|
Poor service for vulnerable people
Today I encountered a flats dweller who had problems with satellite
reception. An elderly lady living alone, she said she would prefer to cancel her contract with the satellite pay TV company but when she had needed a replacement sat box recently the representative of the said company had told her that she had to keep satellite pay TV because 'there was no other way of getting TV in the area.' She demonstrated the 'truth' of this by clicking through a few analogue and digital terrestrial channels, none of which worked. The RF output of the satellite box was OK and fed into a black flylead which disappeared into a rats nest of cables. What you would assume was the other end of the same cable emerged from the rat's nest and was plugged into the telly's aerial socket, and had no signal on it. In fact there were two separate leads, not linked. Maybe I've got a suspicious mind, but . . .? The replacement sat box was a very old one and it turned out to be faulty. In the same building another resident had paid a large and reputable chain store £59 to install her new Panasonic TV set. The set has built in Freesat. There was no satellite flylead fitted and the terrestrial lead was the 'video' type with a plastic shroud around the connectors. The female connector could not mate properly with the male wallplate connector due to the shroud, so she had been left with very snowy analogue, no DTT, and no satellite. She had also been charged £20 to take the old TV set away and had been left with the massive box that the new set had been in, with instructions to keep it for two years. She had been keeping the box in the second bedroom, and moving it (with a struggle) into the living room whenever her daughter came to stay. Bill |
Poor service for vulnerable people
So much for customer service then.
Half the problem is that those setting these things up are complete idiots of course. Brian " wrote in message ... Today I encountered a flats dweller who had problems with satellite reception. An elderly lady living alone, she said she would prefer to cancel her contract with the satellite pay TV company but when she had needed a replacement sat box recently the representative of the said company had told her that she had to keep satellite pay TV because 'there was no other way of getting TV in the area.' She demonstrated the 'truth' of this by clicking through a few analogue and digital terrestrial channels, none of which worked. The RF output of the satellite box was OK and fed into a black flylead which disappeared into a rats nest of cables. What you would assume was the other end of the same cable emerged from the rat's nest and was plugged into the telly's aerial socket, and had no signal on it. In fact there were two separate leads, not linked. Maybe I've got a suspicious mind, but . . .? The replacement sat box was a very old one and it turned out to be faulty. In the same building another resident had paid a large and reputable chain store £59 to install her new Panasonic TV set. The set has built in Freesat. There was no satellite flylead fitted and the terrestrial lead was the 'video' type with a plastic shroud around the connectors. The female connector could not mate properly with the male wallplate connector due to the shroud, so she had been left with very snowy analogue, no DTT, and no satellite. She had also been charged £20 to take the old TV set away and had been left with the massive box that the new set had been in, with instructions to keep it for two years. She had been keeping the box in the second bedroom, and moving it (with a struggle) into the living room whenever her daughter came to stay. Bill |
Poor service for vulnerable people
" wrote in message ... Today I encountered a flats dweller who had problems with satellite reception. I love a good work of fiction! Name the retailer and area or this latest story is not true. |
Poor service for vulnerable people
IanT wrote:
I love a good work of fiction! Name the retailer and area or this latest story is not true. Why isn't it true? |
Poor service for vulnerable people
|
Poor service for vulnerable people
"IanT" wrote in message ... "Pikey Gob****e" wrote in message ... Today I encountered a flats dweller who had problems with satellite reception. I love a good work of fiction! Name the retailer and area or this latest story is not true. He could also post links to pictures of the "horrendous" examples of other people's poor workmanship he constantly claims to have heroically sorted out. If his bull**** stories were real, I'm certain he would. |
Poor service for vulnerable people
On Jan 15, 6:01*pm, tony sayer wrote:
In article s.com, scribeth thus Today I encountered a flats dweller who had problems with satellite reception. An elderly lady living alone, she said she would prefer to cancel her contract with the satellite pay TV company but when she had needed a replacement sat box recently the representative of the said company had told her that she had to keep satellite pay TV because 'there was no other way of getting TV in the area.' She demonstrated the 'truth' of this by clicking through a few analogue and digital terrestrial channels, none of which worked. The RF output of the satellite box was OK and fed into a black flylead which disappeared into a rats nest of cables. What you would assume was the other end of the same cable emerged from the rat's nest and was plugged into the telly's aerial socket, and had no signal on it. In fact there were two separate leads, not linked. Maybe I've got a suspicious mind, but . . .? The replacement sat box was a very old one and it turned out to be faulty. In the same building another resident had paid a large and reputable chain store 59 to install her new Panasonic TV set. The set has built in Freesat. There was no satellite flylead fitted and the terrestrial lead was the 'video' type with a plastic shroud around the connectors. The female connector could not mate properly with the male wallplate connector due to the shroud, so she had been left with very snowy analogue, no DTT, and no satellite. She had also been charged 20 to take the old TV set away and had been left with the massive box that the new set had been in, with instructions to keep it for two years. She had been keeping the box in the second bedroom, and moving it (with a struggle) into the living room whenever her daughter came to stay. Bill Takes me back to my days when out as a TV field service engineer. It was more or less the practice to take that bit more "care" of the elderly. For one thing TV was the only company a lot of them had and I reckon kept many somewhere near sane;!.. We used to just scribble No Fault Found on the tickets when we'd changed just a valve or similar.. -- Tony Sayer- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yes, it's a bit naughty really, but sometimes our reports back to the landlord don't mention that there wasn't a genuine fault, just a bit of finger trouble. Bill |
Poor service for vulnerable people
On 15/01/2010 19:09, jamie powell wrote:
wrote in message ... "Pikey wrote in message ... Today I encountered a flats dweller who had problems with satellite reception. I love a good work of fiction! Name the retailer and area or this latest story is not true. He could also post links to pictures of the "horrendous" examples of other people's poor workmanship he constantly claims to have heroically sorted out. If his bull**** stories were real, I'm certain he would. It's not that uncommon to come across installations of TV's or other kit which is installed in a way where you just wouldn't believe it only you saw it for yourself. Came across 2 jobs about a week apart where Sky HD was installed both elderly residents in the same apartment block. Both had LCD tv's and it seems both HD boxes installed by the same sky engineer. Only single feeds to the apartments so made recording hard to get to grips with for the elderly residents. Both had the HDMI leads missing and one was only connected by RF. Both previously had standard sky boxes. Simple swap boxes and no thought for setting up correctly. Glenn. www.glennmillar.plus.com |
Poor service for vulnerable people
"jamie powell" wrote in message
... "IanT" wrote in message ... "Pikey Gob****e" wrote in message ... Today I encountered a flats dweller who had problems with satellite reception. I love a good work of fiction! Name the retailer and area or this latest story is not true. He could also post links to pictures of the "horrendous" examples of other people's poor workmanship he constantly claims to have heroically sorted out. If his bull**** stories were real, I'm certain he would. There are numerous examples on his website such as this which clearly are not BS. http://www.wrightsaerials.tv/article...es-gallery.pdf Peter Crosland |
Poor service for vulnerable people
On Jan 15, 8:54*pm, "Peter Crosland" wrote:
"jamie powell" wrote in message If his bull**** stories were real, I'm certain he would. There are numerous examples on his website such as this which clearly are not BS. http://www.wrightsaerials.tv/article...es-gallery.pdf Should I keep adding to the Rogues' gallery, or is enough enough? I came across a splendid example yesterday -- the FM halo was upside down so the junction box was full of water; the mast clamp was assembled incorrectly, and the top bracket was fixed into the mortar joint one course below the top of the wall. The aerial was looking straight into the roof of the building. )It was a Televes yellow doodah by the way, and it really wasn't doing the business at all.) I photographed it all, then thought, "Shall I bother?" The gallery is very large now. Actually, anyone who hasn't looked on my website recently might like to go back to it, since I added several hundred items recently. Bill |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:19 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com