HomeCinemaBanter

HomeCinemaBanter (http://www.homecinemabanter.com/index.php)
-   UK digital tv (http://www.homecinemabanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   BBC Con bias (http://www.homecinemabanter.com/showthread.php?t=65372)

Martin Jay December 29th 09 01:32 AM

BBC Con bias
 
On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 23:45:49 +0000, lid wrote:
On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 11:38:32 -0800 (PST), allanbonnetracy
wrote:


He remains virtually untested in any election except in by-elections
where the results have been disastrous.


Much of what you wrote contains some truth, but the above is quite
inaccurate.


And underlines the sad fact that few people in the UK understand how
the electoral system works.
--
Martin Jay
Back the Ban: http://www.backtheban.com/
League Against Cruel Sports: http://www.league.org.uk/

Basil Jet December 29th 09 04:32 AM

BBC Con bias
 
allanbonnetracy wrote:

finding anyone, apart from diehards, prepared
to vote for another five years of Brown is like finding rocking horse
****.


I think Gordon Brown is a great leader and I hope Labour keeps him until the
election. In fact, even if they lose every single seat in the election, I
hope they still keep him for the next few elections.

--
We are the Strasbourg. Referendum is futile.



Alan[_4_] December 29th 09 10:00 AM

BBC Con bias
 
In message , Martin Jay
wrote

And underlines the sad fact that few people in the UK understand how
the electoral system works.


Or care

What's the point of voting if all the politicians are corrupt and only
interested in lining their own pockets?

It doesn't matter who gets in the next time as the current fiscal
situation will dictate what has to be done.
--
Alan
news2009 {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk

Brian Gaff December 29th 09 10:23 AM

BBC Con bias
 
They forgot that the world did not end today, and then there is the, Cliff
did not top the charts this Christmas one...

Brian

--
Brian Gaff -
Note:- In order to reduce spam, any email without 'Brian Gaff'
in the display name may be lost.
Blind user, so no pictures please!
"Martin Jay" wrote in message
...
Con leader goes on fun run:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/oxfordshire/8432439.stm.

Is it really a news item?

Current headlines at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/default.stm:

Briton told of execution timing

Six arrests in fall death inquiry

Met Office warning of heavy snow

Cameron runs in charity mud race

Parents' plea over abduction

Which one stands out as being totally irrelevant and unimportant? :)

Where's the fluffy Gordon Brown story?
--
Martin Jay
Back the Ban: http://www.backtheban.com/
League Against Cruel Sports: http://www.league.org.uk/




Ophelia[_3_] December 29th 09 01:01 PM

BBC Con bias
 


"Basil Jet" wrote in message
...
allanbonnetracy wrote:

finding anyone, apart from diehards, prepared
to vote for another five years of Brown is like finding rocking horse
****.


I think Gordon Brown is a great leader and I hope Labour keeps him until
the election. In fact, even if they lose every single seat in the
election, I hope they still keep him for the next few elections.


lol
--
https://www.shop.helpforheroes.org.uk/


Bigguy[_5_] December 29th 09 02:43 PM

BBC Con bias
 
Martin Jay wrote:
On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 23:45:49 +0000, lid wrote:
On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 11:38:32 -0800 (PST), allanbonnetracy
wrote:


He remains virtually untested in any election except in by-elections
where the results have been disastrous.


Much of what you wrote contains some truth, but the above is quite
inaccurate.


And underlines the sad fact that few people in the UK understand how
the electoral system works.


Uk elections are like a restaurant menu with the 'choice' of chicken +
chips, chicken + roasties, chicken + salad...

What if you don't want chicken?

Who do we beef, fish, venison loving 'extremists' vote for?


I would vote for a donkey to get rid of Labour ;-)

Guy

Ophelia[_3_] December 29th 09 03:12 PM

BBC Con bias
 


"Bigguy" wrote in message
...
Martin Jay wrote:
On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 23:45:49 +0000, lid wrote:
On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 11:38:32 -0800 (PST), allanbonnetracy
wrote:


He remains virtually untested in any election except in by-elections
where the results have been disastrous.


Much of what you wrote contains some truth, but the above is quite
inaccurate.


And underlines the sad fact that few people in the UK understand how
the electoral system works.


Uk elections are like a restaurant menu with the 'choice' of chicken +
chips, chicken + roasties, chicken + salad...

What if you don't want chicken?

Who do we beef, fish, venison loving 'extremists' vote for?


I would vote for a donkey to get rid of Labour ;-)


I reckon UKIP will get my vote.

--
https://www.shop.helpforheroes.org.uk/


Fred X December 29th 09 03:25 PM

BBC Con bias
 
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 03:32:02 -0000, Basil Jet
wrote:

allanbonnetracy wrote:

finding anyone, apart from diehards, prepared
to vote for another five years of Brown is like finding rocking horse
****.


I think Gordon Brown is a great leader and I hope Labour keeps him until
the
election. In fact, even if they lose every single seat in the election, I
hope they still keep him for the next few elections.


Only a mere flicker on the troll-o-meter!

Fred X

Basil Jet December 29th 09 03:36 PM

BBC Con bias
 
Ophelia wrote:
"Bigguy" wrote in message
...

I would vote for a donkey to get rid of Labour ;-)


I reckon UKIP will get my vote.


Sadly that would be a wasted vote in my constituency, because getting the
incumbent Labour guy out by voting for the second party has to be my
priority.

Also I'm concerned that UKIP don't stand for anything except exerting more
power over Britain than the other parties want. It's as if they want power
for themselves but won't tell us what they want to do with it. If they
promised that they would immediately pull us out of the EU and then they
would call a second general election immediately after, that would make them
look more honest and admirable.

--
We are the Strasbourg. Referendum is futile.



J G Miller[_4_] December 29th 09 03:41 PM

BBC Con bias
 
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 09:00:30 +0000, Alan wrote:

It doesn't matter who gets in the next time as the current fiscal
situation will dictate what has to be done.


Not entirely true. A government legislates social as well as economic
policy so although the government will be restrained in terms of
economic spending due to the size of the deficit, it will have the
power to legislate on criminalizing or legalizing aspects of personal
behavior.



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com