|
LED Or LCD
The dog from that film you saw wrote:
"Mutley" wrote in message ... CCFL last 5-10 yrs; LED backlit will work 'forever' ... even if something goes, it might just be a single pixel backlight, or in the worse case a row (or column or a block) but if the Hi-V for the CCFL goes you have an all black screen. I think if the past 20 years are anything to go by and if you've had the set for 10 years it most likely will be replaced as a technology upgrade. some of us are such tv freaks we look forward to the time when we ' have ' to get a new tv! How sad ... |
LED Or LCD
On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 09:30:39 -0600, cjt
wrote: I am going to buy a new TV set.I need to know if the LED are better than LCD? What is the pros and cons?.Also is 220 hertz better then 120 hertz?. Thanks for any input as I am not up to the new technology. the LED sets are in fact lcds as well - it's just that instead of using flourescent tubes to light the screen they use LEDs. in theory they can be better - they can illuminate only the parts of the screen that need it. leaving the black bits as black instead of dark grey, but some don't do that so your only gain is in power saving. true LED sets - OLEDs - organic leds, are still some way off - you'll pay 11 thousand dollars for a 10 inch set that isnt even HD. the LED backlit sets cost more so you need to see both in action to decide if you want to pay the extra. CCFL last 5-10 yrs; LED backlit will work 'forever' ... even if something goes, it might just be a single pixel backlight, or in the worse case a row (or column or a block) but if the Hi-V for the CCFL goes you have an all black screen. I think if the past 20 years are anything to go by and if you've had the set for 10 years it most likely will be replaced as a technology upgrade. My 30 year old Sony TV is still going strong; most current TV content doesn't merit anything better, anyway. My old Philips TV made in mars 1976 and still going strong. |
LED Or LCD
Vet wrote:
I am going to buy a new TV set.I need to know if the LED are better than LCD? What is the pros and cons?.Also is 220 hertz better then 120 hertz?. Thanks for any input as I am not up to the new technology. Vietnam Vet 82 Abn.Div. 1969 I recently bought a 55 inch Vizio from Costco. It is an LCD TV, with LED back lighting. What that does, is illuminate the LCD image using LEDs for brightness. They are used in place of a fluorescent light in older sets. This TV has what is called "local dimming". That dims the LEDs behind a dark areas of the screen. It makes the black levels much better than older LCD TV's, and that makes the picture appear more like a movie theater. I wouldn't buy another LCD TV if it didn't have that technology, or something new that replaces it. It makes a big difference. The TV also has a 240 Hz picture. That makes the TV generate intermediate images between the ones in the source material, so that there are 240 images each second. That minimizes the blur that is common with LCD TV sets during fast action. I never noticed the blur, but I did find that the "smooth motion" associated with 240 Hz resulted in everything looking like a soap opera. I turned that off, and I don't miss it. As with everything else in life, your mileage may vary. -- Jim |
LED Or LCD
Ken wrote:
My old Philips TV made in mars 1976 and still going strong. Those Martian TV's are the best! :-) |
LED Or LCD
cjt wrote:
My 30 year old Sony TV is still going strong; most current TV content doesn't merit anything better, anyway. P'raps. But just one good show in true HD makes it worthwhile for me. MMV. -- john mcwilliams |
LED Or LCD
JimH wrote:
Ken wrote: My old Philips TV made in mars 1976 and still going strong. Those Martian TV's are the best! :-) I dunno. My Venetian set was pretty good. But now everything I have was made in the Far East. -- john mcwilliams |
LED Or LCD
John McWilliams wrote:
JimH wrote: Ken wrote: My old Philips TV made in mars 1976 and still going strong. Those Martian TV's are the best! :-) I dunno. My Venetian set was pretty good. But now everything I have was made in the Far East. Venetian ain't Venusian. Vizio is an American company. Their web page says that they have two offices in the U.S. with 160 people. I don't know where they manufacture though. |
LED Or LCD
John McWilliams wrote:
cjt wrote: My 30 year old Sony TV is still going strong; most current TV content doesn't merit anything better, anyway. P'raps. But just one good show in true HD makes it worthwhile for me. MMV. I know what you mean. I used to feel the way the OP does, until I got an HDTV and saw a Sunrise Earth show titled "Bison before Breakfast". Nature programs in HD can restore your soul. ;) bj |
LED Or LCD
Ken wrote:
My 30 year old Sony TV is still going strong; most current TV content doesn't merit anything better, anyway. My old Philips TV made in mars 1976 and still going strong. My 60+ year old DuMont black & white TV is still going strong. Geez... |
LED Or LCD
On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 10:59:44 -0500, "Vet" wrote:
I am going to buy a new TV set.I need to know if the LED are better than LCD? What is the pros and cons?.Also is 220 hertz better then 120 hertz?. Thanks for any input as I am not up to the new technology. Vietnam Vet 82 Abn.Div. 1969 Most of the LED sets cost rather more right now. If this is your first HD set, the best of the old technology right now goes pretty cheaply. I'd go for that, plan on replacing it in five years as the new LED technologies finish development. Right now something like a 42" 120hz 1080 Vizio goes for about $500, that's probably about the sweet spot. A Sony 720 32" 60hz for about $400 isn't bad, either, for broadcast especially. That said, *now* I will ask the questions that should have come first! As always, what size set are you looking for, do you have any price constraints, and what do you plan to watch on it? J. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:24 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HomeCinemaBanter.com