criticism of an identified company. That should please IanT, but I won't be holding my breath.

--
Graham.

%Profound_observation%

Stealing Bill's pictures
 

On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 22:39:48 -0000, "IanT"
wrote:


"Doctor D" wrote in message
news:[email protected] co.uk...

Lots to see (and criticize) on this page http://www.abaerials.co.uk (click
on gallery) starting with the mains cable running diagonally in the
plaster from TV to socket outlet. They've also nicked one of Bill's
pictures. It's about the only picture that doesn't feature a Triax Unix
52. One size obviously does fit all!

See if you can spot it: Cheers D

I don't see that company having a go at others and claiming to
correct lots of work and installations - but not being able to
name one single case or company involved. Not every company
is honest unfortunately and I get the impression some are run
by cowboys - especially when they keep claiming to correct work
undertaken by other companies.
I know who Trading Standards should be investigating. Remember
homes from hell? Guess which companies have been
recently filmed for a future TV programme.


This from the guy who posted "Winter Hill Off Air?" without checking
if he was the only one losing the signal.
l

Stealing Bill's pictures
 

On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 08:49:54 GMT, "Brian Gaff"
wrote:

Sounds like the speak of a marketing man.


It is the requirement for a

new Digital TV Aerial

that gives them away.

Stealing Bill's pictures
 

On Jan 19, 10:34*am, "Graham." wrote:
On Jan 18, 8:49 pm, "Doctor D" wrote:

Lots to see (and criticize) on this pagehttp://www.abaerials.co.uk(click
on gallery) starting with the mains cable running diagonally in the plaster
from TV to socket outlet. They've also nicked one of Bill's pictures. It's
about the only picture that doesn't feature a Triax Unix 52. One size
obviously does fit all!

See if you can spot it:http://www.wrightsaerials.tv/aerialp...dern/026.shtml

Cheers D

*Many thanks for spotting that! Your eidetic memory must be
exceptional. The cheeky ****ing ****s! I shall be writing to them
tomorrow. Honestly! What a cheek! It wouldn't be so bad if the rest of
their site showed work and working methods of good standard.

A criticism of an identified company. That should please IanT, but I won't be holding my breath.

Don't think /anything/ could please IanT.

Stealing Bill's pictures
 

" wrote in message
...
On Jan 18, 8:49 pm, "Doctor D" wrote:
Lots to see (and criticize) on this pagehttp://www.abaerials.co.uk(click
on gallery) starting with the mains cable running diagonally in the
plaster
from TV to socket outlet. They've also nicked one of Bill's pictures. It's
about the only picture that doesn't feature a Triax Unix 52. One size
obviously does fit all!

See if you can spot
it:http://www.wrightsaerials.tv/aerialp...dern/026.shtml

Cheers D

Many thanks for spotting that! Your eidetic memory must be
exceptional. The cheeky ****ing ****s! I shall be writing to them
tomorrow. Honestly! What a cheek! It wouldn't be so bad if the rest of
their site showed work and working methods of good standard.

Bill


I think you've just called me an anorak, I can't argue with your factual
accuracy.
It stood out like a sore thumb amongst all the pictures of Unix 52s on
inadequate brackets.

Stealing Bill's pictures
 

"IanT" wrote in message
...

"Doctor D" wrote in message
o.uk...

Lots to see (and criticize) on this page http://www.abaerials.co.uk
(click on gallery) starting with the mains cable running diagonally in
the plaster from TV to socket outlet. They've also nicked one of Bill's
pictures. It's about the only picture that doesn't feature a Triax Unix
52. One size obviously does fit all!

See if you can spot it: Cheers D

I don't see that company having a go at others and claiming to
correct lots of work and installations - but not being able to
name one single case or company involved. Not every company
is honest unfortunately and I get the impression some are run
by cowboys - especially when they keep claiming to correct work
undertaken by other companies.
I know who Trading Standards should be investigating. Remember
homes from hell? Guess which companies have been
recently filmed for a future TV programme.

You tease! Go on, tell us.

Stealing Bill's pictures
 

"Ashley Booth" wrote in message
...
Doctor D wrote:


Lots to see (and criticize) on this page http://www.abaerials.co.uk
(click on gallery) starting with the mains cable running diagonally
in the plaster from TV to socket outlet. They've also nicked one of
Bill's pictures. It's about the only picture that doesn't feature a
Triax Unix 52. One size obviously does fit all!

See if you can spot it:
http://www.wrightsaerials.tv/aerialp...dern/026.shtml

Cheers D

I wonder if they are Part-P registered. If so they should know about
safe zones.

--
Ashley
For Windsor Weather see www.snglinks.com/wx

I suspect they won't fall foul of Part P as they appear to have just buried
the flex in the wall with a 13amp plug top at the end!
As "experts" though, they would certainly be liable should anyone drill into
that cable as it certainly doesn't adhere to any safe practice of burying
cables that I'm aware of.

Stealing Bill's pictures
 

Adrian C said...

Wrong Bill.

Great Billing though :-)

Drat. It must have been a cunning plot to make me look a right eedjit.

Thanks Bills

--
Ken O'Meara
http://www.btinternet.com/~unsteadyken/

Stealing Bill's pictures
 

On Jan 19, 5:46*pm, "Doctor D" wrote:
" wrote in message
*Many thanks for spotting that! Your eidetic memory must be
exceptional. The cheeky ****ing ****s! I shall be writing to them
tomorrow. Honestly! What a cheek! It wouldn't be so bad if the rest of
their site showed work and working methods of good standard.

Bill

I think you've just called me an anorak, I can't argue with your factual
accuracy.
It stood out like a sore thumb amongst all the pictures of Unix 52s on
inadequate brackets.

No, I haven't called you an anorak! Actually I 've just got in from a
120 mile drive in which I must have pointed at a rooftop and said to
Hil 'Look at that!' at least a hundred times!

Regarding eidetic memory, my uncle has always boasted that he has a
photographic memory, but not he's nearly 80 he admits there isn't
always a film in his camera.

Bill

Stealing Bill's pictures
 

On Jan 19, 6:29*pm, UnsteadyKen wrote:
Adrian C said...
Drat. It must have been a cunning plot to make me look a right eedjit.

Thanks Bills

An unkind person might say that such a plot was unneccessary. . .

Bill

Stealing Bill's pictures
 

"Doctor D" wrote in message
o.uk...

Lots to see (and criticize) on this page http://www.abaerials.co.uk (click
on gallery) starting with the mains cable running diagonally in the
plaster from TV to socket outlet. They've also nicked one of Bill's
pictures. It's about the only picture that doesn't feature a Triax Unix
52. One size obviously does fit all!

See if you can spot it:
http://www.wrightsaerials.tv/aerialp...dern/026.shtml

Cheers D

The one of a flat roof mounted satellite dish with paving flags holding it
down looks vaguely familiar......

Stealing Bill's pictures
 

I think you've just called me an anorak, I can't argue with your factual
accuracy.
It stood out like a sore thumb amongst all the pictures of Unix 52s on
inadequate brackets.

No, I haven't called you an anorak! Actually I 've just got in from a
120 mile drive in which I must have pointed at a rooftop and said to
Hil 'Look at that!' at least a hundred times!

Regarding eidetic memory, my uncle has always boasted that he has a
photographic memory, but not he's nearly 80 he admits there isn't
always a film in his camera.

Bill



My wife calls me an anorak regularly - I now accept it as a compliment. It's
certainly a talking point.

I have every sympathy with your uncle. I can recall aerials in random towns
but have to run through several choices of names before I can shout at my
kids!

Stealing Bill's pictures
 

" wrote in message
...
On Jan 18, 8:49 pm, "Doctor D" wrote:
Lots to see (and criticize) on this pagehttp://www.abaerials.co.uk(click
on gallery) starting with the mains cable running diagonally in the
plaster
from TV to socket outlet. They've also nicked one of Bill's pictures. It's
about the only picture that doesn't feature a Triax Unix 52. One size
obviously does fit all!

See if you can spot
it:http://www.wrightsaerials.tv/aerialp...dern/026.shtml

Cheers D

It would be interesting to know if they've copied the photos or just linked
to your ones. If the latter, you can have a bit of fun swapping pictures.

Tim

Stealing Bill's pictures
 

In message , Tim Downie
writes


It would be interesting to know if they've copied the photos or just
linked to your ones. If the latter, you can have a bit of fun swapping
pictures.

Tim

All the photos on there are there, not links. If you dig deep enough on
the site there are some that are nothing to do with aerials too!
--
Bill
The other one!

Stealing Bill's pictures
 

wrote in message
...
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 20:49:05 -0000, "Doctor D"
wrote:
snip
This paragraph from the front page tells you all you need to know
about the company:


There is no need to replace your current television as there are
several options already available to receive the Freeview Digital TV
service. One of the more common methods is the installation of a new
Digital TV Aerial at your property, and the addition of a digital
receiver box to receive the signal.


Using digital coax of course

Steve Terry
--
Get a free Three 3pay Sim with £2 bonus after £10 top up
http://freeagent.three.co.uk/stand/view/id/5276

Stealing Bill's pictures
 

On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 07:59:56 +0000, Steve Terry wrote:

Using digital coax of course

What I want to know is, if they ever do start broadcasting 3D television
terrestrially, will I need to upgrade my specially priced digital
television aerial to a 3D television aerial? ;)

I have noticed that people are already asking if they need to upgrade
their Freeview television aerials to an HD television aerial in order
to receive Freeview HD transmissions.

http://www.digitalspy.co.UK/forums/showthread.php?t=1197361

Stealing Bill's pictures
 

On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:50:55 +0100, J G Miller wrote:

On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 07:59:56 +0000, Steve Terry wrote:

Using digital coax of course

What I want to know is, if they ever do start broadcasting 3D television
terrestrially, will I need to upgrade my specially priced digital
television aerial to a 3D television aerial? ;)

Oh, yes. It must be on a 3D mast, held by 3D brackets, with a 3D coax
downlead (twin coax, one centre for each eye). Masthead amps and
distribution amps will need to be twinned. 3D is stereoscopic. Just the
same as with stereophonic systems everything needs to be duplicated.

I hope that helps. ;-)

I have noticed that people are already asking if they need to upgrade
their Freeview television aerials to an HD television aerial in order
to receive Freeview HD transmissions.

http://www.digitalspy.co.UK/forums/showthread.php?t=1197361

For people without technical knowledge that is a perfectly sensible
question.


--
Peter Duncanson
(in uk.tech.digital-tv)

Stealing Bill's pictures
 

"J G Miller" wrote in message ...
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 07:59:56 +0000, Steve Terry wrote:

Using digital coax of course

What I want to know is, if they ever do start broadcasting 3D television
terrestrially, will I need to upgrade my specially priced digital
television aerial to a 3D television aerial? ;)

I've already got a 3D TV aerial. It's got a bit that goes up, a long bit
that goes along, and some itty bitty bits that go crossways.

--
Max Demian

Stealing Bill's pictures
 

On 20/01/2010 15:50, J G Miller wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 07:59:56 +0000, Steve Terry wrote:

Using digital coax of course

What I want to know is, if they ever do start broadcasting 3D television
terrestrially, will I need to upgrade my specially priced digital
television aerial to a 3D television aerial? ;)


Probably...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/rd/pubs/whp/whp157.shtml



I have noticed that people are already asking if they need to upgrade
their Freeview television aerials to an HD television aerial in order
to receive Freeview HD transmissions.

http://www.digitalspy.co.UK/forums/showthread.php?t=1197361

Stealing Bill's pictures
 

On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 21:02:30 +0000, Glenn Millar
wrote:

On 20/01/2010 15:50, J G Miller wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 07:59:56 +0000, Steve Terry wrote:

Using digital coax of course

What I want to know is, if they ever do start broadcasting 3D television
terrestrially, will I need to upgrade my specially priced digital
television aerial to a 3D television aerial? ;)


Probably...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/rd/pubs/whp/whp157.shtml

Interesting. I wonder whether they have considered moving the
polarisation planes through 45 degrees: x rather then +.

--
Peter Duncanson
(in uk.tech.digital-tv)

Stealing Bill's pictures
 

On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:49:41 +0000, Peter Duncanson wrote:

For people without technical knowledge that is a perfectly sensible
question.

Do you not think then that it rather ironic that people will ask if
they need a new antenna to be able to receive HD transmissions, but
it appears that an awful lot of people think that if they have a TV
set which is labeled as "HD Ready" that they will be able to watch
HD broadcasts on the Freeview multiplex?

Stealing Bill's pictures
 

On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:26:09 +0100, J G Miller wrote:

On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:49:41 +0000, Peter Duncanson wrote:

For people without technical knowledge that is a perfectly sensible
question.

Do you not think then that it rather ironic that people will ask if
they need a new antenna to be able to receive HD transmissions, but
it appears that an awful lot of people think that if they have a TV
set which is labeled as "HD Ready" that they will be able to watch
HD broadcasts on the Freeview multiplex?

It is ironic but understandable.

--
Peter Duncanson
(in uk.tech.digital-tv)

Stealing Bill's pictures
 

In article , J G Miller wrote:

Do you not think then that it rather ironic that people will ask if
they need a new antenna to be able to receive HD transmissions, but
it appears that an awful lot of people think that if they have a TV
set which is labeled as "HD Ready" that they will be able to watch
HD broadcasts on the Freeview multiplex?

Not really. The television says it's HD ready, the aerial doesn't.

I've seen a lot of headlines recently - probably stirred up by Murdoch -
about Freeview HD being "a scam" because you have to buy a decoder,
but the real scam is calling a TV "HD ready" when all it means is that
the screen is high enough resolution.

It's reminiscent of all those TVs that were advertised as "cable
ready" just because they had 100 channel numbers, which was entirely
useless.

-- Richard
--
Please remember to mention me / in tapes you leave behind.

Stealing Bill's pictures
 

In article , J G Miller wrote:

What I want to know is, if they ever do start broadcasting 3D television
terrestrially, will I need to upgrade my specially priced digital
television aerial to a 3D television aerial? ;)

Just imagine the gain you could get with a 4D aerial!

-- Richard
--
Please remember to mention me / in tapes you leave behind.

Stealing Bill's pictures
 

On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 23:39:37 +0000, Richard Tobin wrote:

Just imagine the gain you could get with a 4D aerial!

Good point.

Would one even be able to watch TV shows before they were scheduled? ;)

However, at the IEEE Explore Digital Library

http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/lo...rl=http%3A%2F%
2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4027217%2F4027218%2 F04027381.pdf%3Farnumber
%3D4027381&authDecision=-203

QUOTE

The Four Dimensional Linear Antenna Arrays

Shiwen Yang; Zaiping Nie

Environmental Electromagnetics, The 2006 4th Asia-Pacific Conference on

Volume , Issue , 1-4 Aug. 2006 Page(s):692 - 695

Digital Object Identifier Â* 10.1109/CEEM.2006.258049

Summary: This paper presents the review of the study on four
dimensional (4D) antenna arrays, a type of antenna arrays which
introduce a fourth dimension time - into conventional antenna arrays.
The analytical theory and some numerical simulation results on their
applications are presented

UNQUOTE

which is cited in the paper

SIMULATION OF TIME MODULATED LINEAR ANTENNA ARRAYS USING THE FDTD METHOD

by S. Yang, Y. Chen, and Z.-P. Nie

Progress In Electromagnetics Research, PIER 98, 175-190, 2009.

available at http://ceta.mit.EDU/pier/pier98/10.09092507.pdf

Stealing Bill's pictures
 

"brightside S9" wrote in message ...
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:49:41 +0000, Peter Duncanson
wrote:

Oh, yes. It must be on a 3D mast, held by 3D brackets, with a 3D coax
downlead (twin coax, one centre for each eye).

There will ned to be three brackets, named, i, j and k.

No you only need i-h and k-h the third bracket is formed by a matrix.

In America the top bracket is thinner of course.

--
Graham.

%Profound_observation%

Stealing Bill's pictures
 

"Peter Duncanson" wrote in message ...
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 21:02:30 +0000, Glenn Millar
wrote:

On 20/01/2010 15:50, J G Miller wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 07:59:56 +0000, Steve Terry wrote:

Using digital coax of course

What I want to know is, if they ever do start broadcasting 3D television
terrestrially, will I need to upgrade my specially priced digital
television aerial to a 3D television aerial? ;)


Probably...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/rd/pubs/whp/whp157.shtml

Interesting. I wonder whether they have considered moving the
polarisation planes through 45 degrees: x rather then +.

There was a discussion on here or, utb a year or two ago about a proposed
DTT system that required receiving aerials of H and V polerasations from the same transmitter,
some sort of diversity IIRC. I suppose if the idea took off the manufactures
would make x/y TV aerials with separate downleads.

--
Graham.

%Profound_observation%

Stealing Bill's pictures
 

I suspect they won't fall foul of Part P as they appear to have just
buried the flex in the wall with a 13amp plug top at the end! As
"experts" though, they would certainly be liable should anyone drill
into that cable as it certainly doesn't adhere to any safe practice
of burying cables that I'm aware of.

Because the cable is fixed I think it will come under Part P. If I run
a cable to the garage fixed to the fence and into some sockets fixed to
the garage wall but put a 13A plug on the house end - that still comes
under Part P.


If it's not a new circuit, not involving a delve inside the CU and not
involving a special area (kitchen, bathroom or remote building) it won't
invoke part P.

Sockets in a remote garage certainly invoke Part P, a socket fixed the the
outside wall of your house spurred off a socket inside wouldn't.

Stealing Bill's pictures
 

Doctor D wrote:


"Ashley Booth" wrote in message
...
Doctor D wrote:


Lots to see (and criticize) on this page
http://www.abaerials.co.uk (click on gallery) starting with the
mains cable running diagonally in the plaster from TV to socket
outlet. They've also nicked one of Bill's pictures. It's about
the only picture that doesn't feature a Triax Unix 52. One size
obviously does fit all!

See if you can spot it:
http://www.wrightsaerials.tv/aerialp...dern/026.shtml

Cheers D

I wonder if they are Part-P registered. If so they should know about
safe zones.

-- Ashley
For Windsor Weather see www.snglinks.com/wx

I suspect they won't fall foul of Part P as they appear to have just
buried the flex in the wall with a 13amp plug top at the end! As
"experts" though, they would certainly be liable should anyone drill
into that cable as it certainly doesn't adhere to any safe practice
of burying cables that I'm aware of.

Because the cable is fixed I think it will come under Part P. If I run
a cable to the garage fixed to the fence and into some sockets fixed to
the garage wall but put a 13A plug on the house end - that still comes
under Part P.

--
Ashley
For Windsor Weather see www.snglinks.com/wx